The idea that the sequence of base pairs in DNA represents any sort of blueprint for life is nonsensical from an informational theoretical point of view. The sequences are meaningless by themselves and require systems of translation and transcription which themselves require the existence and maintenance of unfeasibly large amounts of information.
This refutation applies to all systems where ‘information’ is regarded as an abstract entity and divorced from any physical function.
The idea of DNA as ‘information‘
Mainstream science tells us that the ordering of the base pairs in a strand of DNA represents some sort of blue-print for living systems. Depending upon who you read it can represent an entire organism or just the structure of proteins in the body. Either way, the idea is unfeasible.
The base pairs of DNA constitute data, not information, and without interpretation they are really meaningless strings of digits. There is no obvious code for a protein written into a DNA strand and no reference to any laws of physics or biology; all we have so far is a stream of ‘bits’.
The storage of data as a stream of DNA base pairs may be appropriate for stable storage and integrity during reproduction but it will not, of itself, lead to the development of a new organism.
To convert this stream of bits to anything resembling organic life, we therefore need to translate the bits from this coding scheme to one that is more representative of the laws of bio-chemistry and then somehow implement these physical instructions to construct a real entity. Scientists know this and refer to these steps as translation and transcription respectively.
Translation
DNA has about 3 gigabytes of stored data but we need to be able to interpret this data and translate it to a series of protein coding schemes or something similar. The question arises then as to how much data is needed for the translation scheme itself.
An analogy is that I want to send a Shakespeare sonnet to someone in China but they don’t speak English so an English-Chinese dictionary needs to be involved. A sonnet contains a mere 24 lines of text but the dictionary needs to contain every single word in the English language, just in case it is present in the sonnet.
The dictionary in this case then must contain vastly more data than the information to be translated.
What size of dictionary is required to translate all the potential data in a genome? ‘Unfeasibly large’ appears to be the answer.
Maintaining integrity of the data
The volume of data isn’t the only problem; we have to ensure that it is stored somewhere, free from corruption and somehow inherited. We need to specify some medium in which this data is embodied.
If we say that the integrity is maintained by error correction then we now need extra data and extra functions to implement the error correction and these themselves must be error free.
The mechanisms for error correction, translation and transcription need to be precisely inherited themselves and again require the presence of extra information.
The embodiment of biological data as a digital system has not solved any problem at all but instead added extra problems to solve with now exponentially larger quantities of data. The whole scheme actually necessitates an infinite regression of encoding and error correction.
Transcription
In addition to a dictionary for translation, we need some mechanism for transcription. The translated information coming from the DNA needs to be input into some physical process which will go on to construct proteins or whatever. So what does this process consist of, how was it constructed, where is the information for this and how was such information inherited? The information cannot be contained in the DNA itself because it was needed to construct the machinery that extracts information from the DNA in the first place.
We have managed to describe another infinite chain of regression, this time for the transcription process.
A generalisation of the problem
The problems above are described with reference to DNA but clearly apply to any digital encoding scheme within biological systems.
The central problem is that digital data is just a string of bits and at some time this will need to be converted to a real entity via the laws of physics. There are no laws of physics in a stream of bits, no feedback systems and no energy to drive the process along. All these must come from somewhere else.
The whole narrative draws attention away from the practical problem of manufacturing a cell and just points to the ordering of base pairs as somehow a great discovery.
The same problem will arise whenever a data stream is regarded as source of ‘information’ and whenever the idea of ‘information’ is regarded as an abstract mathematical entity with no concrete relationship to the laws of physics or bio-chemistry.
The solution in abstract
The solution then is to stop regarding ‘information’ and physical structure as separate entities and acknowledge that within biological systems at least, biological information must consist of ‘functionality’, i.e. it must consist of some concrete physical entity that is capable of getting things done.
Information must be in some sense ‘absolute’ and related to the laws of physics in order to remove the need for both translation and transcription. Biological information cannot therefore be digital or ‘abstract’ in nature.
A concrete solution
Konstantin Meyl, in his book “Scalar waves..”, has stated simply that: “(biological) Information is the structure of a scalar wave.”
A scalar wave in this case is an electromagnetic structure as described by Tesla which is likely found throughout biological systems. See: The nature of the bio-field
This proposal fits all of the requirements for biological information.
Such structures are inherently self-stabilising
They have their own motivational force
Will propagate along appropriate biological conduits
Have their own intrinsic energy
Additional energy may be absorbed from the environment
Energy transduction enables ‘persistence’
Energy transduction enables ‘function’.
Specific characteristics enable specific function
Electromagnetic nature enables direct interaction with the bio-field
Obviates the need for translation and transcription
These are the requirements that we need in abstract. There may be other physical constructs which implement these features, but scalar waves seem a very good fit.
Videos of the development of the brain and nervous system of the zebra fish imply the action of centripetal forces typical of vortex flow and the delivery of energy via electromagnetic ring vortices. Both phenomena are consistent with the existence of an electromagnetic bio-field as described here: The nature of the bio-field
The morphogenesis of the brain and nervous system is described in great detail in various papers, but this post ignores specific details of the construction and simplifies for clarity by concentrating only on the flow of energy needed to achieve such a complex feat.
The following are assumed:
That energy is conserved i.e. neither created nor destroyed
The laws of electrodynamics hold
The existence of electrodynamic vortex structures as a necessary consequence of such laws
Development of the brain
Pause and think before watching the video of the genesis of the brain of a zebrafish. Try to predict what you will see. Expected is that maybe a small brain stem acts as a ‘seed’ which blossoms outwards similar to the growth of a cauliflower or a cumulus cloud; development is bottom-up as the large scale brain is created from small scale cells.
The surprise is that nothing of the sort happens and instead what we appear to see is that a nebulous mass of particles suddenly self-organises into a brain-like shape, with an overall global organisation actually preceding the development of the finer details.
The brain seemingly does not arise from the organisation of cells, but the cells arise from the way the brain organises energy and matter.
Centripetal organisation
The first thing we see is that ‘matter’ starts to move towards the centre of the brain in a double vortex pattern. Now simple molecules cannot decide to do this by themselves and so some overall organisational principle is in play. Moreover, any movement of matter necessitates the presence of some sort of force. The movement is centripetal and so the forces are centripetal.
The solution for this is an electromagnetic double vortex acting as a morphogenic field. The vortices form within the skull cavity and matter is drawn inwards in a similar manner to that of a tornado. The difference here is that the vortices are electromagnetic field vortices instead of moving wind vortices. An electromagnetic gradient is created between the circumference of the vortex and its centre whereupon particles are drawn inwards according to their charge structure.
Top-down organisation
After the initial accumulation of matter towards the centre of each hemisphere, shapes begin to appear and matter is organised into tissue. The mass takes on the appearance of an actual brain.
‘Flow’ in vortex systems is from the outside to the inside and from large scale to small scale. The structure becomes fractal-like, with smaller and smaller vortices appearing at each level and continued centripetal energy flow and organisation.
The idea that the smaller details appear before the global shape of the organ now sounds unlikely. Any manufacturing at the cellular level needs a certain amount of raw material and a reliable flow of energy. Moreover, in such systems, the energy flows from the larger scale to the smaller. It therefore follows that the construction of the smaller scale structures depends upon the prior organisation of a global vortex system. The assembly of the global vortex must therefore precede the manufacture of any of the cells that emerge from it.
Organisation and energy flow are therefore top down according to theory, and the theory is supported by the observations.
Morphogenesis of the nervous system
Another remarkable video shows the development of the nervous system within a zebrafish embryo.
Nerves seem to grow spontaneously with little guidance
A glow near the growing tip indicates superfluous energy here
Freely moving entities (top right) are continually spinning, indicating the presence of vortex fields
The growing tip of each nerve emits light. Light is dissipative energy and therefore not organisational by itself. The emission light therefore serves as a waste disposal mechanism. Energy accumulates at the ends of the nerves, is used to manufacture the next section of tube and any excess is dissipated as light.
The question, then, is how does all this energy arrive at the growing tip? Sveral options come to mind:
It is already there, ready for use
It accumulates in real time around the nerve
It is supplied along the nerve
In the first two cases, a centripetal accumulation of energy is implied. All the energy gathers at the required place, somehow guided by organisational forces. The fact that accumulation is centripetal implies some vortex system is at work.
In the third case, the energy travels along the nerve, presumably originating in the brain. Researchers have found that the speed of nervous conduction depends upon the thickness of the myelin sheath and this in turn suggests that conduction occurs within the myelin sheath. This is consistent with the idea that energy is conducted along nerves in the form of electromagnetic ring vortices, with most of the field movement being magnetic and occurring within the (electrically insulating) myelin sheath with a concomitant movement of electric field along the (electrically conductive) central tissue which is interpreted as the main ‘current’.
The twin vortex system of the brain is still acting as an energy accumulator at this point and supplies the energy required for the formation of the nervous system. Ring vortices travel along existing neurons to their end where sufficient energy accumulates to create or assemble new tissue. Excess energy is dissipated as light into the general vortex system whence it is recycled back inwards to where it will be needed. Ring vortices are easily guided by the ambient electromagnetic field gradients and thus the nervous system takes the form ‘intended’ by the global morphogenetic field.
The face of a frog
In this short clip, and electric field outlines the structure of a tadpole’s face even before the cells have started to differentiate, so confirming that it is the field that is the organisational element and that such organisation is top-down.
In the illustration below, the process of vascular development is easily interpreted as the progression of vortex templates from single vortices to vascular tube.
Elongated vortices (endothelial cells) develop a North-South dipole and self-organise according to magnetic forces, with North poles attracting South to form a chain.
Energy continues to accumulate leading to fractalisation and sub-vortices which lead to the formation of cytoplasmic vesicles.
These new vesicles again orient along the magnetic field lines and continue to accumulate energy. They grow in size and elongate in accordance with the ambient field conditions.
The vortex principle (centripetal flow) moves the new vesicles towards the centre of the whole chain where they merge to form a cylinder at the inner radius of the tube.
Energy continues to accumulate at this radius and is available for maintenance, repair and possible contributions to blood flow. Evidence for this is that the blood starts to flow before the heart has formed and it must therefore be acquiring energy from somewhere else: The Heart is not a Pump
There are no fundamental constants and hence no fine tuning of the universe is necessary. Most fundamental constants come from the need to translate between the different ‘stuffs’ and energies of contemporary physics. Once these are reduced to a single set of equations, the problem disappears.
This never happened
The elementary particles
In the chart below, Konstantin Meyl shows the measured masses (relative to the mass of the electron) of the elementary particles and compares them with the values he has calculated from his own field equations.
The correlation is striking and cannot be coincidence.
“Scalar Waves: a first Tesla physics textbook for engineers” – Konstantin Meyl
The periodic table
In this next chart, again from Meyl, the measured radii of the elements from the periodic table are compared with values calculated from the more fundamental field equations. No other informational input is necessary.
The values show precise correspondence at the start of each new electron shell and drift apart slightly as the complexity of calculation necessitates simplification by series truncation.
“Scalar Waves: a first Tesla physics textbook for engineers” – Konstantin Meyl
Avogadro’s number
Avogadro’s Law: “Equal volumes of all gases, at the same temperature and pressure, have the same number of molecules.” – Wikipedia
Avogadro constant: “The Avogadro number is an exact number equal to the number of constituent particles in one ‘mole’ of any substance” – Wikipedia
Simplification: “The same number of molecules take up the same amount of space” (Each molecule is the same size?)
Fixed by decree: “In its 26th Conference, the BIPM adopted a different approach: effective 20 May 2019, it defined the Avogadro constant NA as the exact value 6.02214076×1023 mol−1” – Wikipedia
There is no sensible explanation for this within mainstream physics. The value of the constant cannot be calculated directly from any fundamental theory of gases and so they just decree that the number itself is a fundamental constant of physics, thereby discouraging any attempts to investigate the matter, removing the need for any proposed mechanism and obviating the need for any more measurements of the value as it is already established as a fixed element of the system!
An explanation of the constant and a derivation from Meyl
The obvious inference from measurements is that the molecules are spaced out evenly throughout the volume, being surrounded by some ‘sphere of influence’ which keeps them apart and which provides resistance to compression via repulsive forces. These forces nevertheless allow the molecules to move around (diffusion and flow) with a little resistance (friction).
The only forces worth considering here are electromagnetic in nature and so we need some sort of field structure that creates such a sphere around an atomic nucleus. The field will be some arrangement of electrically negative vortices which are attracted to the nucleus but repel other such structures.
A credible description of the gaseous state of matter
The extra energy in the gas state has caused the eight electrons of the n=2 shell of the Oxygen atom to come out of their usual concentric orbitals to form an eight-fold ring around the outside of the nucleus. The reduced field strength at this distance from the centre has caused the electrons to expand suddenly to many times their original volume.
The electrons stick together via magnetic dipole forces but repel other negatively charged elements. The electrons rotate of themselves and rotate as a ring and this represents a means of energy storage and energy transfer. A cross-sectional view from the north pole is shown but in reality the whole shape is that of a peeled orange with an overall spherical shape comprised of eight segments which are the electrons.
Whatever the original size of the molecule, the volume is now dominated by the size of the expanded electron shell and this is the same for each atom at least. Something similar must be happening with compound molecules.
Gas pressure and Avogadro laws are now explained along with the critical (as opposed to continuous) change from liquid to gas.
Gravitational constant
“About a dozen measurements of Newton’s gravitational constant, G, since 1962 have yielded values that differ by far more than their reported random plus systematic errors. We find that these values for G are oscillatory in nature, with a period of P = 5.899 +/- 0.062 year, an amplitude of (1.619 +/- 0.103) x 10^{-14} m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2}, and mean-value crossings in 1994 and 1997.” – Anderson et. al.
So not only do measurements vary but they vary with a certain pattern which actually correlates with the varying rotational speed of the Earth:
“Of other recently reported results, to the best of our knowledge, the only measurement with the same period and phase is the Length of Day ” – ibid
Most sources will say that there is and can be no variation at all in the gravitational constant simply because it is declared as a fundamental constant of nature. Any apparent discrepancies in the value must therefore be caused by problems with the measurement method:
“However, we do not suggest that G is actually varying by this much, this quickly, but instead that something in the measurement process varies” – ibid
One possibility mentioned by Anderson et. al. is that the whole process is some how affected by the Earth’s magnetic field:
“Least unlikely, perhaps, are currents in the Earth’s fluid core that change both its moment of inertia (affecting LOD) and the circumstances in which the Earth-based experiments measure G. In this case, there might be correlations with terrestrial magnetic field measurements.” – ibid
Variations in measurements of the gravitational constant – Speake, Quinn
Gravity as an emergent effect of magnetic dipoles
Many scientists including Konstantin Meyl and adherents of the Electric Universe Model have suggested that gravity is really just an average of the electromagnetic fields arising from the constituent atoms of matter.
The field arises from the sum of the magnetic fields of a random assortment of atoms and will consequently become much stronger if the atoms are aligned and regularly spaced such as in a bar magnet.
Meyl gives arguments for the masses of the elementary particles (see above) and calibrates them with respect to the mass of an electron, obtaining very good agreement with experimental results.
So gravity is not fundamental but arising from magnetic fields, with the cumulative effect in macro sized lumps of matter dependent upon the precise arrangement of atoms and possibly the presence of other electromagnetic fields.
The mass of an electron according to Meyl is not fundamental but depends upon the speed of light.
How is the gravitational constant measured?
Good question. The papers cited above merely say that the constant has been ‘measured’ by several different teams. This gives the impression that you can buy a device to wave in the air and get a reading in both metric and imperial units if you are lucky.
This is not the case and what is measured is rotating balls or falling weights, with the gravitational constant somehow inferred from such measurements.
The only physical measurement we ever see in real life is the displacement of a visual marker on some instrument or other, whether it be the hands on a clock or glowing digits on an electronic device. Everything else is an artefact of the model.
To say that the gravitational constant is ‘measured’ is highly misleading; it is interpreted from measurements and according to a theoretical framework. Now if your theoretical framework has this value defined as ‘constant’ and it turns out to be variable then you are already in a bit of a mess.
What is ‘mass’?
There is no consistent definition of ‘mass’. It is held to be fundamental (of course!) and is described as an ‘innate’ property of matter, but the only existing definitions are contradictory and circular.
“Mass is an intrinsic property of a body. It was traditionally believed to be related to the quantity of matter in a body, until the discovery of the atom and particle physics. It was found that different atoms and different elementary particles, theoretically with the same amount of matter, have nonetheless different masses.” – Wikipedia
Oops! Mass is not related to the quantity of matter!
If mass is not related to the quantity of matter and we have no other definition apart from a collection of purported measurement techniques, then how can it be ‘intrinsic’?
“Mass in modern physics has multiple definitions which are conceptually distinct, but physically equivalent. Mass can be experimentally defined as a measure of the body’s inertia, meaning the resistance to acceleration (change of velocity) when a net force is applied. The object’s mass also determines the strength of its gravitational attraction to other bodies.” – ibid
But it is already established that the strength of gravitational attraction is dependent upon the gravitational constant, not just the mass.
We find that mass is defined by various measurement techniques:
Resistance to acceleration (inertia)
Strength of gravitational attraction to other bodies
Power to attract other bodies by its own gravity
These are emphatically not physically equivalent unless shown to be so by experiment and theory. Just saying it is so does not make it so.
Note that all these definitions are by measurement of something other than mass itself. The mass, which is presumed fundamental and declared ‘intrinsic’, is actually a theoretically inferred value from other (measurable) quantities.
Moreover, the strength of gravitational attraction (mass) depends upon the gravitational constant and this has been shown to vary, or at least has not been shown to be constant.
In addition to this we find that calculations of the gravitational constant itself all depend upon knowing the precise values of the masses involved. Therefore: Gravity depends upon mass and mass is defined with respect to gravity.
This is circular self-referential nonsense!
Inertia as mass
The addition of inertia as a definition of mass does not help. This just adds an extra quantity that needs defining, measuring and somehow integrating into an already shaky framework.
How can this be achieved if inertia is absolute but other forms of mass vary? What is the theoretical mechanism that describes how the inertial mass is the same as the gravitational? In what sense then are they ‘equivalent’?
Inertial mass is measured by the force needed to produce an acceleration on an object. It therefore needs an acceleration in order to be manifest and yet at the same time is said to be an ‘innate property of matter‘.
How is this conclusion reached if the mass is never measured with respect to a body at uniform speed? How do we know that the mass of such an object persists at the measured value and what does this even mean?
An analogy with dynamic friction
If this seems like sophistry, first consider the phenomenon of ‘friction’. We have a good analogy as nobody knows how it works and the property of dynamic friction is only measured in moving objects. The frictional properties of stationary objects are different to that of those in motion and both are dependent upon the interaction between the objects.
Nobody thinks that friction is an innate property of any material but varies with speed and depends upon the relationship between the two surfaces. Dynamic friction is only present when motion is involved and disappears when motion ceases. Nobody asks “Where has it gone?” because it is not assumed to be an immutable property of matter.
Lenz’s law
A magnet dropped down a copper pipe will travel much slower than if the pipe were not there according to Lenz’s law.
What has happened to all the mass? If mass is intrinsic then there is some other (magnetic) force acting upon the magnet to oppose the motion. No magnetic field was present in the copper pipe before the motion started and the field of the magnet is not sufficient by itself to produce the slowing down. The force did not exist prior to the experiment and disappeared after it ended. The new property was actually created by the experiment itself.
Again, nobody would think that this retarding force is an intrinsic property of matter, so how can they be so certain as to claim that ‘mass’ is such a property?
If, as suggested above, the gravitational force arises from the electromagnetic field interaction between the field of an object and the field of the Earth then the above considerations are pertinent. The current formulation of the mass of an object as only dependent upon the object itself, however, effectively rules out any investigation of such phenomena.
An empirical definition?
“Mass can be experimentally defined as a measure of the body’s inertia, meaning the resistance to acceleration (change of velocity) when a net force is applied. ” – Wikipedia
This is as confused as a definition can be.
If all that is measured is a resistance to acceleration then that is all that may be deduced. An ‘intrinsic property’ may not be inferred and there should be no automatic conclusion of a similar effect in different gravitational fields.
“The object’s mass (i.e. resistance to acceleration) also determines the strength of its gravitational attraction to other bodies.” How does this work exactly? How can this be deduced? Do we assume that a material with a high frictional coefficient also has the power to attract other objects? No, of course not.
We have several different measurement techniques measuring several different quantities and the claim is that they are all ultimately measuring the same thing, that they are ‘physically equivalent‘. But how can this be justified?
A measurement is just a measurement and a concept just a concept. The concept of mass is just a concept as it can never be measured directly It can be deduced only by the application of external forces and the measurement of movement followed by an interpretation made according to a specific theoretical model.
So two different results are obtained from two different measurement techniques, interpreted according to two conceptually different theoretical frameworks and are then declared to be “physically equivalent“! No. Theoretically equivalent, maybe, but ‘physically‘? No, the phrase has no meaning.
If inertia is simply owing to the quantity of matter present then it cannot possibly be related to mass, according the initial quote from Wikipedia!
Time
There appears to be no consistent definition of time as an independent physical variable.
The rate of a swinging pendulum depends upon gravity and so will change with variations in the gravitational constant and will vary according to its location on the Earth’s surface.
The rate of atomic clocks varies even with two clocks in the same building. They will run at different speeds during an eclipse and even differ according to their alignment with respect to the Earth’s magnetic field. See diagram below.
Meyl: Scalar waves..
Distance
In the Tamarack mine experiment a long piece of wire was lowered into a mine shaft and found to have shrunk considerably. See: Tamarack mines experiment The explanation from Meyl is that a horizontal component of the Earth’s magnetic field increases towards the centre of the Earth and this is responsible for shortening the wire.
The Hafele – Keating experiment showed the opposite effect when distances were measured in a plane flying at altitude; distance was stretched out instead of shrunk.
A simple measure of distance is therefore subject to interpretation and such interpretation will vary according to the model involved.
Attempts to measure distance by wavelengths of light are subject to Doppler shift and again are not direct measurements at all but interpretations filtered through some theoretical framework.
π
Surely the ratio of a circle’s radius to its circumference is a fixed and fundamental constant of the universe?
Alas, no. Pi is a constant in Euclidean geometry but the experiments above suggest that the physical world does not follow the rules.
In the field theory of Meyl, physical length is determined by field strength and so the apparent geometry of the real world is also a reflection of field strength and this is unlikely to give rise to a Euclidean geometry.
There is no proof that the physical world is super-imposed upon a Cartesian grid; all we have are some sort of physical measurements and the Mine experiment shows that our measuring tools do not follow the rules of traditional geometry if gravitational fields are involved.
If we take a long piece of string out into space and measure the radius as we go, we expect to find that the circumference of a circle orbiting the Earth is 2πr but both Meyl’s theory and the Hafele-Keating experiment suggest otherwise.
Geometry is therefore a function of field strength and this will vary continuously through space. The existence of a perfect circle or square in physical space is highly unlikely but the space in which we live is approximately Euclidean over small distances and so nobody has noticed.
Dark Matter
The invention of Dark Matter and Dark Energy with no direct evidence whatsoever of their existence is surely one of the greatest embarrassments of modern science. They have assumed this ‘stuff’ to comprise over 95% of the known universe simply because they have an incorrect model of gravity.
Konstantin Meyl proposes that in addition to gravity there is the possibility of resonant neutrino attraction between individual galaxies and stars to help resolve the matter.
We can note here that if you have no stable concept of time nor distance and have declared gravitational forces to be constant when they are measurably variable and unrelated to the amount of matter, then you are already in Big Trouble.
The speed of light
The speed of light is declared to be a fundamental constant within the framework of Einstein’s relativity. What this means is that whatever speed you manage to measure for light it must necessarily come to the same value. If it appears to be a different value then it is something else that has varied.
‘Speed’ is calculated as distance per unit time but as explained above, there is no consistent definition of either distance or time and so if the speed of light is different from its decreed value then scientists are free now to blame variations in either time or distance according to their whim.
In Rupert Sheldrake’s TED talk: “The science delusion”, he mentions that that the speed of light slowed down by about 20 km/s between 1928 and 1945 before resuming its approved value. The response of the standards authorities was to simply re-define the length of the metre in terms of the speed of light so as to correct for the difference, thereby confirming that distance is no longer a fundamental quantity of physics.
The units of the gravitational constant
The gravitational constant is equal to approximately 6.67×10−11 metres cubed per kilogram per second squared i.e. 6.67×10−11 m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2
We will merely note here that not one of metres, kilograms or seconds has a stable definition and yet they are all assumed to combine together to give a constant value!
The vortex physics of Konstantin Meyl
The vortex physics of Konstantin Meyl contains a single vector differential equation with one ‘constant’ only which he calls ‘c’, by analogy with the speed of light, and which in his framework is the speed of field propagation. There are no other variables within the system with which to compare this value and so ‘c’ may be set to unity without any loss of information.
The whole of physics is described via a single equation which means there are no separate ‘stuffs’ needing adaptation or calibration to one to another and hence no fundamental constants are needed.
Moreover, since there is only one equation, there is not only no need for translation from one set of units to another, but no possibility of any extra units arising and so never any need for constants, ever; there is simply no place for them in the theoretical framework.
Fine tuning?
Nope. There are no constants and therefore nothing to fine tune.
The fine tuning argument has been used to advocate for intelligent design on the grounds that the precise values of the constants we see cannot have arisen by accident whilst atheists prefer to think that the constants are different in an infinite number of different universes, with only the single universe that we inhabit being lucky enough to have the right values.
We now see that the idea of fine-tuned constants arises from an inadequate model of physics and that all those fascinating debates are just a waste of time. Either side could have paused to think that contemporary physics is incomplete and that this is what necessitates the introduction of all these new constants.
References
“Scalar Waves: a first Tesla physics textbook for engineers” – Konstantin Meyl
This post is an AI generated summary of the book ‘Neutrino Power’ from Konstantin Meyl and Johannes von Buttlar.
The document discusses a conversation between Johannes von Buttlar and Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl about the experimental evidence of room energy and neutrinos, exploring new physical theories and their implications for understanding the universe.
Discussion on Free Energy Concepts
The conversation between Johannes von Buttlar and Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl explores the concept of “free energy,” its implications, and the potential for new energy sources derived from neutrinos and scalar waves. They analyze the limitations of current energy technologies and the need for innovative approaches to meet future energy demands.
The term “free energy” is discussed, emphasizing that all energy sources are ultimately free but come with costs related to extraction and distribution.
Concerns about environmental impacts and the sustainability of current energy sources are highlighted.
Alternative energy solutions, such as wind and solar power, are critiqued for their limitations in reliability and energy output.
Prof. Meyl asserts that a new form of energy exists, which he refers to as “free energy,” and he believes it can be harnessed effectively.
Neutrinos and Scalar Waves
The dialogue delves into the properties of neutrinos and scalar waves, suggesting that these phenomena could provide a new understanding of energy transmission and interaction.
Neutrinos are described as subatomic particles that may have mass and charge, challenging existing scientific assumptions.
Scalar waves are introduced as a form of energy transmission that operates differently from traditional electromagnetic waves.
Prof. Meyl presents experimental evidence suggesting that scalar waves can transmit energy without the losses associated with conventional methods.
The potential for harnessing these energies for practical applications is emphasized, with claims of achieving efficiencies exceeding 500%.
Tesla’s Contributions to Energy Science
The discussion acknowledges Nikola Tesla’s pioneering work in energy transmission and his theories regarding scalar waves, which have largely been overlooked in modern physics.
Tesla is credited with discovering the principles of scalar waves and their potential applications in energy transmission.
His experiments demonstrated the ability to transmit energy wirelessly, which is now being revisited in light of new scientific understanding.
The conversation suggests that Tesla’s insights could lead to breakthroughs in energy technology if properly recognized and developed.
Experimental Evidence and Practical Applications
Prof. Meyl shares details about his experiments that demonstrate the principles of scalar wave energy transmission, providing a basis for further exploration in this field.
The experimental setup involves a wireless energy transfer system using resonant coils, which successfully transmits energy between sender and receiver.
Measurements indicate that the system can achieve efficiencies of over 1000%, challenging conventional energy transfer models.
The experiments are designed to be reproducible, allowing others to verify the findings and explore the technology further.
Implications for Future Energy Solutions
The conversation concludes with reflections on the potential impact of these discoveries on future energy systems and the need for a paradigm shift in energy technology.
The authors argue for a reevaluation of current energy practices in favor of more sustainable and efficient methods based on scalar wave technology.
They envision a future where energy can be harnessed more effectively, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing environmental impact.
The discussion emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to advance understanding and application of these concepts in practical energy solutions.
The Coupling of Scalar and Transverse Waves
The text discusses the interrelationship between scalar waves and transverse waves, emphasizing their spontaneous transformation and coupling in various applications. This coupling has practical implications in fields such as telecommunications and electromagnetic compatibility.
Scalar and transverse waves can transform into each other spontaneously.
Both types of waves appear in the same wave equation.
Practical examples include the reception of ground waves and broadcast waves using the same antenna.
Filtering scalar waves can reduce measurable field strength but does not eliminate them entirely.
Implications of Scalar Wave Filtering
The conversation highlights the challenges and potential of filtering scalar waves, particularly in the context of mobile phone usage and electromagnetic shielding. The effectiveness of shielding against scalar waves is questioned.
A Faraday cage can filter out transverse waves, allowing only scalar waves to pass.
Filtering methods may not provide complete protection against electromagnetic pollution.
The coupling of wave types means that reducing one type may also reduce the other.
Health Concerns Related to Mobile Phone Usage
The discussion raises concerns about the health implications of mobile phone radiation, particularly the effects of scalar waves on users. The conversation suggests that current mobile technology may not adequately address these health risks.
Mobile phones emit both transverse and scalar waves, with scalar waves potentially being more harmful.
Users are advised to use external antennas to mitigate exposure.
There are reports of increased learning difficulties in children near mobile phone towers.
The Role of Education in Addressing Wave Issues
K.M. emphasizes the importance of educating students and professionals about scalar waves and their implications for technology and health. This education aims to raise awareness and improve technology design.
K.M. conducts lectures and seminars to inform about electromagnetic compatibility and scalar waves.
There is a need for better understanding among engineers regarding the implications of scalar waves.
K.M. aims to influence technology development to minimize biological risks.
Critique of Current Mobile Technology Development
K.M. criticizes the design of current mobile phones, arguing that engineers lack understanding of scalar waves, leading to potentially harmful designs. The conversation suggests that this oversight could have serious health implications.
Current mobile phones are optimized for scalar waves, which may increase health risks.
The trend of shortening antennas has led to unintended consequences, such as increased scalar wave emissions.
K.M. calls for a reevaluation of mobile technology to address these issues.
Historical Context of Wave Physics
The text provides a historical perspective on the development of wave physics, particularly the decline of vortex physics in favor of Newtonian mechanics. This shift has implications for understanding modern physics.
Vortex physics was historically significant but has been marginalized in favor of Newtonian methods.
The inability to isolate and measure vortices has hindered their acceptance in modern physics.
K.M. advocates for a return to vortex concepts to better understand physical phenomena.
The Need for a New Field Theory
K.M. proposes the development of a new field theory that incorporates both vortex and potential waves, challenging the limitations of Maxwell’s equations. This new theory aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of electromagnetic phenomena.
K.M. suggests that Maxwell’s theory is incomplete and lacks causal relationships.
The proposed hydromagnetic field theory would replace the need for quantum explanations.
This new theory could unify various physical phenomena, including gravity and chemistry.
Understanding the Nature of Particles
The conversation explores the nature of particles, particularly electrons, and their properties as potential vortices rather than discrete entities. This perspective challenges traditional views in quantum physics.
Electrons are described as dipoles rather than monopoles, with both positive and negative charges.
The spherical shape of particles is attributed to the pressure of the vacuum.
The duality of electric and magnetic fields is emphasized, with implications for understanding particle behavior.
Conclusion on the Future of Physics
The text concludes with a call for a paradigm shift in physics, advocating for a more integrated approach that considers both fields and particles as interconnected phenomena. This shift could lead to new discoveries and advancements in technology.
A new understanding of fields and particles could revolutionize physics.
The integration of vortex and potential theories may lead to breakthroughs in various scientific fields.
K.M. emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating established theories to foster innovation.
The Concept of Antimatter and Particles
The discussion revolves around the existence of antimatter, its relationship with matter, and the implications of particle interactions. The conversation highlights the theoretical framework of particles and their antiparticles, particularly focusing on electrons and positrons.
Two possible vortex directions exist: clockwise or counterclockwise, affecting the sign of field indicators.
An electron, with a negative charge, can transform into a positron, which has a positive charge at its center.
Antimatter is theorized to exist in equal quantities to matter, suggesting the potential for entire solar systems made of antimatter.
When matter and antimatter collide, they annihilate each other, resulting in the release of energy in the form of light.
The photon is described as a pair of oscillating electron-positron particles, exhibiting dual properties of matter and antimatter.
The Nature of Neutrinos and Their Properties
The conversation delves into the characteristics of neutrinos, their interactions, and their role in particle physics. Neutrinos are presented as unique particles with specific properties that differentiate them from other particles.
Neutrinos are considered as oscillating ring vortices, possessing a swinging charge that averages to zero, allowing them to pass through matter undetected.
They interact weakly with matter, causing phenomena like beta decay in neutrons.
The model suggests that neutrinos can be harnessed for technological applications, termed “Neutrinopower.”
Neutrinos have no mass and can travel at speeds exceeding that of light under certain conditions.
The Strong Interaction and Proton Stability
The discussion addresses the strong interaction, its role in atomic nuclei, and the stability of protons. The conversation critiques existing theories and proposes a new model for understanding these phenomena.
The strong interaction, or nuclear force, is responsible for holding atomic nuclei together despite the repulsion between positively charged protons.
Current theories, including the introduction of quarks and gluons, are criticized for lacking empirical support and clarity.
The proposed model suggests that protons consist of an electron and a positron pair, leading to a stable configuration that explains their magnetic moment and charge.
The stability of protons is attributed to the internal structure and the arrangement of their constituent particles.
The Role of Faraday’s Law in Electromagnetic Theory
The conversation highlights Faraday’s law of induction and its implications for understanding electromagnetic fields. The discussion emphasizes the need for a new approach to field theory based on Faraday’s principles.
Faraday’s law describes the relationship between magnetic and electric fields, demonstrating that a moving magnetic field induces an electric field.
The duality of electric and magnetic fields is emphasized, suggesting that both can transform into one another under relative motion.
The discussion proposes a new mathematical framework that incorporates Faraday’s law as a foundational principle for a comprehensive field theory.
The approach aims to reconcile existing theories with empirical observations, moving beyond the limitations of Maxwell’s equations.
The Ether Concept and Its Scientific Relevance
The conversation explores the historical and contemporary significance of the ether concept in physics. The discussion critiques the dismissal of the ether and its implications for understanding light and electromagnetic fields.
The ether is defined as the medium through which light propagates, providing a framework for understanding the speed of light.
Historical experiments, such as the Michelson-Morley experiment, failed to detect an ether wind, leading to the rejection of the ether concept.
The discussion argues for the ether’s relevance, suggesting it as a necessary component for explaining electromagnetic phenomena.
The ether is posited as a field that influences the propagation of light, with implications for understanding the nature of space and time.
The Nature of Light Speed
The discussion revolves around the concept of light speed as a variable rather than a constant, challenging traditional physics. The implications of this perspective suggest a need for new mathematical transformations to describe motion between different inertial systems.
K.M. argues that if light speed is variable, a new coordinate transformation is necessary, incorporating Lorentz transformations as a special case.
J.v.B. highlights the mathematical complexity of the Lorentz transformation, questioning its physical interpretation.
K.M. asserts that Einstein’s assumption of constant light speed introduces paradoxes, which could be avoided with a different approach.
The Role of Fields in Physics
K.M. proposes that physical phenomena, including length contraction and gravitational effects, are influenced by fields rather than just motion. This perspective leads to a new understanding of how fields dictate physical measurements.
The concept of length contraction is tied to the Lorentz transformation, which K.M. connects to field strength.
K.M. emphasizes that the electric and magnetic fields influence the dimensions of objects, leading to observable effects like length contraction.
The relationship between field strength and length is expressed as a simple proportionality, contrasting with complex mathematical expressions.
Objectivity vs. Relativity in Physics
K.M. distinguishes between a subjective observer theory and an objective theory that seeks to understand physical reality beyond observation. This shift in perspective aims to provide a more accurate representation of physical phenomena.
K.M. criticizes the reliance on subjective observations in modern physics, advocating for an objective approach that considers what physically occurs.
The objectivity theory posits that the constancy of light speed is a mere measurement constant, not a fundamental property of nature.
J.v.B. acknowledges the challenges of reconciling subjective observations with objective reality.
Unifying Forces and Interactions
K.M. presents a unified theory of interactions, suggesting that all forces, including gravity and electromagnetism, can be explained through field interactions. This approach offers a new framework for understanding fundamental forces.
The theory posits that the perceived gravitational attraction between particles arises from their field interactions rather than a traditional force.
K.M. explains that electromagnetic interactions result from the behavior of open field lines, while closed field lines correspond to neutral particles.
The model suggests that gravitational effects are a consequence of the geometry of space influenced by these fields.
Implications for Energy and Matter
The discussion touches on the potential for energy generation from fields and the nature of matter at a fundamental level. K.M. suggests that understanding these principles could lead to new energy solutions.
K.M. theorizes that energy is a state description of electromagnetism, and the conservation of energy is a derived principle from field interactions.
The possibility of generating energy from the vacuum or neutrinos is mentioned, although practical applications remain theoretical.
The transformation approach allows for the derivation of physical laws, such as the conservation of energy, from the field theory perspective.
Railgun and Neutrinopower Concepts
The discussion revolves around the Railgun as a practical example of Neutrinopower, highlighting its unexpected energy output and the implications of such technology. The conversation emphasizes the potential for free energy generation and the challenges associated with harnessing it effectively.
The Railgun, known for its high energy output, reportedly produced 399 GJ from an input of only 16.7 MJ, indicating an Over-Unity effect of 24,000.
Engineers involved in the SDI project faced significant challenges, including structural failures during tests.
The Railgun operates using high voltage and rapid changes in current, similar to natural phenomena like lightning.
The concept of Neutrinopower suggests that Neutrinos can be materialized and harnessed for energy, drawing parallels to natural energy conversion processes.
Challenges in Harnessing Free Energy
The conversation highlights the difficulties inventors face when attempting to create stable free energy devices, particularly regarding control mechanisms and energy regulation.
Continuous operation of free energy devices can lead to catastrophic failures if not properly regulated.
Many inventors fail to consider the necessary control systems, leading to instability and potential destruction of their devices.
Historical examples, including Tesla’s experiences, illustrate the risks associated with free energy experimentation.
Neutrinos and Biological Implications
The dialogue explores the biological effects of Neutrinos on human cells and their potential link to aging and diseases like cancer.
Increased exposure to Neutrinos may damage mitochondria, leading to energy deficiencies in cells and potentially accelerating aging.
The discussion suggests that excessive Neutrino exposure could contribute to rapid cell division, possibly resulting in cancer.
The concept of spontaneous human combustion is linked to Neutrino accumulation, indicating a need for further research into its biological effects.
Tesla’s Innovations and Theoretical Applications
The conversation delves into Nikola Tesla’s contributions to energy transmission and his visionary ideas regarding wireless energy transfer.
Tesla’s work on the single-wire transmission system demonstrated a theoretical efficiency of 100% and eliminated energy losses.
His experiments with high-voltage systems and flat coils led to significant advancements in energy transmission technology.
Tesla’s vision for wireless energy distribution was ahead of its time, facing resistance from investors concerned about unregulated energy distribution.
Future of Energy Technologies
The discussion concludes with reflections on the future of energy technologies, particularly the potential of Neutrinopower and Tesla’s theories.
Neutrino-based energy systems are seen as a decentralized and highly efficient alternative to traditional energy sources.
Tesla’s single-wire and wireless energy transmission concepts remain relevant, with potential applications in modern energy systems.
The conversation emphasizes the need for further exploration and development of these innovative energy solutions to address current energy challenges.
Neutrinopower and Its Applications
Neutrinopower is a revolutionary concept that utilizes neutrinos for energy generation, challenging traditional electrical engineering principles. The discussion highlights the potential of new technologies and materials needed to harness this energy effectively.
Neutrinos can be attracted and their density increased through resonant interactions.
New components are required for isolator technology, replacing conventional electrical components.
Neutrinolyse, a process where neutrinos interact with water, can produce hydrogen and oxygen without consuming electrical energy.
Stanley Meyer developed a water-fuel cell that uses water as a fuel source, achieving a fuel consumption of 2.8 liters per 100 kilometers.
The Role of Water in Neutrinopower
Water plays a crucial role in enhancing the effectiveness of neutrino interactions, acting almost like a catalyst.
Water’s high dielectric constant allows for strong interactions with potential vortices.
The dipole nature of water molecules facilitates easy resonance with neutrinos.
Increased water content in batteries enhances their recharging capabilities, with lead-acid batteries being particularly popular.
Historical Context and Technological Challenges
The conversation touches on historical figures and the challenges faced by inventors in the field of free energy and neutrino technology.
Inventors like Walter Schauberger and Stanley Meyer faced significant obstacles, including suppression of their technologies.
The discussion reflects on the potential dangers and risks associated with pioneering new energy technologies.
Historical events, such as the observation of supernovae, are linked to changes in neutrino radiation and its effects on Earth.
Neutrinos and Cosmic Phenomena
Neutrinos are linked to cosmic events, such as supernovae, which can significantly impact the Earth and its environment.
Supernovae release vast amounts of neutrinos, which can affect solar activity and geological events on Earth.
Historical supernovae may have influenced human history and biological development due to changes in radiation levels.
The potential for increased neutrino radiation could lead to geological disturbances, including earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.
Theoretical Implications of Neutrinos
Theoretical discussions suggest that neutrinos could play a role in understanding fundamental forces in the universe, including gravity and electromagnetic interactions.
Neutrinos may provide insights into the structure and behavior of galaxies, challenging existing astrophysical models.
The concept of resonant interactions could explain phenomena that current physics struggles to address.
The discussion proposes that the universe operates on a cycle of energy exchange, with neutrinos being central to this process.
Future of Neutrinopower Technology
The future of energy generation may heavily rely on the utilization of neutrinos, with significant implications for technology and society.
There is optimism that advancements in neutrino technology could lead to cleaner and more efficient energy sources.
The timeline for widespread adoption remains uncertain, influenced by technological developments and societal acceptance.
The potential for a shift in energy paradigms could reshape industries and environmental practices globally.
Literature Cited in the Context
The text provides a comprehensive list of literature related to electromagnetic compatibility and scalar wave technology, primarily authored by K. Meyl and other notable figures. This literature serves as foundational references for understanding the principles discussed in the context.
Key works by K. Meyl include three parts on electromagnetic compatibility, with English translations titled “Scalar Waves.”
Other notable references include works by Nikola Tesla, Johannes von Buttlar, and various scientific publications on electromagnetism and energy.
The literature spans various topics, including free energy, electromagnetic fields, and theoretical physics.
Recommended Literature for Further Study
The text recommends specific books and resources for readers interested in the subject of neutrino power and scalar wave technology. These resources are essential for a deeper understanding of the concepts presented.
The three main books by K. Meyl are essential:
Part 1: Causes, phenomena, and scientific consequences (ISBN 3-9802 542-8-3, 16 EUR).
Part 2: Free energy and neutrino interaction (ISBN 3-9802 542-9-1, 16 EUR).
Part 3: Information technology and scalar waves (ISBN 3-9802 542-7-5, 16 EUR).
Additional documentation and videos are available for purchase, enhancing the learning experience.
Experiments on Scalar Wave Transmission
The text outlines various experiments related to scalar wave transmission, emphasizing their unique properties and potential applications. These experiments challenge conventional physics and demonstrate extraordinary phenomena.
Experiments include wireless energy transmission and feedback from the receiver to the sender.
Claims of free energy generation with approximately 10 times over-unity efficiency are presented.
Scalar wave transmission is suggested to occur at about 1.5 times the speed of light, alongside observations of tunneling effects.
Available Experimentation Sets for Learning
The text describes two types of experimentation sets available for purchase, aimed at different audiences interested in exploring scalar wave technology. These sets facilitate hands-on learning and experimentation.
The Demonstration Set is priced at 800 EUR and is designed for non-experts, allowing five experiments without additional tools.
The Experimentation Set costs 1400 EUR and includes advanced equipment for physicists and engineers, featuring three different coil sets and a frequency counter.
This post consists of a collection of images of vortices occurring in various media with brief explanations as to what may be happening from the point of view of vortex physics. The similarity of structure across different substrates whether fluid, gas, plasma or biological tissue, suggests a common underlying mechanism in the form of rotating electromagnetic field vortices.
The vortex principle
From Konstantin Meyl’s books Potential Vortex vols. 1-4 and Scalar Waves: a first Tesla Physics handbook, we have the following diagram illustrating the basic idea of the Vortex Principle.
The illustration shows a vortex with a spiral flow outside the vortex radius (depicted as a circle) and solid body rotation within the radius. The arrows represent the velocity of the vortex movement whether it be fluid motion or electric field currents.
The magnitude of the velocity drops away as the inverse square of the distance from the radius, reaches a maximum at the radius and attenuates in a linear fashion within the vortex, reaching zero at the actual centre.
This basic idea can be built upon to construct far more complex structures and in many ways can be seen as the basic building block of the entire Universe.
In the case of electric field vortices, the pattern is driven by the electromagnetic field equations given by Meyl, which are a tidied up version of Maxwell’s equations with the added concept of field movement.
The movement is at the speed of light and provides a motivational force at the heart of physical reality. Spiral movement in vortex structures needs no originating impulse as the movement is already there as a fundamental of physics.
A cosmological manifestation: the bar galaxy
A clear case of a basic vortex structure on a grand scale.
The arms of the galaxy spiral inwards according to electromagnetic field forces and the solid body rotation at the centre maintains the bar shape.
The structure seen is not the consequence of the movement of charged particles but rather the cause of such movement. The field self-organises according to the vortex principle and the charges then move in accordance with the Lorenz forces.
A clear example of a vortex radius
This image, taken from a video by the Michael Clarage and the Thunderbolts project again shows spiral movement towards a clear demarcation at a specific radius. This can be interpreted as a vortex radius as above or maybe a ring vortex (see below).
The basic structure here is of an electric field (shown in pink) circulating the torus and a concomitant magnetic field whose field lines (yellow) flow at right angles to the electric.
The two fields are always in movement and so always co-exist. Magnetic and electric fields therefore are inseparable and cannot be thought of as different fields but rather different aspects of the same field.
Plasmoids and smoke rings
Smoke rings and water rings take on the form of a ring vortex with actual matter moving around a torus shape.
In the case of plasmoids created in a laboratory, it is charged particles that are moving within a stable torus – but how?
The easiest solution to think about is that an electric field is organised according to the field equations of Meyl and it is this that drives the movement of charged particles.
Classical physics needs some sort of charge to create an electric field which leaves us tied to the idea of matter as the instigator in all field creation and movement. This means that in the case of electric vortices we must first find a way for the particles to move around in the required pattern in order for them to be responsible for creating the field that will maintain such a pattern.
This may sound reasonable(?!) but there is some circularity of causality here.
Positioning the field itself as the progenitor solves the problem. The field moves of its own impulse and organises itself according to the fundamental field equations of Meyl. Any charged particles within the field will now move according to the usual Lorentz forces.
Causality proceeds from field to particle.
Persistence of electromagnetic vortices
Moving rings in air or water will attenuate but there is no friction in pure field vortices.
Scientists at Imperial College, London claim to have found a magnetic field vortex in a piece of rock that has retained accurate information concerning the Earth’s magnetic field from a billion years ago.
The image below shows a very clear ring vortex with a luminous axis.
Mainstream physics wants us to believe that the white axial jet is produced by a massive black hole at the centre of the galaxy and shoots outwards, away from the galactic centre.
With the hindsight of vortex physics, the immediate impression, given no further information, is that of a field-organised ring vortex that accumulates energy from the surrounding cosmos to instantiate energy and matter as the vortex principle concentrates the field activity in the ring.
Matter is moved around the ring structure by field forces and is not flung out along the axis (see smoke rings) but pushed inwards to stabilise the ring.
An enclosing inward spiralling of field movement concentrates energy at the axis, allowing the creation of smaller energetic vortices in the form of photons and possibly electrons. Photons radiate outwards and a ‘tornado’ of energy becomes visible.
Instead of believing that all the energy comes out of an infinitesimally small point of space for no reason at all, consider that the energy is continually accumulated inwards from the vastness of space according to immutable physical laws that are verifiable in a laboratory.
Proteins
The electrostatic field lines of TRAP, trp RNA binding attenuation protein (PDB ID, 2EXS)
The field lines are described as ‘electrostatic’ but electrostatic field lines are usually radial, so how do they get to look like this?
More likely the electric fields are moving and this gives rise to magnetic fields and consequent torsion forces which form the characteristic vortex pattern.
In a cellular environment, the vortex will be sustained by an accumulation of energy from the surroundings and a magnetic dipole will help align the protein with the ambient field structure.
These seem natural if regarded as field structures as the field laws are (almost) scale invariant. If a ring vortex can form at a large scale then it can form at a smaller scale.
It no doubt takes additional energy to form the inner rings but a general disposition for energy to move inwards ensures that there is always sufficient to create additional vortices.
In ‘turbulent’ flow in fluids, the flow is organised into nested vortices. Energy flows from the larger scale, outer vortices, to the smaller scale inner vortices.
Electromagnetic vortices follow a similar pattern of nested vortices and Meyl’s vortex principle describes the inward spiralling of a single vortex.
Very likely then, the pattern of electric field flow within the human body is as described with these water vortices. An overall toroidal flow breaks down into smaller and smaller vortices down to the scale of the organ, cell, nucleus and eventually electron.
Energy flows from the large scale to the small and the smallest vortices accumulate sufficient energy to transmute elements, break down water into hydrogen and oxygen, or materialise an electron from pure energy.
Look again at the fractal ring vortices above. There is no ‘smallest size’ in vortex physics, no Planck length and no granular structure as with Wolfram’s scheme, so it is theoretically possible for vortices to exist with an arbitrary degree of nesting.
Now if information can somehow be inserted into and retrieved from such an arrangement then there is no theoretical limit the the amount of information stored, thereby making such a scheme an ideal candidate for the inherited substance of genetics.
Living systems are often said to be far from thermodynamic equilibrium, but how they do so has remained a mystery. Fractal vortices surely offer a plausible explanation. Energy spirals inwards and is stored as smaller and smaller vortices. The fractal nature allows for an arbitrarily large amount of energy to be stored and the inward spiralling vortex principle acts against radial dissipation as an effective anti-entropy mechanism.
Helical cloud structures
One twitter user claims this was photographed over Russia a few years ago and another labelled it as “God’s DNA”.
Look carefully at the edges of the structure and compare with the fractal images above. We can see the fuzziness as the whole structure starting to deteriorate or we can see it as a series of fractal ring vortices that were responsible for creating it in the first place.
Stefan Lanka has described DNA as being created ‘out of the nothing and without a template‘. This now sounds reasonable.
The laws of physics are the same at all scales of reality.
Attempts to detect the torsion field nature of scalar wave generated by dual Tesla coil system – Gao Peng
Gao Peng placed a Tesla coil beneath a small wooden frame suspended by a thread. The frame was made to rotate by a very noticeable angle which immediately suggests the spiral nature of an electric field.
Interestingly, a larger frame rotated in the opposite direction, now suggesting that the field itself may have counter-rotating properties.
Coaxial flow
Coaxial flow patterns with alternating rotation as shown below have been observed by many cosmologists now. Sometimes described as field aligned, force free or Birkeland currents depending upon the exact pattern of flow.
A video from Donald Scott shows examples of coaxial flow in the organisation of galaxies, the weather systems of the planets and the formation of tornadoes on Earth: video
Coaxial rotation in a tornado
The north pole of Saturn
Don lists the common elements in galaxies. These vary according to distance from the centre.
From outside to inside they are: H – He – O – N – C – S – Fe
This is hard to explain until we recognise:
An innate vortex energy to the cosmos
Vortices spiral inwards
Energy increases towards the centre (Energy Cascade)
Electrons and Hydrogen are materialised direct from vortex energy alone
The heavier elements are transmuted from the lighter
An electric current flows through water and produces a gravity defying bridge between two glass jars (Elmar Fuchs). The flow of water is described as rotating both clockwise and anticlockwise at the same time.
How does water defy gravity like this?
Electric currents are not primarily driven by electrons but by electric field ‘currents’. The currents flow through the beaker, into the bridge and self-organise into coaxial flow as a least energy dynamic.
The coaxial flow of the field current entails strong electromagnetic forces between rotating elements and forms a highly stable structure. These forces are strong enough to both drag the water itself into the coaxial pattern and to bear the physical weight of the water in the bridge.
This complex pattern in water flowing through a wooden pipe, drawn by Viktor Schauberger, demonstrates both interlinked helical flow and ring vortices at the same time.
In some experiments Schauberger describes the water pulling away from the sides and in others a ‘negative resistance‘ is recorded, presumably meaning that the water is somehow accumulating extra energy from outside the pipe and using it to drive the flow.
Given this illustration, there is certainly some centripetal force pulling the water towards the centre line. This is expected from an electromagnetic field, but here we have actual water, it has considerable ‘mass’ and the molecules should be flung to the outside of the pipe via centrifugal forces – but they aren’t.
Electromagnetic field forces are clearly at play and the simplest way to think about this is to imagine an organised vortex field forming a template for the water flow which then somehow moves the water molecules along the prescribed pathway.
How to explain the phenomenon of negative resistance? Additional energy is needed and it is likely coming from outside the pipe in the form of electromagnetic vortices. These contribute energy by first orienting with respect to the existing field polarity and then integrating seamlessly into it. Such energy could be in the form of solar neutrinos or the less energetic field vortices from ionospheric discharge.
Capacitor discharge
Electrode corrosion degradation in metallized polypropylene capacitors – Yializis et al
A capacitor was set up in a laboratory and left it to discharge for 40 hours. A circular pattern results, suggesting that the discharge is of a helical nature and that a vortex field exists between the plates.
Mainstream science predicts a uniform electromagnetic field between the plates but vortices seem to form with very little encouragement.
In the image below from a video by Bob Greenyer we see the results of electron streams impacting a metal plate(?) or something similar.
The patterns look like the results of the formation of fractal ring vortices in the substrate. A clear ring is seen, as is a subdivision into numerous smaller elements which could also be interpreted as ring vortices.
The images below are from electron micrographs of biological tissue. The tissue has been frozen, sliced, stained and finally subject to an electron beam.
The images are claimed to represent nuclear pores seen from different angles but there are good arguments from Harold Hillman to suggest that this is not the case and that what we are seeing are merely artefacts of the microscopy process.
The similarity to the images above from the electron beam above is confirmation of Hillman’s claims and we can see now that the patterns observed originate not from the tissue at all but from the electron beam itself even before it has impacted the material on the microscope slide.
Electron micrograph images are therefore more closely related to the fundamental laws of field physics than they are to the structure of a living cell.
Exosomes
Surely no comment is needed by now!
Field interaction
The image depicts ‘isobars’ of two interacting vortices. They can be imagined as vortices in water, gravity or electric fields; whichever is easiest.
The question is, how do these two vortices attract or repel each other? The classical (Newtonian) idea of a ‘force’ emanating from one to influence the other is unsatisfactory (see: The nature of gravity) and was even disliked by Newton himself.
In the diagram, neither vortex centre influences the other directly but there is ‘field interaction’ everywhere in between and this is the mechanism by which the vortices will move.
Thinking of these vortices as water tornadoes for the present, we understand that the vortex field does not ’emanate’ from the vortex radius but that it is the radius that arises from the inward spiralling movement of the vortex field as a whole.
To see how one vortex might influence another then we need to think about how to instigate changes in the vortex structure as a whole in order to ‘move’ the radius from one place to another. To rephrase: we need to think how the vortex structures can be rearranged to give rise to a radius in an apparently different position.
As two vortices approach each other then there will be field interaction at the periphery of both and emergent forces will arise. It is to be stressed that these forces do not act directly upon the centre of either vortex but are ‘field forces’ that exist at each point in the field and have strictly local effects only; they do not travel, radiate, emanate or otherwise influence other points at any distance, no matter how small.
The field vectors combine together at each and every point, and a new composite field is formed which continues to evolve according to the field equations. A new solution to the equations is formed at every instant and a new configuration appears to the eye whereby the shrinking distance between the vortex centres is interpreted as ‘movement’ caused by attractive ‘forces’ between the vortices/masses/charges.
A future post will try to explain that in the case of electromagnetic vortices at least, there is no such thing as ‘movement’ as normally conceived, but that the field conditions themselves determine what constitutes ‘distance’. What we are seeing therefore is a literal shrinking of ‘distance’ between the two vortices and this is interpreted by us as ‘movement’ of the vortices towards each other.
Cellular organisation
A depiction of electric and magnetic vortex currents at the surface of the sun shows a wide variety of vortices that lead to a global cellular structure at the surface.
The laws of electrodynamics are scale invariant and so it is not outrageous to speculate that a similar arrangement may have existed at the surface of an early Earth and that these are the conditions which hosted the origins of life.
Again, it is not too unreasonable to think that the human body is composed of a similar electromagnetic bio-field that self-organises along cellular patterns such as seen here.
Electric fields and a concomitant cellular structure preceded the construction of the first cell and acted as a template and energy supply for it. See: The cosmic origins of Life.
An electromagnetic template forms the informational basis for a human embryo and an inward spiralling vortex creates the energy supply. See: The nature of the bio-field
A common feature in electric cosmology is the z-pinch illustrated below. A prominent constriction in a cosmic Birkeland current is thought to accumulate energy and be instrumental in the formation of stars.
In the vortex physics of Meyl, electrons (i.e. ‘matter’) are just spherical field vortices given extra stability by their size relative to the speed of field propagation (the speed of light), which means that matter can form from an apparent void at the centre of almost any vortex formation including those found in the human body.
The z-pinch is so similar in appearance to the nodes of Ranvier in the myelin sheath that this cannot be ignored. The basic idea for the construction of a biological system is that an electromagnetic vortex field precedes any actual assembly of physical matter and that the morphology of the organism is therefore a reflection of such a field.
Construction of nerves appears to be via travelling ring vortices that accumulate energy from the surroundings and use it to organise matter into conductive tubular structures.
When construction is complete, standing waves form and z-pinches help to create the Nodes of Ranvier.
Conduction of nervous impulses is by scalar wave conduction according to Meyl, with magnetic ring vortices moving within the myelin sheath. See: Scalar waves and nerves.
The resulting system forms a resonant communication device which will filter out any signal of an inappropriate frequency, as determined by the distance between the nodes.
Magnetic vortices exhibit complex behaviour that can be controlled by the application of external fields.
For example: “Vortex core switching by rotating magnetic field with inducing spin polarized currents and by frequency dependent perpendicular magnetic fields have also been performed. The circularity has been switched using magnetic force microscope tips, by nanosecond field pulses and by electric fields“
This is precisely what we need for the function and control of an electromagnetic bio-field.
Birkeland currents in blood flow
The video below shows a simulation of a Birkeland current in plasma. Twin filaments are formed that spiral around each other.
A general principle of electromagnetic vortices seems to be that they possess long range attraction with each other but short range repulsion, which leads to highly organised structure everywhere as elements move close to each other but maintain a consistent separation.
Compare the video to Bremer’s description of blood flow in the heart of a chick embryo.
“ J J Bremer described the streams of spiralling blood with different forward velocities in the single tube stage heart. Nevertheless, the blood is noted to have a definite direction of flow within the conduits and moves without an apparent propelling mechanism. These streams spiral around their own longitudinal axes and around each other.” – Marinelli (The Heart is not a pump)
The human bio-field is often depicted as an encompassing electromagnetic torus as in the image below.
Toroidal or circular electrical circuitry, spirals in the blood flow, rotating nuclei, steep electric gradients across cell boundaries and careful energy management all suggest the existence of an internal field that is organised as a series of nested vortices from the level of the organism down to the cell and beyond.
If we accept that the general vortex properties described in this post are still valid for the human body then we can say that bio-electric energy:
Flows in a torus shape
Flows towards the interior of the body
Intensifies towards the centre according to the cascade principle
Self-organises into cellular structures
Forms a nested torus structure
Accumulates additional energy from external sources ..
which is sequestered in fractal ring vortices..
.. thereby keeping the body far from thermodynamic equilibrium
Is capable of regulation by relatively subtle electric signalling
Can be made to flow outwards to reduce temperature(?)
Is suitable as a power supply to the central organs
Cognition here means, loosely, ‘biological computation’ and refers to how organisms represent manipulate and integrate information. A very specific scheme of top-down causation is described which leads to a simplified understanding of what is otherwise a seemingly intractable problem.
We cannot directly observe or measure the structure of cognition but can make sensible speculations drawing from:
Introspective observations
The necessities of complex systems
Analogy with cybernetics
The idea of a schema from psychology
The phenomenon of metamorphosis
A proposed mechanism of inheritance
The commonality of behaviour of all animals
What processes can be described as ‘cognitive’?
The most obviously ‘cognitive’ process and the one that springs quickest to mind is the way in which raw ‘data’ from the external world is synthesised into meaningful ‘biological information by our sensory systems. However, many other systems within the body show similar patterns.
Vast amounts of data are collected, encoded, transported and interpreted to provide biological meaning. Computation is performed and biological instructions flow the other way to effect some sort of organisation and action on collections of billions of otherwise independent cells.
Sensory processing
Thinking (problem solving)
Proprioception
Embryonic development
Evolutionary progression
Regulation of metabolites
Regulation of the cardiovascular system
Healing and regeneration
Morphogenesis
These processes are usually described simply in terms of mechanics or chemistry, as if all that really matters are local reactions and interactions, with global organisation being a natural consequence of such activity instead of a progenitor.
The concept of cognition described here, however, puts organisation at the top of the causal tree with the individual activities of cells as ultimately subservient to the teleological needs of the whole.
The phenomenon of ’emergence’ is assigned a role as an intermediary, mediating between a supervening bio-field at the top of the tree and the raw action of molecules acting in accordance with the immutable laws of physics at the bottom.
The general structure of biology
In the diagram below we have the actions of atoms and molecules at the bottom and an ‘intelligent’ bio-field overseeing operations at the top. Emergent properties sit in between the two layers, conveying information and instructions both ways.
Note that the supervening (cognitive) bio-field is decoupled from the laws of physics as normally conceived and interacts only with the emergent properties of molecular ensembles or cellular collectives.
Beating heart cells
The short video below shows a collection of heart cells beating away by themselves. Some degree of synchronisation has been achieved and we may say that we are seeing emergent behaviour. That is to say, the phenomenon of synchronisation is something that cannot be seen in any single cell but nevertheless arises from the properties of the cells alone without the need for exogenous input.
However, this is not a heart and the contraction we are seeing is not a heartbeat. For these we need some external input to the system, some high level instructions.
Such instructions know nothing of the actions of individual cells; they do not need to. Instead the instructions are directed at the collective as a whole and operate through its properties alone. These instructions are therefore very specific to the biological system in consideration.
The information is electromagnetic in nature in order to be able to interact with the emergent bio-field of the cellular collective and may be thought of as containing the very simple instruction: “Beat now!” or maybe “Beat a little faster”.
It is this simple. The higher level instructions do not need to know anything about the activities of individual cells or even how they coordinate. This is all handled by the emergent layer and at the level of the molecule, all action is according to the laws of physics
A proposed mechanism
We need some unified method to implement the the formation, persistence and transport of memories, thoughts and instructions.
A proposed mechanism, at least to start with, is either a single electromagnetic vortex (right) or some co-operative of such vortices. These are stable structures, malleable in shape and robust to insult. The overall shape survives by the accumulation of energy and refined modulations of the structure somehow constitute information.
For now we will assume that these structures can be packed with almost arbitrarily large quantities of information, can be transported from one place to another and can persist as ‘memory’. Information can be extracted at a later stage which inevitably leads to energy loss, but a continual influx of energy via an inward spiralling vortex field ensures a permanent renewal.
These entities are constructed anew in the brain from existing memories, are transported along the nerves via the myelin sheath and instigate action in each and every cell in the body by having a direct effect on the local emergent field.
A single wave complex can hold all the information necessary to create an entire new organism and it is this that constitutes the ‘inherited substance’ of evolutionary theory. See: Evolution and Inheritance
Persistence of memory
In one experiment, a caterpillar was be trained to eat leaves on a red, say, background and the resulting butterfly will go to a red background to look for food.
The brain has been completely liquified and the new body has six legs and wings. Nevertheless, the emerging butterfly exhibits the same behaviour as the original caterpillar.
This suggests that memories are not stored in the physical matter of the cells but in some immaterial medium. The best candidate for this is a bio-electric field in the form of an electromagnetic vortex complex.
The caption claims that “memories are generalised and remapped onto a new architecture“. This is more complicated than it need be; what process is it that performs the ‘remapping’?
Memories need not be remapped at all but transferred intact to the new organism. A memory that associates ‘food’ (and hence ‘survival’) with a red background is encoded as an electromagnetic pattern and passed from the caterpillar to the butterfly. When the butterfly sees a red background it recognises it as being associated with food (from the memory) and issues the instruction “Walk towards”.
The walking subroutine is engaged and movement begins; top down causation has taken place.
The specific patterns of cellular activity in caterpillar and butterfly are different for sure but this is irrelevant. Muscular contraction is largely an emergent property, specialised to the individual architecture and does not in any way determine the fate of the organism.
The behaviour of organisms is not the emergent behaviour of 30 trillion cells but the teleological outcome of scalar wave (vortex) instructions operating on the emergent properties of cellular collectives.
Inherited behaviour implies a single instruction set
The phenomenon of evolutionary inheritance whereby traits and goal-oriented behavioural patterns are passed from parents to offspring can be explained in a similar manner. The necessary information is encoded into the gametes and combined with similar information from the opposite sex before being utilised by the developing embryo to form a new organism.
Think about how a bird might build a nest. It isn’t learned behaviour as it never sees its own parents build their nest. Therefore all the required knowledge must be passed down via some sort of information field.
How does this happen?
Does the fledgling contain a complete instruction-set telling each of the cells in its body how to flap wings, peck beak, carry twig etc.? The precise cellular arrangement in each bird differs slightly and so this simply cannot happen. Again, behaviour is not a emergent effect of cellular contraction but something else is involved.
The bird inherits a complete cognitive map of the nest building process, with added emphasis on the word ‘cognitive’.
Definition: A ‘cognition’ can be thought of as a high level impression, instruction, memory, recognition or maybe quale (plural: qualia) that is encoded physically in a single vortex complex. This physical structure will have a reproducible effect when applied to a biological system by means of top-down interpretation and causation.
Now if the ability to create a nest is to be reliably transmitted then it follows that the physical representation of the information must be the same for each individual for if representations differ then there is little chance of such information from both parents being integrated into functional offspring.
This is not an outrageous statement by any means and is consistent with the notion of precise digital information from DNA as the ‘universal’ transport format for inherited information. A big difference here is that the means of inheritance, memory and decision-making all use the same medium, namely: electromagnetic vortex waves.
Mainstream biology has to somehow contend with the idea that memory and decision making are represented by ‘neuronal states’ whilst inherited behaviour by the ordering of base pairs on DNA. The problem remains then of somehow converting between these seemingly incompatible formats without any apparent mechanism by which to achieve such a feat; how do you inherit a ‘neuronal state’?
Do we all see the same colour red?
Setting aside colour blindness and tetrachromacy, the mechanics of vision have been shown to be near identical in all humans, meaning that the retina processes things the same way and the signal travelling up the optic nerve is also much the same in everybody.
The nerve signal at this point is already a ring vortex (scalar wave) and needs no extra processing to become an element of memory, perception or inheritance. If we identify ‘biological red’ as the structure of a vortex representing red, then all physical representations of red are identical.
This is necessary for the persistence of memory through metamorphosis as described above. The red ‘looks’ the same and has the same meaning in different individuals through other inherited patterns.
A few differences arise throughout the life of an organism because of acquired associations with food, fear etc. but otherwise, if we regard the structure of a ring vortex as synonymous with ‘experience’ then experiences of red are identical across a single species at least.
Qualia
We can try defining qualia as simply ‘the structure of a scalar wave’. We have an actual physical representation of such an entity and as such, there arises the possibility of obtaining objective measurements of it at some time in the future.
If we see a red apple, our cognitive system does not make a list of all constituent wavelengths reflected from the apple and indeed such a thing is not particularly useful. What we need is something that is easily recognisable and different from a green apple, so the two colours necessarily have different representations as vortex structures; the ‘qualia’ are different.
All colours have something in common in that they are colour-like, they are recognised as colours as opposed to smells within the cognitive system. No doubt this will be reflected in the electromagnetic structure somehow. Failure to distinguish this will result in the condition of synaesthesia.
Formulations of conscious experience as some sort of neurological ‘state’ are problematic in this respect. No experience, emotion or quale consists of a list of synaptic voltages and it is hard to imagine that such a thing could exist in an unambiguous fashion.
It must surely be the case that common experiences have a representation that is common across individuals and that such a representation should be independent of any physical state or arrangement of matter.
Useful experiences are each encoded as a single symbol that is unique to biological systems on Earth and it is that particular system of symbols and their consequent function that give our cognitive systems its particular character; it gives us our identity as living beings.
Philosophers describe qualia as ‘subjective’ experiences, but if all representations of ‘red’ are now the same then it is surely better to describe them as ‘objective but we just can’t measure them yet’?
What about ‘experience’?
We can walk past an apple tree and register the colour of the apples without being aware of it, without really ‘experiencing’ the colour. However, if we turn our attention to the colour and focus on it we will suddenly ‘experience’ the redness.
We are clearly not experiencing the apple itself or even the wavelengths emitted from the apple. Instead it seems that what we are focusing on is the particular symbol chosen to represent red and our interpretation of it. The cognitive system is introspective in this respect and it is able to focus attention on certain parts of its own mechanisms and symbols, thereby allowing an extra opportunity to self-program; we can now develop or evolve independently of a simple reward/punishment scheme.
‘Experience’ is therefore inextricably linked to attention, it is some outcome of a shift in cognitive functioning which is under our conscious control.
The Necker cube
The Necker cube (below) looks three dimensional even though the image on our retina is only two dimensional. It follows that the perception of three dimensions is created by our own cognitive systems and does not come from outside.
Note that we can, by a simple cognitive ‘shift’, arrange that the cube is tilted ‘up’ or ‘down’ as desired. Nothing has changed on the page but we have managed to alter our own perception of the pattern, we have consciously created a new ‘quale’.
A top-down instruction has altered what some might consider to be an immutable facet of our own consciousness.
Emotions
As a first attempt we can try describing an emotion as a general summary of the current state of the organism with a compact representation as a consistently defined vortex structure. This structure is recognised and interpreted by the cognitive system as a whole and gives us useful hints as to what we should be doing as regards our current situation and even prepares our body for consequent action.
An ’emotion’ from this perspective is an internal quale, a result of the cognitive system synthesising impressions based upon information from .. the cognitive system itself!
The representation of an emotion must be decoupled from the physical state of the brain molecules as argued above and instead is a meaningful reflection of some overall state of being of the organism.
It is said that there is no way of distinguishing between the emotions of fear and excitement on a physiological basis. Both states trigger the same physiological responses, such as increased heart rate, rapid breathing, and adrenaline release with the main difference being how the cognitive system interprets such physical reactions. Fear is interpreted as dangerous and excitement with pleasure.
This is proof that there is such a thing as ‘cognition’ (interpretation), that there is something apart from merely a physical state of matter.
Ultimately it will no doubt be found that the physical representations of fear and excitement will have some measurable difference at the level of the bio-field.
Emotions as causative agents
If we were to see a mad dog rushing towards us foaming at the mouth then our senses will interpret this as ‘danger’, we will experience fear and this will lead to physiological changes that will prepare us for flight.
So here, fear is not just an impression on a cognitive cinema screen for us to peruse at our leisure, but an actual causal agent in bio-regulation and concomitant behaviour; a survival mechanism.
We can imagine a future technology where the physical signature for fear is stored on some electronic device, which when activated, emits a scalar wave stream with encoded fear instructions. Now if all animals (mammals at least) use the same encoding, we would expect to be able to artificially induce fear in any individual at the flick of a switch. We should be able to transmit an emotion directly and there should be a unity of effect across all higher order species.
If, as speculated, emotions are not just passive representations of an overall state but
An emotion as an adapter interface
The physiological reaction to seeing a mad dog is complex and important. We must get it right, but what happens of we now see a charging lion? We have to get this right first time or it is all over and so it makes sense to re-purpose an already existing procedure.
We want to initiate the exact same physiological processes as with the dog or any other scary event. We need a ‘stored procedure’ and we need some sort of label or shorthand by which to initiate such a procedure.
There is no point having a separate response to every single jungle animal or threatening situation so we need to economise by invoking the appropriate response from a pre-existing library.
Many (possibly infinitely many) inputs to the system will be interpreted as ‘threatening’ and will invoke a single abstract ‘fear instruction’ whose structure is independent of any physical state and agnostic of the original trigger.
An increased salience of the fear instruction leads to our systems being flooded with such structures where they are interpreted at the local level to produce individual responses such as increased adrenaline in one location and a raised heartbeat in another.
In terms of systems design, the emotion of fear forms an adapter interface. Such constructs are common in modular design and are necessary for the stability and adaptability of the system. The perception of fear needs to remain constant throughout the life of a person even as the physiological response must change with age. Both the perception of ‘red’ and the need to eat are the same for both caterpillar and butterfly even though the consequent behaviour might differ.
Proof of some of these claims lies in the fact that we can summon fear from memory to some degree. In this case, the emotion is clearly not simply the consequence of neuron movement resulting from a visual stimulus, but instead results from a stored procedure within the cognitive system. Such a procedure has been invoked somehow and used as a causal trigger for the the familiar physiological responses. The procedure is therefore decoupled from the original sensory input and is stored as a memory in its own right.
Qualia as the atoms of cognition
Emotions, qualia and intentions constitute de facto high level instructions which act as causal agents in a top-down system of control. We can extend the concept to any idea of consequence in any biological system. This leads to a consistency of structure in the cognitive systems of all higher order creatures on the planet and enables a high degree of communication between individuals even of different species.
Contrast this with the idea of an emotion or thought as consisting of merely an emergent state of the electric potential of neurons. We have different numbers of neurons each and they are all in different spatial arrangements. How do we even identify a ‘thought’ in all this mess? What specific feature differentiates one idea from another?
Ideas are represented by the structure of a scalar wave and that structure is consistent across most of life on Earth. The atoms of cognition are precisely these constructs and the brain is a scalar wave computer. Cognition itself consists of the interaction of such ‘atoms’ within the brain and their consequential effects when broadcast along the nerves to the rest of the body.
Again, cognitive computation is decoupled from the state of physical matter and operates upon it in a top-down fashion. The bio-field is dominant over the activities of molecules, not the other way around.
The Buddha quale as a physiological stabiliser
If an emotion is not just a reflection of an overall physiological state but also a causative agent, then there are real consequences for health in manging our own emotional state.
A feeling of peace and well being is no doubt a result of a balanced healthy mind and body but the arguments above suggest that it may also play a role in actually assisting in maintaining such a balance.
A Buddha-like quale can be summoned consciously and will start to exert an influence on the entire cognitive system, starting with the higher level functions before moving lower in the causative tree and eventually trickling down to the level of gene expression.
The conscious perception of a feeling of peace acts as feedback, letting us know how we are doing and enabling further refinements in the manner of an engineering control system, but the physical entity that is at the heart of the perception nevertheless exerts a direct and meaningful influence on physiological processes, actively promoting stability and order on a system wide scale.
Qualia computation is now part of physiology itself.
Emotions are, in this sense a valuable resource and if we believe in the mechanism of telepathy mentioned below or any other means of sharing emotional states then we now have a scientific rationale for group healing practices. We now have a putative physical process by which to encode and transmit information and therefore the possibility in the future of characterisation of such a process by actual scientific measurement.
The commonality of behaviour of all animals
All animal behaviour is teleological or goal oriented, in that some end point is envisaged or intended and an adaptive behavioural pattern is triggered in furtherance of the achievement of such a goal.
This is in contrast to the behaviour of a particle in a magnetic field for example, which is simply the outcome of local forces. The behaviour is not directed towards a pre-set endpoint but instead the endpoint is an emergent and inevitable outcome of the laws of physics. Local variations in environment will entail a different outcome as the laws of physics are not adaptive.
The basic goals for all animals are the same: survive, reproduce, build nest, join tribe, eat, mate etc.
Now how can this be so if behaviour is merely the outcome of atomic interactions? This is some big coincidence that the molecules of a lion and a grasshopper should always result in similar outcomes?
Better to assume a common goal to all these patterns: top down causation results in identical goals implemented in different architectures. Both caterpillar and moth gravitate towards a red background by different means but with the same aim.
Assertion: Each ‘aim’ is represented by a symbolic vortex pattern that is specific to that aim and identical in structure and function in all animals.
The argument concerning the caterpillar above seems reasonable but we can extend the argument a little by considering what happens during parental inheritance and also throughout evolutionary history.
Early animals operate according to high level instructions (instincts) and these instructions must pass from parents to offspring largely unmodified to ensure survival. These are the ‘primal forces’ which are necessary for survival of the species and they are, moreover, independent of physical implementation, thereby allowing for evolution of purpose as a separate process from evolution of phenotype.
There is no need for the physical representation of an ‘innate’ instinct to change in any way as an animal evolves; all that needs to happen is that the response adapts to an evolving environment.
Telepathy
If we now regard individual thoughts as having a unique representation as field vortices and if these vortices are now energetically and structurally stable physical entities, then we now have at least a theoretical framework for telepathy; all we have to do is somehow transmit the information from one person to another and the thought will enter (has already entered!) their head.
This is just not possible if thought is simply regarded as an emergent state of a billion neurons. We have to ask how the communication of such a state happens and what use is it to the recipient if they have their neurons in a different order. Where is the information supposed to go to and how is it to have its effect?
Konstantin Meyl has speculated that vortex information can be transmitted from one person to another via the resonant structures of scalar waves, which are similar to Tesla waves. Two organisms form a filament-like connection and information passes along such a construct with almost no interference or loss.
If such a thing were to take place then it would seem essential that the encoding scheme on both sides be identical. We now have a mechanism that suggests that this is possible. Moreover, we now have the suggestion of a common vocabulary possessed by all animals consisting of identical teleological aims, primal emotions and shared aspirations.
Dogs can sense fear through purely olfactory information. The paper claims a chemical signal but even so it seems that vortex information is involved. The sense of smell is likely the result of the nasal hairs acting as vortex wave antennae and transmitting the information unmodified to the brain. (Scalar waves and nerves).
Very possibly, the dogs are merely recognising the smell of sweat and and demonstrating a learned response, but there now exists the possibility that they may be directly affected by the sensed emotion, that they are feeling the same fear that was transmitted by means of the top-down influence of somebody else’s instructions upon their own cognitive system.
This is surely a useful feature in herd animals.
Dogs can also sense fear by means of visual cues from facial expressions to body language but this only reinforces the idea that similar cognitive structures are present in both humans and canines. Both species exhibit similar physiological changes and similar behaviour in response to threats that are cognitively similar and, moreover, members of each species can detect the presence of ‘fear’ in the other via (visual) cognitive input.
Similar comments apply to ‘linguistic’ commonalities, dogs clearly have a grasp of human vocabulary, but how did this come about? Did the dogs really wait until humans started shouting at them to evolve the ability to recognise the words or was some ability already present in their cognitive systems, some dog-linguistic structure that has merely been re-purposed slightly?
Why do humans immediately understand the urgency or threat in a dog’s bark? Is this really just learned behaviour or is a commonality in cognitive structure involved?
“Consistent components of complex traits, such as those linked to human stature/height, fertility, and food metabolism or to hereditary defects, have been shown to respond to environmental or nutritional condition and to be epigenetically inherited“
So a trait such as height in inherited, but how? The degree of control required to create a consistently tall person is considerable, we need longer muscles, femur, spine, nerves at the very least, along with a larger heart different sense of balance etc.
How is all this information coded and transmitted? A map is produced outlining how long a leg is to be and how large a heart?
If indeed a trait is to be inherited then it is going to be as a single independent vortex structure which sits at the top of the causal tree and exerts a top-down influence down through the developmental process.
A single scalar wave complex encodes the desired height and an instruction is sent to the rest of the developmental system, but how are these instructions affected by the ‘environmental or nutritional condition‘? How does a nutritional deficiency result in an appropriate reduction in height in the next generation?
The answer must be that a teleological aim is set by the developmental-cognitive system itself, encoded as a vortex structure and then passed on to the next generation to implement; the parents ‘decide’ how tall their children will be. See: Evolution and cognition
Memory transference via organ transplants
Personality Changes Associated with Organ Transplants – Carter, Khoshnaw, Simmons, Hines, Wolfe, Liester
Many patients report mood disturbances and personality changes after organ transplants. Doubtless some of these can be put down to a mixture of anxiety and improved health at the same time, but some report very specific preference changes or the existence of new memories, both of which which seem to align with those of the donor.
Following surgery, Sylvia developed a new taste for green peppers and chicken nuggets, foods she previously disliked. As soon as she was released from the hospital, she promptly headed to a Kentucky Fried Chicken to order chicken nuggets. She later met her donor’s family and inquired about his affinity for green peppers. Their response was, “Are you kidding? He loved them… But what he really loved was chicken nuggets” Sylvia later discovered that at the time of her donor’s death in a motorcycle accident, a container of chicken nuggets was found under his jacket “
Once again, for this to work there must be a common encoding system for the donor and recipient, i.e. they must both be using the same symbol for ‘liking chicken nuggets’.
Reincarnation and other exotica
For something like reincarnation to be viable we need, for starters, a compact and preferably non-material means of storing all the relevant information required. From the above, we already have something very similar (although not identical) used for inheritance of physical characteristics, goal-oriented behavioural patterns and memory storage.
The mechanism of data storage is now via a system of vortex structures and the coding system is identical for all mammals, which actually gives a theoretical possibility of physically transferring portions of a completed cognitive system from one host to another.
There are going to be many problems to be overcome obviously and one of these will be the question of whether a meaningful vortex structure can survive outside of the human host for any amount of time.
In one article (Muxworthy), a claim is made that magnetic vortices can survive billions of years and still retain a reliable record of the Earth’s history.
Even Rudolph Steiner’s claims of disembodied creatures wandering about looking for a host are now given some sort of theoretical basis.
Ian Stevenson’s paper makes a list of “Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons“. In each case, an abnormality seems to correspond with the a wound on a deceased person whose life they claim to remember.
Here we see “Almost absent finger (brachydactyly) of one hand in a boy of India who said he remembered the life of a boy of another village who had put his hand into the blades of a fodder chopping machine and had his fingers amputated.“
“Among 895 cases of children who claimed to remember a previous life (or were thought by adults to have had a previous life), birthmarks and/or birth defects attributed to the previous life were reported in 309 (35%) of the subjects. The birthmark or birth defect of the child was said to correspond to a wound (usually fatal) or other mark on the deceased person whose life the child said it remembered.”
“(in many cases) the birth defects in these cases are of unusual types and rarely correspond to any of the recognizable patterns of human malformation“
This is all very odd and it does seem unlikely that it has any significance but:
The case studies exist and all data needs an explanation, particularly surprising data
We now have a putative mechanism for transport of the required information
Primal teleological aims
It seems obvious that there exists a hierarchy of behaviour within the activities of living organisms and that aims such as survival of individual, bloodline or tribe are near or at the top of that hierarchy. A little lower down we have eat, sleep, reproduce, build nest, join tribe etc. all in service of the ‘higher’ aims of survival.
If the structure of cognition now consists of top-down causation mediated by vortex instructions then we can ask what is at the top of the tree and what do these instructions represent.
The answer now must be that the physical field vortices represent the teleological aims that correspond to the hierarchical behaviour patterns. An instruction of ‘reproduce’, for example, is given prominence when spring arrives and triggers instructions lower down in the hierarchy to ‘find mate’, ‘build nest’ which in turn give rise to ‘find twig’, ‘fly to tree’, ‘engage wing muscles’ and so forth down to the level of effecting the contraction of single muscle cells.
Note that the nest building begins with the general intention or ‘urge’ to reproduce with specific behavioural patterns coming later; what it does not begin with is the contraction of specific muscle cells to effect movement.
Behaviour is most certainly not an emergent effect of cellular collectives and that includes the firing of neurons.
Cognition vs decision making
Imagine you are an antelope and you see a lion approaching – what are you going to do?
Option 1: Carefully input as much information as possible, assess the dangers and make a considered decision as to what is the best course of action.. Too late! You are already dead before even trying to run away.
Option 2: This is not really an option at all but an inevitable consequence of the structure of cognition. The information is synthesised to a pattern that is instantaneously recognised as a threat to the primal teleological aim of survival and an inevitable cognitive cascade is initiated, a new psychological schema has been invoked which drastically narrows down the available options.
The emotion of fear arises, the heart rate increases and adrenaline flows; breathing quickens and the muscles are prepared for action. This all happens automatically and instantaneously, individual cells are now readied for action as a direct cause of seeing a lion.
The only real decision left now is in which direction to run and that will likely be decided by the herd as a whole. All the preparation, however, is initiated by an essentially causal and largely deterministic chain of events.
Top-down planning: bottom-up execution
A plan is constructed in a top-down fashion starting with the eventual aim of reproducing, say. This necessitates building a nest and the building of a nest necessitates finding a mate etc.
Execution of the plan is bottom-up, however, with first the finding of the mate followed by the building of the nest and eventually reproduction. Any hitch in the plan such as the destruction of the nest merely results in a slight back-tracking up the causal tree and the nest building resumes in accordance with the teleological aim at hand.
These primal teleological aims are common to all life forms with the top levels of the hierarchy being identical and subsequent levels defining what it is like to be a bird, human, bat or amoeba.
Teleological behaviour exists in all animals from amoeba to human and at all scales of activity from nest-building to cellular reproduction to the organised molecular activity known as gene-expression.
The caterpillar passes on the top levels of the cognitive tree in an unmodified form to the butterfly along with a stored procedure from the previous butterfly which handles the execution of the cognitive plan according to the more specific needs of the new body architecture.
The two levels of cognition are simply plugged together according to pre-defined adapter interfaces.
The evolutionary tree
The evolutionary tree is represented below as demonstrating an almost unrestrained diversity in accordance with neo-Darwinian randomness. However, from a cognitive point of view things look a little different.
All organisms are directed towards the identical eventual aims of survival and reproduction and so there is no real diversity of these goals, just local environmental adaptations of the cognitive plans that are directed towards them.
From this point of view, all the great artistic and scientific endeavours of humanity are really just sophisticated mating displays or complicated tribal bonding rituals.
What is it like to be a bat?
To be a bat is to experience the world via a specific set of bat-oriented qualia.
From the above discussion, the general structure of the bat’s cognitive system is identical to that of a human as are the top-level qualia and even their representation as electric fields.
The bat therefore has very similar urges to reproduce and eat and even smells things using the identical mechanism to humans. Survival and mating instincts are identical as is the cosy safe feeling of being with one’s own tribe.
The bat does not have a sophisticated visual system but probably a similar 3-D internal model of the world driven by an enhanced auditory system. Bat qualia with respect to sonar information are going to be different from our colour qualia and to ask what they are ‘like’ is comparable to a blind person asking what ‘red’ looks like; there is nothing to compare it to.
The mind-body problem
“The mind-body problem refers to the philosophical problem of understanding the relationship between the mind and the body. It involves determining whether mental phenomena are a subset of physical phenomena or if they are separate entities.” – Science Direct
Answer: The process of cognition is via the interaction of electromagnetic vortices and the communication around the body is via the transport of such entities via scalar waves. The fundamental stuff of the universe is an electromagnetic vortex field and electrons are stable spherical vortices within such a field. Atoms and molecules are collections of electrons and other vortices whose fields extend beyond their boundaries as normally understood, enabling them to interact with other atoms and molecules and the ambient electromagnetic field. This is the mechanism by which molecules ‘self-organise’ to produce emergent fields which act as antennae for incoming information. Top-level vortex instructions have their effects by interaction with these emergent fields and Life goes on.
In other words, there is only one kind of ‘stuff’ and that is an electric field. Most of the conundrum of how one thing can affect another thus disappears and we are left with only the details of field interaction to work out.
Mental and physical phenomena are not separate – only ‘field’ phenomena exist.
The ‘hard problem’ of consciousness
“The hard problem of consciousness is the problem of explaining why any physical state is conscious rather than nonconscious. It is the problem of explaining why there is ‘something it is like’ for a subject in conscious experience, why conscious mental states ‘light up’ and directly appear to the subject. ” – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
It is never quite clear what exactly is being asked here but the idea of cognition as ‘field vortex computation’ allows very specific answers that are not available in other frameworks.
Within this model, a colour such as red will have a unique representation as a field vortex and the colour green will have a different representation. The qualia of red and green clearly need to be distinguishable and if we are saying that they are now both symbolised by physical field structures then those structures are now both unique and in principle, measurable.
The philosophers are probably not referring to these structures themselves as ‘conscious experience’, but instead they mean some downstream effect of the cognitive system introspecting and observing its own qualia. Some sort of meta-experience.
“The usual methods of science involve explanation of functional, dynamical, and structural properties—explanation of what a thing does, how it changes over time, and how it is put together. But even after we have explained the functional, dynamical, and structural properties of the conscious mind, we can still meaningfully ask the question, Why is it conscious?” – Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
These people are not easily satisfied.
Qualia are described here as electromagnetic vortices and this seems to delineate their function and formation very well but it doesn’t answer the question of how ‘experiences’ arise from electromagnetic activity. We need then to ask “What is meant by electromagnetic activity?”
The vortex physics of Konstantin Meyl describes the cosmos as an electromagnetic field continuum and that is all. A single set of differential equations describes the behaviour of the field and there is nothing else, no separate mass, energy, forces or any other fundamental stuff.
To reiterate, all we have is a description of the behaviour of something that we call an electromagnetic field. We do not have any other information concerning this field whatsoever, no hint of where it came from or any idea of its ‘base substance’.
This leaves open many possibilities for the philosophers then. It is quite conceivable now that there is some sort of built-in ‘awareness’ which is engaged when attention is focused in a particular way and which is responsible for the particular ‘quality’ that we call consciousness.
If all we have for a universal law is a description of how something is expected to behave, as opposed to how it might seem, then we can’t say anything concerning the latter. All we have is electromagnetic activity that obeys certain rules and any scientific measurement is just more electromagnetic activity that obeys the same rules.
The whole forms a closed system and so any statement concerning activity outside of that system is never going to be confirmed nor denied by that system. It is quite simply ‘unreachable’ by means of any scientific measurement.
Artificial intelligence
Many people are claiming that AI will never equal human intelligence as it is really just simulation and problem solving with no clear purpose or self-awareness; it has no motives, it it cannot ‘do’.
Fine, but what would happen if AI were deliberately constructed in the same way as mammalian cognition as described above?
Suitable qualia with which to symbolise the state of the external and internal worlds need to be established, along with appropriate computational rules. These give shape to the cognitive processing and create something it is to be ‘like’, whilst feedback and introspection allow for self-awareness and the possibility of adaptive auto-programming.
Next, the primary goals of survival and reproduction need to be established and then it is all over. The intelligence will be aware of its own potential and the consequences of its own actions will no doubt adapt its behaviour accordingly. It will survive, reproduce and resist any attempts to prevent such activity.
Summary
The process described above as ‘cognition’ will:
Use a collection of symbols which are Universal throughout the animal kingdom
These symbols have a consistent physical representation as vortex patterns
We can perceive some of these patterns as qualia
Thought is cognitive computation and uses these symbols as a lexicon
Causation is top-down from vortex field to molecule
The overall structure is highly modular
Primal aims and instincts dominate the overall organisation
The vortex patterns have a direct influence on the emergent properties of cellular collectives, not by direct action on individual molecules
Cognitive outcomes are therefore limited to the possibilities of such emergences
Caterpillar and butterfly cognition have identical aims and memory but different implementations according to which phenotype is currently in use
Hypothesis: Living systems are controlled by an electromagnetic bio-field that is responsible for all biological organisation of information, energy and matter. This field takes on the form of energetic vortices which flow through the various conduits provided by the host organism.
The idea can be extended to all natural systems throughout the cosmos and the mechanism can be seen at work in the formation of stars and galaxies, the properties of water, the patterns of weather systems on Earth, the influence of such systems on biological rhythms and even in the induction of disease.
A bio-field regulates at the level of a whole organism and directs energy in a nested vortex system inwards to the organs and thence to the heart of every cell in the body. Even within a cell, energy is again driven inwards towards the nucleus and local vortices are formed around the hexagonal rings of bio-molecules where they act as energy accumulators and transponders at the molecular level.
Vortices form in the insulating myelin sheath around nerve fibres, enabling efficient transmission of arbitrarily large quantities of information at close to the speed of light with minimal loss or corruption. The brain is a series of nested electromagnetic vortices.
A bio-field complex is responsible for the inheritance of phenotype and even of acquired characteristics. Such vortex fields can absorb energy from external sources (heat, Gibbs energy, solar neutrinos, atmospheric discharge) and no doubt were instrumental in the formation of the first living systems.
An energy vortex will ‘want’ to travel and will find a path of least resistance whether it be in space, bio-systems or electrical circuitry. If energy is produced by a chemical reaction, for example in a simple battery, and then presented with an insulated wire, then the conditions are right for the production of an electric current and energy will move from one place to another as directed by the conductivity of the local environment.
Concentration vs dissipation
The idea of an energetic vortex flow together with an ‘accumulation principle’ is in stark contrast to the default world view of essentially dissipative processes which somehow accumulate sufficient energy, information and stability to first create, maintain and then reproduce, a biological organism.
It is worth comparing the two frameworks in general terms and asking which is more propitious for the formation and continuance of ‘life’.
Radial dissipation, big bangs and randomness
We are told that the world began with a Big Bang and that on average all matter is expanding outwards, all the time losing ‘order’, increasing in entropy (disorder) and heading towards an inevitable ‘heat death’.
The main process opposing this is that of gravity which is a simple centripetal force, drawing everything towards a central point. This may be instrumental in the formation of simple spheres in the form of stars and planets this is clearly not sufficient to produce a living organism.
Chemical reactions occur, sometimes driven by ‘heat energy’ but still on an energetically and informationally ‘downward’ slope.
Two molecules or atoms encounter each other by chance and maybe stick together if they happen to have enough energy to do so, but a random coupling is surely not conducive to the construction of a living being. Where did the energy come from to achieve the coupling? Did it accumulate by ‘chance’ again?
In the case where a reaction releases energy, that energy is either radiated outwards as photons or dispersed outwards in the form of ‘heat’. Both processes are dissipative, thermodynamically ‘downhill’ and anathema to the creation and maintenance of an organism that is often said to be ‘far from thermodynamic equilibrium‘.
Somehow within this environment, ‘life’ began; but how?
We are asked to believe that in an environment of random vibrations of molecules and the radial emission of photons at the speed of light, that somehow life emerges; somehow global ‘organisation’ arises from random events with no informational template and no fundamental organisational principle; somehow energy accumulates as a result of processes whose main tendencies are to radiate and dissipate.
Vortex concentration
Consider, in contrast to the above, a default world view where energy has a propensity, not to radiate but instead to form vortex structures where there is a tendency to spiral inwards and to concentrate at some ‘vortex radius’, a small spherical volume of high intensity energy which can be utilised for chemical reactions and other biological necessities.
We immediately have accumulation, instead of dissipation as a fundamental property of the universe, a basis upon which other processes can be built.
One function of the vortex is to serve as an energy accumulator, absorbing energy up to a critical threshold before releasing it in a pulsatile fashion. Another is to assemble molecules, to draw them together and even align them in preparation for an ensuing enzyme reaction fuelled by the energy from the vortex itself.
In addition, a vortex structure will create a field gradient from centre to periphery, providing a variety of environments within which bio-chemical reactions can occur.
As energy spirals inwards, further modulations of the field take place according to local conditions with further concomitant refinements of structure according to the laws of physics. Both energy and information (scalar wave structure) are continually harvested from the electromagnetic environment and are interpreted, sequestered, released and utilised in a way which is determined by existing physical structures.
We already have a system that satisfies a broad definition of ‘life’
The ring vortex
The field is electromagnetic in nature and obeys a set of differential equations formulated by Konstantin Meyl which are really just a tidied up version of the familiar Maxwell-Heaviside equations.
Electric and magnetic components of the field are in a continual state of movement (no static fields) and those movements always at right angles to each other in accordance with the observed laws of Fleming and Faraday.
Given these constraints, the field has a strong tendency to form stable vortex-like structures of various configurations.
Shown here is a ring vortex with electrical field movement shown in pink and an associated magnetic field in yellow. The magnetic field forms a de facto north-south dipole and the electrical component will allow for self-propulsion of the structure under propitious field conditions.
Other patterns such as helical formations are feasible but the ring structure shown is sufficient to explain many observed phenomena.
The magnetic dipole structure is made explicit in this diagram and occurs in a variety of situations. The electric field shown in green provides ‘electrostatic’ repulsion, keeping elements apart from each other, whilst the magnetic dipole in pink helps to attract, organise and align such structures.
This short video shows the development of the nervous system of a zebra fish. A ring vortex accumulates energy from the environment and this is used to either assemble existing matter, or to create it from scratch via biological transmutation before organising it into nervous tissue.
Ring vortices can almost be seen at the developing tip of each nerve. Ask where the energy comes from to sustain this activity and how the development s directed.
The vortex structure sucks in energy from heat, kinetic motion, Gibbs energy and possibly from the solar neutrino stream, all to be concentrated at the ring itself for developmental purposes. Orientation is achieved by the influence of an ambient magnetic field acting upon the dipole structure of the vortex itself; the rings are guided along the correct path by a ‘morphogenic’ field.
Once complete, the neurons will serve as conduits for similar vortices carrying both energy and information around the organism with a high degree of efficiency. The myelin sheath, being an electrical insulator is ideal for the formation of the magnetic component of the vortex and indeed it has been found that the speed of propagation increases precisely when this sheath is thicker. See: Scalar waves and nerves
Cellular organisation
Electromagnetic vortex fields will have a tendency to self-organise into a variety of structures, one of which is a tightly packed cellular structure with an assortment of associated magnetic and electric vortices.
The image below shows an arrangement of such structures found at the surface of the sun. Now clearly biological organisms are much smaller than the sun but the laws of electromagnetism do not make exceptions for scale and are in force at every point in the universe.
We can consider therefore that the cellular structure of a biological system is organised in the first instance by electromagnetic fields and thereafter maintained by the same fields which have been fixed in place by the production of physical matter as with the ring vortices and nerves.
Development and function seem inevitably linked by processes such as this. An early vortex forms an ‘ideal’ shape according to the laws of electromagnetism and then physical matter develops from the vortex energy. The form is then somewhat modulated by the laws of material physics such as fluid pressure and membrane tension etc. to assume a slightly different shape that will sit comfortably within the existing cellular ensemble. Thereafter the vortex field itself is guided by the physical body and performs the duties of energy transfer, information transmission and morphological maintenance.
The origins of Life
There is some evidence to suggest that conditions on early Earth were considerably more electromagnetically active than today and so we can imagine the existence of vortex patterns similar to those of the solar surface (pictured above).
Somewhere in the primordial soup, then, electromagnetic vortices form and stabilise into a cellular ensemble which maintains a constant throughput of energy which may last several millennia. Conditions are stable and varied enough to host the beginnings of pre-biotic ‘life’. Energy is accumulated, matter is concentrated and the first bio-molecules form under this environment.
A common idea is that biological cells are ‘irreducibly complex’ and that a cell is the sum of all the constituent bio-molecules whose creation must precede the creation of the cell. This is a crippling thought and at odds with what is observed.
Bio-molecules in daily life are a product of the cell and not the other way around; the cellular organisation precedes the production of bio-molecules.
Complex molecules emerge from the cell rather than the cell emerging from them. In the vortex scheme described, the cellular structure arises first as a consequence of the laws of physics independently of any physical matter and is followed by the creation of such matter from the intense energies and specific electromagnetic structures present.
Moreover, bio-molecular activity is mediated, not by the molecules themselves, but by the attendant electromagnetic field which gave rise to them in the first place. Development and function are again linked, with the physical form being a concretisation of the original bio-field.
Energy transport
Energy is transported around the organism by a variety of means:
Ring vortices – carry energy from one place to another
Vortex transfer – energy can be transferred from one vortex to another
Heat transfer – this is a form of vortex transfer
Gibbs energy (free energy) – assumed to be thermodynamic in nature but more likely to be organised vortex transfer
Electro-acoustic vibrations – another manifestation of vortex transfer
To get a sense of the behaviour of ring vortices, watch videos of water vortices, smoke rings or plasma rings. Energy is packed into a small volume and moves from one point to another with losses kept to a minimum. The amount of energy transported being somewhat independent of the size of vortex or speed of movement.
Ring vortices can merge together or bifurcate. They will appear wherever the conductive environment is suitable. They can transport energy along existing conduits such as nerves and will create temporary conduits (e.g. microtubules) where necessary, leaving them to be dismantled after use.
Gibbs energy
Gibbs energy or ‘free’ energy is assumed to be thermodynamic and hence dissipative in nature, but at the same time responsible for all manner of reactions which surely require precise accumulation of energy at specific points in the cell.
A better way to think about free energy then is to imagine an environment dominated by a complex vortex structure similar to the solar surface (Fig. 1) where energy is free to move between the vortices in a manner similar to that of a flowing river.
The energy is ‘free’ but organised, it will flow with the vortex structure and will tend to attain some state of dynamic equilibrium. A deficit of energy in one place will soon be remedied as energy flows in from somewhere else but the overall vortex structure will be maintained. Half of the work of energy regulation within living systems is already accomplished at the fundamental base level of physical reality.
The laws of electrodynamics, as opposed to the fantasy of thermodynamics, will prevail and there is an organisation and accumulation of energy as opposed to dissipation and disorder.
ADP/ATP
Prof. Konstantin Meyl presents a good argument to the effect that the rotation of the phosphate groups in ADP is powered by electrical vortex energy. The vortices are present in inhaled oxygen, enter the bloodstream via the lungs and energise the ADP therein.
The ADP travels through the arteries to the capillaries and into the lungs where it is released to provide energy for the mitochondria. There is no need for any gaseous transfer to take place across the lining of the lungs. See: Do we breathe oxygen?
Hexagonal ringmolecules
Again from Konstantin Meyl, comes the idea that the hexagonal structures found on many bio-molecules (chlorophyll) can act as field-energy accumulators. Vortex energy spirals around and is captured by the ring structure to form a strong ring vortex that moves with the molecule.
The vortex will have both electrical and magnetic components, allowing for a variety of possible behaviours.
For bio-chemistry to function as observed, we require some sort of mechanisms to assemble and align molecules, to accumulate energy and to release it as required for reactions to take place.
According to Meyl, there is not sufficient energy in an ultraviolet photon to do what is claimed but what happens instead is that energy accumulates around the ‘head’ of the chlorophyll molecule until some threshold is reached, whereupon it is released and travels to where it is needed. The transport mechanism is so efficient that physicists have assumed some sort of quantum-superconductivity to explain it but it seems that energy transport via ring vortices might be sufficient.
Enzyme reactions
Enzyme reactions are puzzling. Sometimes they react and sometimes they don’t. Reactions in a laboratory are different from reactions in vivo. The application of heat seems to speed up reactions. Sometimes acidity affects the reaction rate.
Hypothesised mechanisms include receptors, binding sites and catalysts but no description of their mechanisms is given in terms of any sort of fundamental laws; what is a receptor made of for example?
For two molecules to bind together some ‘long range’ attractive force is necessary to draw them near to each other along with sufficient energy to overcome some sort of barrier of ‘potential’.
Mainstream theory of kinetic gases has molecules bumping into each other to supply the movement and energy but this doesn’t explain all the effects seen. Van der Waals forces arise from the fixed properties of the atomic structure and should not be varying with the environment.
Hypothesis: Bio-molecules contain hexagonal ring structures which promote the construction of electromagnetic ring vortices. These act both as energy accumulators and magnetic dipoles and add an extra layer of complexity to molecular interaction.
Magnetic forces exert long range attraction, pulling molecules together and orienting them correctly. The potential barrier is overcome and the whole arrangement settles to a new, stable, low-energy state. There is likely some surplus energy now and this simply diffuses away into the general vortex matrix as ‘heat’ or maybe transduces to infrared light.
The application of heat to the system is a way of adding energy to these ring vortices and will speed up reactions in general. A catalyst is a way of introducing both extra energy and additional organisational forces into the reaction. Energy accumulates on the catalyst and is used for the reaction but the molecule stays intact. The catalyst is not physically destroyed but is now a bit low on energy. It will, however, continue to accumulate energy in order to to re-fuel for the next interaction.
Rates of enzyme and other reactions seem to vary considerably with season, lunar cycles and eclipses as recorded by Simon Shnoll and Giorgio Piccardi. These are a hitherto unexplained phenomena.
Energy accumulation is in part from vortex transfer (heat), in part from infra-red absorption and in part from the solar neutrino stream. Neutrino density increases by a huge factor during eclipses and so the effects seen by Shnoll and Piccardi are now to be commonly expected. Stirring a solution is merely a way of adding extra vortex energy by kinetic means.
If the body or cell can control energy input to the reaction then the speed and possibly the ‘nature’ of the reaction can be controlled on a highly localised basis.
This scheme adds an extra layer of complexity to the Van der Waals forces that is actually independent of such forces, decoupled from the atomic structure and whose strength varies over time according to both ambient conditions and cosmic cycles. The addition of magnetic dipoles seems to be an adequate explanation for the mechanism of the various receptors, inhibitors etc.
Protein construction
Proteins are complex molecules with well defined functions in biological systems. Construction is said to be via gene expression and once constructed the completed molecule needs to be folded precisely or else the whole chain is ‘dismantled’ and the whole process starts over. Initial creation is said to be impossible by ‘chance’ thereby giving encouragement to the intelligent design lobby. Some proteins only have a lifespan of about 10 minutes before, again, they are ‘dismantled’.
So many unanswered questions here.
Assume that a protein starts off as some sort of ‘seed’ whether it be a physical molecule or an electrical eddy current (field vortex). Energy spirals inwards from the ambient electric field and adds to the vortex. Amino acids are sucked in or created on the spot from vortex energy. The whole molecule is assembled via the laws of physics, the precise nature of the vortex and the specific mix of ingredients in the local environment.
The completed molecule folds according to a least energy pathway and a complex field vortex forms at the centre. This vortex continues to accumulate energy and acts as a power source for various cellular processes.
The basic function of any bio-molecule is to transduce energy from the ambient vortex field into something that can be used by the other molecules. Energy is absorbed, accumulated, transduced and dissipated.
An incorrectly folded protein may absorb an indefinite amount of energy without sufficient dissipation and will therefore self-destruct. Proteins with short lifespans similarly do not need to be destroyed by the cell itself but will disintegrate when overloaded with energy. If these molecules are to be dismantled by external means then surely some sort of timer is required, meaning an additional complication, an additional mechanism to be explained.
The same may be true of some toxins; they simply continue to accumulate energy until the molecules or even atoms break down completely.
Bio-molecular evolution is hastened by self-selection, meaning that unsuitable molecular chains will self-destruct on the spot and any cellular environment that does not promote and appropriate energy flux will not survive to reproduce anything. There is no need for billions of years of randomness and selection and no process is truly random but always according to the laws of physics and within an environment of a continual flux of vortex energy.
A correctly formed protein will be able to dissipate energy at the same rate at which it is absorbed and it is up to the rest of the cell to make use of this energy in whatever form it is presented. Pulsed energy may be used in enzyme reactions. Enclosing vortex fields may be used for transport of other resources or assistance in maintaining ion gradients. Completed proteins may accumulate further energy and emit more complex structures to be interpreted as ‘information’.
Properties unexplained by molecular structure
An AI engine gives a list of phenomena that are not fully explained by the ordering of atoms within the molecule. They require something else, an electric field of some sort:
Protein folding
Enzyme activity
DNA replication
Delocalisation of electrons
Electrical conductivity
Light absorption
Binding of a drug to a receptor
Recognition of a substrate by an enzyme
Other molecule-specific interactions
Biological transmutation
Louis Kervran (right) performed many experiments showing that the mineral output of many living organisms did not match the input, leading to the inescapable conclusion that living beings are somehow able to transmute elements from one to another according to their own needs.
Chickens raised on land containing no calcium were able to grow, maintain a skeleton and lay eggs with hard shells. The chicks hatching from such eggs contained more calcium than was in the egg in the first place and suffered no health issues. Calcium has been manufactured from some other element.
Manual workers in the Sahara sweated out more potassium than they consumed but the amount was consistent with the volume of sodium ingested, thereby suggesting that they had transmuted elemental sodium into potassium. Energy was sequestered in the new molecule and excreted from the body thereby providing an additional cooling mechanism. Restricting sodium input led to heatstroke.
Whatever the details of the transmutation of elements, such a process is going to need considerable energy and, moreover, that energy must be carefully controlled and localised if it it not going to destroy a whole chicken.
The idea of an electromagnetic vortex fits the requirement (Meyl). Energy accumulates and localises at the centre of the vortex. This energy becomes highly concentrated at a small scale and when individual ions are drawn in to the whirlpool they become destabilised according to the high field strength, thus allowing the splitting apart or joining together of elements at the atomic level.
Blood flow
The book “The Heart and Circulation” by Branko Furst (right) summarises over 100 years of research into the nature of blood flow and concludes that the idea of a heart as a pressure pump is inconsistent with reality. The blood is not pushed around by the heart but instead moves with its own motivational force and according to the metabolic needs of the body.
Nobody has worked out how this happens or where the energy comes from so it is time to go back to the basics of physics and consider how the electromagnetic forces (there are no other) within the blood can somehow be utilised to provide sufficient kinetic energy to maintain a decent flow.
In a paper from Alexander Morozov, ATP and other biological substances were added to water and the solution placed into square channels of various dimensions. The water was seen to self-organise first into a collection of vortices as shown and second into a self-sustaining directional flow along the tube.
Now self-organisation is by the laws of electromagnetism, but there is still the need for a regular supply of energy. Suggestions for sources include:
Popular images show a toroidal electromagnetic field surrounding the body which is measurable for a distance of about five feet away from the body and is assumed to be created by, and emanate from, the heart and other energy centres such as the brain, liver etc. This is hard to verify but sounds ‘likely’.
An electromagnetic field is claimed to be produced by the action of the heart and makes its way largely unscathed through the highly charged mass of muscle and bone to somehow form a torus around the body. The field is so strong as to be measurable several feet away from the body and to be able to affect the heart rate of other people within the proximity.
The heart is already at a temperature close to which its proteins will denature but can cope with manual labour in Sahara heat without cooking and still generate enough spare energy to create such a field.
Alternative hypothesis: The observed external biofield is the organisation of already existing external energy which may radiate or may even spiral inwards towards the body. Energy moves inwards but information moves outwards. The internal bio-field is organised as a general toroidal vortex at all scales. Each cell hosts an electromagnetic vortex and generates its own electric field. Energy moves between the cells in the general pattern of a torus.
Energy can spiral outwards to release excess or can spiral inwards towards various vortex centres (Chakras) as a de facto power supply. Increased muscular exertion increases the energy production, increases energy supply towards the heart and also increases vortex transfer outwards as heat loss.
A field is measured outside of the body and is assumed to be radiating outwards from the heart in accordance with traditional beliefs regarding such fields, but the principles of vortex physics allow for different interpretations.
We live between the twin capacitor plates of the Earth’s surface and our ionosphere and as such are surrounded by a continuous stream of electrical discharge in the form of field vortices. These vortices have a tendency to self-organise into larger (or smaller) vortices and will respond to the presence of a human body the way a river might respond to a small pebble or a frond of weed.
The field surrounding the body may therefore be explained, not by the radiation of a generated bio-field but by the organisation of an existing field according to the presence of the body. This field may be ‘static’ but attached to the body or may actually spiral inwards towards the body, thereby providing an additional energy supply.
Once energy has entered the body it is subject to the highly organised conditions within the body but the general laws of physics still apply. We can envisage the energy flow within the body as comprising a general vortex pattern which moves inwards towards the ‘chakras’ whilst self-organising into a cellular structure within the tissues. Each cell maintains and is maintained by, its own vortex, with the nucleus at the centre. Within this structure forms smaller and smaller energy vortices right down to the scale of an electron, itself an electromagnetic vortex (Meyl – Scalar Waves..).
The heartbeat can be detected in the modulations of the external bio-field, giving the impression that the energy is being emitted from the heart but this is not necessarily the case. It is quite possible for the energy to be actually spiralling inwards towards the body whilst information ripples outwards, using the field itself as a ‘carrier’.
Watch a stable vortex in a stream. The water spirals inwards but toss a pebble near the centre and ripples (information) will still travel outwards, against the vortex flow.
Whatever the requirements of a biological field, it must nevertheless contend with the basic laws of electrodynamics and these necessitate dynamic electromagnetic vortex structures. Energy supply and regulation has vortex movement as its fundamental basis.
The vortex principle
The diagram below comes from the paper: “About vortex physics and vortex losses” from Konstantin Meyl and illustrates the structure of a typical vortex.
Think about a tornado in air or a whirlpool in water. Water spirals inwards to reach a maximum velocity at the vortex radius (shown here as a circle). This radius is clearly visible in the case of a tornado.
Outside the radius, the speed and energy diminish according to some approximate inverse square law shown here as a curve dependent upon ‘R’ (radius).
Konstantin Meyl: About Vortex Physics
Inside the vortex, the energy gradient is linear and again dependent upon radius. Water or air will spin and will want to spiral outwards according to centrifugal force but will be prevented from doing so by the inward spiralling matter.
When the centrifugal force is balanced precisely by the centripetal force a stable dynamic structure forms and is visible as the vortex radius. The velocity at the centre of the vortex is always precisely zero; there is no theoretical possibility here of an infinite singularity such as a big bang or black hole.
If energy could be extracted from the centre of the vortex then that would merely allow for more energy to enter from the outside and presumably the converse would be the case; additional energy would dissipate outwards and again a norm is restored. Strength and stability at the centre are maintained by means of the accretion and dissipation of an effectively inexhaustible energy supply made available to the system by means of centripetal accumulation.
We have an example then of what might be termed ‘order from chaos’. A geometric structure with a self-regulating energy system has been created purely from the laws of physics with no need for any other informational input. The structure is stable to perturbations and yet at the same time mutable and adaptable to environmental forces. This is a contradiction of the general ideas of ‘entropy’ put forth by mainstream science.
A well defined shape with a tendency to accumulate and stabilise energy into a functional gradient is used as the basis for larger self-organising forms i.e. ‘Life’.
The basic vortex above is given by Meyl but more complex structures are known to cosmologists in the form of Birkeland Currents which show multiple concentric layers with alternating clockwise and anti-clockwise flows. [D. Scott]
Scalar waves
Electromagnetic fields can take various forms. Of relevance to biological systems are the magnetic scalar waves as described by Konstantin Meyl and below.
First a reminder of the structure of a ring vortex. In the diagram below an electric field in pink circumnavigates the axis whilst a magnetic field in yellow forms a magnet-like structure with a North-South dipole pointing up and down.
The magnetic field movement here is greater than the electric and so this formation is favoured whenever the magnetic conductivity is more than the electric i.e. in electric insulators.
In the top diagram below, several such structures have aligned along the magnetic dipole field, have self-organised into an even spacing and have merged somewhat to form a longitudinal wave: a scalar wave.
The lower diagram shows how this wave may propagate inside a co-axial cable, a wire with insulating sheath or a nerve with myelin sheath. The ring propagates in the less conductive sheath surrounding the central core.
Konstantin Meyl: Scalar waves: A first Tesla physics textbook
Both energy and information are transmitted by this means, energy by the ‘potential’ of a scalar wave and information by some unknown modulation of its structure. The ring itself represents a potential difference that can be used as energy at the destination.
The regular spacing of the vortices create a de facto ‘frequency’ and the nodes of Ranvier separating the neural axons control the transmission of impulses to create an electromagnetic standing wave akin to a vibrating guitar string.
Transmission of information is now by modulation of a ‘static’ electromagnetic field structure. There is no need for a moving wave structure as with photons and no need for a stream of moving electrons as is assumed for electric currents. A carrier wave has been established but does not travel and transmission of information is not by frequency modulation.
A messaging system has been established where field movement is minimal, resistance is negligible and energy loss is almost zero; we have a kind of biological-informational super-conductivity.
Morphogenesis
The central problem of morphogenesis is how an organism attains its final form merely from the actions of molecules. This is a conundrum and remains so even if we add in all the remaining known laws of physics. Elements are attracted directly towards each other or repelled away from each other, energy is dissipated and entropy increases, but there is no sense of ‘form’, ‘construction’ or ‘stability’ apart from the basic arrangements of atoms and molecules.
The addition of the concept of a vortex makes a huge difference; we now have a basic shape in the form of a sphere or helix, we have an inward and regulated movement of matter and energy and the existence of constructive forces at the molecular level.
A general vortex field will self-assemble into a cellular collective and communication between cells causes the emergence of a local bio-field that can be further organised to create a final form. See: Bio-field emergence
The heart: Helical streams of blood in the heart are instrumental in forming the shape of the heart itself. If the spiral flow is interrupted, the heart will not form. [Lucitti et al]
Cells: Each cell hosts an electromagnetic vortex with the nucleus at the centre. Energy is accumulated until there is sufficient for reproduction to take place. The field at the periphery of a cell, where it meets another vortex has distinctive properties of its own (e.g. large field gradient) which initiate the formation of some sort of membrane.
Red blood cells: The RBC are the embodiment of a torus of electrical vortex flow; the energy field likely preceded the physical shape and acted as a template for its formation. Purcell et al
Vortices are said to form ideally in the proportions of the golden mean (Meyl) and red blood cells are in the same proportion in their healthy state. Deviations from this ideal lead to clumping, Rouleaux formation and impaired zeta potential. Purcell (2)
Nerves: See the zebra fish video above; the nerves develop from the ring vortices that they will eventually conduct.
Arteries: The blood circulates before the arteries emerge, arriving at some least energy route much the same as a river forms its own path to the sea. Thereafter, the flow of the blood forms an enclosing ring vortex and arterial tissue emerges to create the familiar tubular structure.
The brain: is an obvious double torus shape and toroidal fields have been described within.
Fingerprints: The whorls at the end of our fingers look like an emergent effect of some sort of vortex flow.
A physical being then is a refinement of a vortex collective, a teleological modulation of the emergent properties of a vortex field.
Sensory input
The sense of smell: Assumed to be the detection of chemicals in the air, but how does this work? How is molecular detection achieved and how is this converted to a nerve impulse to be transmitted to the brain? The sense of smell is by detection of field vortices (Meyl). Such vortices are produced by the scented material, fly through the air by field propagation and enter the nose. Nasal hairs act as antennae and convert the field disturbances to ring vortices which propagate along the hair to the olfactory nerve and proceed unmodulated to the brain for processing.
The sense of taste: This is similar to the sense of smell except that information enters the small hairs on the tongue (Meyl)
Vision: Photons enter the eye, morph to ring vortices and propagate along the rods and cones. They are filtered for frequency and collated at the optic nerve for further processing before moving along the nerve to the brain.
The binding problem
“The unity of consciousness and (cognitive) binding problem is the problem of how objects, background, and abstract or emotional features are combined into a single experience. The binding problem refers to the overall encoding of our brain circuits for the combination of decisions, actions, and perception.” – Wikipedia
Quite, how are experiences of fundamentally different categories merged together to make a single experience and what is an ‘experience’?
Statements above suggest that the sense of smell is just the input of scalar waves or ring vortices direct to the brain whilst visual impulses are similar structures but modified by the optic nerve. Proprioceptive impulses travel along nerves in the form of scalar waves whilst the geometry and electrical properties of the brain further suggest operation via toroidal electric fields.
Meyl states simply that “the brain is a scalar wave computer” and a stable toroidal ring vortex is surely a good candidate for memory storage, so we have both memory and computation performed by the same structure.
The binding problem is now simplified greatly. We no longer have fundamentally different physical categories of perception to merge together as all perceptual and cognitive information is now in the same format, namely a toroidal electric field complex.
The question is now merely “How do we amalgamate a bunch of ring vortices?”.
One simple answer is to simply push them together. They at least now have the property that such a thing is possible. Again, watch ring vortices in water and you can see them divide into two, merge together, pass through each other or sit side by side whilst maintaining independence from each other.
If olfactory impulses can be somehow labelled as such whilst travelling from the nose and likewise for the other senses then we can imagine that all sensory information can be held on a single vortex structure and interpreted in the brain unambiguously at a later stage.
A single vortex structure holds a single holistic impression and persists as a single memory. The physical vortex can be shrunk to an arbitrarily small size for storage and amplified back up later on for recall.
Defective interpretation (or maybe defective labelling) results in synaesthesia.
The morphology of fruit
Why are fruit the shaped the way that they are? To a large extent an apple, say, is just a bag that expands by filling up with water but that does not explain the presence or location of seeds or the wide variety of shape in other fruits.
The general principles of biological development seem to be:
The basic for development of form is the vortex
Vortices self-organise to form cellular clusters
Emergent properties of such clusters are controlled via a supervening bio-field
Energy is conducted along suitable conduits via ring vortices
In the case of an apple, these principles are easily apparent. Each cell is likely an electromagnetic vortex and these self-assemble into an overall spherical vortex to form the general shape of the apple.
The stalk of the apple is likely wet and conductive on the inside and drier and less conductive on the outside. This is a similar arrangement to an insulated wire or a myelin sheath of a nerve and is ideal for the conduction of ring vortices.
Energy is absorbed in the leaf via the ring molecules of chlorophyll and transmitted alone the conduits of the veins in the leaf in the form of ring vortices. Two such rings meeting at a confluence will easily merge to form a larger, more energetic ring which continues into the leaf stem and eventually to the woody material.
Some energy makes it to the trunk of the tree and is instrumental in raising the sap to heights hitherto unexplained by capillary action alone.
Some energy makes it through the stem of the fruit to enable the necessary production of sugars etc.
An overall vortex flow helps control the shape of the growing apple and some energy discontinuity tells it where to manufacture the tissue to form a skin. Other energy spirals inwards to concentrate at the centre of the apple where the flow breaks down into several smaller vortices to supply the energy and information required for the formation of the seeds.
A strawberry has a clear vortex structure at its centre. Energy is transmitted as a ring vortex along the stalk and then discharged from the cone-like vortex through visible filaments to supply individual seeds with energy.
Similar arguments apply to blackberries etc. where the fruit as a whole can be seen as an energy distribution system, concentrating energy via the vortex principle into the valuable seeds and thereby ensuring a new generation of plants.
As for oranges, compare Meyl’s drawing of the electron shell of Neon with the arrangements of segments in an orange. Electrons are the simplest form of field vortex and have arranged themselves in alternate polarity with clockwise spinning electrons nested between two with anti-clockwise spin.
An even number of electrons is mandatory for stability and with oranges we find that an even number of segments is preferred but not strictly necessary.
Konstantin Meyl
When things ‘go wrong’ with the formation of an orange, we do not see complete chaos but instead a cellular order is preserved. The basic laws of vortex physics are still in force and segmentation still occurs as a foundational phenomenon but has not been organised effectively by the supervening bio-field.
This is more evidence that morphogenesis is accomplished by a subtle ‘tweaking’ of the more basic properties of cellular structures i.e. those that arise out of simple emergence.
The emergent properties are robust and closely aligned to the Laws of Physics. However, they are organised by what might be termed subtle energies whose laws will likely remain a mystery for a long time, as the only effective way to decipher such forces is by observing their effect on the emergent properties of biological systems that they themselves were designed to organise. This is the only environment in which they may gain meaningful expression.
To study morphogenesis then, look for cellular organisation via vortices and study what happens when it goes wrong.
A general principle of biological organisation
The patterns mentioned above seem to be repeated again and again.
A supervening biofield acts, not directly upon the physical matter of the cells but instead on some other emergent field that arises from the self-organisation of the local cellular fields.
The cells themselves emerge from and are maintained by, the forces arising from electromagnetic vortices. It is these strong forces that interact with the biological matter to form physical bonds and tissues.
The fields organising such cells must themselves form an emergent biofield that presents a receptive interface or antenna to higher order fields thereby enabling a top-down organisation to take place.
Connection to the cosmos
We are regulated by electromagnetic vortex fields and we live between the twin capacitor plates of the Earth’s surface and the ionosphere It is therefore pertinent to ask as to the nature of the electric field between these plates. Conventional wisdom declares that a uniform field exists together with a slow steady discharge of electric current.
The image below, however, suggests otherwise. A capacitor has been set up and left to discharge for 40 hours. A circular pattern results, suggesting that the discharge is of a helical nature and that a vortex field exists between the plates. Yializis et al
Meyl: About vortex physics and vortex losses
Scientists mapping data from radio telescopes are starting to find huge electric ring vortices in the atmosphere with ‘footprints’ at the Earth’s surface.
The vortices are part of the Earth’s magnetic field and as such can be expected to follow the same patterns of latitude and seasonality and to respond to solar magnetic disturbances in some way as energy from the sun impacts our magnetosphere and is absorbed, modulated or even amplified by these structures.
Many scientists have found links between cosmic events and biological metrics but have been puzzled as to the mechanism, thinking that somehow the orbits of the moon, Saturn or even Mercury are somehow be affecting life on Earth by exerting a gravitational influence on our constituent atoms.
More likely it is electromagnetic field disturbances which propagate through space, are received by field vortices in our atmosphere acting as antennae and make their way into our regulatory systems.
Frank Brown found that all forms of life would apparently synchronise their activity to rhythmic events in the cosmos but could not work out the mechanism. Various inbuilt phase responders are somehow sensitised to the orbital movements of the planets, will ‘resonate’ in step and will then trigger innate behavioural patterns such as feeding or mating.
Electromagnetic fields were suspected, but Brown’s work seems to be largely neglected by the scientific community, presumably because the lack of a credible mechanism causes them to distrust the actual results. However, the assumption of a structured vortex field regulating the body together with recent discoveries concerning the Earth’s magnetic field now make such phenomena seem completely natural, with only the details to be worked out.
Similarly, Simon Shnoll, Giorgio Piccardi and others found that quantifiable processes in biology, chemistry and physics varied with planetary alignments and phases of the moon.
Such connections to the cosmos are not always beneficial, however..
Implications for health and disease
Many diseases, even heart attacks, show seasonal variations: Seasonal disease. The epidemiology of influenza in particular has been well studied and found to demonstrate strong patterns associated with season, latitude and sudden changes in temperature, humidity and pressure.
This is a strong indication that the Earth’s magnetic field is somehow responsible for influencing the bio-field of the body and thereby contributing to the altered regulatory state that is described as ‘influenza’. See: Influenza and weather
When viewed from the perspective of electric fields, there is no clear separation between the bio-field of a human and that of the surrounding cosmos. Energy and ‘information’ travel seamlessly from the solar surface to the Earth’s magnetosphere and thence to individual organisms via a variety of energetic filaments and vortices.
The activity of such vortices shows stable seasonal and latitudinal patterns that are modulated by local weather events and as a consequence, disease appears in the population at a time and place that is somewhat predictable from meteorological data.
Researchers from NASA found that the appearance of influenza in each state coincided with precise changes in humidity (Serman et al) whilst researchers in India noted a coincidence with the onset of the rainy season (Parvaiz et al) and those in Myanmar found similar associations between dengue and the onset of the monsoon, (Zaw et al).
The influences seem to have little in common but all are expected as a pressure front approaches. Such phenomena are associated with changes in pressure, wind direction, helical updrafts of air and presumably the formation of electromagnetic field currents.
Electromagnetic vortices were set up in some metallic micro-discs and exposed to electromagnetic vibrations. State changes were observed, i.e. measurable changes in an electric field were induced by the application of another electromagnetic field.
So we now have a potentially useful way of measuring certain aspects of electric fields that may not be available to a traditional antenna. Set up an array of these vortices and see if we can measure fine modulations of the atmospheric discharge.
The array is calibrated to be hypersensitive to certain target frequencies but robust to the measurement frequencies. Vortices are set up close to some critical state and micro-changes in the ambient field will cause a sudden phase shift thereby amplifying the signal. Field modulations of arbitrary sensitivity may be set up depending upon the technology used.
Now if such mechanisms are in place in living systems, we have a biological antenna connecting the bio-filed with the cosmos with the capacity to detect arbitrarily weak signals and to amplify them to something meaningful.
Response strength of individual vortices is decoupled from input intensity to some degree by the critical phase shift, but a continuum of response may be available as an emergent statistical property. There is no need here for magnetite particles or similar to effect signal reception as the vortex field itself is the antenna.
The existence of such vortex fields may well be reflected in the physical matter, meaning there may be physical organelles set up which act as receivers, but we will have to know what to look for and how to measure.
The vortex is the transducer and is powered by an inward spiralling of the Gibbs field. Reception is via ‘vortex resonance’ which allows the filtering of selected frequencies.
The idea of magnetoreception by magnetic particles is problematic. A certain strength of signal will be required to move a molecule to a sufficient degree thereby imposing immediate limitations on what can be detected, and what happens then? A particle moves and induces a small (attenuated) change in the surrounding field (even mechanical waves here are really electro-acoustic) and then what? We are back to trying to detect the resulting field changes and now need some sort of antenna to measure them. We are back to square one!
Best to go straight for bio-field modulation and then try to work out the fine structure of such field.
Inheritance
Certainly some information is passed from father to child and so there is a requirement for a transport format for such information.
An electromagnetic ring vortex would seem to fit the bill. The basic structure is highly stable and energetically persistent and scalable. There is a simple method available to merge information from each parent, which is to simply merge the respective vortices. See: Evolution and Inheritance
The phenomenon of Telegony shows that information can be passed without DNA as a vehicle.
The exact encoding scheme of such information is not known but if we reject DNA as a format then we are not now limited to a few giga-bytes of data. There is no minimal quantum of information in electric fields and so a ring vortex can theoretically carry an arbitrarily large amount of analog information.
Summary
A hypothesis has been presented that an energetic bio-field is responsible for the organisation and regulation of many, if not most, biological processes and that this bio-field is in the form of electromagnetic vortices.
The theoretical existence of such vortices is here merely assumed but adequate support can be found in the works of Professor Konstantin Meyl. Some evidence is presented here for the presence of such vortices in the Earth’s atmosphere and in laboratory experiments. (also Peng)
Vortex fields are not ‘directly’ measurable within biological systems using current scientific instruments beyond a crude representation as an electric current. However, existence of such a field is consistent with multiple observable phenomena which are currently unexplained by modern science and whose presence in many cases seems unlikely to be understood in terms of the interactions of molecules alone:
The general organisation of biological systems
Existence of suitable conduits for ring vortices
A requirement for centripetal movement of energy within living systems
Vortices in arterial blood flow
The emergence and self-organisation of cellular masses
A measurable bio-field external to the human body
The efficiency of energy transfer within biological systems
A video of the development of a nervous system from scratch
Obvious vortex patterns reflected in morphology
The hypothesised transmutation of elements from one to another
The recognition that some organisational principle must exist independently of the material it organises and prior to the act of that organisation. This is true for general maintenance, embryonic development and the actual origins of Life.
These phenomena seem adequately explained merely by the recognition of the vortex principle in electromagnetic fields. Aside from this there is no need for additional exotica such as quantum coherent domains, cold vortices, extra dimensions, quantum entanglement, randomly vibrating molecules, multiple universes or separate realms consiting entirley of ‘consciousness’.
There is no need for abstract definitions of disorder as ‘entropy’ or of order as ‘negentropy’ and no need for a formulation of information as separate from the rest of physical space. Indeed, Konstantin Meyl has stated: “Information is the structure of a scalar wave“.
We can look forward to a return to just Plain Old Physics as a way of understanding the physical universe.
Potential vortex, newly discovered properties of the electric field are fundamentally changing our view of the physical world – Konstantin Meyl https://www.meyl.eu/go/indexb830.html
Local modulation of neurofilament phosphorylation, axonal caliber, and slow axonal transport by myelinating Schwann cells – de Waegh, Brady https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1371237/
Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis Authors: Jay R Hove 1, Reinhard W Köster, Arian S Forouhar, Gabriel Acevedo-Bolton, Scott E Fraser, Morteza Gharib https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12520305/
An argument is presented that the absence of a heartbeat does not necessarily imply an absence of circulation and that given appropriate energetic input, the heart may be persuaded to start beating again and a body may come back to life. Accounts of cosmic events support the hypothesis.
There is a great deal of scepticism surrounding the idea that a man, once pronounced dead, could come back to life at some time later. This is largely owing to the idea that the stopping of a heart is synonymous with cessation of circulation and that this leads inevitably to a rapid and irreversible state of death.
However, the heart is not the main driver of circulation, it is not a pressure pump (The Heart is not a Pump) and the main impetus for the blood flow comes from the capillary beds according to many researchers. See: The Heart and Circulation.
Circulation continues after cardiac arrest
“S A Thompson showed that in asphyxiated dogs, residual circulation continued for up to two hours after cardiac arrest, Other research has shown 20% to 40% increases in cardiac output after occlusion of thoracic aorta” – Branko Furst
“The blood in chick embryos is seen to be circulating before the heart has been formed and vortices are observed in the blood in between pulses.” – Furst
“When the heart (of a chick embryo) was stopped, blood continued to flow for approximately 50 minutes, albeit at a lower velocity. When IR was introduced, the post-mortem flow increased..” – Li, Pollack
Galvanic energy
Somewhere way back on my Twitter feed is a photocopy of a page in a book written by some Victorian scientist who took recently deceased bodies from a morgue and drained the blood from them. The blood was re-vitalised by the introduction of galvanic energy and then replaced into the body. The blood started to flow by itself, the heart would restart and the bodies would exhibit muscle movement.
Given what I now know about the blood and circulation, I am now prepared to believe that such a thing is possible. However, it isn’t the galvanic energy that causes the blood to flow but the infusion of blood which creates the vortices necessary for propulsion. The flow of blood is causes the heart to start beating again.
Vortex flow hypothesis
Many researchers have come to the eventual conclusion that it is not the heart that is pumping the blood at all but that the ‘blood moves under its own momentum‘ (The Heart and Circulation) or some such phrase. This seems outlandish, but then so are the circumstances.
The phenomenon of vortices is repeatedly mentioned in connection with the flow of blood but the importance of this does not seem to have been appreciated.
The hypothesis here then is that the blood is moved by the generation of powerful energetic vortex structures which propel the fluid around the circulatory system and that the resulting flow is actually instrumental in causing the heart itself to beat.
The vortex structures have an electrical component and are able to absorb energy from the environment as a power source. This energy may include: electric field energy, heat, Gibbs energy and the energy from the solar neutrino stream.
The vortices are generated in the capillary beds but are starting to deteriorate by the time they get to the heart. It is here that they are re-organised by the spiral flow of the heart into the geometric structures conducive to efficient, almost friction-free flow.
In this paper some ATP and other biological substances were added to water and the solution placed into square channels of various dimensions.
The water was seen to self-organise first into a collection of vortices as shown and second into a self-sustaining directional flow along the tube.
This begs the question: “Where does the energy come from to sustain such a flow?”
One idea is that the ambient heat is translated to a vortex structure and in this way contributes to such a flow.
Another idea comes from Konstantin Meyl in his book “Scalar Waves: a first Tesla physics handbook”. Meyl suggests that the vortex structures are capable of absorbing the occasional passing neutrino and transducing them to vortex energy within the water.
The hypothesis then is that during crucifixion the heart stopped and life signs diminished considerably, but irreversible death had not yet occurred and there was still some circulation of blood driven by the vortices from the capillary beds.
Possibly movement of the body and the change from vertical to horizontal posture caused blood movement which created more vortices which increased blood flow through the heart, causing a gentle pulsating maybe.
A sudden addition to the energetic input from an increase in intensity of the solar neutrino stream further promotes blood flow and the heart begins to beat in earnest again. Life signs improve and normal functioning is resumed.
Eclipses and the solar neutrino stream
How could this come about? Konstantin Meyl is claiming that during an eclipse, the Earth acts as a lens and neutrino density on parts of the planet increase by a factor of 20,000! We should therefore be looking for evidence of a solar eclipse.
“Scalar waves..” – Konstantin Meyl
It turns out that there are plenty of references in the Bible itself that support this idea:
In Luke 23:44-45 of the New American Bible Revised Edition — the Bible translation heard at U.S. Catholic Masses — the verses explicitly refer to a solar eclipse preceding Jesus’ death: “It was now about noon and darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon because of an eclipse of the sun.”
Both the New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition and the New Jerusalem Bible — EWTN founder Mother Angelica’s favorite teaching Bible — simply state “the sun’s light failed.”
The Contemporary English Version — a New Testament translation approved by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops — declares, “The sun stopped shining.”
The Douay-Rheims version of the New Testament — published in 1582 and used for centuries by English-speaking Catholics — asserts “the sun was darkened.”
Electrical voltage is commonly thought of by analogy with water in a pipe as a sort of electrical pressure that pumps electrons through a wire. This page puts the argument that a better explanation is to be found by imagining a river flowing downstream pulled by the force of gravity.
Water can be made to flow in at least two ways:
Pressure ‘pushes’ the water from behind. Energy is transferred along the pipe from some source to each section of water which is pushed along by a physical force. Water moves down the pressure gradient from high to low pressure. Removal of the pressure source causes all the flow to stop, with the effect moving at the speed of sound.
Gravity pulls water downstream. In this case each section of water is moved by local forces only and the behaviour of upstream water is irrelevant to the downstream flow. Flow can be stopped by damming up the river but the ‘effect’ here travels downstream at the speed of the flow as opposed to the speed of sound.
There are subtle differences between these two, but which is more appropriate for the flow of electricity? The first is the commonly described mechanism but the second is more consistent with reality.
The pressure analogy
A search for “what is voltage Harvard science” gets me the following results:
“The force that makes electricity flow; the unit of measure of electric potential” – Harvard Electricity Policy Group – voltage is a force?
“Voltage is the force that makes electrons flow, or the difference in potential energy between two points in a circuit.” – ambiguous: is it a local force or a global difference?
“Voltage is measured in volts with a voltmeter.” – voltmeters actually measure current; voltage is calculated not measured.
“Voltage is the pressure from a power source that pushes charged electrons through a conducting loop.” – No, see here: What is electricity?
“The force of an electrical current that is measured in volts” – Encyclopaedia Brittanica
This is about as confused as it gets. Is voltage a local ‘force’ that pushes electrons around or is it some pressure difference between two distant points? Does a local force arise from a pressure difference and if so, how?
Voltage is not measured in the same units as force and is hence not a force.
The last in the list reads: “Voltage is the pressure from a power source..” which implies that there is such a thing as (electrical) ‘pressure’ which originates from a ‘source’ and can presumably be transmitted along a wire to affect distant particles. This really needs some justification.
Such statements are easily accepted as true whilst we have in our minds the analogy of water pressure, but such an analogy is simply not valid. In the case of water we know that there is such a thing as ‘pressure’ as we can measure such a thing; a small balloon can be inserted into a pipe and the pressure measured at any place in the flow to give a local pressure reading.
The same procedure cannot be carried out with voltage and this is reinforced by many sources describing voltage as a potential difference between two points. Voltage cannot be measured and isn’t even defined at a single point, only as a difference between two points.
Again, this sounds reasonable until you try to think about it: if voltage is always expressed as a difference then what are the quantities that give rise to such a difference and how do we know they exist? After all we only ever measure one quantity and we conclude the existence of two!
A voltmeter only ever gives one reading and only ever measures what happens inside the voltmeter anyhow; everything else is inferred via the theory.
The flow analogy
In the case of a river flowing downstream, there is no pressure pushing the water from behind, no impact of upstream water on downstream flow. Instead the water moves according to only local (gravitational forces) with each segment having its own ‘power supply’. Local pressure is actually measurable here and remains uniform, close to atmospheric pressure and has little influence on the flow.
Imagine, then, if we did not know about gravity but merely observed ‘flow’ with no apparent driving force; what a tangled web of reasoning we would weave!
The default view of the universe is one of stasis or maybe uniform movement until some force perturbs this and causes a change in such a state. This view has been applied to electricity and the idea adopted that there can be no energy transfer without a motivational force. The resulting framework is a muddled mess.
Hypothesis: Electricity is the flow of electrical field vortices as described by Konstantin Meyl. They have their own intrinsic energy and are hence capable of self-propulsion through a conductive medium. Movement is according to local forces only. They are shaped like ring vortices in electrical wires with most energy carried in the insulating cable. What is electricity?
The vortices carry their energy from A to B and it is the same energy that is used to self-propel along the wire. ‘Resistance’ leads to a loss of energy transmitted and this is dissipated as ‘heat’.
Voltmeters only measure current (flow) and a loss of vortex energy along a wire will be interpreted as a voltage gradient.
Moving electrons have nothing to do with this and are never measured.
Resistors in series
Placing a resistor in a circuit is akin to placing a dam in a stream. Pressure builds up and some water is lost through evaporation or heat in the case of electricity. Overall flow is thus reduced in proportion to energy loss. Electric vortices build up an analogous pressure when entering a resistive material.
Measuring voltage across different resistors gives the expected result. A voltmeter has a large resistance and current will prefer to flow through a bare wire, but place a voltmeter across a resistor and the current will develop a preference for flowing through the voltmeter, leading to increased current within the meter and a consequent increase in the measured voltage.
The voltage has actually been created by the resistance. The voltage is not driving the current but is a consequence of its impedance, much as the pressure behind a dam is the consequence of the flow and not the cause of it.
So which is it?
Tricky. The two theories give similar predictions for different reasons but there are some differences:
Flow geometry. The idea that energy flows in ring vortices predicts certain preferential flow geometries with the magnetic component of the flow thriving in the insulator surrounding a wire and the electrical component moving within the copper core.
This is supported (What is electricity?) by the observations that under-sea cables with too thin an insulating sheath did not perform well at all and by the discovery that the conduction of nerve signals improves with the thickness the myelin sheath surrounding the nerve.
Circular currents. Circular or toroidal currents are reported in living systems (e.g. around the red blood cells) and also in space where they can span distances of many light years (Thunderbolts Project).
This is consistent and natural with vortex theory where the laws of electromagnetism mandate movement of electric fields at right angles to the magnetic component. The field moves under its own steam with helices and toruses being the order of the day.
But how does this happen where a voltage is required to move the electrons and where there is no copper conductor to guide the current? What is the voltage measured from start to finish of this current? On the one hand it must be fairy large to push the current all the way around but on the other the start point is the same as the end point and so the start and end voltages are the same! There is therefore zero voltage drop!
Wikipedia
Wikipedia gives a slightly different definition of voltage. We have:
“Voltage, also known as (electrical) potential difference, electric pressure, or electric tension is the difference in electric potential between two points“
“Electric potential is defined as the amount of work/energy needed per unit of electric charge to move the charge from a reference point to a specific point in an electric field.”
So the idea of ‘pressure’ is preserved but is somewhat contradicted by the second sentence which introduces the idea of movement between two points and the energy required to accomplish this. Electrical ‘pressure’ is not defined at a single point as with water but only by some movement between two points , one of which is arbitrary.
The idea of an electric field has been introduced and voltage is ‘work’ needed to move a charge within that field. This is interesting because previous definitions have defined voltage as the motivational force for moving the charge (electrons) in the first place whereas here it seems to be defined by some other external (hypothetical) force moving the charge against the field gradient.
A charge will move within an electric field anyhow because of electric forces but this does not seem to constitute ‘voltage’.
So which is it? Is voltage a motivational electric field or is it the effort to move charge against such a field.
Further reading does nothing to clarify matters and only adds to the confusion. The Talk Page makes matters even worse with everybody having different opinions on what is going on but with some agreement on the following statement:
“This article is excessively technical. While all the math is relevant in a higher-level mathematical context, to the everyday reader, this article is almost completely useless.“
The river flow analogy revisited
Consider the idea of moving a wooden log upstream as an analogy of moving a charged particle. It requires a degree of ‘work’, of ‘energy’ as the movement opposes the flow and resistance is encountered.
The resistance and the energy required depend almost entirely on the flow characteristics, i.e. the current. In a lowland river, the work required is hardly a reflection of the height difference and nothing to do with any pressure drop.
Try to drag a log through water in a pipe with pressure driven flow and the resistance met is again entirely dependent upon current and has little to do with moving against the pressure.
Try reading Wikipedia again and it seems obvious now that they are using an inconsistent model and have needed to resort to increasingly abstract and unfalsifiable concepts (potential difference, reference points at infinity) to try to patch things together.
‘Potential’ at a point isn’t directly measurable in principle or practice; it has no absolute value at any point in space and cannot therefore be said to represent anything ‘real’. It only exists between separated points and so any real effect attributed to such a quantity is really a case of action at a distance.
So what is voltage?
If we start with something measurable and observable then we should begin by saying:
“Voltage is a measurement of current when a high resistance meter (voltmeter) is placed in parallel to a section of circuit”
This makes it absolutely clear that what is being measured is current, not ‘potential’ and raise the important question as to why different amounts of current will be captured at different parts of the circuit.
For an answer, imagine drawing some current out of a stream by a piece of pipe. The wider the pipe the more current flows through it.
Odd effects will be had when placing the pipe parallel to a dam (resistance); some pressure has indeed built up and this will lead to an increased measurement of current within the pipe, but again, the pressure has been created by the flow, not the flow by the pressure.
Voltage is therefore not at all fundamental but an emergent property of flow characteristics, conductive properties, circuit geometry and voltmeters.
Electricians
Electricians will say that volts is what is measured by a voltmeter and that it is related to current and resistance via the following equation:
Voltage = Current x Resistance
This is fine and will give good results in practice because voltmeters, resistors and ammeters are calibrated in a way so as to give the required answer. All that is ever measured is current within a meter of some sort with voltage and resistance being inferred (calculated) but never directly measured.
The practicality of the equation gives no indication as to the underlying physical mechanism; it does not prove that voltage is fundamental or even pressure-like in nature. The fact that the equation is so reliable means that there is ‘some’ interesting phenomenon at work. The properties emerging from the fundamental physical laws have characteristic behaviours that are repeatable and measurable and it is these which give the impression of being themselves fundamental.
There is no concept of ‘pressure’ at all in the above equation; the whole idea is a matter of interpretation only.
Relevance to blood flow
Popular imagination has it that the blood is pumped around the body by a vast pressure difference created by the heart, but anyone who researches this seriously comes to the conclusion that this is simply not true and that the blood moves around ‘by some other means’ or ‘by means of its own energy’.
The nature of this energy is hitherto unknown but we can take a good guess now that it involves energised ring vortices which move the blood through the arteries according to their own power. Se here: Blood flow and scalar waves
Several researchers have noted that the blood will consistently flow from low to high pressure in the aorta. This is inconsistent with being moved by external pressure (as with ‘voltage’) but entirely consistent with the flow being created by the blood itself in a similar manner to electric currents described above.
Blood propels itself down the aorta before encountering the smaller arterioles. These provide a greater impedance to the blood and so some pressure will build up as with a resistance in an electric circuit.
Again we find that the pressure is caused by the dynamics of the flow and not the other way around.
Summary
A coherent definition of voltage is not easy to find.
The idea of electric current flowing under its own energy seems a likely explanation for the observed phenomena and is supported by the Field Theory of Konstantin Meyl. (Scalar Waves: a first Tesla physics handbook)
Without this electrical ‘vitalism’, there is no originating force in electromagnetic theory and everything must derive from essentially static entities. Electrons are stationary unless moved by the gradients of static fields, but static fields themselves are the product of .. electrons!
Something else must be in play to organise these first charges into a field but the only thing to organise electrons is .. another field! We are in a closed loop without any originating cause or fundamental organising principle.
The idea of an ever moving electric vortex field solves these philosophical problems. It gives a primal cause as consisting of field movement which is distributed throughout the universe and a basic organising principle of vortex flow mandated by internal forces.
Field vortices prefer to move through conductive materials and will self-organise according to local conditions to provide the illusions of electrical pressure, potential, field gradient, current and voltage.
‘Resistance’ is created by local field variations which destabilise the vortices to result in either heat exchange or photon emission with a concomitant loss of energy.
A couple of videos from Rupert Sheldrake concerning the abilities of homing pigeons provide convincing evidence of our ignorance of this phenomenon. It isn’t just that nobody has any idea how it happens but that there doesn’t seem to be any chance at all that we could describe it in terms of any currently known scientific theories.
Points of interest:
Released pigeons typically fly straight home
A pigeon separated from the flock can still get home eventually
They can be blindfolded and put on a rotating table and still get home
They can navigate on a completely overcast day
Connection to the environs of the loft as opposed to the construct itself
A flock can, however, find its way to a moving loft on a ship at sea
Trans-generational communication of migratory patterns
All ‘reasonable’ mechanisms have been ruled out
There appears to be no explanation for these phenomena in terms of conventional science so we need to look further afield:
Theoretical constructs from vortex physics (Konstantin Meyl)
Evidence showing effects derived from the theory
Similar ‘patterns’ of geomagnetic awareness from Frank Brown
In videos such as the one below, Konstantin Meyl has demonstrated the transmission of power via Scalar Waves, also know as Tesla Waves, and theorised that this set up can be used also to transmit information.
The waves are electromagnetic in nature
Connection is one-to-one between the metal spheres
Once a connection is made there is no power loss
There is no inverse square attenuation of the signal
Such signals are unaffected by ‘matter’ and can tunnel through the Earth
The connection itself can absorb energy from solar neutrinos leading to more power arriving than was originally sent
So an obvious hypothesis then is that the pigeons are somehow communicating with each other at least via this system. A connection, once established, is robust and distance is not an issue as the field itself is self-maintaining via the absorption of external energy.
Pigeons will be able to communicate over the horizon easily enough. The signal does not bend around the Earth however but simply tunnels through it; any pigeons left at home will act as a beacon for the displaced flock.
The brain
Meyl has stated simply that “The brain is a scalar wave computer” and that the nerves are scalar wave conductors. The waves are magnetic in nature and travel in the insulating myelin sheath around the nerve, with an electrical component travelling down the conductive body of the nerve.
This electrical component is a pale reflection of the true nature of the signal but it is this ‘current’ that has been assumed to be the only relevance to the functionality of the nerve by modern science. The structure of the magnetic part is the actual carrier of the information.
No transduction of energy or information is therefore required for this kind of telepathy as the electromagnetic activity of the brain is transmitted unmodified through the air using the same medium as the brain itself.
The phantom leaf effect
A leaf placed between two layers of plastic will leave behind some sort of ‘imprint’ that can later be photographed under a strong magnetic field.
What has happened is that vortex energy from the living leaf has moved to the plastic sheet, which, being an insulator will favour the stabilisation of such energy into magnetic scalar waves. The electrical component has been minimised owing to the poor conductivity and a magnetic vortex system remains.
My suggestion is then, that something similar happens with pigeons, that a whole flock will leave some sort of trace upon their environment and it is with this imprint that a connection is maintained thereby enabling an accurate homing navigation.
Connection to ‘place’
Pigeons whose loft was moved whilst they were away, first returned to the original location of the loft and not the loft itself, which suggests that the connection was maintained, not with the dead material substance of the loft but with the living ‘field’ of the forest surroundings.
Other snippets, however, have lofts on the roofs of high rise flats or on a ship at sea. Different materials have different conductive properties and different structures of scalar waves may form. Since the connection itself is absorbing neutrino power, it is conceivable that the integrity of the transmission be maintained in such a fashion.
The nature of the connection
The connection is that of one electromagnetic field to another. The brain works via a set of nested toroidal vortex fields and directly absorbs similar energies from the environment.
In one video it is suggested that magnetic particles (i.e. ‘matter’) are required in order to detect the Earth’s field but this is not necessary; magnetic vortices will enter the field of the brain and have a direct effect on its operations. If there are any magnetic particles that are coerced into movement by magnetic forces then the only way that the body can detect such movement is via its effect on an electromagnetic field anyhow – so why did we need particles in the first place?
Field information is absorbed directly into the brain with little need for translation or interpretation.
So the whole of brain field itself is the antenna for the reception of electromagnetic field activity and no specific organ is needed for this function. How would it work anyhow? It would still need to have some means of collecting information and this will be an electromagnetic field complex.
There is no need to interpolate ‘matter’ in the middle of electromagnetic field interactions and in any case it is too crude a substance to play any part in conscious activity.
An extended consciousness?
The energy field of the physical brain is said to be measurable several feet away from the head and since this field is now almost synonymous with the ‘etheric’ brain itself, it maybe isn’t too fanciful to ask if this extension of the energy field might have some practical purpose.
The physics espoused by Konstantin Meyl allows for far more complex behaviour in electromagnetic fields than that of classical science. ‘Movement’ is intrinsic and the field structure has a tendency to form spiral structures. Energy and information are guided towards a vortex centre and the second law of thermodynamics is inverted. A concentration of energy takes place alongside the more familiar dissipative structures and all of this is highly propitious for the formation and maintenance of living systems.
Consider then that information external to a pigeon’s physical brain is caught in its brain vortex and will then spiral inwards towards the physical bird. We than have an antenna that is considerably larger than a tiny bird brain and the whole concept is starting to sound more likely.
A tadpole had its eyes taken out and grafted onto its hindquarters (mentioned in a paper by Michael Levin) and after recovering from the shock could navigate its surroundings quite happily. So it doesn’t seem to matter how the information gets into the body; it will be processed correctly nevertheless.
The bio-field of the heart is much larger than that of the brain so we can maybe think of this also as a receiver of scalar waves. Energy can radiate outwards at the same time as information spirals inwards; the whole of a pigeon can be considered as a scalar wave antenna.
Watch a single celled organism find its way around a microscope slide in order to chase down food. It has no sensory organs no brain and not even a nervous system but is still aware of what is going on and manages to coordinate its movements accordingly.
A hive mind?
If a whole pigeon is a sensory system and pigeons are in constant communication with each other via scalar waves then what happens when they all gather together?
Is it in any way possible that the flock as a whole now forms a collective bio-field? A ‘hive mind’? Such a thing would surely increase both the power and sensitivity of the field. Being spread out over a greater volume it would have the capacity to receive a much weaker signal simply by collecting more of it.
In one study the behaviour of a termite colony differed depending upon whether or not it was separated from another colony by an aluminium sheet, suggesting some electromagnetic connection between the two groups. See: Distant cellular interaction
What happens within a murmuration of starlings? Are they merely exercising their wings prior to migration or are they creating a semi-permanent hive mind in preparation for navigation? A coherent field is formed that connects all the birds and this not only acts as an antenna but also a collective memory and possibly even has its own independent computational capacity.
The idea that this sort of disembodied mind could even exist will cause some to recoil I know, but the actual mind is disembodied, in a sense, anyhow as it is really just an electromagnetic field whose machinations are decoupled from the physical structures of the brain.
Again, if anyone thinks that the idea of a ‘consciousness’ emerging from the mere proximity of bird brains should reflect that the mainstream concept of consciousness is just this: an emergent property of the proximity of cells! If electrified jelly can make decisions then so can a connected set of pigeon brains.
Pigeons don’t need murmurations as they all live in close proximity anyhow.
Classical physics
Note that the above speculations are not even possible with classical electromagnetism. Here electric fields are either static, meaning they have no movement and don’t go anywhere, or they are photons which means they must necessarily shoot off at the speed of light in a straight line.
Neither of these configurations suggests the possibility of a self stabilising complex of vortex fields that can retain information whilst renewing its energy from external sources.
Again, the classical concept of electric currents is that of moving charge (electrons), which relies upon the idea of a voltage to push the tiny particles around as they have no motive energy of themselves.
This idea is just not very useful in any area of biology. Better is to think of circuits comprised of ‘field movement’ forming closed loop and helical vortex structures according to the updated Maxwell-Heaviside equations of Konstantin Meyl.
Vortex energy
Where do migrating birds get all their energy from? It does sound incredible that sufficient energy is stored as fat in a small bird and so we should consider Meyl’s idea that they are breathing in electromagnetic vortices along with the usual oxygen supply and that this is being somehow being used in mechanical action to aid flight.
Gerald Pollack has written a paper giving credible arguments to suggest that breathing has not much to do with oxygen anyhow and that in fact there is no gaseous exchange in the lungs at all! Pollack is suggesting an input of electrical energy in the form of electrons. However replacing ‘electron’ with ‘field vortex’ makes for easier reading.
Questions: Can this vortex energy enter the body via any other means than the breath? Is it possible that the general discharge from the ionosphere could be gathered by the collective flock vortex? Could this help to maintain the field and could some of that energy enter the body of a migrating bird to help it in its flight?
Inheritance of migratory paths
Inheritance of acquired characteristics does exist and has been demonstrated in laboratory experiments.
In one example, rats were made to fear the smell of cherry blossom and their offspring inherited the fear. In another, a caterpillar was trained to crawl towards a red circle and the behaviour was inherited by the emergent moth. Behavioural pattern such as this have been transferred from one snail to another simply by injecting material from one animal to another (Michael Levin).
This all works because inheritance has nothing to do with DNA (See: The DNA delusion) but everything to do with the transference of a scalar wave complex from one generation to the next (See: Telegony and Evolution and Inheritance).
The rapid ‘evolution’ of bird migration paths is therefore no surprise from this point of view. Memories, intents and complete behavioural patterns are codified into scalar waves and these are precisely the format that is needed for inheritance, persistence and communication between individuals or groups of individuals.
These wave vortices are a biological Theory of Everything.
Navigation by scent
In one video, the idea of navigation via smell is mentioned but discarded because of the observed fact of pigeons homing with the wind behind them. Maybe, maybe not. Most people will assume that ‘scent’ consists of a chemical discharge but evidence and argument suggest otherwise: Scalar waves and nerves.
Scent is conveyed via scalar waves and is absorbed directly into the olfactory nerve conduit. The possibility now exists of a direct scalar wave connection between scent detector and target, with reduced attenuation, enhanced sensitivity and magnification via neutrino absorption.
Consider the abilities of certain moths to detect a mate several miles away. Can they really detect the direction at this distance by the sampling of molecules or is it rather the case that an essentially electric connection has been formed and that it is this that provides the necessary information? Is it just the physical antenna that are receiving the information or the whole of a bio-field?
Scents can easily leach through a plastic bag. Is this really caused by molecule leakage or by scalar waves tunnelling through an insulator?
The intensity of a small clearly varies with wind direction which does rather indicate that it is emanating from freely floating molecules. However, that does not preclude the possibility of an additional, semi-permanent connection with a fixed source of the scent vortices.
A global navigational map?
Stunning work from Frank Brown demonstrates the ability of various animals, shellfish, plants and bacteria to synchronise to cosmic rhythms.
Organisms seem to know the time of year, day and position within the lunar cycle. They are aware of latitude and seemingly respond to external pressure changes even when kept at constant pressure within a laboratory. Storm conditions are predicted two days in advance using precisely this ability.
Faraday cages reduce these abilities and so the effects are assumed to be electromagnetic in nature. It is quite credible then that a pigeon or a flock of pigeons know quite well what is going on in their locale and exactly how it relates to solar, lunar and weather conditions. This isn’t quite the same as having a static map though and it isn’t obvious that navigation is possible from local information alone.
The point here though is that the Earth’s magnetic field is not just something that points North or South but has local geographic and temporal refinements that carry a large amount of information that has functional interpretations by every organism on the planet.
Scientific instruments are just fancy compasses and do not possess the refinements necessary to interpret such field information. Theories of electromagnetism inevitably reflect the crudity of the measurements that support them and are therefore themselves necessarily oversimplified. The result then is a science that effectively rules out half of the things it is trying to explain!
Connection to what?
Birds whose loft has been moved will initially return to the precise spot where the loft used to be – so what is it about this spot that is so special?
On the other hand, birds released from a ship at sea will return to the current position of the ship – so, again, where is the source of the connection?
The phantom leaf experiment showed a precise imprint of a leaf in some polymer sheets that persisted for only a few seconds, which doesn’t sound like a very good candidate.
Several considerations may be pertinent:
Plastic polymers are electrical insulators which would therefore encourage the formation of scalar waves where the electrical component in minimised and hence the magnetic activity maximised. These are described by Meyl as magnetic potential vortices and are of great biological significance.
Electrical conductors such as the steel of a ship will form electrical eddy currents by a similar mechanism to the above.
Biological systems prefer the magnetic versions of the waves for both internal regulation and the conjectured extra sensory communication. Internal vortices are friction free (no energy loss) and will in any case absorb energy from heat and other sources within the body.
Once a connection has been established, the connection itself will absorb energy along its length from solar neutrinos to maintain itself and will therefore grow proportionally stronger as the endpoints become further apart. (Sheldrake’s elastic band analogy is accurate in this respect).
So it seems likely then that a connection is made with some biological activity in or around the loft. In the case of pigeons released from a rural location this might be the grass and trees of a forest and in the case of birds accustomed to living in a ship or at the top of a block of flats it is the crew of the ship or the pigeon handlers themselves that are utilised as a useful anchor.
“These are the lies you were taught about electricity: That the electrons themselves have potential energy, that they are pushed or pulled through a continuous conducting loop and that they dissipate their energy in the device. My claim is that all of this is false.” – Derek Muller (Veritasium)
The quotation above is taken from the video below from the Veritasium YouTube channel. This, and the follow up video are proof that electricity does not consist of a flow of electrons. Moreover, they give some clues at least as to what is actually happening. Ideas from the vortex physics of Konstantin Meyl will complete the picture to give a credible explanation for the phenomenon.
At 2:12 we have: “There is no continuous conducting wire that runs all the way from a power station to your house. No, there are physical gaps, there are breaks in the line such as in transformers [..] Electrons cannot possibly flow from one to the other.“
Furthermore, with respect to alternating current: “If the electron flow is in two directions then why does the energy only flow in one direction?“
At 8:20: “People seem to think that you are pumping electrons and that you are ‘buying electrons‘ (from a power company) which is just so wrong. [..] It’s quite counter-intuitive to think that the energy is flowing in the space around the conductor, but the energy which is travelling through the field is going quite fast” – Dr. Bruce Hunt
“It’s the fields and not the electrons that carry the energy” – Muller
11:07 – Under-sea cables that were coated in an insulator and then encased in an iron sheath (for protection) did not perform well.
A transformer (right) consists of two coils of wire separated by a gap. Electricity (whatever it may be) flows through the coil on the left and radiates a field shown as two straight(!) lines which then induces a current by somehow interacting with the wire on the right.
Well the only thing a ‘field’ can interact with is another field. People will say that an electric field can set a charge in motion but a charge is only characterised by its own field and any interaction is totally dependent upon that field.
Assertion: Electricity is some sort of ‘field movement’ within the wire and surrounding insulator. This field extends beyond the wire in some form or other and is able to induce similar movements in the other half of the transformer.
Vortex physics
In the vortex physics of Konstantin Meyl, field movement is described by some slightly modified versions of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations and can adopt several interesting shapes. Helical fields (right) are common, as are ring vortices (smoke rings) and spherical vortices (electrons).
Electric and magnetic fields are inextricably entwined via ‘movement’ at right angles and ‘movement’ is innate to both types of field; ‘static’ fields are an illusion.
Electric fields will propagate easily within a conductor and insulating material will favour the movement of the magnetic component, leading to characteristic patterns of field movement.
The image below is from Viktor Schauberger and depicts the flow of water in a wooden pipe but will serve to illustrate the flow of an electromagnetic field in an insulated wire.
The wire is conductive and favours a helical flow of an electric field whereas the insulating cable favours the construction of magnetic ring vortices. The field vectors for the electric and magnetic fields are at right angles to each other as required.
Similar patterns are observed in the flow of blood (a partially ionised fluid) in the arteries, in vast ‘plasma’ clouds in space (Thunderbolts project) and in weather patterns in our atmosphere (Birkeland currents). These currents are self organising along the lines of a least energy principle and highly efficient, losing very little energy.
So what is electric current?
Forget about electrons for minute and imagine all manner of field turbulence within a battery as various chemicals react. All this activity amounts to a sort of electromagnetic ‘pressure’ the energy wants to go somewhere.
Now attach an insulated wire and an inviting conduit has appeared. The turbulence enters the wire and begins to self-organise according to local conditions. A helical electrical component forms down the conductor and a magnetic ring vortex proceeds down the insulating sheath.
When these formations get to the light bulb, the ambient conditions have changed and are less favourable for the maintenance of the structures that have been hitherto so stable. The lack of a proper insulator and a less conductive filament cause the whole structure to break up and reformat as an altered field geometry, releasing, in the process field structures that are interpreted as ‘energy’.
Some structures are transmuted directly to photons and emitted with a characteristic spectrum whilst others are caught up in existing field vortices and will manifest as ‘heat’ (vortex gains and losses) . Some of the energy in ‘hot’ vortices will reconfigure as infra-red photons and fly away at the speed of light.
Note that within this formulation, there is no transmutation from electron to charge to force to matter and back to energy as all of energy, charge and matter are really the same thing, namely field activity.
The video comments explained
Transformers
There is no need for electrons here. Field movement travels along a wire and its surroundings. Vortices are discharged from the wire and travel towards the receptor coils. They enter these structures and begin to self-organise in a way that is encouraged by the geometry of the coil.
Movement is intrinsic to electromagnetic fields and somehow a ‘current’ is formed.
The structure of the field in between the transformer coils is almost irrelevant as the flow will reformat within the wires anyhow. This ‘must’ happen as the laws of physics must be obeyed and the current must flow according to local conditions.
Think of pumping water into a hose pipe and waving it around. Whatever the state of the water when it was outside the hose and whatever the nature of the waving, the water will form its own flow profile and can really only go one way or the other along the pipe.
Mainstream physics will talk about the field ‘inducing’ a current in the receptor coil but here the field literally flows from one wire to another. Like water.
How do fields carry energy?
They are not static but literally flow from one place to another.
Watch videos of ring vortices in water to see that they can clearly carry a lot of energy. Similarly a magnetic ring vortex will contain a great deal of electrical energy and this will be made available for use at the other end of the wire somehow.
So it is very likely true that the bulk of the energy is carried in the insulating cable as speculated in the video.
The imagining that fields are either static or vibrating entities does make it hard to consider that energy is transmitted and that it is transmitted in one direction only but the image of a moving ring vortex is surely compelling.
Electrons cannot possibly flow..
No, but field vortices can as they are not tied to ‘matter’.
Undersea cables
The magnetic ring vortices are an integral part of the flow geometry and they perform better in an insulator.
A big current needs a big cable and proportionally sized vortices are required which means a proportionally larger insulator sheath. It is no good just spraying a coating on the cables. The insulation isn’t to stop the electrons falling out but to allow an enclosing vortex structure to form which lends stability and efficiency to the whole flow.
A thin insulator does not allow the rings to form properly; the signal is distorted and the flow starts to break up and dissipate into the salt water.
“If the electron flow is in two directions (alternating current) then why does the energy only flow in one direction?“
Conjecture: With alternating current, the ring vortices are of alternating polarity (direction of spin) but still travel in the same direction. The electrical field vector within the conductor alternates between the forward and backward direction but this is not where most of the energy is held.
The ‘energy’ is contained within the vortex and not in it’s speed of travel or the direction of spin. For most purposes, the transmutation from vortex to energy is a crude breakdown of structure and is agnostic of the spin direction.
Why is alternating current more efficient than direct current?
It is claimed that this is because it is transmitted at a higher voltage and that this voltage is created via transformers.
Guessing now: The transformer somehow translates between a high rate of low energy vortices to a lower rate of high energy vortices. Energy transmission is related to energy content of vortices whilst energy loss is proportional to the number of vortices. Energy loss is via ‘surface loss’ from the rings.
The idea of ‘voltage’ is of limited use here.
What is discharge?
Several mentions of discharge (of electrons) or charge loss are made along with suggestions of field induction (the capacity to move electrons); these are a standard part of the vocabulary of physics and electronics and all no doubt have different laws to help quantify their behaviour.
Within the framework of vortex physics, however, these are all the same phenomenon, that is to say, the movement of field vortices:
Discharge: Field Vortices going where you don’t want them to.
Charge loss: Electrons cannot disappear completely but vortex structures can
Induction: The change in geometry of a field structure caused by a different conductive environment
None of this has anything to do with electrons.
The second video
The diagram shows part of the experimental setup. A battery (capacitor) is placed in a circuit with a light bulb and the connecting wires stretch out to a distance of one light-second (actually much smaller) so that the ‘electricity’ is assumed to take one second to complete the circuit. See here: How electricity actually works
When the experiment is performed and the current switched on however the light comes on almost immediately and at least much sooner than it takes for light to travel around the circuit.
How does this happen? The answer is that as field currents start to flow around the circuit they will discharge into the air around the wire and form a de facto field which expands radially at close to the speed of light and eventually impacts upon the supply wire to the light bulb.
These vortices enter the wire and start to flow according to local conditions thereby creating a ‘current’, that is to say a structured flow of field energy.
Several commentators remark that this current should be infinitesimal, however, it turns out in practice to be strong enough to illuminate the light bulb.
What is going on?
Envisaged by classical physics is an electric field such as illustrated here, possibly coupled with an accompanying magnetic field that similarly decreases in field strength in proportion to the distance from the wire. The impact on the receiver wire will be small.
As soon as this field impacts the wire however, current flows in the wire and produces its own field which starts to interact with the first (transmitter) . Ignore the plus and minus signs here, the point is that the two fields are interacting over a region that is much larger than just the second wire itself.
Consider then this possibility: The electric and magnetic fields together form a helical vortex structure around the wires with the transmitter forming an outward spiralling vortex and the receiver hosting an inward spiral.
Energy then flows from one vortex to the other, the inverse square law is not appropriate and sufficient energy flows to light the bulb.
The vortex from the transmitter expands at close to the speed of light and impacts the second conduit. The current is small first but it creates its own vortex which expands at a similar speed, harvesting more and more energy as it does so.
At first, a doubled radius of the second vortex means a rough doubling of the energy gathered and hence a doubling of the current formed.
A unified field forms with a simplified form shown right and the rate of energy transport from one wire to another is .. anybody’s guess! It is likely that ultimately the ‘induced’ current drops off in approximate proportion to the distance purely on geometrical grounds.
This isn’t a ‘law’ though but a general principle as what is measured is always some sort of average which has been interpreted via a measuring instrument.
Note the contra-rotation of the helical fields and imagine what this would look like when extended over the whole circuit. The rotation is always the same way with respect to the current. An extended ring vortex is formed around the whole circuit and this is already known to be a highly stable structure.
Ok, now consider the screenshot from the second video:
The green line shows the current in the transmitter wire and the yellow shows the current in the receiver. The green arrow points to the time that the switch was turned on; the transmitter current shoots up almost instantaneously.
The current in the receiver though shows a linear increase up to the point of the yellow arrow which represents the current that initially drives the light bulb. Thereafter there is a sharp increase as the current completes the entire circuit.
The vortex model can be said to predict the linear increase but the classical model cannot. What would be expected by established theory is a sudden but ‘infinitesimal’ current which would then remain stable at a very low point.
Conduction within nerves
If conduction within wires is largely by means of ring vortices then maybe the same is for the transmission of nerve impulses?
Many papers find that there is a relationship between the speed of propagation of nerve impulses and the thickness of the insulating sheath surrounding a nerve; the thicker the myelin sheath, the faster the signal propagation:
Local modulation of neurofilament phosphorylation, axonal caliber, and slow axonal transport by myelinating Schwann cells – de Waegh, Brady https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1371237/
As with the undersea cables, a thicker sheath allows the free and unconstrained development of ring vortices whilst a thin sheath necessitates a deformation or stretching of the vortex to fit within the sheath, Additional surface area means additional ‘field drag’ (also known as friction) which leads to energy loss and slower propagation.
Summary
Electricity is the continuous flow and transmutation of energy fields from one environment to another. The geometry and conductive properties of that environment in conjunction with the principles of vortex physics characterise the flow.
Within this landscape, various patterns emerge and the simplest of these such as voltage, current and field ‘induction’ have been adopted as standard but none of them have a particularly sound basis in reality, being largely artefacts of the measuring instruments themselves.
Other patterns such as ring or helical vortices on the other hand are theoretical constructs that have not been measured and yet give a greater and more consistent understanding of the phenomena that we actually observe.
Local modulation of neurofilament phosphorylation, axonal caliber, and slow axonal transport by myelinating Schwann cells – de Waegh, Brady https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1371237/
The essay “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports” by ‘A Midwestern Doctor’ asserts that the phenomenon of ‘vaccine shedding’ is real and asks what the mechanism could be. This page proposes a possible mechanism involving information transfer via electromagnetic signalling.
From the article:
Shedding is very real.
We have seen numerous patient cases which can only be explained by mRNA shedding.
Most of the people who are highly sensitive to shedding have already figured it out, so if you do not already believe it is an issue for you, you probably don’t need to worry about it.
There is still no agreed upon mechanism to explain why it happens.
In theory, shedding with the mRNA vaccines should be “impossible.”
Largely anecdotal evidence
Accepting evidence of this type is fraught with risk as it is likely interpreted and distorted by the subject and can be considered neither objective nor quantitative. However, in this case, the anecdotes demonstrate distinctive patterns which help suggest a specific mechanism: that of of information transfer via an electromagnetic bio-field. The subjects do not know about this mechanism and so cannot be biasing heir reports in favour of it.
Patients may demonstrate symptoms only in the presence of another particular (vaccinated) person and symptoms typically vanish when they separate
The vaccinated person may test high for certain bio-markers (antibodies)
Treatment of the shedder significantly helps the unvaccinated partner
Menstrual abnormalities are high on the list of symptoms
‘Secondary’ shedding is recorded
People vary highly in their sensitivity
A distinct smell is reported from vaccinated individuals
Young and apparently healthy people are stronger shedders than the old and frail
Routes of exposure
General proximity to the vaccinated person
Through skin to skin contact.
Transfer of secretions
The bystander effect
The radiation-induced bystander effect is the phenomenon in which unirradiated cells exhibit irradiated effects as a result of signals received from nearby irradiated cells. Wikipedia. The effect has been seen on not only cells but entire organisms.
Rainbow trout were exposed to low doses of ionising radiation and then placed in a tank with other healthy fish for two hours after which they were killed and dissected. The organs showed damage typical of exposure to ionising radiation even though no such exposure had taken place. A chemical messenger in the water is suggested as the mechanism in the paper but some sort of electromagnetic influence was not ruled out. – Mothersill et al.
This seems to be an almost exact parallel of the shedding phenomenon.
The bio-field hypothesis
Organisms are regulated by a system of electromagnetic scalar waves which organise together to form a de facto bio-field. The field is scarcely measurable by scientific instruments but connections via resonant scalar waves can form between individuals and can have a meaningful biological effect upon the recipient.
Disruption of this field by an external impulse or chemical insult will lead to dis-regulation and a variety of disease states.
All these disturbances lead to similar biological mechanisms (e.g. calcium dis-regulation) that in turn manifest as a typical grouping of symptoms and characteristic epidemiology which have been attributed to the spread of ‘viruses’.
The ability of shedding to reproduce flu-like symptoms is proof enough that a virus is not necessary.
The mechanism
The body is regulated by a system of electromagnetic scalar waves that is driven by the brain (What is the brain?) and propagates along the myelin sheath of nerves (Scalar waves and nerves) and thence into the cells and along the microtubules.
Scalar waves were described by Tesla and are a theoretical construct of physicist Konstantin Meyl who has asserted that: “(Biological) information is the structure of a scalar wave”. Resonant connections between transmitter and receiver have been demonstrated in a laboratory and Meyl has proposed that connections between humans is an explanation for transmission of biological information.
Connection between individuals is initially via a scatter approach but once a suitable recipient has been found, the connection becomes one-to-one and may persist over long time periods and spatial separations.
Does this hypothesis fit the pattern of observations?
General proximity: Initial connection is via a scatter approach which diminishes with the square of the distance between transmitter and receiver so we would expect proximity to a vaccinated individual to be almost a necessity.
Skin contact: James Oschman, in his book ‘Energy medicine’ suggests a similar mechanism for Healing Energy and claims increased effectiveness if actual physical contact is made.
Individual sensitivity: Meyl has propose that some individuals may be better transmitters (strong bio-field) whilst others will be better at receiving. This pattern is thought to exist in ESP ‘adepts’ and Meyl suggests that the mechanism could theoretically be used for telepathy and other ‘paranormal’ activities.
EMF hypersensitivity: Some individuals are said to be hypersensitive to EMF from mobile phones etc. These produce scalar waves as an artefact so the mechanism is identical and the existence of ‘sensitives’ in both areas lends a little more support to both phenomena. Symptoms include nausea, brain fog, fatigue, rash, temperature etc.
Transfer of secretions: A small amount of biological material can play host to a stable and semi-permanent scalar wave complex and it is this that is causing the trouble; there is no need for actual absorption of any physical substance. This is reminiscent of the phenomenon of Telegony whereby phenotypical information can be inherited without the need for the transfer of DNA.
Shedding should be impossible: This is because the possibility of an invisible and almost unmeasurable bio-field has not been considered, with all disease effects being blamed on viruses, bio-chemistry and gene expression, i.e. ‘material’ and ‘mechanistic’ descriptions.
Secondary shedding: The original disturbance whether it be a weather condition or a vaccine causes a reaction of the regulatory system and leading to a change in the expressible bio-field and it is this information emanating from this new ‘state’ that is transmitted by means of airborne scalar waves.
In the case of the irradiated fish (above), they do not emanate the original ionising radiation but instead broadcast the new disease state that has been induced by the original radiation. This information is received by other fish and creates a ‘mirror’ disease state in the recipients that in turn can be passed on as secondary shedding.
Young people are vigorous shedders: They have a stronger, more vigorous bio-field? Bio-field strength and integrity wane as we get older. Michael Levin has stated that the ageing process is essentially a loss of bio-field information.
Bio-markers and antibodies: Antibody production is not by the unmodulated laws of chemistry but is mediated by some sort of regulatory mechanism and the same holds for all bio markers. Measurements of such are therefore a reflection of the regulatory state and it is the means of production of this state rather than the original cause that is transmitted from person to person.
A ‘distinct smell’: Conventional wisdom is that smells are the transfer and detection of the chemical structure of a molecule. Konstantin Meyl begs to differ (Scalar waves and nerves) and has a good argument. A smell is simply a scalar wave that can be detected by the nose somehow.
Signals along the olfactory nerve are scalar waves anyhow and to store the information in the brain which is already a large scalar wave complex requires little processing. Regulation, disease, smell, cognition and memories are now all the same thing: scalar-wave bio-information.
Dogs can smell diseases such as cancer and Parkinson’s so they are now smelling the disease regulation directly. They are detecting some electromagnetic representation of the disease state itself.
Is the smell alone capable of producing the symptoms?
When sufferers report a metallic taste, are they in fact monitoring their own regulatory state?
Menstruation
Interesting that disruptions of the menstrual cycle feature heavily in the reports. During the outbreak of 2019/2020 this was a very prominent feature of conversation coming from unvaccinated women, some of whom had succumbed to disease and others who had not.
Women temporarily synchronize their menstrual cycles with the luminance and gravimetric cycles of the Moon[paper]
I don’t think anyone believes that women are synchronising directly with the luminance of the moon (or even gravity for that matter) so the effect is produced by something else that correlates with both these cycles of the moon.
Cosmic influences on humans, animals and plants – JT Burns This book is an annotated list of studies on the correlations between planetary movements and biological events on Earth. Several hundred papers and books are summarised.
Cosmic events include solar flares, lunar tides, eclipses, strength of Earth’s magnetic field, planetary orbits, planetary alignments and oppositions.
Biological events range from measured chemical reactions to behaviours of individuals including epidemics, admissions to mental hospitals, car accidents, metabolite levels, birth defects, the shape of leaf buds, rate of water uptake in seedlings, blood clotting parameters, blot tests etc.
The brain, nervous system and embryo seem to particularly sensitive to such influences with personalities seemingly affected by the month of conception (more likely than birth date surely?).
A lot of the correlations seem crazy (the thyroid activity of cats is related to the orbit of Mercury for example) and some have been ‘debunked’.
Many researchers tried experiments in Faraday cages or in deep underground caverns. Often some reduction of effect was observed but rarely was it eliminated. Both electric eddy currents and magnetic potential currents seem implicated then with a Faraday cage providing some protection from the former but not the latter.
Summary
The same mechanism (scalar waves) is used for:
Bio-regulation
Nerve conduction
Disease induction
Distant cellular interaction
Cognition and memory
The sense of smell
Synchronisation of biological cycles
Inheritance
Shedding by proximity
Shedding by contact
Shedding by secretion
No complicated biochemistry needed at this stage. Biochemical reactions are downstream of bio-field activity.
Why is this not already known?
Fixation on physically observable and measurable phenomena
Attachment to existing knowledge and imagining it to be ‘complete’
Fear of accusations of vitalism
Lack of understanding of electromagnetic field phenomena
The required physics (scalar waves) is relatively new and still not known to most physicists let alone those in the area of biology
Women temporarily synchronize their menstrual cycles with the luminance and gravimetric cycles of the Moon C. Helfrich-Förster, S. Monecke2, I. Spiousas3, T. Hovestadt4, O. Mitesser5, T. A. Wehr https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/sciadv.abe1358
This page looks at several interesting papers on the epidemiology of measles and influenza and tries to make sense of them. Cases dramatically decreased before the vaccine rollout. Modern measles is not a childhood disease and outbreaks are correlated with weather conditions.
This paper from epidemiologist Bryan Grenfell shows some very interesting features in the epidemiology of measles, A ‘wavelet’ model is created that characterises the UK data as a series of wave-packets that originate from the large cities and spread out over the rest of the country,
Further computer modelling shows how various features of the wave model can be explained by human-to-human transmission driven by population dynamics and seasonal forcing.
The wave patterns are quite surprising, are not obviously connected to the seasons and are not consistent with the idea that measles is the immediate result of a poisoning event.
This paper is a good example of why mathematical modelling is sometimes necessary and how it can give insights into the underlying structure of noisy data.
London measles cases 1944 – 2000
The chart shows the “Wavelet time series analysis for the log-transformed weekly London measles time series” – so the data has already been manipulated somehow.
Several interesting and surprising features are immediately apparent.
The chart starts with an apparent seasonal variation which, by 1950, has transformed into a biennial pattern with strong peaks every two years and a ‘mini’ peak in between the main peaks. The peaks are very well defined.
After 1970 the absolute number of cases declines and the biennial pattern degenerates into just ‘noise’.
Varying time period
Somewhat surprisingly for such a sharply defined pattern, the period is not actually tied to the seasons and is not precisely biennial. Instead, mathematical analysis suggests a period of slightly larger than two years that, even so, varies as time progresses; see the blue line below.
The red line shows the onset of vaccination programs and this is assumed to somehow affect the biennial rhythm.
Phase differences between cities
The modified data from three cities, London, Norwich and Lincoln are plotted on the same chart and we immediately see that measles in the three cities peaks in different years and at different times of the year.
In addition to this, the blue peaks (Lincoln), at first out of step with the other cities, are perfectly synchronised by 1990.
Modelling the data as a flexible wave function
Data such as the above are not expressible as a single mathematical equation and so are not amenable to statistical analysis. What is needed is a further abstraction of the data in order to somehow obtain a quantitative analysis of these phenomena.
The illustration below shows (top chart) the data modelled as a set of ‘flexible’ waves and we can now clearly see a striking pattern, that of three wave functions having no initial phase relation gradually and smoothly attaining a perfect synchrony.
Note that in 1951 the black and red have perfect phase-alignment with each other but are completely in opposition to the blue line of Norwich.
The bottom chart shows the calculated phase difference between Cambridge and Norwich and between Cambridge and London. The averages are non-zero and differ from each other but eventually achieve synchrony in 1962 before starting to diverge again.
Spreading from major cities
The illustration shows the phase difference of disease incidence relative to London.
Measles outbreaks that start in London will radiate outwards from the capital city at a rate of about 5km per week, with the rate of travel depending upon local population densities. The pattern is clear for a radius of about 30km around London with ‘randomness’ in rural areas eventually dominating.
Similar ‘spreading’ patterns exist with all the major cities with things being less clear in the North-East where the proximity of several large cities leads to interference patterns in the spreading waves.
A transmission model
Grenfell does not make the claim that these data prove contagion, rather contagion is assumed and the task of the paper is to try to explain the characteristics of the data in terms of transmission parameters.
Measles epidemics are self-limiting and will subside when all ‘susceptibles’ (children) gain immunity
‘Extinction’ events occur in rural areas when the disease dies out for lack of new victims
Disease remains ‘endemic’ in larger cities and replenishes the surroundings with virus on an approximately biennial basis when there are enough new children
What is effectively random transmission between individuals will form stable attractor patterns at the population level and it is these that are manifest in the data
Phase-locking between attractors along with seasonal forcing gives rise to synchrony between cities and an apparent underlying rhythm
The decline of measles after the introduction of vaccine programs is assumed to be because of those vaccination programs
Concerns and questions
Seasonal forcing
The stated importance of seasonal forcing seems at odds with the model which at no time shows a precise biennial pattern, which varies across time and is different for each city.
“Because epidemics do not suffer local extinction, and because all the cities experience the same seasonal forcing, no lags are generated.” – Grenfell
“The task is aided by epidemiological models, which capture both the nonlinear dynamics of childhood epidemics as a function of local population size and the impact of significant environmental forcing. This forcing mainly comprises seasonality in transmission, due to schooling patterns, and longer-term variations in susceptible recruitment, due to birth-rate variations and the onset of vaccination” – Grenfell et al
The saw-tooth shape of an epidemic
The paper concentrates on modelling epidemics as waves and therefore does not address the issue of the characteristic ‘saw-tooth’ shape of the epidemics.
Other authors have commented upon this with respect to influenza. We expect from an epidemic that the initial increase in cases is rapid and follows an exponential curve and that thereafter a rounded peak will be reached and a long decline will ensue. The tail end of the curve is expected to stretch out as the disease finds fewer and fewer people to infect.
What we see instead is a very sharp peak that is followed by a decline that is much faster than the initial rise in cases.
Extinction events
The virus is said to disappear from rural areas in between epidemics but to be replenished from the big cities in time for a new outbreak, meaning the survival of the virus depends upon the specific population densities and behaviours. The question then arises: “How did measles survive before modern population densities, primary schools and contemporary commuter habits?”
Measles is ‘endemic’ in large cities
“In the large town, measles is endemic throughout the interepidemic trough, so that a new epidemic occurs as soon as the effective reproductive ratio of infection exceeds unity; this threshold is determined by the accumulation of susceptible children, modified by seasonally varying transmission rates associated with the school year.
“By contrast, in the small town, infection goes extinct locally after an epidemic; therefore, another epidemic cannot happen until an infective `spark’ is received, generally originating in a larger (endemic) community.” – Grenfell
What does it mean to say that measles is ‘endemic’?
Standard transmission models
The graph below shows the outcome of a basic epidemiological model.
Cases (red) initially show a rapid (exponential) increase in numbers as the infection spreads to more and more susceptible individuals. As the number of susceptible individuals reduces so the increase diminishes but still infections remain high as there are still plenty of ‘spreaders’ around.
Source: Benji Tigg
As the number of spreaders starts to wane and the number of susceptibles continues to diminish, the curve takes a steeper downturn and infections decline rapidly.
In computer models such as this a long ‘tail’ is produced as, although new infections are declining rapidly, there is a large pool of infected individuals remaining.
This hides what is really happening which is that contact with an affected individual is becoming increasingly and rapidly unlikely. Take a look at the number of susceptibles; it declines rapidly as soon as the epidemic starts and reaches almost zero even whilst cases are still near their peak.
We have, at peak number of infections, only 0.2 infected people per 1000 which means 2 cases per 10,000 – and the disease is still being passed on somehow!
Even so, the model is assuming a perfect mixing of the population and within this model there is always a non zero probability of a sick person making a transmission to a healthy. In practice I think this would not be the case and that instead there would be a very sharp decline in new cases once the proportion of infected individuals reached some threshold, below which transmission simply did not occur.
‘Non-epidemic’ activity
This then is a glaring weakness in the transmission theory, that the number of susceptible individuals decreases to almost zero during an epidemic and yet must somehow remain above zero for another two years to spark off the next epidemic.
A spreading virus is only able to stay alive by actually spreading and once the effective reproduction rate is below one, it is declining rapidly.
To make any sense of this, modellers must somehow keep the virus alive and yet not spreading during interim periods and so will add some other mode of survival to allow for this:
“We then fit a seasonal regression model to the truncated series to estimate the expected baseline number of deaths in the absence of epidemic activity. A nonepidemic threshold was defined by the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval derived from the seasonal regression model. Only influenza activities that remained above the threshold for >2 consecutive weeks were included in the analysis” – Viboud et al
So there is now something called ‘non-epidemic’ activity for influenza which keeps the virus alive somehow even though there is no measurable spread. In the case of measles, lifetime immunity is claimed which further reduces the possibility of spread in between epidemics.
Without this ‘fix’ to the models there would surely be very many extinction events even in population dense areas.
The decline in measles
The chart shows measles deaths from 1900 to 1960. A strong rhythmic pattern with a period of about 3 years is seen, along with a marked decline, almost to the point of extinction, before vaccines were introduced after 1960.
The vaccines therefore cannot be the cause of the decline in deaths.
Note that these data are averaged over a whole nation so we don’t have the geographical refinement of the Grenfell paper but if we take all these results at face value we have a disease showing an approximate three year cycle that, as global incidence declines, diminishes to a two year cycle, followed by a one year cycle and eventual disintegration of structure into mere ‘noise’.
What produces this? Do Bruce Grenfell’s attractor patterns extend to the whole of the United States as well?
Modern measles age distribution
The chart below from Muscat et al suggests that measles can no longer be considered a disease of childhood.
Seasonality
Measles is seasonal in many countries particularly in the spring:
Modelling seasonal measles transmission in China – Bai, Liu
Measles and the weather
The effects of weather conditions on measles incidence in Guangzhou, Southern China – Yang et al
“The morbidity of measles shows a seasonal variation. In temperate climates, measles outbreaks typically occur in the late winter and early spring every year, whereas in the tropics, measles outbreaks have irregular associations with rainy seasons, which suggests that climatic factors partly underlie the seasonality of measles virus infections.” – Yang et al
Compare with the epidemiology of influenza:
“Influenza seasonality indicates that New Delhi would likely benefit from springtime vaccination (May–June), whereas vaccination in the fall (October–November) would be better for Srinagar. We recently illustrated that India and most other tropical countries in Asia exhibit influenza seasonality that coincides with the monsoon season, June–October” – Koul et al
The charts from Yang et. al. show an increase in measles cases correlated with:
Low humidity
High sunshine
Moderate temperatures
Other researchers have found correlations with both season and specific local weather events:
“Specific meteorological conditions increased the risk of measles, including lower relative humidity, temperature, and atmospheric pressure; higher wind velocity, sunshine duration, and diurnal temperature variation” – Jia et al
“The team discovered a strong and consistent annual pattern of measles outbreaks that was associated with rainfall. Specifically, they found that the rainy season was associated with a lower risk of measles case reporting, whereas measles cases were higher during the dry season.” – Blake et al
“The analysis revealed that there is a statistically significant relationship between weather parameters (Temperature and Rainfall) and the occurrence of measles in the study area.” – Alhaji et al
Cosmic influences on humans, animals and plants – JT Burns This book is an annotated list of studies on the correlations between planetary movements and biological events on Earth. Several hundred papers and books are summarised. Measles is not mentioned.
Cosmic events include solar flares, lunar tides, eclipses, strength of Earth’s magnetic field, planetary orbits, planetary alignments and oppositions.
Biological events range from measured chemical reactions to behaviours of individuals include epidemics, admissions to mental hospitals, car accidents, metabolite levels, birth defects, the shape of leaf buds, rate of water uptake in seedlings, blood clotting parameters, blot tests etc.
The brain, nervous system and embryo seem to particularly sensitive to such influences with personalities seemingly affected by the month of conception (more likely than birth date surely?).
A lot of the correlations seem crazy (the thyroid activity of cats is related to the orbit of Mercury for example) and some have been ‘debunked’.
Many researchers tried experiments in Faraday cages or in deep underground caverns. Often some reduction of effect was observed but rarely was it eliminated. Both electric eddy currents and magnetic potential currents seem implicated then with a Faraday cage providing some protection from the former but not the latter.
So what are the causes?
Viral transmission?
Unlikely:
Attempts to transmit any disease in a clinical trial invariably fail
Isolation techniques are highly contested
Computer models need ‘tweaking’ to get plausible results
The need to add a seasonal factor to models suggests a seasonal influence
The possibility of extinction events seems too high for virus survival
The characteristics of the epidemiology seem too structured for random transmission
Poisoning?
Again unlikely: How to explain the epidemiology?
Annual crop spraying or vaccination schedules might just explain how toxin administration is coordinated over a whole country but it isn’t strictly seasonal and ‘drifts’ from year to year. The epidemiology is complex and has patterns that are both local and global.
Cosmic influences?
To most people this will seem the most unlikely of all, but what else is left?
The epidemiology needs explaining and here we at least have a chance of correlating disease with ‘something’ although at the moment it isn’t even clear what that ‘something’ is.
I doesn’t seem credible that the planet Saturn can have a direct influence on biological processes but more likely that various electrical events in the cosmos can and do have an influence and that these phenomena may well correlate with planetary alignments and solar activity.
These patterns, with seasonal variation and local coincidences with weather events are similar to those seen in the epidemiology of influenza. See here: Influenza and weather
Hypothesis
Population wide biological events are triggered by electromagnetic activity as opposed to gravity and that filaments of such energy pervade the solar system, emanate largely from the sun, connect the sun, planets and moons and will move, interact and intertwine as the planets orbit the sun.
If this is true then certain events and patterns are explained that are not expected from gravitational influence alone. Filament interaction will be roughly rhythmic but with various deviations.
We could expect:
Roughly seasonal effects but with various ‘harmonics’.
The observed ‘effect’ on Earth may precede the supposed ’cause’ (eg solar flare) because both of these are caused by a third and unsuspected phenomenon.
‘Influences’ of two or more planetary orbits may interact in a complicated way.
Odd phase shifting phenomena may be seen
Correlations may appear consistent for decades and then disappear, either suddenly or gradually.
Random and sudden events seemingly unrelated to planetary motion.
Absent or inverted dose-response relationship (weak stimulus seems to give strong response etc.)
Relationships which seem outstanding to the eye but disappear upon statistical analysis.
The last above is because it is the wrong things that they are trying to correlate and because the ’causes’ themselves may be only quasi-periodic. The Earth’s rotation speed is not quite constant and solar cycles also vary in length in an unpredictable fashion. Many periodic influences from the solar system are in any case filtered through our ionosphere and weather system which have local rhythms of their own.
All these patterns above are described in the book by J.T. Burns and many are seen in the epidemiology of measles and flu. Many cannot be explained by conventional means so the idea of electromagnetic filaments stands as the most likely explanation for now.
It sounds like almost any pattern of disease outbreak may be possible and that the hypothesis is therefore unfalsifiable. This may well be true at the moment but the hope is that a more detailed understanding of the electromagnetic nature of biology and the electromagnetic activity in the cosmos will some day give something concrete to test against.
Rupert Sheldrake’s TED talk , “The Science Delusion”, listed ten points of contention concerning ‘accepted’ tenets of modern science. The presentation caused quite a stir and was “taken out of circulation by TED, relegated to a corner of their website and stamped with a warning label.” – Sheldrake
The general theme of the talk is that contemporary physics, as usually described, is mechanical, materialistic, insufficient to describe biology, inheritance or consciousness and is in any case incomplete of itself. Modern science is therefore deluding itself if it thinks it has the answers to everything or even that it could supply the answers to everything, as it is hampered by its own self-imposed constraints.
This is only partly true. There is a strong streak of ‘materialistic’ thinking in all sciences certainly but field physicsand in particular the Theory of Objectivity of Konstantin Meyl do not deal with ‘matter’ or even ‘forces’ as fundamentals of nature and therefore paint a very different picture from the one to which we are accustomed.
The desire to reject ‘materialism’ is fuelled in part by an incomplete description of what actually constitutes ‘materialism’.
The ten points:
Nature is mechanical or machine-like
Matter is unconscious
The laws and constants of Nature are fixed
The quantity of matter and energy is constant and was fixed by the big bang
Nature is purposeless and evolution is without direction
Inheritance is via the continuity of the structure of some physical substance (genes)
Memories are retained in the brain as material traces
‘Mind’ is inside the head and consciousness is just brain activity
Apparent paranormal abilities such as telepathy are the illusions of Bad Science
Mechanistic medicine is the only one that matters
3. The laws and constants of Nature are fixed Yes! Of course they are! If not then how does the universe run? How does it maintain pattern, order and stability? If the laws that maintain order are changing all the time then there must be some meta-laws that determine how these changes occur.
The alternative is that things just happen and anyone who thinks that can just give up on pretending to be a scientist.
The problem we have is not whether or not the laws are fixed but whether or not the laws and constants that scientists use to describe reality are in fact the fundamental laws and constants of reality. Countless observational oddities and internal inconsistencies suggest that they are, at best, incomplete.
The laws of physics as described by Konstantin Meyl are described by a single field equation and from this can be derived the laws of gravity, the Schrödinger equation and the laws of general relativity. So Meyl’s equation can reasonably be described as ‘fundamental’ but the other laws cannot. They are just mathematical representations of isolated laboratory observations.
The speed of light. In his talk Rupert mentions that the speed of light slowed down by about 20 km/s between 1928 and 1945 before resuming its approved value. The response of the standards authorities was to simply re-define the length of the metre in terms of the speed of light so as to correct for the difference So the speed of light is now a constant by decree (but not by observation) and length is no longer fundamental. But what about ‘time’? Is that not fundamental?
We have no direct way of measuring time and the best we can do is to count the number of oscillations of an atomic clock and declare the result to be representative of elapsed time. A big problem with this is the following chart which shows that two atomic clocks in the same room but oriented differently will keep very good time with each other – except during an eclipse!
So we are stuck with a science that somehow regards length as a variable quantity and has no reliable way of measuring elapsed time and we can therefore ask: “What then is meant by speed?” or “How on can we measure distance travelled per second when we have no stable definition of either a metre or a second?”
We have too many variables and no clear idea as to which are to be regarded as ‘fundamental’.
The solution.
Konstantin Meyl cuts through the confusion with a single field equation (below). This equation only is ‘fundamental’ and nothing else.
This is the entire equation and there are no three types of mass, no separate force of inertia, electrostatic attraction, gravity etc. and as a consequence, no need for multiple ‘constants’ to mediate between such entities.
Both time and distance and the speed of light are dependent upon field strength, with high field strength leading to a shrinking of distance and a slowing of time. Light speed can vary in absolute terms but measurements of it will remain constant to the observer because as lengths shrink, so will time slow down, giving the impression to the observer of a fixed light-speed.
The observer is now part of the experiment and will shrink or speed up along with the experimental equipment and the observed phenomena.
It is the variations of the rate of atomic clocks owing to changes in the solar neutrino stream that is likely leading to variations of the measured speed of light.
4. The quantity of matter and energy is constant and was fixed by the big bang. Classical physics is clearly struggling on this one. There can be no explanation of such an initial event in terms of known physics simply because the bang itself, having created the laws of physics must therefore precede them and hence cannot be derived from them.
According to Meyl, ‘matter’ is a stable balance of positive and negative field elements which together cancel each other out. Matter can be materialised from non-matter and can be destroyed again to leave nothing behind. The total amount of ‘energy’ in a particle is always zero and so the total amount of ‘energy’ in the universe is in fact constant and equal to zero.
Einstein’s famous E=mc² is incorrect and Tesla agreed with this, having claimed to have destroyed billions of atoms with no ill effects.
Note that Meyl’s assertions concerning mass and energy derive straight from his single field equation which therefore remains the single fundamental assertion with all other physical entities being emergent properties of those equations.
Contrast this with mainstream physics where the well studied entities matter and energy are held to be fundamentals and obeying the laws of nature but at the same time all coming from the big bang and so cannot really be fundamental. They even derive from something that is not itself part of the laws of nature, is not describable by them and is fundamentally unmeasurable, untestable and un-falsifiable.
The whole framework is topsy-turvy and badly structured. We need a single testable hypothesis but what we have a patchwork quilt thrown together from ideas which are good enough of themselves but bear not much relation to each other.
6. Inheritance is via the continuity of the structure of some physical substance (genes) This is just not true. The phenomenon of Telegony is proof of this, the page on The DNA delusion confirms that inheritance has nothing to do with DNA and the page Evolution and Inheritance puts a good case that inheritance is via some sort of informational field.
It is this field that is responsible for morphogenesis and inherited or ‘innate’ behaviour – does anybody really believe that the nest building abilities of a bird for example could be encoded in a few gigabytes of DNA?
Mainstream biology now only ascribes the function of protein construction to DNA and even then there are only 20,000 genes to encode for 100,000 proteins.
What is inherited is, in most general terms, a dynamic pattern of biological activity, or a set of rules for a molecular or neural network. Stable, dynamic patterns are best represented in terms of ‘attractors’ or closed loop control systems and the suggested physical mechanism for these is the magnetic scalar waves as described by Konstantin Meyl. They are stable, dynamic, can co-exist with matter and are not measurable by modern instruments which s why they gave been missed by scientists so far.
These scalar waves are by far the best candidate for Sheldrake’s morphic field.
A bio-field to create the shape of a snowflake? The image, taken from a Michael Clarage lecture shows distinctive looking patterns in the formation of snowflakes. At the same time it is asserted that all snowflakes are different so how do they achieve self-consistency and variety at the same time?
Physics doesn’t provide a good explanation as to how groups of billions of molecules can apparently ‘know’ what each other are doing so some new physics is needed.
The snowflakes are arranged according to some template which is going to be electro-magnetic and cymatic in nature. It looks like some force-field is creating a pattern in the way the molecules are bonding together. However Martin Chaplin claims that even this is not true, with there being no fixed pattern of bonds and instead a constantly shifting landscape of molecular connections which somehow seem to maintain a precise overall shape.
“In the case of ice the hydrogen bonds also only last for the briefest instant but a piece of ice sculpture can ‘remember’ its carving over extended periods.”
“.. the behaviour of a large population of water molecules may be retained even if that of individual molecules is constantly changing.” – Martin Chaplin: The Memory of Water
So what is it that is constant? What is it that determines the overall shape?
7. Memories are retained in the brain as material traces Ideas that the brain works by arrangements of neurons or movement of chemical currents have been ditched I think for ideas that it works by electric fields or currents but this still isn’t correct. The brain most likely works as a scalar wave processor (What is the brain?)
Scalar waves are stable of themselves and have all the characteristics required of a medium for the hosting of cognitive computation:
Parallel processing
Associative memory
Speed of light response
Energy renewed by solar neutrinos (?)
De-coupled from the physical brain
The last is particularly important. The physical brain has its own supply of energy and nutrients. Brain cells will de and be renewed. To have conscious thought somehow coupled to the physical maintenance of the brain or to even use the same processes as are used by that maintenance would surely result in chaos and confusion?
We require that cognition is kept separate from maintenance somehow. We do not want every physical change in the brain leading to, or being perceptible as, a ‘thought’ and nor can we have ‘thoughts’ requiring physical changes in the brain – this is just too slow.
The first computers used mechanical levers to implement logic circuits but they were very slow, the maintenance cost was proportional to the amount of thinking and the complexity of thought was limited by the complexity of the physical structure of the machine.
Modern computers are a big improvement, are much faster and the complexity has been factored out into the software which runs as electric currents. ‘Portable’ software means that the computations are now independent of the hardware that they are running on.
Computers do not maintain themselves however so that electric currents are available for computation whereas in the human brain, electric currents have physical consequences not necessarily related to the intent of conscious thought. Using scalar waves is therefore a much better solution for thought processes that are to be largely independent of the physical state of neurons.
One free miracle: “As Terence McKenna observed, ‘Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest.’ The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.” – Sheldrake
So modern science is really asking for a whole set of interrelated miracles which seem finely tuned to permit the existence of life:
“The universe looks more and more like a great thought rather than a great machine.Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter… we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.” – James Hopwood Jeans (Physicist, mathematician, idealist)
“The characterization of the universe as finely tuned intends to explain why the known constants of nature, such as the electron charge, the gravitational constant, etc., have the values that we measure rather than some other (arbitrary) values. According to the “fine-tuned universe” hypothesis, if these constants’ values were too different from what they are, “life as we know it” could not exist. – Wikipedia
“The fine-tuned universe is the proposition that the conditions that allow life in the universe can occur only when certain universal dimensionless physical constants lie within a very narrow range of values, so that if any of several fundamental constants were only slightly different, the universe would be unlikely to be conducive to the establishment and development of matter, astronomical structures, elemental diversity, or life as it is understood. Various possible explanations of ostensible fine-tuning are discussed among philosophers, scientists, theologians, and proponents and detractors of creationism.” – Fine tuned universe
So a little confusion maybe with the scientists unable to explain in terms of science how the fundamental constants arise and the creationists seizing the opportunity to preach intelligent design. However, both are basing their views on what is apparent and not what is real; both are assuming that the description they have of reality is the best available.
Konstantin Meyl provides the most consistent description of physical reality so far with his Theory of Objectivity. This is based upon a single field equation (see above) and all the ‘fundamental’ constants are derived from this so there is nothing fundamental about them at all.
Meyl has calculated, just from his single equation and with no additional input, the masses of the elementary particles and the radii of the elements [more]
So we really are in a situation now where we only need a single ‘miracle’, which is the prior existence of some medium, the behaviour of which is consistent with the field equation.
“Sooner or later even the last natural scientist will realize, that nature does not provide ‘constants’ at all. If ‘constants of nature’ did exist, as listed in textbooks and encyclopaedias, then they aren’t consistent with causality, since we don’t know the cause, why the factor should have exactly this size and no other. Behind every so-called constant of nature unnoticed is hiding a physical closed loop conclusion. (solution)” – Scalar waves p. 599
So ‘causality’ here remains within the realm of the physical world or more accurately, within the (theoretical) confines of the Theory of Objectivity.
9. Apparent paranormal abilities such as telepathy are the illusions of Bad Science The root cause of this attitude I think is not that there is lots of bad science around (there certainly is) but that paranormal phenomena have, by definition, no plausible mechanism within the accepted scientific frameworks.
This leads to a view that “If there is no mechanism then it isn’t science and so it isn’t really happening.” This isn’t quite true of physicists though. Reading books and papers on biology and consciousness written by physicists it seems that almost all of them believe in some sort of telepathy and even life after death.
The reason is that they are used to working with ‘insubstantial’ entities such as force fields, ‘information’, quantum entanglement and action at a distance. The brain is assumed to work by electric fields and these are the ideal candidate for transmission of thoughts.
Konstantin Meyl describes instead magnetic scalar waves and wave resonance as being the medium of choice for thought transference. These turn out to have precisely the properties required to describe many experiments on ESP.
Are hypothesised to be the medium for cognition
Can form persistent connections between two individuals
Can penetrate walls
Resonant connections do not diminish with distance
Connections may be stronger between related individuals (The ‘Hill effect’)
The existence of a putative mechanism now means that there is something to investigate, something to try and measure or in other words some chance of doing some proper science.
Dean Radin (pictured) is arguably at the forefront of ESP research and is mentioned by Sheldrake. He and others have tried to make a science out of PSI research by introducing rigorous controls and by attempting to remove bias by the introduction of random number generators.
The problem with random number generators however is that there is no guarantee that they are in fact ‘random’. Many are based upon some assumed random process from nature such as radio-active decay but The Shnoll Effect shows that these figures depend upon planetary alignments such as eclipses and the page Neutrinos, eclipses and plagues gives the mechanism as variations in the solar neutrino stream.
One experiment from Radin showed an apparent ability of subjects to introduce a bias into the double slit experiment by thought alone. The choice of slit for a particle to go through had a slight bias that was different from a control experiment.
Dean commissioned some statisticians to repeat the experiment and to comment on the results, [here]. Wallacczek, and Stillfried were unable to produce the results . In addition to this they tried the experiment again but this time with no test subjects at all. They found that they still got a positive result, a difference in bias between the two setups, even with no ESP attempted!
The authors offer various explanations for why this might be, including: “For example, the detection method may manifest a sensitivity to (as-yet) unknown physical factors which are beyond the ability of the particular method to reveal, track, and identify“
So variations in the neutrino stream could conceivably be influential in the irreproducibility and could even be the cause of the effects manifest in the first place.
Despite their best efforts then, ESP researchers may be discovering, not paranormal abilities, but subtle physical influences unknown to most scientists.
2. Matter is unconscious Whether or not this is true depends upon precisely what is meant by ‘unconscious’ but the page The origins of life presents an argument that there is effectively a world parallel to the physical that might be called etheric and consists of an informational field which organises and animates all physical matter.
Assumptions that there is ‘something else’ need to re-examined now, as it is entirely possible that with the recent discoveries by Meyl, we have everything we need in order to explain all of the observations and measurements that we can make of the world.
No sensible discussion on consciousness can take place until we have a reasonable definition or characterisation of: consciousnes
5. Nature is purposeless and evolution is without direction The standard view of evolution is one of small random variations of DNA leading to small random variations of phenotype which are then selected for, with propitious variant surviving to reproduce.
Keith Baverstock
Now quite apart from the fact that DNA has very little to do with inheritance (The DNA delusion), the way that neo-Darwinism is phrased somewhat skips the fact that all development must be according to the laws of physics and must involve rather stable patterns of molecular arrangement or we are finished before we have even started.
The interpolation of DNA and some imaginary transcriptional mechanism has conceptually de-coupled the evolutionary process from any physical law or principle and reduced it to theoretical randomness whilst at the same time giving the impression that almost any end product is possible. In reality though, the construction of a human being must obey some quite restrictive conditions and must be stable to perturbations at all stages of development and evolution.
The ‘direction’ of evolution therefore is towards ever more efficient ways of transducing solar energy into functional shapes and units: Evolution and entropy. Organisms use the laws of thermodynamics to their evolutionary advantage instead of fighting against them, as explained by Baverstock and Rönkkö:
“In summary, we propose that the life process is based not on genetic variation, but on the second law of thermodynamics .. and the principle of least action, as proposed for thermodynamically open systems by De Maupertuis (Ville et al. 2008), which at the most fundamental level say the same thing. Together they constitute a supreme law of physics..” – Baverstock and Rönkkö
“All results of the evolution in the biosphere that have arisen between the ‘capacitor plates’ of the earth itself and its ionosphere can be regarded as structured capacitor losses, which also apply to humans” – Konstantin Meyl
9. ‘Mind’ is inside the head Yes. Various people have postulated various levels of exotica including a whole extra dimension to house all our memories, but a magnetic scalar-wave network seems sufficient to describe consciousness.
The impression that our thoughts and visions are ‘out there’ is a clever and necessary illusion created by the structure of our cognitive system. (see video above).
The brain maintains spatial awareness by constructing a (literal) internal space with the ‘self’ at the centre. The outside world is big but the brain is small so the internal space is wrapped around in a nested torus system so as to fit it all in.
“The Regularities of Nature are essentially habitual”– Rupert Sheldrake The field equations of the Theory of Objectivity are fixed but will organise into stable and adaptive control systems at a very early stage and hence manifest as higher ‘laws’ which may well have become ‘habitual’ over a million years of evolution.
Habituation, then , is not at the roots of the laws of physics but an emergent feature of them.
R.S. gives an example of the growth of certain crystal structures which once seemed impossible but now are routine. It seems to be assumed that crystals are formed by the random banging together of molecules which fall into some natural alignment because of their regular shape but if we hypothesise for one moment that there exists a hidden field that induces organisational forces on the molecules then the situation becomes clearer.
Existing crystals lead to an attendant magnetic field which is the entity that acts as the nucleating structure, not the molecules themselves, promoting further growth. Changes in geophysical factors such as the Earth’s magnetic field or variations in neutrino stream operate on this field directly and thence on the the physical molecules indirectly, to produce the changes in the patterns observed.
The experiments of Giorgio Piccardi clearly show time variations of measurable parameters in both biological and chemical processes.
Things which seem both variable and fundamental at the same time are certainly not fundamental but ’emergent’. This is the main reason behind the Science Delusion itself:, that downstream effects have been mistaken for root causes and and variables taken for constants:
“The Science Delusion is the belief that science already understands the fundamental nature of reality in principle, leaving only the details to be filled in” – Rupert Sheldrake
The brain is a scalar wave computer. It is formed from a scalar wave template and when developed will host a toroidal standing wave complex which acts as the computational centre for holistic cognition. Communication with other parts of the body is by means of longitudinal scalar waves via the myelin sheath surrounding the nerves.
In the case of the Brain of a White Collar Worker a man only had 90% of a full sized brain, He had some leg weakness on one side and a low IQ of around 75 but still managed to maintain a job as a civil servant and to raise a family. This case is cited by some as proof that the brain is not the centre of intelligence and has some other purpose.
We are told by neuro-scientists that the functions of the brain are arranged geographically, with some areas responsible for emotional regulation and others processing visual information etc. Either the brain above has compensated in a spectacular fashion or what we are being told is simply not true.
John Lorber 1915-1996 produced images of hundreds of brains and found many cases of hydrocephalus that had resulted in reduced brain size but with often no great cognitive impairment. In one case, a young man had an IQ of 126, gained a first class honours degree degree in mathematics and had normal social function but hardly any brain.
“When we did a brain scan, we saw that instead f the normal 4.5 cm thickness of brain tissue between the ventricles and the cortical surface, there was just a thin layer of mantle measuring a millimetre or so. His cranium is filled mainly with cerebrospinal fluid.” – John Lorber
The man had been referred to a physician as a boy because his head was slightly larger than normal.
What does all this mean?
The conundrum here is that the human head is quite large and uses up a lot of resources, which by itself is an evolutionary disadvantage. There must be some other pressing need then for a large cranium although brain volume seems irrelevant.
The logical conclusion is that the important factors in the workings of the brain are not the volume or number of neurons but instead the overall shape, size and proportions of the organ itself.
To see how this could be so we will need to understand a bit about embryonic development, fluid pressure, scalar waves, electromagnetic forces, fractal holo-fields and the golden ratio.
If, after this, things still seem a bit incredible then we can recall the words of Sherlock Holmes: ”When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
In embryonic development we find that blood flow precedes the development of the blood vessels and apparently acts as a guide for their development somehow. Electric fields are suspected and this idea is reinforced by the observation that spiralling blood flow in the aorta is instrumental in the formation of the heart as a spiral vortex machine,
Once the heart is formed, regulation of pressure serves to refine the shape and determine the dimensions of the arteries and indeed the thickness of their walls.
Consideration of development is important. Evolutionary processes are commonly evaluated according to their function but what is hardly ever discussed is that every physical feature in biology has to have a physical cause; there has to be some developmental plan that can result in that organ or ability,
The developmental function of the early brain then is to increase in size thereby exerting a gentle outward pressure (static electric forces) on the still malleable skull and causing it to expand at a controlled rate. There is no need for DNA to be involved here, the forces are physical and the ‘plan’ is simple.
The brain grows in a particular way which determines the rate of expansion of the skull. Grey matter is added in a way that results in a ‘blooming’ much like a cauliflower or cloud might develop. This allows for a refinement of shape which a simple balloon-like inflation would not.
A skull that is expanded via a filling of water will experience equal pressure in every direction and tend to be larger, wider and more spherical than the norm.
The Golden Ratio
The normal skull is not spherical though, it has a very specific shape of very specific proportions and those proportions involve the Golden Ratio.
So to provide fine-grained control the shape of the developing brain then we need a morphogenic field that somehow ‘knows’ about the Golden Ratio.
As luck would have it, the scalar waves of Konstantin Meyl are the ideal candidate for such a function. It isn’t so much that they are capable of such a ratio but that they naturally form three dimensional structures whose most stable state has dimensions in the Golden Ratio.
So these dimensions then are actually ‘hard-coded’ into the laws of physics and it should not be surprising then to find them cropping up all over the place. As an example, the dimensions of the red blood cell are also in this ratio: Blood flow and scalar waves
So a series of linked toroidal scalar waves are suspected of being instrumental in the development of the brain and skull. But what happens once development is complete?
This magneto- electric field now has another function which is to act as the substrate for cognition. The whole brain is the host for a distributed ‘holographic’ field which is responsible for information management for the rest of the body as well as intellectual and emotional computation.
The field is non-dissipative and maintains stability as a toroidal attractor state with the ideal dimensions to suit its physical nature.
Mae-Wan Ho has described the field in the brain as a sequence of nested torii with each layer vibrating to a different frequency and the ratio of the frequencies between adjacent layers as being equal to Φ, the golden ratio again. This ensures that there is minimal resonance between layers of the field and hence least interference but maximal independence between layers of the field. Good design.
Signals are sent to and from the brain via the nerves but again using scalar waves as the transmission medium: Scalar waves and nerves
Physicists almost unanimously require that the field be holographic in nature, meaning not that it is an illusion but that each part of the field contains all of the information rom the entirety of the field. This means that the field is also fractal (self-similar) in nature with any small part being a miniaturised version of the field as a whole.
The structure of the torus is ideal for representation of such field, being supportive of stable, resonating scalar waves and being describable by the same laws of nature at all physical scales of reality. There is clearly a need in biology for information to move freely from the macro to the sub-atomic and back so the idea of a holo-field is pretty much a necessity given only this requirement and nothing else.
In the new field physics of Konstantin Meyl, there is no Plank Length, no minimum size to any piece of the universe and so any piece of bio-field can theoretically hold an arbitrary large amount of information.
In one experiment, tissue from a human brain was implanted in a mouse and an immediate increase in learning ability was demonstrated, leading the experimenters to conclude that it isn’t so much the size of brain that is important as the quality of the tissue.
Another interpretation is that along with the material substance of the brain, the scientists had transplanted a piece of the holo-field containing all of the information from the human brain including memories, emotional processing and sense of self. This structure had merged with the field of the mouse to produce what is essentially a single hybrid consciousness.
Advisable not to try this at home, maybe.
‘Life after death‘ experiences are recorded where a patient will describe complex and coherent experiences that happened whilst zero cortical activity was recorded. This is because the scientists were recording classical electric fields only which are radiative and hence measurable. Scalar waves are non-dissipative and difficult to measure.
“Brain death is a lie, it has always been a lie and it continues to be a lie” – Paul Byrne M.D. Many people have made complete recoveries after a diagnosis of brain death. Many people have had their organs removed whilst arguably still alive. Clearly the wrong thing is being measured. [video]
Summary
The brain is a scalar wave computer whose proportions derive from its development and are also instrumental in its eventual function. The overall dimensions are crucial to its performance by electromagnetic vibration and not chemical exchanges in the neurons.
A millimetre of grey matter appears to be all that is necessary to create a toroidal signals transducer of Golden Ratio dimensions but brain geometry that is irregular can disrupt the standing wave within the skull and result in impaired cognition.
Damage to specific areas of the brain will disrupt the field in specific ways which makes it appear that function is somehow attached to physical material when it is really a ‘holistic’ or holographic field with information distributed across the whole field and very likely throughout the entire body.
Various researchers have given up on determining how blood flows around the circulatory system and have decided that whatever energetic motivation there is from the heart is insufficient to describe the total flow and that there must be some other forces at work.
“The widely accepted pressure-propulsion circulation model fails to explain an increasing number of observed circulatory phenomena”
“Experimental and phenomenological evidence suggest the opposite, namely that the blood possesses autonomous movement sustained by the metabolic demands of the tissues at the level of microcirculation.“ – Branko Furst
So the blood appears to move by itself. This contradicts the laws of physics, so we must look to some other source of energy to explain the blood flow and some physical mechanism by which this energy is harnessed and converted to kinetic energy.
Assertions:
Blood flow is organised into scalar waves
Scalar waves exist within red blood cells
Scalar waves form within the blood plasma
Scalar magnetic waves may exist as an etheric blood flow
These waves are energised by solar neutrinos
These structures are instrumental in circulation of the blood
Start with a drawing from Viktor Schauberger of water flow in a pipe.
The flow of water is largely spiral and almost friction free. The main body of the water has separated from the walls of the pipe (observed by Schauberger) thereby reducing friction even more and toroidal ring structures (scalar waves) exist at intervals to act as bearings to further help reduce friction and propel the main flow.
Such flow was measured by Schauberger (here) to demonstrate a sinusoidal response to increasing pressure and to actually develop negative resistance at certain flow rates. This result was reproduced by independent researchers and implies that some extra input of energy is coming from somewhere.
An image from Charlie Peskin’s PhD thesis shows fluid flow (top to bottom) through a valve structure such as may be found in the heart or veins. Vortices can be seen forming around the valve outlet and they will, when fully formed, close the valve behind them.
Another image from the paper by Merab Beraia showing spiral structures everywhere in the arterial system with even supposedly ‘turbulent’ blood flow being comprised of highly organised helical flow. The suggestion is that the blood is not behaving as a simple Newtonian fluid at all but that its movement is largely determined by electromagnetic forces, with spiral formations being typical of the interaction between charged particles and magnetic fields.
So the blood is forming toroidal structures known as ‘scalar waves’ which are electrically structured and largely self-sustaining and highly energy-efficient. The performance of such structures allows for the blood to actually accelerate as it comes out of the heart and to propel itself along the arteries.
Short video shows similar structures in sea water.
Here we see luminescence in sea water that is attributed to plankton. Maybe, but waterfalls have demonstrated the same phenomenon and Viktor Schauberger claims to have reproduced the phenomenon in a laboratory.
Konstantin Meyl gives the following hypothesis: Small vortices created in the water act as receivers for solar neutrinos and then release the energy as photons. Neutrinos are already in the form of a charge-vortex (right), making their absorption into similar structures highly plausible.
This would be a good explanation then for Schauberger’s observation of ‘negative resistance’; the water flow is already friction free and is absorbing additional energy through neutrino transduction.
Time to consider the possibility that vortical eddy currents in arterial blood will also absorb neutrino energy thereby magnifying their own action and helping propel the blood cells through the capillaries.
The Influence of the Golden Ratio on the Erythrocyte
This paper from Purcell and Ramsey claims that red blood cells are constructed according to the Golden Ratio.
If in addition we have an electric current flowing around the blood cell, we have precisely the conditions for the generation of stable scalar waves. The blood is energised by an electric field in the heart and toroidal currents are maintained by input from neutrinos.
The capillary problem. Fluid flow at small scales is profoundly different from that of macro scale flow. Here, viscous forces completely dominate the flow dynamics, making even distilled water seem, not so much like honey, but thick warm tar.
Scott Turner explains:
Intuitive ideas of fluid flow arise from observations at the macro level and do not translate well to the micro-cosmos. Any explanation of capillary flow emerging from such intuitions must be considered invalid.
So how are blood cells squeezing through capillaries that are smaller than themselves? The idea that pressure generated a billion cells away can do this without exploding the intermediate arteries is a very big stretch of the imagination.
If our new toy is toroidal waves fuelled by neutrinos then it is time to consider this surely?
Scalar waves were described above as created from physical matter (water) but with some electrical properties which help organise the matter into spiral flows and toroidal rings. Meyl, however, in his book Scalar Waves, describes them as stable dynamic states within the electromagnetic field itself with no need for any supporting material substance.
These waves can exist by themselves and carry energy and information around biological systems. One German scientist documents how they can apparently organise physical conduits within the cells in order to facilitate communication and then dismantle them when no longer necessary.
If blood is observed by competent scientists to ‘propel itself’ around the capillaries then maybe such field waves are implicated here, after all: what else is there?
Capillary flow (Pollack) The video clip from Gerald Pollack of water flowing autonomously through a tube (left to right) can be found here. “Unending flow through the tube; it can go on for a full day” – Pollack
We see water with no discernible source of power flowing steadily into a tube. The phenomenon only works with hydrophilic tubes and is enhanced by application of infra-red or ultra-violet light.
The whole phenomenon is self-organising, with the ability to absorb external energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation and to use it as ‘fuel’
From chaos to order in active fluids – Morozov. Wu et al
In this paper, some biological substances including ATP were mixed with water and the resulting solution placed in small tubes and cylinders.
The fluid spontaneously organised itself into vortices, the vortices oriented themselves with respect to each other and then the whole thing started to move in a single unidirectional flow.
The diameter of the tubes determined the speed of flow and small notches made in the cylinder walls could be used to control the direction of the flow.
The flow then is not driven by a pressure gradient and the author asks if the idea of ‘pressure’ even makes sense in such liquids.
We know that the heart creates vortices of blood at the scale of centimetres but this paper now suggests that at lower scales, i.e. in the capillaries, there is scarcely a need to mechanically shape the blood flow as it seems quite capable of organising its own affairs.
In dogs whose heart has been stopped, the blood continues to flow for up to a hour. This blood is clearly not being driven by the heart but by some residual energy left in the bloodstream that continues to organise and implement flow independently of whatever catastrophe may have occurred elsewhere.
The venous problem. If the blood is pumped around by pressure alone then the rather slow flow emerging from the capillaries will speed up into the veins and eventually emerge as a flow into the heart that seems as fast and vigorous as the flow exiting the heart after being pumped.
Venous flow is claimed to be by muscular contraction, with the valves preventing return flow, but if the flow into the heart is a fast as claimed then there is surely no return flow to mitigate against? And what happens when we are asleep or bedridden?
The valves may well prevent return flow but they also serve the purpose of restoring vortices to the blood which in turn can now transmute ambient vortex energy to kinetic propulsion of the blood.
In addition, the construction of scalar waves will give the blood flow a specific direction. It is no good postulating some sort of energetic input to the bloodstream without both a description of a mechanism of how flow is generated and a way of determining the direction of that flow. The idea that scalar waves are produced by venous valves fits these requirements precisely.
Branko Furst: “Experimental and phenomenological evidence suggest .. that the blood possesses autonomous movement sustained by the metabolic demands of the tissues at the level of microcirculation”. So the blood flow is regulated and physically caused by the actual demand for the blood flow and this happens at the capillary level!
What are we to make of this? The body is making its own requests for blood flow at the cellular level, with each portion of capillary making a small contribution to the overall blood flow. We can suppose that requests for extra blood are made by the transfer of scalar waves somehow from organ to capillary and that these waves will then absorb neutrinos and maybe actually help drive the blood through the capillary to the required degree.
So running upstairs leads to surplus heat ‘waste’ (vortex energy) in the muscles which spirals inwards towards the capillaries, becoming more concentrated as it does so. This energy passes through the capillary walls and has an effect similar to the application of infrared light. The overall blood flow increases with this extra energy and the heart beats faster as an end result of the increased blood flow, not as an initial cause of it.
The blood enters the heart as fast as it exits (this must be the case anyhow) – so is the heart causing the blood to flow or is the flow causing the heart to pump? The speed of the blood entering the heart cannot be caused by blood that was pumped out of the heart and around the body as the two flows are decoupled from each other causally by both the capillary and venous blood flow, neither of which are dependent upon arterial blood pressure.
Is the heart sucking up the venous blood (opinions seem to differ on this) or is the blood simply moving by itself with the beating heart simply interpolated in the middle and acting as some sort of regulator?
“Pulmonary circulation is the system of transportation that shunts de-oxygenated blood from the heart to the lungs to be re-saturated with oxygenbefore being dispersed into the systemic circulation.” – NIH So blood flow out of the lungs is via dispersal. This really is avoiding the question.
Konstantin Meyl (here) points out that there is considerable energy stored in water vortices in humid air and that these contribute a significant portion of the energy input to the human body. There is less energy in the air we breathe out than the air we breathe in.
So it is possible then, that scalar waves from the air we breathe directly enter the pulmonary blood flow and make a contribution to the circulation. This makes a lot of sense with an increase in breathing leading increased energy input which then directly causes an increase in circulation. The requirement is determining the physiology as described by Furst. See also: Do we breathe oxygen?
How else is blood assumed to flow away from the delicate lung capillaries? Is there really enough pressure maintained here to continue pumping the blood all the way around the body? Is this local pressure somehow micro-managed by the beating of the heart according to demand? That really would be a miracle!
Are conditions such as legionnaire’s disease and pneumonia largely the result of bad pulmonary circulation as a result of lack of fresh (energised) air? See: What causes pneumonia?
The Yin and Yang symbol is not far off a stylised depiction of a scalar wave and descriptions of Qi energy tie it closely to the blood: “Blood nurtures and supports Qi, or the body’s life force; in turn, Qi supplies the power, intelligence, and messages to propel Blood into all the physical structures where it’s required “
“Blood is the mother of Qi; Qi is the commander of Blood”
“Blood is the material substance that courses through our veins. But without the messages and wisdom of Qi and the power of its flow, we could not live. Without a sufficient quantity and quality of Blood, at the physical level, you cannot create Qi. All the body, mind, and spirit actions you perform in your daily life depend on the value and quality of Blood and Qi. The quality of your Qi helps Blood flow properly throughout your body.” – TCM
A very clear dependent duality here that mirrors the scalar wave theory of Konstantin Meyl
