Denis Rancourt’s paper: Cancer arises from stress-induced breakdown of tissue homeostasis [here] challenges the mainstream paradigm of cancer metastasis and gives a list of characteristic features of cancer development that need explaining.

These points are addressed here with respect to a previously formed hypothesis that all meaningful biological activity is mediated by an electromagnetic bio-field which takes the form of a nested vortex structure: The nature of the bio-field. All of Rancourt’s points are naturally explained in accordance with the hypothesis, with the various features of tumour growth and disposition closely matching the predicted behaviour and geometry of such a field.
Cancer arises from stress-induced breakdown of tissue homeostasis – Denis Rancourt
https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=84&name=2015_11_30_cancer_arises_from_stress_induced_breakdown_of_tissue_homeostasis
Part-III should make it clear that one reason that treatments are so ‘off’ is that the medical profession has an incorrect model of what cancer actually is. I review the scientific literature about what cancer actually is and is not. There is no observational basis for the medical establishment’s dominant paradigm of cancer known as ‘metastasis’ as we shall see.
Ninety percent of patients who die from solid-tumour cancers die from a multitude of tumours on many organs in the body. the first diagnosis typically involves detection of a single tumour that is most evident because it is palpable near the outside of the body, such as in a breast. But those patients that dies are found to be burdened with many tumours, which are detected by autopsy after death. As a result, since the surgeon sounded the alarm on the basis of the first-discovered tumour, and since the surgeon has been focussed on removing that first-discovered tumour, the surgeon saves face by proposing and believing that the other tumours are ‘secondary growths’. that the cancer is a ‘disseminated cancer’, and that the first-discovered tumour must have ‘spread’ to internal organs.
This temporal illusion of disease development has plagued oncology for well over one hundred years, and appears to be irresistible to virtually the entire medical profession. – Rancourt
- How does cancer spread? How does it metastasise?
- What are the ‘seed’ and ‘soil’ of metastasis?
- Why do some organs develop secondary tumours more easily than others?
- Do identical seeds always give rise to tumours in identical tissues?
- Why would cells evolve the ability to induce tumour growth?
- Why are the most virulent cells in a primary tumour not the selected originators of the distant tumours?
- How do relatively few (genetically) deviant cells recruit the majority of non-deviant cells in a tumour to grow a complex tumour and its supporting vascular network in what is otherwise healthy tissue?
- Why is susceptibility of an organ to cancer related to the circulatory patterns in the organs?
- Is cancer caused by genetic mutations?
- Why is there more cancer on the surfaces of organs?
- How is cancer associated with wound healing?
- Why is cancer associated with abnormal (migratory) blood clotting?
Properties of the bio-field
The bio-field has several very distinctive qualities which are pertinent to the questions asked by Rancourt. All of these were established or hypothesised independently of any evidence for cancer and are outlined here: The nature of the bio-field They cannot therefore be said to constitute post-facto rationalisations or ‘epicycles’.
- The field is a dynamic, ‘living’ electromagnetic continuum of information and energy
- The overall structure is that of a set of nested electrodynamic vortices
- Energy flow is centripetal by the ‘vortex principle’: Pollackโs water engine
- Causation is top-down, feedback is bottom-up
- Field propagation is close to the speed of light
- Information transfer is along electro-magnetically conductive pathways
- The field is responsible for morphogenesis, maintenance, repair and regulation
- The fractal vortex structure leads to a natural modularity of function
- Biological control is deterministic and ‘cognitive’
- Control of blood flow is fully cognitive: The bio-field of the heart
- The field is effectively unmeasurable by modern scientific instruments
Many specific questions concerning cancer can now be answered in terms of specific bio-field qualities. In general we can say that the assumption of a bio-field of the nature described, alters our default view of biology in such a way that other problems simply evaporate as they are shown to be mere artifacts of existing faulty assumptions.
Hypothesis
Cancer is caused by a disruption or dysfunction of the bio-field. Several possibilities come to mind:
- Insufficient local energy to maintain bio-field integrity
- A surplus of energy leading to uncontrolled growth
- Malformed bio-field instructions
- Information seeded to an inappropriate ‘soil’
- Chemical (material) corruption of the soil
- Compromised top-down signalling
Answering some questions
Can cancer spread and if so, how?
Cancer is caused by bio-field information that is antipathetic to local organisation for one reason or another. Such information is hypothesised to take on the specific physical structure of an electromagnetic ring vortex and to travel along specific conductive pathways in the body such as nerves, blood vessels, connective tissue, primo-vascular system and possibly acupuncture meridians.
A travelling vortex stream may be measured as an electric current under certain circumstances but the two are not identical and the informational content of the signal is unmeasurable in the conventional sense. The only way to ascertain the nature of biological information at the present is to allow it to impact a biological system and see what happens.
According to these hypotheses then, it is perfectly possible for cancerous signals to travel from one place to another in the body and in a way that is invisible to current science.
To test the hypotheses we can look at the pattern of metastasis to see if spread is likely to have been along the conductive pathways described.
What are the ‘seed’ and ‘soil’ of metastasis?
The ‘seed’ is a compact complex of bio-field instructions which are responsible for morphogenesis and cellular regulation. The ‘soil’ is the local bio-field which organises the physical material of a cell whilst remaining open to instructions from a supervening bauplan.
If a piece of flimsy vein is transplanted to become part of an artery it will soon be transformed by the local morphogenic field into a muscular section of artery. The two tissues are different in different soils but similar enough to respond to the same instruction set in a meaningful manner.
If a piece of liver, say, were transplanted into an arterial environment we would not expect such a happy result.
The outcome of such a transplant then is a combination of seed and soil where both are currently invisible to contemporary science and all that is observed is the eventual outcome in terms of the arrangement and activity of bio-molecules. Study of such phenomena is akin to the study of the shadows on the back of Plato’s cave without even a theory of what causes them and imagining that they themselves are the progenitors of their own organisation.
Why do some organs develop secondary tumours more easily than others?
The bio-field as a whole is organised as a series of nested vortices with energy moving inwards towards the chakras. This organisation gives an obvious heterogeneity to the overall energy field and we should consider the relevance of this to cancer formation:
- Internal organs have more energy available which may make them more resilient to bio-field corruption but may allow for more aggressive cancerous growth once it starts.
- The periphery of an organ is the periphery of a vortex and also the inner ‘concentration ‘radius’ of an enclosing vortex. We expect a sharp discontinuity of energy and maybe a certain amount of ‘turbulence’ at these places.
- The outer skin has no enclosing vortex to supply it with energy and we expect different (low?) energy conditions here.
- In addition to centripetal movement of energy, there exists the possibility for energy to move along specific conductive pathways as mentioned above.
- The lining of the lungs may rely upon energy from inhaled air to maintain itself: Do we breathe oxygen?
- Accumulation of chemical toxins should be considered as a source of bio-field corruption.
Do identical seeds always give rise to tumours in identical tissues?
Possibly, but we have no way of determining whether or not two tissues or two seeds are ‘identical’.
Possibly we can divide seeds into various equivalence classes having similar functions upon a class of similar soils.
Why would cells evolve the ability to induce tumour growth?
The question assumes some sort of Darwinian model or process for the emergence of biological life. Such ideas are a distraction and need to be rejected.
A common idea is that genetic information is an abstract construct represented by a digital string and that a cell is constructed on the basis of such information. Meaningful novelties in biology are said to be caused by random mutations of such information which are then somehow implemented by the transcription process.
The idea of development via random mutation gives the impression that almost any arrangement of molecules is possible and the requirements of natural selection suggest that almost any such arrangement that survives a couple of generations must be ultimately beneficial for the organism. This leads to an idea of ‘top-down’ development whereby evolutionary novelties are ‘driven’ by selective necessity. It ignores the idea of a bio-field altogether and manages a rationale for morphogenesis independent of any physical process that might produce it.
Cancer is a dysfunction and not an evolutionary novelty and is a physical process not a random mutation of abstract information.
Cancer is likely one of:
- Physically corrupted top-down bio-field instructions
- Correct instructions operating in the wrong place
- Bad implementation of instructions because of local bio-field corruption
- Bad feedback
Why are the most virulent cells in a primary tumour not the selected originators of the distant tumours?
Tumours are not initiated by cells but by mobile packets of morphogenic instructions.
How do relatively few (genetically) deviant cells recruit the majority of non-deviant cells in a tumour to grow a complex tumour and its supporting vascular network in what is otherwise healthy tissue?
Tumours are not initiated by cells but by mobile packets of morphogenic instructions.
A cell is a vortical energy centre which responds to morphogenic instructions from a supervening bio-field; that is its function. Morphogenic instructions are complex and are quite capable of producing complex vascular networks; that is their function.
The formation of a vascular network is accomplished by process much closer to the basic laws of physics than one might think: Vascular morphogenesis The morphogenesis of capillaries
Why is susceptibility of an organ to cancer related to the circulatory patterns in the organs?
The circulatory patterns are determined by the vascular network and the vascular network is determined by the morphogenic field. The field persists after morphogenesis is complete and is responsible for tissue repair and maintenance.
Energy spirals inwards from the environment to the organ and is thence guided and concentrated by the conductive pathways of the organ. Energy concentration is determined in part by the circulatory patterns of the organ and the bio-field feeds off such energy.
An organ, or a finger is created around a template consisting of an electromagnetic vortex complex. If a finger is damaged then the electrical circuit is broken and electromagnetic turbulence occurs. A new electromagnetic environment is created which promotes new tissue growth, initially of a generic type, but later of more specific type once the field has restored some integrity and is amenable to top-down instructions once more.
Why is cancer of the heart so rare?
Geometric considerations alone suggest that the heart is at the centre of the bio-field vortex system. Electrical energy is recycled around a toroidal system with the heart and other chakras at accumulation points.
The heart is not going to be energy deficient.
Moreover, there exist sufficient energy outlet to prevent overloading with energy. The blood is charged with electrical energy (Electromagnetism and blood) and this flows through the arteries towards the periphery. Energy flows along nerve cells in the form of ring vortices in the myelin sheath and a large proportion of this energy flows from the heart up to the brain.
The entire circulatory system likely has its own dedicated regulatory subsystem (The bio-field of the heart), making the heart almost infallible from the point of view of energy supply and regulation.
How is cancer associated with wound healing?
What Does Cancer Metastasis Have to Do with Wound Healing? More than You Might Think: https://www.mskcc.org/news/what-does-cancer-metastasis-have-do-wound-healing-more-you-might-think – Matthew Tontonoz
Scientists at the Sloan Kettering Institute have discovered that the ability of cancers to metastasize to other organs is dependent upon their ability to co-opt natural wound-healing pathways.
โWe now understand metastasis as the regeneration of the wrong tissue โ the tumour โ in the wrong place โ distant vital organs,โ
This is clear evidence that a morphogenic bio-field is in operation. Tissue is created and organised into meaningful biological structures in both wounds and cancer. These are highly similar processes and will naturally use similar ‘pathways’.
The claim that cancers will ‘co-opt natural wound healing pathways is slightly odd as it places the cancer as the causative agency whereas according to the bio-field hypothesis, the cancer is the result of the morphogenic pathways, not the instigator.
It is far from clear whether a single cancer does actually metastasize or whether the various tumours instead result from the same corrupted instruction set which may not necessarily reside within an actual tumour.
What is a ‘pathway’?
A ‘pathway’ is the collective activity of a number of molecules and reactions that results in a meaningful biological outcome. A large number of processes will start to behave in a stereotypical fashion, seemingly to achieve a goal oriented outcome.
The very existence of ‘pathways’ is further supporting evidence for a supervening bio-field. Molecules cannot organise themselves and cannot make any decision to do so. A higher organisational principle is therefore in operation. An organisational bio-field is responsible for the coordination of such pathways.
Correct functioning of such a principle results in healthy tissue and incorrect functioning results in tumours. Tumours may be complex and functioning in some sense as the basic nature of the bio-field is to organise inanimate material into a living system. If a brick making machine is fed cake mixture, the resulting bricks will still be brick shaped.
Morphogenesis is fundamental and causative
The nature of dysfunction in cancerous cells is further indication of these assertions. Tissue may be misplaced and growth may be uninhibited, but the basic tendency to form functional tissue and complete vascular systems still persists. Morphogenesis appears to be ‘fundamental’ and causative.
We have two basic choices for morphogenesis:
- Organisation arises as an emergent property of the activity of individual cells and molecules and is dependent upon such activity
- Organisation is top-down; an organisational principle exists independently of the constituent molecules and is imposed upon them
The patterns of cancer formation alone seem to favour the second option. Tissue ‘organisations’ seem to move from one tissue to another and similar ordering is imposed upon a different collection of molecules with typically different properties and function. The entity that seems to migrate from one place to another is therefore one of an ‘organisation’ which is independent of the material tissue.
Moreover, even when only one tumour is present, the corruption is that of ‘organisation’ rather than the dysfunction of a molecule. The dysfunction of any single molecule is meaningless with respect to the overall bauplan and the observed corruptions are implemented wholesale in different parts of the organism.
Why is cancer associated with abnormal (migratory) blood clotting?
The Trousseau sign of malignancy or Trousseau’s syndrome is a medical sign involving episodes of vessel inflammation due to blood clot which are recurrent or appearing in different locations over time.
Trousseau’s syndrome is a rare variant of venous thrombosis that is characterized by recurrent, migratory thrombosis in superficial veins and in uncommon sites, such as the chest wall and arms. This syndrome is particularly associated with pancreatic, gastric and lung cancer
Blood clotting is generally described as a series of chemical reactions triggered by some chemical signalling.
The idea of remote signalling is indicative of a bio-field and the observation that thrombosis is now ‘recurrent’ in ‘uncommon’ sites is suggestive of global dysfunction, i.e. that of a bio-field. How does thrombosis disappear and then recur? It must be lying low for a while, invisible to material processes; it must therefore consist of pure ‘organisation’.
Cancer is sounding like a systemic problem rather than a local anomaly.
Control of blood circulation is fully ‘cognitive’
The post: The bio-field of the heart posited that circulatory control is fully ‘cognitive’, that is to say that blood flow is controlled in a fine grained manner by a an intelligent control system with feedback and teleological aims.
It seems that blood flow itself is controlled in each and every section of artery independently of flows in other parts of the system and even independently of the blood pressure given that the blood can sometimes flow from low to high pressure.
Sufficient feedback exists for the heart to ‘know’ what is going on and sufficient resources are available to the heart to take remedial action under normal circumstances.
Given the dysfunction of blood clotting in cancer patients we can now consider that blood clotting is also under the top-down control of the bio-field and that the clotting itself is merely another manifestation of whatever dysfunction has led to the cancer in the first place.
How can dogs smell cancers?
The sense of smell is said to involve the ‘detection’ of molecules in the nose. This surely involves some sort of (electromagnetic?) signalling between the molecule and the nose, but a more economical hypothesis is to say that the bio-signals travel direct from the source to the olfactory nerve with no need of intermediary molecules: Scalar waves and nerves
Cancer is caused by characteristic bio-field activity and likely leaks information in the form of ‘off-key’ frequencies (Frรถhlich- below). This information is detected directly by dogs and other animals and alerts them to the fact that something is wrong. Very likely, different cancers and different diseases have different characteristic smells.
The nose is a sensitive measuring instrument for external bio-field information.
Can cancer be cause by stress?
Rancourt points at ‘stress’ as major cause of cancer whilst Stefan Lanka and the German New Medicine movement claim ‘psychological trauma’ but neither of these are physical (biological) processes and neither are particularly well defined. We are stuck with the problem of how a ‘psychological’ state can affect a ‘physical’ cell.
However, if we are saying that an electromagnetic bio-field is responsible for all biological regulation then both cancer and stress are now conceived in terms of ‘characteristic bio-field activity’. A regulatory state which promotes hyper-vigilance and prioritises the fight-or-flight response is unlikely to have ‘healing and maintenance’ as its top priority; energy is limited and is diverted to the ‘wrong’ functions in the long term.
Stress induced cancer therefore remains a possibility under this paradigm.
Other ideas
Cancer arises from a corrupted nucleus?
This is unlikely given multiple results which suggest that the origins of mutation lie outside the nucleus of the cell:
Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics – Thomas Seyfried et al.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3941741/
A nucleus of a tumorous cell was transplanted into a healthy cytoplasm and normal cells resulted. Conversely, when a normal nucleus was transplanted into tumorous cytoplasm, the result was a tumorous cell.

Further studies will be needed to determine whether tumors arise from defects in the nuclear genome alone or in the mitochondria alone, or require defects in both the mitochondria and the nuclear genome. Such studies will provide evidence for or against the nuclear gene driver hypothesis of cancer initiation. – Seyfried et al.
Cytoplasmic mediation of malignancy – Barbara Israel, Warren Schaeffer
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/19784786_Cytoplasmic_mediation_of_malignancy
Cytoplasmic hybrid (cybrid) clones, derived from the fusion of cytoplasts from malignantly transformed cells to normal whole cells, produced tumors in 17% of the animals injected with them. Nuclear/cytoplasmic hybrid (reconstituted cell) clones, derived by fusion of cytoplasts from malignant cells with karyoplasts of normal cells, produced tumors in 97% of the animals injected.
These results are clearly consistent with the prediction from the bio-field model which is that cancer originates from the corruption of a top-down control system. Events within the nucleus are not causal but are largely the results of the action of a supervening bio-field.
The bio-field resides in all parts of the cell but ‘information ‘instructions’ and energy travel inwards (top-down) whilst feedback moves outwards (bottom-up).
A beneficial scale of EMF frequencies – Geesink and Meijer
Electromagnetic Frequency Patterns that are Crucial for Health and Disease reveal a Generalized Biophysical Principle: the GM scale โ Dirk K F Meijer, Hans Geesink
https://www.academia.edu/35199978/Electromagnetic_Frequency_Patterns_that_are_Crucial_for_Health_and_Disease_reveal_a_Generalized_Biophysical_Principle_the_GM_scale
The authors looked at hundreds of experiments concerning the effects of electromagnetic waves of different frequencies upon living systems and found that certain frequencies had beneficial effects upon living organisms and some had detrimental effects.
The beneficial frequencies all lay on a 12 note Pythagorean musical scale where the intermediate notes all had detrimental effects.
Favourable and Unfavourable EMF Frequency Patterns in Cancer: Perspectives for Improved Therapy and Prevention โ Dirk K F Meijer, Hans Geesink
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=82944
The search was narrowed down to effects on cancer only and the pattern persisted. Radiotherapy outcomes were significantly improved by the choice of beneficial frequencies.
The studied EM frequencies showed a fractal pattern of 12 beneficial (anti-cancer) frequencies, and 12 detrimental (cancer promoting) frequencies, that form the central pattern of a much wider self-similar EMF spectrum of cancer inhibiting or promoting activities. Inhibiting of the cancer process, and even curing of the disease, can thus be considered through exposure to the coherent type of EM fields. – Geesink, Meijer
What does this mean?
Nobody knows, but a couple of possibilities come to mind:
- The body uses certain frequencies as part of its signalling mechanism and the detrimental frequencies interfere with this.
- The beneficial frequencies act as a simple energy supply to the bio-field. These energies are absorbed by the field and integrated into it in order to strengthen it into a robust, meaningful system. The detrimental frequencies ‘clash’ with the existing order and lead to some energetic ‘turbulence’ which is not absorbed properly weakens the overall coherence of the system.
The description from Geesink and Meijer of the frequencies forming a specifically fractal pattern is interesting.
The bio-field is described here: The nature of the bio-field as consisting of nested torus structures and therefore having a fractal nature. Energy moves in a circuit and spirals inwards according to a energy cascade. Each circuit can maybe said to have an associated frequency and such frequency doubtless increases as the scale diminishes with the inward concentration.
It seems that each fractal vortex structure may be amenable to ‘refuelling’ via a fractal energy input.
Herbert Frรถhlich
Long-range coherence in biological systems. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 7,
399โ418. โ Frรถhlich , H., 1977.
https://ayuba.fr/pdf/frohlich1977.pdf
โThe problem of cancer is one of the control of cell division. While bacterial cells under appropriate conditions keep on dividing, cells in a fully grown differentiated tissue or organ divide relatively rarely, though they divide more rapidly in growing tissues and organs. We shall assume that a controlling agency belonging to the whole organ, i.e. a collective property, exists and that individual cells respond to it.โ
โThis then implies that a coherent electric vibration carried collectively by the individual nuclei extends through the whole tissue (organ), and that the vibrations of each individual cell respond to it and are thus held in the appropriate phase, such that the total electric energy is a minimum. In general, this vibrating polarization field will form a complicated spatial pattern.โ โ H. Frรถhlich 1977
Frรถhlich clearly believed in a bio-field and had the idea that a group of cells could somehow begin to operate at a different set of frequencies to the rest of the organism. Such a group would form a coherent organism in its own right but be isolated from the top-down control of the rest of the bio-field:
If, by external influences, some cells are changed such that their relevant frequencies are altered then:
a) These cells no longer respond to the control and
b) The strength of the controlling vibration is reduced
So the activity within the cancer is not in fact random and the growth not completely chaotic but instead is organised at a different set of frequencies to the rest of the body. The cancer is effectively insulated from the main signalling system and de-coupled from any form of global regulation. It is supplied with nutrients and continues to grow, but lacking the information as to its own location within the body it does not โknow its placeโ; it will produce inappropriate tissue and grow at an uncontrolled rate.
This is confirmed by Geesink and Meijer by measuring the signals emitted from cancer cells and showing them to use a scale of electromagnetic frequencies that is harmonic of itself but out of tune with the rest of the body; a brass instrument playing in a classical orchestra.
Michael Levin
Endogenous Voltage Potentials and the Microenvironment: Bioelectric Signals that Reveal, Induce and Normalize Cancer – Levin, Chernet
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4267524/
Cancer may be a disease of geometry: a misregulation of the field of information that orchestrates individual cellsโ activities towards normal anatomy. Recent work identified molecular mechanisms underlying a novel system of developmental control: bioelectric gradients. Endogenous spatio-temporal differences in resting potential of non-neural cells provide instructive cues for cell regulation and complex patterning during embryogenesis and regeneration. It is now appreciated that these cues are an important layer of the dysregulation of cell: cell interactions that leads to cancer.
In identifying bioelectric gradients as providing instructive cues for cell regulation, Levin is describing a de-facto bio-field.
The question arises as to how such gradients are created, maintained and regulated. This is likely unanswerable in terms of classical bio-physics where electric fields arise from charge and are static in nature. If a field gradient is to be created then charged particles must be arranged just so in order to produce such a gradient. The problem now is that to achieve separation of negative and positive charges requires the action of .. an already existing electric field!
The formulation of the field in terms of a living vortex field solves these problems. The field naturally forms vortex patterns as in a tornado. A centripetal pressure gradient naturally forms from high on the periphery to low in the centre. The vortex naturally self-regulates and self-maintains by the accumulation of energy from the environment.
Tissue Organisation Field Theory
Are the Somatic Mutation and Tissue Organization Field Theories of Carcinogenesis Incompatible? – Simon Rosenfeld
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3855256/
Conversely, according to TOFT, carcinogenesis is primarily a problem of tissue organization: carcinogenic agents destroy the normal tissue architecture thus disrupting cell-to-cell signalling and compromising genomic integrity. – Rosenfeld
This sounds like the bio-field theory outlined above but with no clear idea as to the nature of the field and still with too much emphasis on the influence DNA on biological organisation.
However:
Hence, in TOFT the DNA mutations are the effect, and not the cause, of the tissue-level events. – Rosenfeld
Yes! Material mutations are a downstream effect of bio-field activity.
Statements such as this run throughout the literature on biology. Top-down control via some sort of bio-field is often suggested by the language but rarely mentioned explicitly. Researchers observe and describe what is obviously top-down influence from a supervening field but rarely identify it as such.
Scientists who are not thinking of biology primarily in terms of a causative field structure nevertheless will invariably find themselves describing such a phenomenon in whatever vocabulary seems familiar to them. Here, bio-field influence is described as a ‘tissue-level event‘.
Similarly, even though the idea of DNA as a source of biological information is given due deference, we find that it often turns out to be irrelevant to the problem under discussion.
Summary
A hypothesis has been proposed that cancer is ‘inappropriate morphogenesis’ caused by disruption or dislocation of the action of an electromagnetic bio-field.
A list of anomalies, unexplained by existing theories is addressed, with each item having natural sounding explanations within the bio-field paradigm.
The nested vortex structure of the hypothesised bio-field shows parallels with common locations for tumour growth.
Metastasis is possible via bio-field information transport.
‘Stress’ as a cause of cancer is supported by this hypothesis.
Several views of cancer exist which are contrary to the mainstream paradigm but are nevertheless found to be consistent with the bio-field hypothesis.
The language of many researchers implicitly supports the idea of a bio-field even when not explicitly described as such.





































































































































