The sun is the centre of a giant cosmic energy vortex. Field energy spirals inwards and condenses at the centre to produce the hydrogen ball described by astronomers. All energy is supplied from the outside and input energy equals output energy. The nuclear reactor described by mainstream science leads to too many anomalies.
Several odd but well documented characteristics of the sun need explanation:
- The sun maintains a spherical shape despite rapid rotation
- The hottest part of the sun is outside of the sun (coronal heating problem)
- Comets can accelerate away from the sun
- There is no bow wave as the sun moves through space
- Solar output has been fairly constant over several billion years
- The atomic composition is consistent with transmutation of elements
Hypothesis
The sun is not to be considered as a stand-alone object that is burning its own fuel and radiating the resulting energy into space, but as part of a much larger system of energy taking on the form of a vortex and with the sun at the centre as an integral part of that vortex.
Electromagnetic field energy spirals inwards towards the sun where it can materialise as matter, first as electrons and then hydrogen, with further elements produced by transmutation.
Much of the energy will be manifest as photons or other energetic particles which will then radiate outwards as ‘sunlight’. A constant supply of energy means that the sun is not getting any bigger or smaller on average, thereby providing a stable platform for life to evolve and flourish over the millennia.
Vortex physics
The diagram, taken from Konstantin Meyl’s book Vortex Physics shows the general structure of a vortex whether it be composed of water, air or an electromagnetic field. Intensity is zero at the centre, increases to a maximum at the vortex radius and thereafter drops off towards infinity.
Shown is how the velocity of, for example air in a tornado, will vary according to distance from the vortex centre. Rotational movement within the vortex radius is described by Meyl as increasing linearly as shown; this is identical to the rotation of a solid body.
Compare this with this description of the sun: “The radiative interior exhibits solid-body rotation” – Wikipedia
Cosmologists have simply missed the idea that energy can come from outside the sun and as a consequence imagine that all the complex behaviour they see around the sun comes not from local causes but from complex activity inside of the star itself. ‘Stellar dynamos’ are thought to exist which wind up some electrical energy and beam it outside of the sun:
“The geometry and width of the tachocline are thought to play an important role in models of the stellar dynamos by winding up the weaker poloidal field to create a much stronger toroidal field” – Wikipedia
Maybe, but how did these dynamos come into existence and what powers them? Each answer begs another question.
The laws of electromagnetism favour the appearance of toroidal vortex structures at all scales from that of the electron up to that of an entire galaxy and this is all the explanation that is needed to understand the general structure of the cosmos.
The Coronal Heating Problem
“The coronal heating problem in solar physics relates to the question of why the temperature of the Sun’s corona is millions of kelvins greater than the thousands of kelvins of the surface” – Wikipedia
This is simply not surprising from the point of view of vortex physics; they are describing a ‘heat vortex’. Energy is spiralling inwards from the solar system and continues to intensify until its inward movement is balanced by the outward radial ‘pressure’ of the energy from the centre.
A vortex radius is formed and is measured as a heat-energy maximum.
“The high temperatures require energy to be carried from the solar interior to the corona by non-thermal processes, because the second law of thermodynamics prevents heat from flowing directly from the solar photosphere (surface), which is at about 5800K, to the much hotter corona at about 1 to 3 MK (parts of the corona can even reach 10MK).” – Wikipedia
This is the problem then. The second law of thermodynamics is said to ‘prevent’ heat flowing from cold to hot, but everywhere in vortex systems we see precisely the opposite, i.e. an organised flow of energy or matter from low intensity to high.
Consider the huge amounts of energy present at the centre of a hurricane. The spiral activity begins many miles from the centre of the structure itself, moving slowly at first but increasing in speed as the radius of movement decreases. The wind reaches its maximum velocity at the visible vortex radius, the ‘wall’ of the hurricane.
The energy for the spiral did not ‘build up’ all of its own accord. It did not come out of nothing, it was guided inwards from the environs by the vortex structure. We are not seeing the usual radiative (dissipative) flow of energy mandated by the laws of thermodynamics but an inward moving compression of energy.
The heliosphere
The image below left is the expected shape of the sun’s heliosphere as it moves through space. The sun is imagined as a solid body that cleaves its way through a cluttered medium forming a distinctive bow wave of space debris and having a heliosphere that it not spherical but deformed by some sort of cosmic viscosity.
The image on the right shows the model derived from measurements. The heliosphere is nearly spherical without deformity and the whole moves with space instead of through it. The sun is not pushing its way through the interstellar medium but flowing along with it or even pulled by it.
This is because the whole vortex system is not separate from the interstellar medium but instead arises from movements within it it. It is one and the same thing as space itself and moves in complete harmony with it.
The heliosphere is not maintained by the sun but the sun by the heliosphere and the heliosphere by its own wider environment.
The external energy supply to the Sun is overwhelmingly obvious.. – Jamal Shrair
www.journalcra.com/sites/default/files/issue-pdf/23817_0.pdf
The solar constant
The solar constant is a measure of the power output of the sun, the irradiance. Naively one might expect that since the sun was created billions of years ago and has been burning up ever since, that the irradiance would diminish over time. However:
” The solar constant is an average of a varying value. In the past 400 years it has varied less than 0.2 percent. Billions of years ago, it was significantly lower.” – Wikipedia
So the irradiance is increasing over time. This is open to interpretation but is certainly not inconsistent with the idea that the sun is receiving energy from the cosmos and then radiating it back out to the solar system.
‘Oumuamua
‘Oumuamua is an odd comet-like object that accelerated towards the sun, looped around it and then accelerated away again. In other words its orbit was not entirely governed by conventional gravitational laws. Hypotheses have been put forward as to how this might happen but the matter is far from settled:
“Further, it exhibited non‑gravitational acceleration, potentially due to outgassing or a push from solar radiation pressure.” – Wikipedia
Comets are said to have an exceptionally low density of about half a gram per cubic centimetre. One possibility then is that comets are largely electrical phenomena whose movements are governed more by the ambient electromagnetic field than the ‘gravitational’.
An electrical vortex itself moving in the strong vortex field near the sun is capable of quite complex behaviour. It is quite conceivable that such an entity could interact with the ambient field in such a way as to accelerate away from the sun, against the gravitational gradient. It is even conceivable that it could absorb energy from such a field in order to power itself and even to transmute some of that energy to matter and thus expand in size.
Maintenance of spherical aspect
“The Sun is a near-perfect sphere with an oblateness estimated at 9 millionths, which means that its polar diameter differs from its equatorial diameter by only 10 kilometres” – Wikipedia
Wow! This is not just a spinning mass of gas held in place by gravity. It just isn’t. The sun is largely an electrical phenomenon and is shaped by electromagnetic forces.
If the sun were a spinning mass of hydrogen then we would expect to see a large swelling at the equator much as is the case in the rather solid Earth and other planets.
What we are seeing is the small centre of a much larger vortex structure; the heliosphere. Electromagnetic field activity spirals inwards and organises itself into a turbulent sphere of field energy.
Energy is concentrated at the centre and it is here that we can expect some of that energy to materialise as electrons or hydrogen ions. Maybe the small bulge at the equator is indicative of the amount of matter that is created; in other words the ‘mass’ of the sun.
Transmutation of elements
Wikipedia gives the elemental composition of the sun as follows:
- Hydrogen: 73.46%
- Helium: 24.85%
- Oxygen: 0.77%
- Carbon: 0.29%
- Iron: 0.16%
- Neon: 0.12%
- Nitrogen: 0.09%
- Silicon: 0.07%
- Magnesium: 0.05%
- Sulphur: 0.04%
So there is an abundance of the most simplest elements and the others are largely those elements described by Louis Kervran as being capable of transmutation (even within biological systems) from the simpler ones.
The simplest interpretation then is that energy enters the Sun and the field conditions thus created are propitious for first, the materialisation into the simplest form of matter and second for the transmutation of these elements into more complex atoms.
There is therefore no need to assume a Big Bang in which all matter was created at once, rather matter is in a continual cycle of creation and transmutation, sometimes to other elements and sometimes back to photons to be radiated outwards into the solar system as light.
Earth sun connection
The Sun as an Extremely Sensitively Interconnected and Regulated System – Attila Grandpierre
https://old.konkoly.hu/staff/grandpierre/Sun_Sensitive.pdf
The rotation rate of the Earth is not constant and sometimes varies over the course of a day:
“Not only the minimums of the Earth’s rotation show connections with the solar activity period, but also, as Currie (1973) showed, the rotation rate of the Earth actually correlates with the solar activity!” – Attila Grandpierre
Grandpierre notes that sometimes the change in solar activity comes first and at others it is the Earth’s variations that seem to initiate activity in the sun!
“Trying to understand what do these coincidences mean, it is important to note, that within the third time-range of coincidences in 1969-1971, at first the Earth produced the jump in 1969 (Le Mouel, Gire, Madden, 1985), and the Sun followed it only afterwards, in late 1971! In a time-linear causal sequence this circumstance would involve that the Earth was more sensitive to the global conditions of solar system at that time, and that the core changes of the Earth induced changes in the solar core! This circumstance points to a mutuality in the core-core interactions, since it seems to be clear that at other occasions the Sun was the initiator of correspondence.”
To be considered though is that the initial cause of all these phenomena is a surge in activity of the solar energy field. Sun-Earth connections exist in the form of large electromagnetic filaments (Thunderbolts Project) which can accumulate energy from the cosmic field and transmit it to both Sun and Earth, making it seem that one or other of these bodies is the origin of the effect, depending upon where the effect is first observed.
Slight digression
The idea of matter and thence mass appeared quite early on in scientific thought and were followed closely by the idea of a gravitational force that emanated from the observed matter and exerted an effect upon distant masses.
So matter is considered primal in terms of causality; it is matter that gives rise to force fields and not the other way around. Things that are visible and tangible are given a special place in this ideology despite all evidence to the contrary.
This way of thinking has is not approved of either by Einstein or even Newton himself, both decrying the idea of action at a distance as not worthy of consideration. However, despite advocating field physics in the form of General Relativity, scientists still persist in thinking according to the old patterns, often whilst pretending otherwise.
Gravity
So the sun is at the centre of a cosmic (electromagnetic) field vortex which spirals inwards and gives rise to the warm shiny ‘object’ we see.
Purely geometric considerations mean that the field strength varies with the inverse square of the distance from the vortex centre, becoming stronger nearer to that centre.
Note that the inverse square law of gravity is always expressed as weakening as the distance increases which only serves to give the (erroneous) impression that the field is somehow ‘broadcast’ outwards from the massive object, that some insubstantial energy is radiating i.e. moving away from the source.
Now according to Meyl (Scalar Waves: A First Tesla Physics Handbook) a strengthening field gives rise to a contraction of matter and hence a smaller distance (rulers literally shrink) and a weakening field gives the opposite: Tamarack mines experiment. A planet orbiting the sun then will expand slightly on the night-time side and distances here are slightly longer.
The size of the Earth on its outer side then is larger in accordance with a square law and a circular orbit is therefore the default mode of movement. This has nothing to do with any sort of force acting at a distance. This is like trying to drive a car whose wheels on the left have been made slightly larger than the ones on the right. A steering wheel is not necessary to drive in a circle.
This arrangement will behave, because of the inverse square aspect, in a similar fashion to the assumed gravitational force of Newton although nothing of the sort is going on. Comets are therefore free to move according to local field conditions and are not so constrained in their paths as previously imagined. In the case of the Earth we can add some velocity and inertia to recover the elliptic orbit we are familiar with.
Superimposed upon this system are variations caused by genuine gravitational effects produced by the Earth itself and whatever ‘matter’ there is in the Sun. Attempts to calculate the mass of the sun from the perceived effects of its gravitational field are therefore fraught with risk as most of those effects are not in fact gravitational in nature.
A genuine gravitational effect does exist and is undoubtedly what we measure at the surface of the Earth, but according to the above, this is just not the same mechanism as happens with respect to the Earth moving in the field of the Sun. They have similar measurable effects and the presence of the inverse square effect gives the impression that they are the same phenomenon.
The Sun’s field is not the same as the Earth’s; it isn’t ‘gravity’!
Related pages:
References:
The website of Konstantin Meyl – http://meyl.eu
About vortex physics and vortex losses – Konstantin Meyl
https://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliteratur/About_Vortex_Physics_and_Vortex_Losses.pdf
Scalar waves – Konstantin Meyl
https://www.amazon.com/Scalar-Waves-Konstantin-Meyl/dp/3980254240
Interview with Konstantin Meyl – YouTube
https://youtu.be/tKTkpC-DHZ8