The essay “What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports” by ‘A Midwestern Doctor’ asserts that the phenomenon of ‘vaccine shedding’ is real and asks what the mechanism could be. This page proposes a possible mechanism involving information transfer via electromagnetic signalling.

From the article:
- Shedding is very real.
- We have seen numerous patient cases which can only be explained by mRNA shedding.
- Most of the people who are highly sensitive to shedding have already figured it out, so if you do not already believe it is an issue for you, you probably don’t need to worry about it.
- There is still no agreed upon mechanism to explain why it happens.
- In theory, shedding with the mRNA vaccines should be “impossible.”
Largely anecdotal evidence
Accepting evidence of this type is fraught with risk as it is likely interpreted and distorted by the subject and can be considered neither objective nor quantitative. However, in this case, the anecdotes demonstrate distinctive patterns which help suggest a specific mechanism: that of of information transfer via an electromagnetic bio-field. The subjects do not know about this mechanism and so cannot be biasing heir reports in favour of it.
- Patients may demonstrate symptoms only in the presence of another particular (vaccinated) person and symptoms typically vanish when they separate
- The vaccinated person may test high for certain bio-markers (antibodies)
- Treatment of the shedder significantly helps the unvaccinated partner
- Menstrual abnormalities are high on the list of symptoms
- ‘Secondary’ shedding is recorded
- People vary highly in their sensitivity
- A distinct smell is reported from vaccinated individuals
- Young and apparently healthy people are stronger shedders than the old and frail
Routes of exposure
- General proximity to the vaccinated person
- Through skin to skin contact.
- Transfer of secretions
The bystander effect
The radiation-induced bystander effect is the phenomenon in which unirradiated cells exhibit irradiated effects as a result of signals received from nearby irradiated cells. Wikipedia. The effect has been seen on not only cells but entire organisms.
Rainbow trout were exposed to low doses of ionising radiation and then placed in a tank with other healthy fish for two hours after which they were killed and dissected. The organs showed damage typical of exposure to ionising radiation even though no such exposure had taken place. A chemical messenger in the water is suggested as the mechanism in the paper but some sort of electromagnetic influence was not ruled out. – Mothersill et al.
This seems to be an almost exact parallel of the shedding phenomenon.
The bio-field hypothesis
Organisms are regulated by a system of electromagnetic scalar waves which organise together to form a de facto bio-field. The field is scarcely measurable by scientific instruments but connections via resonant scalar waves can form between individuals and can have a meaningful biological effect upon the recipient.
Disruption of this field by an external impulse or chemical insult will lead to dis-regulation and a variety of disease states.
External impulses may include:
- Seasonal disturbances of the ionosphere causing influenza: Influenza and weather
- Similar phenomenon resulting in, for example, measles: Measles
- Scalar waves produced as an artefact of radio waves: 5G and Covid
- Resonant connection with other life forms: Distant cellular interaction
- Other cosmic factors: Neutrinos, eclipses and plagues
- Healing energy from e.g. Reiki practitioners
All these disturbances lead to similar biological mechanisms (e.g. calcium dis-regulation) that in turn manifest as a typical grouping of symptoms and characteristic epidemiology which have been attributed to the spread of ‘viruses’.
The ability of shedding to reproduce flu-like symptoms is proof enough that a virus is not necessary.
The mechanism
The body is regulated by a system of electromagnetic scalar waves that is driven by the brain (What is the brain?) and propagates along the myelin sheath of nerves (Scalar waves and nerves) and thence into the cells and along the microtubules.
Scalar waves were described by Tesla and are a theoretical construct of physicist Konstantin Meyl who has asserted that: “(Biological) information is the structure of a scalar wave”. Resonant connections between transmitter and receiver have been demonstrated in a laboratory and Meyl has proposed that connections between humans is an explanation for transmission of biological information.
Connection between individuals is initially via a scatter approach but once a suitable recipient has been found, the connection becomes one-to-one and may persist over long time periods and spatial separations.
Does this hypothesis fit the pattern of observations?
General proximity: Initial connection is via a scatter approach which diminishes with the square of the distance between transmitter and receiver so we would expect proximity to a vaccinated individual to be almost a necessity.
Skin contact: James Oschman, in his book ‘Energy medicine’ suggests a similar mechanism for Healing Energy and claims increased effectiveness if actual physical contact is made.
Individual sensitivity: Meyl has propose that some individuals may be better transmitters (strong bio-field) whilst others will be better at receiving. This pattern is thought to exist in ESP ‘adepts’ and Meyl suggests that the mechanism could theoretically be used for telepathy and other ‘paranormal’ activities.
EMF hypersensitivity: Some individuals are said to be hypersensitive to EMF from mobile phones etc. These produce scalar waves as an artefact so the mechanism is identical and the existence of ‘sensitives’ in both areas lends a little more support to both phenomena. Symptoms include nausea, brain fog, fatigue, rash, temperature etc.
Transfer of secretions: A small amount of biological material can play host to a stable and semi-permanent scalar wave complex and it is this that is causing the trouble; there is no need for actual absorption of any physical substance. This is reminiscent of the phenomenon of Telegony whereby phenotypical information can be inherited without the need for the transfer of DNA.
Shedding should be impossible: This is because the possibility of an invisible and almost unmeasurable bio-field has not been considered, with all disease effects being blamed on viruses, bio-chemistry and gene expression, i.e. ‘material’ and ‘mechanistic’ descriptions.
Secondary shedding: The original disturbance whether it be a weather condition or a vaccine causes a reaction of the regulatory system and leading to a change in the expressible bio-field and it is this information emanating from this new ‘state’ that is transmitted by means of airborne scalar waves.
In the case of the irradiated fish (above), they do not emanate the original ionising radiation but instead broadcast the new disease state that has been induced by the original radiation. This information is received by other fish and creates a ‘mirror’ disease state in the recipients that in turn can be passed on as secondary shedding.
Young people are vigorous shedders: They have a stronger, more vigorous bio-field? Bio-field strength and integrity wane as we get older. Michael Levin has stated that the ageing process is essentially a loss of bio-field information.
Bio-markers and antibodies: Antibody production is not by the unmodulated laws of chemistry but is mediated by some sort of regulatory mechanism and the same holds for all bio markers. Measurements of such are therefore a reflection of the regulatory state and it is the means of production of this state rather than the original cause that is transmitted from person to person.
A ‘distinct smell’: Conventional wisdom is that smells are the transfer and detection of the chemical structure of a molecule. Konstantin Meyl begs to differ (Scalar waves and nerves) and has a good argument. A smell is simply a scalar wave that can be detected by the nose somehow.
Signals along the olfactory nerve are scalar waves anyhow and to store the information in the brain which is already a large scalar wave complex requires little processing. Regulation, disease, smell, cognition and memories are now all the same thing: scalar-wave bio-information.
Dogs can smell diseases such as cancer and Parkinson’s so they are now smelling the disease regulation directly. They are detecting some electromagnetic representation of the disease state itself.
Is the smell alone capable of producing the symptoms?
When sufferers report a metallic taste, are they in fact monitoring their own regulatory state?
Menstruation
Interesting that disruptions of the menstrual cycle feature heavily in the reports. During the outbreak of 2019/2020 this was a very prominent feature of conversation coming from unvaccinated women, some of whom had succumbed to disease and others who had not.
Women temporarily synchronize their menstrual cycles with the luminance and gravimetric cycles of the Moon [paper]
I don’t think anyone believes that women are synchronising directly with the luminance of the moon (or even gravity for that matter) so the effect is produced by something else that correlates with both these cycles of the moon.
Space in the solar system is not empty but filled with electromagnetic filaments stretching between the sun and the planets. The orbiting moon disrupts these filaments and the knock-on effects are used to synchronise biological processes on Earth. Some effects are beneficial and others cause trouble. See: Neutrinos, eclipses and plagues, Influenza and field vortices, Influenza and weather, Measles, The nature of gravity
Cosmic influences on humans, animals and plants – JT Burns This book is an annotated list of studies on the correlations between planetary movements and biological events on Earth. Several hundred papers and books are summarised.
Cosmic events include solar flares, lunar tides, eclipses, strength of Earth’s magnetic field, planetary orbits, planetary alignments and oppositions.
Biological events range from measured chemical reactions to behaviours of individuals including epidemics, admissions to mental hospitals, car accidents, metabolite levels, birth defects, the shape of leaf buds, rate of water uptake in seedlings, blood clotting parameters, blot tests etc.
The brain, nervous system and embryo seem to particularly sensitive to such influences with personalities seemingly affected by the month of conception (more likely than birth date surely?).
A lot of the correlations seem crazy (the thyroid activity of cats is related to the orbit of Mercury for example) and some have been ‘debunked’.
Many researchers tried experiments in Faraday cages or in deep underground caverns. Often some reduction of effect was observed but rarely was it eliminated. Both electric eddy currents and magnetic potential currents seem implicated then with a Faraday cage providing some protection from the former but not the latter.
Summary
The same mechanism (scalar waves) is used for:
- Bio-regulation
- Nerve conduction
- Disease induction
- Distant cellular interaction
- Cognition and memory
- The sense of smell
- Synchronisation of biological cycles
- Inheritance
- Shedding by proximity
- Shedding by contact
- Shedding by secretion
No complicated biochemistry needed at this stage. Biochemical reactions are downstream of bio-field activity.
Why is this not already known?
- Fixation on physically observable and measurable phenomena
- Attachment to existing knowledge and imagining it to be ‘complete’
- Fear of accusations of vitalism
- Lack of understanding of electromagnetic field phenomena
- The required physics (scalar waves) is relatively new and still not known to most physicists let alone those in the area of biology
References:
What We’ve Learned from Over a Thousand Vaccine Shedding Reports
Author: A Midwestern Doctor
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences
Communication of Radiation-Induced Stress or Bystander Signals between Fish in Vivo – Carmel Mothersill et al
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es061099y
Women temporarily synchronize their menstrual cycles with the luminance and gravimetric cycles of the Moon
C. Helfrich-Förster, S. Monecke2, I. Spiousas3, T. Hovestadt4, O. Mitesser5, T. A. Wehr
https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/sciadv.abe1358