A nested electromagnetic toroid structure for the organisation of biological systems

Abstract

A hypothesis is presented that living systems are controlled by an electromagnetic field which is responsible for all biological organisation of information, energy and matter. The overall form of the field is that of nested toroidal structures, enabling a general centripetal flow of energy towards the organs, cell nuclei and ultimately, bio-molecules. Local refinements of structure take on the form of energetic ring vortices which flow through the various conduits existing within the host organism to provide a transport mechanism for both information and energy. Such an energy flow is analogous to the Chi of traditional Chinese medicine. The mechanism of action of such a field is by electromagnetic signalling upon the fractal field structure of cellular and molecular collectives, thus providing for a top-down causation which is amenable to influence from an electromagnetic cognitive system. The whole arrangement is not only consistent with recent developments in electrodynamic physics, but is an inevitable consequence of them. The physical forms of biological structures and measurable conductive properties of tissue types, together with the laws of electromagnetism give clues as to the precise nature of local energy flow and these conjectures are supported in many cases by existing observations. The hypothesis has implications for health, bio-regulation, the origins of life, morphogenesis, embryonic development, the circulation of the blood, consciousness studies, the mind-body problem and biological inheritance.

Introduction

The existence of some sort of energetic bio-field in living systems has long been hypothesised as responsible for otherwise seemingly intractable problems such as molecular and cellular organisation, energy management, the origins of life, inheritance, morphogenesis, embryonic development, enzyme reactions, regeneration and consciousness. However, the problem has been identifying the nature of such a field and the precise mechanism by which it interfaces with known existing processes.

Proposals have been made for ‘bio-electric’ systems, morphogenic fields, subtle energies, etheric bodies, quantum coherence, quantum entanglement, a ‘dynamic kinetic state’, ‘living’ or ‘vital’ energies such as the Chinese ‘chi’, ‘consciousness’ as an organising force and even proposals of extra dimensions to accommodate all the additional information.

Most of these solutions rely upon some causal origin outside of classical physics and this is immediately problematic for a variety of reasons.

  • In the first instance, we need an entire new physics to explain the properties of the new domain and a whole set of laboratory techniques by which to measure them.
  • Secondly, we need a theory of how our new ‘energies’ are able to influence existing physical processes. How can anything that is non-physical have any influence on the physical world at all? Some mechanism needs to be described.
  • Thirdly, having found some way of influencing physical reality, we need to explain, how such a thing can happen without transgressing the current laws of observable physics with nobody noticing. We need to decide whether what we are seeing in biological systems is consistent with the laws of physics or not.

If we think that the existing laws of physics are sufficient to describe reality, then we automatically rule out any other causal influence and cannot explain what we see in biology. We have to say that things ‘just happen’ in accordance with the laws of nature but we have no idea why they happen. We observe the bio-chemical reactions that occur in embryonic development but cannot explain how it is that those particular molecules were in that particular place at that particular time so as to create such a consistent morphology.

Something is clearly missing. The answer must be that the laws of physics are incomplete and that what we are seeing is some subset of the available behaviours, some shadow on the wall of Plato’s cave, when what we really need to see is the full spectrum of sunlight and activity that produces such shadows.

A solution is described here in terms of an extension to current electromagnetic theory which introduces an intrinsic ‘energy’ to electromagnetic fields, thereby allowing them to become proactive in initiating biological events whilst at the same time preserving the integrity of current research results and providing no contradiction with the existing laws of electrodynamics.

The resulting activity of electromagnetic fields is shown to provide credible mechanisms for many hitherto unexplained phenomena, whilst the existing laws of physics remain in force at all times.

Bio-fields in living systems have been hypothesised before but without a clear description of their fundamental nature. This hypothesis explicitly describes them as:

  • Electromagnetic fields
  • Forming natural vortex structures
  • Having intrinsic ‘movement’
  • Having intrinsic ‘energy’
  • Giving rise to centripetal flow of both energy and matter

The hypothesis

Overview

Biological processes are controlled by a supervening ‘bio-field’ which is responsible for the management of all all energy, matter and information within living systems.

The field is electromagnetic in nature and acts in accordance with extant laws of electromagnetism, but with an added predisposition to ‘movement’ which gives it an intrinsic energy similar to descriptions of the Chinese concept of Chi. It has the ability to propel itself through the conductive elements of biological systems and a general propensity towards centripetal, as opposed to radial, movement of energy.

The relationship between the magnetic and electric components of the field together with its intrinsic movement necessarily gives rise to structures which are either helical or toroidal in nature. Such structures can carry energy around the system and are instrumental in histogenesis, organogenesis and morphogenesis.

Moving fields, when applied to a metal wire or antenna, will induce an electric current, with the result that the such field structures have already been measured in various ways but have been interpreted as mere electric currents or ‘bio-electricity’.

Organisation of field structures into longitudinal or Tesla waves enables communication both within and between organisms. Partial measurements of such phenomena have given rise to the misconception of ‘bio-photons’.

The supervening field functions in a top-down manner by acting upon the more basic electromagnetic fields that emerge (bottom up) from the coordination of cellular and molecular collectives, thereby enabling muscular contraction and sub-cellular organisation such as gene expression and protein folding.

Overall topology

The field has a fractal vortex topology. The outer toroidal field depicted in popular images extends beyond the body is no doubt correct, being an inevitable consequence of the laws of electromagnetism.

Illustration of a human figure surrounded by a purple energy field, depicting an electromagnetic aura with a focus on the heart area.



This field is often described as ‘radiating’ from the body but more likely adheres to the vortex principle, spiralling centripetally into the body and continuing inwards towards the various ‘chakras’. Here, the field forms sub-vortices at the central organs, supplying them with both electrical energy and a morphogenic template.

Further fractalisation takes place to form single cells within the organs. Each cell now forms its own vortex structure with a rotating nucleus forming the vortex ‘radius’ at the centre and the electric ‘field movement’ at the periphery being measured as an ‘electric current’ by various researchers.

A diagram illustrating the concept of magnetic fields, featuring circular loops and labelled components including ~H1, ~H3, and ~E2, with arrows indicating direction.

Such field movement, giving rise to magnetic dipole forces throughout, likely helps the cells maintain cohesion, whilst the electric component maintains separation by repulsive forces.

Inside a cell, the field forms further fractal vortices within the intracellular water. Organisation is now at the level of the bio-molecule, with some proteins forming clear toroidal structures and DNA forming a double helix.

The field again fractalises to form smaller vortices at the scale of an atom where energy continues to accumulate, becoming intense enough to transmute atoms themselves from one element to another; sodium to potassium or magnesium to calcium, for example.

Free energy

This nested vortex field is all pervasive within biological systems and at the smallest scales constitutes what is sometimes called ‘free energy’ or misinterpreted as the thermodynamic ‘Gibbs energy’.

Thermodynamic (entropic) energy has a nature that is both random and dissipative, whereas a vortex field is highly organised according to an overall fractal pattern, with stable inward spiralling tendencies within each vortex and dissipation ‘managed’ via separate processes.

Energy gradients and field gradients arise naturally from the vortex structure with energy concentrations at the centre of vortices made available to meet the local needs of the cell, which will include enzyme reactions, protein construction, mitosis etc.

Measurements may well show statistical ‘randomness’ of energy distributions but this does not preclude the existence of a highly organised system of distribution along the lines of a fractal vortex structure; if the vortex nature is not looked for it will not be found. The energy is distributed at all physical scales according to the fractal principle and this is misinterpreted as simple diffusion.

Diffusion rates seem to vary in a highly propitious manner in biological systems according to a number of factors already under the control of the organism as a whole. One more control system in the form of adaptive vortex structures can easily go unnoticed.

The ring vortex

The ring vortex is a highly stable bio-field configuration arising naturally from the laws of electrodynamics. An energetic torus structure similar to those produced in water or smoke rings is capable of self-propulsion, self-stabilisation and self-repair to a certain degree. Energy and possibly information is easily transported via such structures along suitable conduits such as nerves or microtubules with the vortex itself adapting its morphology to suit the dimensions of such conduits.

Conversely, the concentration of energy within the vortex is used to actually create such conduits in the first place, with the stable toroidal topology acting as a morphological template for tubular structures.

Ring vortices are easily ‘steerable’, meaning they are amenable to control by a supervening morphogenetic field.

A close-up view of a jellyfish with a soft, translucent body, displaying a halo of pinkish hues against a dark background.

Energy accumulation

A ring vortex is a good example of an energy accumulator. Such rings move within a nested vortex structure of available energy which will spiral inwards towards the ring and amalgamate with the existing structure thereby acting as an ever present distributed power supply.

Watch such rings organise smoke in the air or see them self-propel through water; they seem to persist longer than other types of fluid disturbances which dissipate fairly quickly. Either they have found some way of avoiding frictional losses or they are harvesting energy from their surroundings. Similarly, a tornado accumulates distributed energy from its surroundings and concentrates it at the vortex radius.

Scalar waves

A succession of ring vortices can self-align and form a resonant connection between two points in the form of what is variously termed ‘longitudinal waves’, ‘scalar waves’ or ‘Tesla waves’. [1]

Such constructs transport both energy and information through suitable conduits such as microtubules or nerves, where the nodes of Ranvier determine the wavelength of resonant standing wave which acts as a carrier for the vortex rings.

These electromagnetic waves now need no physical medium through which to propagate, nor do they consist of streams of moving electrons. Rather, the electromagnetic standing wave forms its own carrier medium, with the ‘message’ transmitted solely by means of modulations of the carrier field itself.

No electrical resistance exists within this medium and hence energy loss is at a minimum, with even the possibility of the whole structure accumulating energy from its surroundings as a supplementary power supply.

Connection to the cosmos

Animals, plants and humans demonstrate a clear and largely rhythmic connection to the cosmos, maintaining diurnal and annual cycles and even somehow synchronising with lunar or planetary cycles. In addition to this we see animals showing signs of distress long before a hurricane hits, pigeons finding their way back to a loft over hundreds of miles and other birds migrating thousands of miles to the same nest site each year.

One suspected mechanism is a coupling between magnetic particles in the brain of a creature and modulations of the Earth’s magnetic field.

Such a link is somewhat crude, however, and a better alternative is proposed whereby electromagnetic variations have a direct impact upon the bio-field of an organism by ‘field coupling’ of internal vortex structures. This enables each individual organ to interpret input as it sees fit and in addition explains why such a mechanism, being effectively unmeasurable, has not yet been identified by modern science.

Morphogenesis

It is proposed that these energetic vortex structures form the origins of morphology within biological systems. The vortices play host to strong field gradients which are responsible for the physical arrangement of matter and hence for the construction, maintenance and reproduction of living cells.

Transmutation

The measured levels of mineral ions within living organisms is best explained by the existence of elemental transmutation as hypothesised by Louis Kervran. The mechanism is hitherto unexplained, but the centripetal accumulation of energy within vortex systems seems a likely candidate for the progenitor of such processes.

Evidence and arguments

In support of vitalism

The hypothesis presented here is explicitly vitalist in the sense that it is proposing the existence of an organised and dynamic form of invisible ‘energy’ that courses throughout all life forms and is the source of all meaningful and constructive biological action.

This idea may be regarded by some as so intellectually disordered as to be hardly worth considering [5][11], but sceptics should reflect that there are already multiple forms of energy which are readily accepted by mainstream science as both existing and available for use within living systems:

  • Brownian ‘energy’: The random vibration of molecules said to be the cause of Brownian motion and fuel for ‘Brownian motors’ [6]
  • Gibbs energy (Free energy): This is formulated as thermodynamic (i.e. entropic) in nature but is still somehow thought to act as the source of energy for many bio-molecular interactions. [7]
  • Quantum vacuum energy: This is claimed by physicists to exist in vast quantities. Nobody has verified the quantities claimed and yet belief in its existence persists. [8]
  • Electricity and electron transport chains: This is the flow of small particles (electrons or ions) which bear similar charges (positive or negative) and therefore exhibit mutually repulsive (dissipative) forces. [9]
  • Heat: Heat is again thermodynamic and dissipative in nature, it has no innate organisational capacity according to its current scientific formulation, but is still considered by some as a possible source of meaningful energy for biological systems. [10]

In all cases, the observed effects are centripetal and organisational, but the assumed mechanism is dissipative, both energetically and informationally. For such mechanisms to work in this way therefore, we require that it is the material component, i.e. the physical bio-molecules, which are playing the organisational role whilst the energy is a mere power source.

Molecules, however, are just molecules and have no organisational capacity so we need to re-locate the causal impulse elsewhere. The hypothesis presented here puts the organisational and informational responsibility upon a structured energy source and delegates a passive role to the molecules themselves.

To choose one example, ‘free’ energy is claimed to be harvested by Brownian motors to perform meaningful tasks in biological systems. This is just about plausible, maybe, but it doesn’t explain how the motor was constructed in the first place nor how it maintains a regular supply of precisely the correct amount of energy without apparent buffering, feedback or other form of regulation.

We therefore have a need for some fundamental organisational ‘principle’ and, in addition, some physical instantiation of such a principle.

Energy itself needs to be organised, regulated, and transported from A to B. It needs to flow along some sort of conduit and needs to have the capacity to move or assemble biological material. The energy itself must have some internal structure which is more than just a random collection of vibrating atoms. We need some candidate for this energy field and preferably one that is within the scope of current physics.

The solution that immediately suggests itself is that of a dynamic and to some extent self-organising electromagnetic field which operates according to the laws of electromagnetism. An inward moving vortex principle [2] counters the tendency to dissipation, whilst the strong field gradients are instrumental in the movement and orientation of charged particles. Furthermore, the accumulation towards the centre of a vortex provides sufficient energy to promote chemical reactions.

The electromagnetic nature of the field allows movement of both energy and information along conductive pathways within the organism such as nerves, microtubules and blood vessels, with such movement being instigated and maintained by the innate energy of the field itself.

A form of ‘vitalism’ is thereby described without the assumption of any new physics apart from the idea that the field is ‘dynamic’, i.e. imbued with its own innate energy which enables self-propulsion around the body with no apparent motivating force.

It is possibly this aspect of vitalism that will repel many, this idea that something can move or propagate by means of itself without any external motivational force or apparent attenuation.

However, consider the humble photon, it fulfils precisely these criteria: it is an electromagnetic field phenomenon that self propagates at the speed of light with no external energy input and will continue to do so until something gets in its way. Its speed, frequency, energy and amplitude will not diminish. Energy and information are transported from one end of the cosmos to the other with no theoretical or measurable loss.

The bio-field proposed here can in some sense be regarded as a more complex version of a photon, a folding and propagation of a dynamic electromagnetic field which evolves in accordance with the field equations in combination with the local conductive conditions.

A recent paper describes a photon as a solution to Maxwell’s equations in the form of a toroidal vortex [75]

Centripetal energy flow: the vortex principle

The generalised ‘vortex principle’ as described by Meyl [2], is that of an inward spiralling flow of energy, fluid or plasma towards a central vortex ‘radius’. Flow inside the radius is of the form of solid body rotation and where the centripetal flow meets the solid body rotation, an intensification of density and velocity is achieved, giving rise to a distinct impression of solidity to the whole phenomenon.

Graph illustrating velocity as a function of radius, featuring a circular diagram with arrows indicating direction and magnitude of velocity.

This is easily be observed in the formation of tornadoes to take but one example. Air flows inwards towards the centre with increasing energy and velocity, and a vortex radius is formed with the appearance of a ‘wall’ of air, within which the wind speed diminishes to a calm centre. This wall of air characterises the phenomenon in our minds as a distinct object, a ‘tornado’ even though what is really present is a continuum of air flow with no actual sub-divisions.

The same illusion can be extended to all objects in the universe from black holes to stars, planets, human beings, individual cells and even single sub-atomic particles such as electrons. [1]

Already with this single principle, we have:

  • Centripetal energy flow as a counter to radial dissipation
  • The tension between centripetal and centrifugal flow as the basis for the self- regulation of energy
  • The vortex radius acting as a morphological template
  • The coexistence of stability and flexibility
  • The creation of electromagnetic field gradients to be used in charge separation
  • An accumulation of available energy at the vortex to enable enzyme reactions etc.

The Hairy Ball Theorem

The hairy ball theorem of algebraic topology can be summarised as saying that you cannot comb the hair on a coconut, say, without creating a ‘whorl’ somewhere. This is true of all hairy balls but not of a torus, however, where it is possible to comb all the hairs in a smooth fashion either around or through the central ring. [14]

We can try to imagine the global flow of air on our planet and find that, again, there must be at least one whorl somewhere. In fact the weather system is composed entirely of cyclonic and anti-cyclonic structures.

The theorem is in the realm of topology and is therefore agnostic of the mechanism or medium. It applies to any directional ‘field’ including the dynamic electromagnetic fields we are considering here. The electric and magnetic components of such a dynamic field will always be at right angles to each other and so in the case of a ring vortex (torus), we will see one of these circumnavigate the torus whilst the other moves into, through and out of, the hole in the torus. [19]

Movement of an electromagnetic field leads to a tendency to ‘curl’ and so we will necessarily see the following features:

  • Constant spiral or rotational ‘movement’
  • Magnetic and electrical components at right angles to each other
  • The torus topology for a sustainable flow
  • Scale invariance

The emergence of the torus structure is therefore almost a theoretical inevitability, with helices and spherical vortices representing variations on a theme.

The hairy ball theorem [14] is phrased in terms of pure topology and is agnostic of scale, medium, mechanism or precise shape. This makes it eminently suitable for biological systems where we can expect to see the same principles in operation at all scales, from molecule to cell and up to the level of the organism as a whole. Moreover, the shape of any organism is in a state of constant change whilst the topology remains stable.


The ubiquity of the torus structure at all scales of reality

At the largest scale of reality possible we find that a torus is but one proposed topology for the entire universe and within this, we have many instances of plasma toruses often with diameters of many light years. [13][15]

The shapes seen in the cosmos can be reproduced in a laboratory by energising a plasma with an electric potential. The gas on first appearance seems to self-organise in accordance with the field equations of Maxwell and maintains a stable toroidal form. The rotating gas molecules are not flung out by centrifugal forces but maintain a stable torus shape, held together by centripetal electromagnetic field forces. [16] In other words, it is actually the field forces that are organising the molecules and not the other way around.

We therefore have observational evidence again that within an electromagnetic field we see the emergence of both centripetal flow and persistence of form i.e. ‘stability’, each highly desirable features within living systems.

Dramatic view of a large funnel cloud forming above a grassy landscape, with dark storm clouds swirling ominously in the sky.

Similar forms can be seen within weather systems as mentioned, in smoke rings, and in the formation of underwater rings which hold their form and self-propel with minimal attenuation. The shapes and behaviour of these rings are so similar to those produced by electric fields that we can speculate that they too, are at least in part, the product of organisational electromagnetic forces and not just the emergent result of the kinetic motion of molecules.

This idea has theoretical support from Konstantin Meyl, who models gases (and indeed fluids), not as a collection of molecules operating under kinetic forces but as an electromagnetic continuum governed entirely by the laws of electrodynamics. [1]

The human bio-field is said to have been measured as a torus field centred at the heart and although actual evidence is hard to find, a toroidal structure is a theoretical inevitability given the laws of physics and the rotational electric fields found in the heart itself. [17] The organs may be visualised as manifestations of toroidal templates and red blood cells are a clear torus shape hosting rotating electric currents [19]. Proteins have been visualised as surrounded by, and hence likely organised by, toroidal electromagnetic fields [18].

Meyl has pointed out that the hexagonal rings on many bio-molecules are ideal frameworks around which vortex fields can accumulate [1] and has formulated single electrons as simple spherical vortices, akin to a torus, but with a closed centre.

Helical and vortex structures are found in the bloodstream, again at all scales, from the ring vortices exiting the heart [4] to smaller helical structures in the arteries and ultimately, as mentioned, the red blood cells themselves. [19]

As above, so below..

That which is above is like to that which is below, and that which is below is like to that which is above.” [26]

The famous Hermetic maxim is nothing more or less than the assertion that the same physical laws are in operation at all points in the universe and at all scales of reality. This is particularly pertinent with theories of vortex physics, where the basic vortex structure is both geometrically scalable and easily observable in all parts of the cosmos.

Arthur Yu’s water engine

The ‘water engine’ as described by Yu and Pollack [21] [77] serves as a most basic example of spontaneous self-organising centripetal toroidal flow.

A capillary tube is placed into a container of water and a global vortex flow begins almost immediately, with water flowing from the periphery of the container, towards the tube at the centre and through it to exit at the other end. Flow speeds up if energy, in the form of infrared light, is directed at the container as a whole.

This may be seen as a template for the general flow of energy (Chi) within a biological entity, for the organised toroidal movement of water and for the transport of other materials within such a flow.

Diagram illustrating the flow of a system with labelled arrows indicating direction and movement, featuring a central horizontal element.
Arthur Yu’s water engine

Viscous flow


Small scale fluid flow is described as flow with a low Reynolds number, where inertial forces are insignificant compared to so called ‘viscous’ forces [22]. However, in a model of a liquid as an electromagnetic continuum, viscous forces are necessarily electromagnetic in nature and therefore acting according to the laws of electromagnetism [20]. The lack of inertial forces at small scales therefore implies a complete dominance of electromagnetic forces and the inevitable emergence of toroidal vortex structures, despite conventional descriptions of low Reynolds flow as ‘laminar’.

The theoretical mismatch here arises from the failure of science to accurately describe the nature of viscous forces. They seem not to be defined in terms of the fundamental forces of physics but simply by the effect that they have [23], with no purported mechanism or theoretical basis and no particular ‘character’ to them, apart from attenuating movement and dissipating energy as heat.

The recognition of such forces as fundamentally electromagnetic in nature immediately imbues the fluid with additional properties consonant with such forces and greatly promotes the understanding of biological systems in general and blood flow in particular. Viscous forces do not just impede flow but encourage specific geometric and dynamic flow patterns.

The movement of bacteria though low Reynolds number flow has been compared to a human scale swimmer swimming through warm roofing tar [72][73]. This is a clear impossibility and so there must be some other principle involved.

Physical form reflects field structure

The bio-field of the human body does not exist independently of the physical matter that hosts it, particularly when that physical matter consists of ions, electrons and other particles, which, even though they have neutral charge overall, nevertheless present complex charge profiles to the external environment. All these charges are associated with local electromagnetic fields and these will inevitably integrate with any global field structure.

Conversely, an organised collection of charged particles cannot be assembled without the motivating force of an electromagnetic field and cannot sustain its organisation without the continued existence of such a field.

The fields arising from the physical particles on the one hand and the global bio-field on the other, do not exist side-by-side or in different ‘dimensions’; they are not separate or ‘superimposed’ in any sense, but instead form a single unified electromagnetic field which necessarily obeys the fundamental laws of such.

It therefore follows that the organisation of the particles. i.e. the outward form of the physical body, is a reflection of the underlying bio-field and that as a result, we may make deductions as to the structure of the field from outward observations of the material body whilst at the same time making predictions about the workings of such a body based upon purely theoretical considerations of the nature of electromagnetism.

The fractal nature of the field

Everywhere in nature we see torus shapes nested within torus shapes and we can now speculate that these physical forms are induced by the action of an electrodynamic field which must, as a consequence, be fractal in nature.

Weather systems necessarily assume an overall toroidal topology by the Hairy Ball Theorem [14] and this is itself comprised of smaller cyclonic systems at the scale of continents which in turn play host to tornadoes and ever smaller eddies in the air at the scale of a human. In the cosmos, we see an arguably toroidal universe divided into spiralling galaxies of obvious fractal structure and nebulae of striking double helix formations.

Turning to the human body now, we have an overall physical whole which is divided into smaller organs and conduits, each of which is further sub-divided into cells containing nucleus, microtubules, proteins, hexagonal molecular rings and the double helix structures of DNA.

The natural conclusion is that the bio-field of the human body is organised according to an identical topology, with each distinguishable biological artefact acting as host to an individual vortex field which was the progenitor of that artefact and which subsequently maintains it throughout its lifespan.

The similarity of structures throughout the cosmos suggests a similar underlying cause, namely the fractalisation of an electromagnetic field. Moreover, if we are satisfied that the human bio-field is electromagnetic in nature and that the laws of physics apply everywhere in the universe, then a fractal vortex bio-field is a necessary consequence of this argument and the observations of physical form are mere confirmation.

The energy cascade

Energy, in a vortex, will move from the periphery to the centre in a spiral flow to create a ‘radius’ of peak intensity; energy is accumulated in a centripetal fashion.

Other vortices can arise within the main flow and will, in turn, accumulate energy from their environs and direct it inwards towards their local radius. An energy cascade is thereby formed, with energy moving down the physical scale from large to small and from outer to inner (nested) vortices. [25] [31]

The flow is therefore from periphery to centre both within a single vortex and between multiple vortices of a fractal cascade.

Big whirls have little whirls that feed on their velocity, And little whirls have lesser whirls and so on to viscosity” – Lewis Richardson [25]

Conductivity and conduits

The proposed bio-field is composed of a ‘living’ energy similar to descriptions of Chi and clearly fulfils many of the properties attributed to such an ‘energy’ [27]. In contemporary terminology this means a field consisting of electrodynamic vortices of either a ring type (similar to plasma or smoke rings) or a helical flow. The rings proceed under their own propulsive energy and adapt according to local conductive conditions, giving the field a ‘living’ aspect.

We can therefore speculate as to the direction and degree of the flow of energy around the system according to the conductivity and geometry of the various tissue types and structures within the body.

Nervous conduction

One example is the nerve axons which are electrically conductive on the inside but are surrounded by a non-conductive myelin sheath. The function of the sheath is assumed to be ‘insulation’, which is to say, to stop the electrons spilling out into the surrounding tissue. However, it has been proposed by Meyl [1] that the function of the sheath is to host a magnetic ring vortex which carries both energy and information along the nerve sheath.

The reduced electrical conductivity within the myelin sheath inhibits the movement of the electrical field component thereby encouraging relative movement of the magnetic component and this results in a travelling magnetic ring vortex with an electrical ‘dipole’ field along the centre of the nerve. It is this electric field movement that is measured by scientists and misinterpreted as the movement of electrons i.e. an electric current.

Support for the ring vortex hypothesis is given by the observations that nerve currents are seen to move faster in those sections of nerve having thicker myelin sheaths and the fact that that depletion of the sheath leads to highly impaired nerve conductivity. [28]


Meyl goes further and suggests that the nodes of Ranvier impede the progress of the ring vortices to encourage the formation of standing waves similar to those of a plucked guitar string. This standing wave is now available for the
transmission of biological information which travels, not by the movement of electrons but by subtle modulations of a stationary and highly stable electromagnetic field. No movement of matter or charge is present, no electrical resistance impedes flow and as a consequence there is no loss of energy via heat. Communication of information is thereby achieved with close to 100% efficiency.

Energy management

Some sort of electric potential or current is produced in almost every cell of the body [33] and conversely, each cell ‘consumes’ a certain amount of energy as part of its normal function. Energy deficit leads to impaired function whilst an energy surplus is clearly unsustainable and damaging in the long term. The energy requirement of each cell will vary hugely according to activity and there is no reason why the rate of production should always match the rate of consumption. What is key here is not static levels of energy but the rate at which such levels change. The rate of change must have an average of zero over long time frames.

There is therefore a need for a global energy management system to transfer surplus energy from one cell to another which is either suffering from an immediate deficit or is predicted to be so in the near future.

How does this work? Does a cell somehow monitor its own levels and send out a signal for more energy even before it is needed? Are all cells monitoring for such a signal? Are they somehow able to ‘know’ that they have surplus energy and to release it in quantities as required and in the appropriate direction?

This all seems highly unlikely. Moreover, this needs to happen at all scales and so we need some sort of system for the delivery and regulation of energy at the scale of the organism as a whole, at the scale of a cell and even down to the scale of a molecule. We need monitoring, feedback and buffering at all these levels in order to ensure there is no overload, bottleneck or deficit.

The problem, as stated, is fractal in nature and so a fractal solution is immediately looked for. A management system in the form of an energy cascade within a nested vortex structure is a clear candidate for at least the basis of such a system.

Energy spirals inwards towards the centre of a vortex and accumulates at a radius. A concentration of energy is formed along with steep energy gradients, both features doubtless serving useful functions within the system. A surplus of energy at the centre causes the radius to expand and for an alteration of the surrounding field gradient which tends to discourage the accumulation of further energetic input, such energy remaining round the periphery to be made available to other neighbouring vortices.

Conversely, a lessening of energy within the vortex, leaves the vortex open to the influx of external input and a replenishment can take place even before a functional deficit has occurred.

Excess of energy can be stored for later use by means of the formation of sub-vortices within the larger leading to further fractalisation of the field.

The vortex system therefore provides, via the most basic laws of physics, a self-stabilising basis for the regulation of free energy, already equipped with a transmission mechanism, feedback and automatic buffering.

The overall energy flow


The overall flow of free energy within the body is from the periphery to the centre. Energy is produced in the outer tissues (muscle cells) and moves inward towards the central organs whose energy demand is high but also variable. This overall flow is somewhat self-regulating by the vortex principle and ensures that there is neither a long term excess or deficit as far as the organs are concerned.

The organs themselves are topological toruses and energy moves within them in a vortex pattern in accordance with the Hairy Ball Theorem [14]. The vortex cascade continues inwards to individual cells, which themselves form ‘spherical’ vortices, and thence down to the scale of ring vortices accumulating round the hexagonal rings on biomolecules. Meyl [1] has shown that electrons and protons themselves can be thought of as spherical electromagnetic field vortices and so the whole organism is may be conceptualised solely as a self-organising fractal field structure with no real distinction between matter, energy and field.

Energy flows in the same way that the water in a river flows and if a ‘conduit’ is encountered then the energy flows along the conduit. In terms of electric field energy, a conduit is an arrangement of matter whose conductive geometry is propitious for the formation and movement of electric field structures. A common pattern for a conduit will be a tube such as a nerve fibre which is electrically insulating but magnetically conductive. This allows the conduction of self-propelling ring vortices where the movement is mostly in the magnetic domain. A longitudinal electric field modulation forms in the interior of the conduit and is measured as an electric current. The whole structure has the nature of an electromagnetic longitudinal wave as described by Nikola Tesla.

Concrete examples

The heart, brain and chakras

The general flow of energy within the body is inwards towards the organs, with a special concentration at those needing the most energy including the heart, brain and uterus. These happen to coincide with the oriental descriptions of the chakras as the fundamental ‘energy centres’ of living beings.

The heart, being at the centre of the torso, is the recipient of a great concentration of energy and as a consequence, its bio-field is measured as correspondingly more powerful. This may be regarded as an explanation as to why the heart is where it is: the location has not much to do with the efficiency of pumping but everything to do with energy management and the structure of an electromagnetic vortex field.

Any vortex system has a concentration of energy towards the centre and in a living organism there must be something at that centre. Whatever this something is, it is necessarily the recipient of a continuous stream of energy. It therefore must process this energy one way or another and ideally in a way that benefits the organism. Unlimited accumulation of energy is unsustainable and therefore a priority of such a central organ is the dissipation of such energy. From considerations of energy management alone then, we can predict the evolution of an ‘organ of distribution’ at the centre of any reasonably large organism.

The heart must not run out of energy; this is paramount. Furthermore, it needs to be able to increase output at a moments notice in anticipation of exercise and therefore must, in normal circumstances, have access to more energy than it needs for its current purposes.

One way of this is via some sort of buffer or accumulator which fills up in times of plenty and is available for use at any time. This sounds fine at first but a buffer still needs management and can only hold enough energy for a finite (short) period. ATP and ADP are said to perform this function but their energy capacity is clearly limited.

A more dynamic solution is provided for by the mechanism of a constant and plentiful flux of energy which enters via the vortex mechanism and whose excess is moved elsewhere by a different mechanism. Looking at the architecture of the brain we see that a large and efficient conductor of ring vortices exists in the form of the vagus nerve. Excess energy at the heart therefore moves itself along a path of least resistance upwards towards the brain, creating a large toroidal energy field which is measurable a few feet away from the head, being almost as powerful as the field from the heart itself. In addition to this, electrical energy is imparted to the red blood cells, themselves hosting toroidal ring vortices, and moved along the blood stream to the organs and capillary beds.

So, far from running out of energy and having to request more of it in times of stress, the heart is always supplied with surplus energy, being at the centre of the main dynamic energy flux of the whole human body. It only uses a portion of such energy to keep itself beating and distributes the remainder via the conductive pathways available.

Furthermore, the fractal nature of the energy provides for an automatically regulating buffering system, with excess local energy forced into ever smaller scale vortices. This energy is kept at a small scale by centripetal ‘pressure’ until such time as this pressure diminishes, under which circumstances, it will be released to a larger scale for practical ‘consumption’. We have a de facto buffering system managed by the fundamental laws of vortex physics.

Muscular contraction

The act of muscular contraction is achieved by a single instruction to ‘contract’ which initiates a top-down fractal cascade of information and energy transfer from a high level vortex field down through the levels of muscle groups, muscles, cells organelles and finally molecular sized modulations of the electric field system.

A man wishes to commence walking, so he initiates the process by some conscious ‘intention’ and his muscles soon start to move. The idea that the brain somehow coordinates the contraction of each individual muscle cell to achieve this is not credible and so some distributed processing system is required.

The brain forms an intention to walk and a signal in the form of a ring vortex is sent from the brain to the leg with the high level instruction ‘lift leg’ or something similar. This is soon translated to ‘contract muscle group’ and the group apportions duties to individual muscles, requiring them to contract according to a specific pre-determined pattern and according to stereotyped relative tensions.

The instructions and consequent actions are already moving down the fractal cascade of a nested toroidal structure and now move further inwards to individual cells, with instructions now to ‘contract cell’. The energy and information continue to fractalise down to the scale of organelles and molecules whereupon local free energy is utilised in accordance with the instructions and the structure of the local bio-field is now physically deformed to become directly causal in the contraction.

The nature of the initial instructions to ‘contract’ may be regarded as ‘high level programming’, but both the general top-down fractal vortex flow and the final action are mediated by the very basic laws of physics.

Biological instructions are represented as physical modulations on the structure of a ring vortex (or similar). These physical modulations can be interpreted as ‘information’ at the higher level, but at the scale of an atom, will have a physical and meaningful effect on cellular activity; what started out as an ‘instruction’, now constitutes ‘action’. There is therefore no formal separation between information and implementation with this scheme.


As the muscle contracts, modulations of the local vortex field travel back up the fractal structure to provide feedback to the brain. Local field structures at the sub-cellular level merge to provide an executive summary of the state of the cell and such cellular signals then merge to provide a higher level summary of the tensions within the muscle group as a whole. Functional field movement has now become higher level ‘information’ again and the feedback loop is complete. The brain receives, not a detailed record of the activity of each cell but a highly processed executive summary of only the essential ‘cognitive’ information.

Both ‘cognition’ (biological information processing) and ‘function’ use the same medium now and differ only by their relative positions in the fractal cascade.

“‘Information’ is the structure of a scalar wave” – Konstantin Meyl. [1]

The primo vascular system

Description

The primo vascular system consists of an interconnected system of ducts, the Bong-Han ducts, which are said to be electrically conductive and to have endings in almost every cell in the body. They exist inside the heart and the blood vessels and form networks surrounding each internal organ. If the ducts surrounding a particular organ are disconnected from the main system, then that organ will eventually die. There appears to be no central pump for this system and the function is unknown. [34] [35] [36]

The system as a whole has the character of a ‘balancing system’, whereby a build up of energy of some sort around one will lead, by some sort of ‘pressure’ to a transfer of energy along the connective ducts to a neighbouring organ. The process repeats, with the result that the system achieves a stable state. No elaborate equipment is needed, a state of equal global potential is achieved in an almost fail-safe manner by the basic laws of physics alone.

A similar argument holds for any organ suffering a deficit of energy for whatever reason; the required energy rushes in from the distributed system to compensate.

Relevance to the model


Both the physical disposition and the assumed function of the primo vascular system fit well within the hypothesis of an overall toroidal energy flow. Energy spirals inwards towards the heart, for example, providing it with a continuous supply. Surplus energy is essential for continued function and for any sudden change in requirements and so already we have a need to deal with such a surplus when it is not needed.

According to this hypothesis, the flow towards the heart depends to a large extent on the simple geometry of the body, and it would be an incredible feat if the heart was always supplied by the precise amount of energy it requires by this means alone.

All energy distribution systems have sumps, accumulators or buffering systems and the body is no exception to this rule. Energy accumulates at a natural vortex radius and the Bong-Han networks appear to be coincident with these radii within the body. Excess energy never even makes it into the heart (it cannot afford to ‘cook’), but moves into the electrically conductive ducts and is distributed elsewhere by means of ring vortices. A heart requiring additional energy will ‘invite’ it in from the Bong-Han system as a whole by means of basic physical laws, resulting in a very highly stable and reliable system indeed.

An organ disconnected from the buffering system will survive for a while on its extant energy supply but in the long term will suffer both an excess and deficit at different times and will inevitably deteriorate.

The flow of fluid within the system is said to be pulsatile but no physical pump is apparent. This already suggests the character of an ‘accumulator’; energy builds up somewhere to reach a threshold before being released at regular intervals thereby giving rise to a ‘beat’.

Acupuncture meridians

The meridian channels of Chinese acupuncture seem to mostly follow the lines of fascia between the muscles but are occasionally seen to pass through holes in the fascia and to navigate from superficial layers to deeper muscle tissue, crossing tissue boundaries and presumably conductive discontinuities. How is this possible?

One answer may be that a resonant scalar wave connection has been formed between the two endpoints. These are described by Meyl [1] and take the form of longitudinal electromagnetic waves (Tesla waves). Such waves will conduct both information and energy and be stable to perturbation. The channel may not be spatially fixed but will adapt to physical extension or flexion of the muscles to maintain a highly robust connection.

The construction of proteins

The image below shows the electromagnetic field lines around a protein [38]. The caption claims electrostatic lines but are nevertheless typical of a dynamic ring vortex.

The electrostatic field lines of TRAP, trp RNA binding attenuation protein

3D visualisation of a molecular structure with radial lines in red, blue, and white, showcasing intricate patterns and textures, against a grey background.

Nwilddev, CC BY-SA 3.0 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0,
via Wikimedia Commons

If the electric field lines have movement in the direction depicted then there will be magnetic field lines at right angles to these around the circumference of the torus, with the ring as a whole forming an electric dipole.

Interesting questions arise such as how a collection of molecules could produce and maintain such a field and how the molecules were assembled in the first place. These seem unanswerable at first sight and indeed they are unanswerable when phrased in this way, but if we regard the field itself as the progenitor and the molecules themselves as playing a passive role in the process, then all becomes clear.

The fractalisation of the intracellular bio-field is the initial step in the process. A ring vortex forms from the ambient field and starts to accumulate matter in the form of existing amino acids etc. The molecular structure grows, is formed according to local electromagnetic forces and eventually collapses (folds) in on itself. The folding is, again, within a structure containing strong field gradients and vortex forces and it is these that influence the eventual form of the protein as it moves down a least energy ‘funnel’. [39]

Certain foldings are supported and maintained by the vortex forces and others are not, any malformed protein is dismantled by an electromagnetic whirlwind and the process starts over.

The field torus itself persists, supplied with energy from the fractal cascade, thereby maintaining the molecular structure of the protein which cannot exist without formative forces. If the energy supply were to disappear, then so would the supporting vortex eventually degrade and the protein itself disintegrate.


The cell as a vortex

A cell sits between an organ and an organelle or molecule in terms of scale and in terms of placement within the body. An organ consists of many cells and a cell consists of many molecules. This is consistent with the proposal of an overall fractal organisation to the physical structure.

Several characteristics of a cell help to cement the idea that it is coincident with an electromagnetic vortex.

The cellular nucleus

A vortex concentrates energy towards the centre and typically forms a distinctive ‘radius’ such as can be seen with a tornado for example. The cellular nucleus is an obvious candidate for the cellular vortex radius. A discontinuity of tissue is observed and a markedly different collection of molecular interactions occurs within the nucleus, consistent with markedly different field gradients and energy levels.

A nucleus is said to rotate within the cell [40] [41] which implies the impact of a rotational force. This is again consistent with the idea of a vortex radius; the nucleus is at the cell’s central vortex radius and rotates with it, dragged around by electromagnetic forces.

This rotation is thought to be somehow involved in cellular migration. The idea of a fractal vortex system now gives us a basis for thinking about the mechanisms of such migration. Each cell is a single vortex with rotational field movement at the periphery which interacts with neighbouring cells to achieve stability, morphogenesis and migration.

The idea of a moving cell within an otherwise static environment is unlikely to lead to a solution but a cell in a landscape of constantly rotating electric field vortices already possesses the necessary energy and already has dynamic boundary forces acting upon it from its neighbours. All that is needed is the application of some external supervening field to somehow organise local vortices into biologically meaningful movement. This influence is unlikely to act upon each individual cellular vortex but upon some emergent field of the cellular collective as a whole. Local laws are preserved but the collective seems to develop ‘intentional’ behaviour by no visible means; it appears to ‘self-organise’.

Making predictions

It is said that good scientific theory should make verifiable predictions and this attitude has considerable merit. The problem with biology lies in the fact that seemingly everything that happens in a living organism that is capable of observation has already been observed and described, leaving little chance of making original predictions.

What we can do, however, is to describe some obvious consequences of the vortex hypothesis and then check to see of they are consistent with existing observations and explanations.

Cellular adhesion and organisation

If each cell forms an electromagnetic vortex then we expect that a spinning electric field is formed along with a magnetic dipole and that these constructs will interact with neighbouring cells. This overall field will entail magnetic forces that are attractive and electric forces that are repellent, thereby drawing the cells together whilst at the same time maintaining a regular separation between them.

To the classical scientist, the spinning electric field at the periphery may be interpreted as a ‘charge’ layer or may be measured as an electric current. The strong and ordered fields within the cell may have polarising effects on incident light.

Equatorial attraction

An electrical vortex consists of a spinning electric field which is necessarily accompanied by a magnetic dipole with north and south poles. It is commonly known that an attractive force exists between opposite poles, but lesser known is the ‘equatorial’ attraction, resulting from weaker forces at the equator and indeed all other parts of the magnetic field. [24]

It is proposed that it is these forces that at the periphery of each cell of the body and are responsible, at least in part, for the general cohesion of biological tissue.

A cellular vortex system

A vortex has an inner radius but the outer periphery of a cell is also an inner radius of a larger enclosing vortex system. We therefore would expect to find steep field and charge gradients at the outer edges of the cell, along with the consequential construction of a different tissue type i.e. a membrane.

The global weather system on Earth provides a good example of a cellular vortex system. The arrangement in the Northern hemisphere is one of continent sized anti-cyclones, at whose peripheries can be found counter rotating streams of air. Turbulence is formed and is manifest as tornadoes, i.e. smaller vortex formations with concomitant high-energy centres.

In an arrangement of biological cells therefore, we would expect to find smaller vortices in the extracellular matrix resulting in the formation of specialised bio-molecules such as adhesion proteins. These molecules may well have adhesive properties in their own right but may also act as accumulators for further vortex energy and it is these vortex formations that are instrumental in holding the cells together.

The forces are strong, short range and specialised, but necessarily sit within the larger cellular vortex system which supplies them with a continuous supply of free energy (vortex energy). If the organism should die then the energy supply eventually diminishes and there is a consequent weakening of adhesion; the cellular structure deteriorates and putrefaction commences.

Double layers and bi-layers

Vortices in cosmology and plasma experiments have been found to form electromagnetic ‘double layers’ of counter rotating fields. Such formations in biological systems are clear candidates for the formation of ‘bi-layers’ around cells and the zeta-potential around red blood cells. [42] [43] [44]

How else are alternating layers of positive and negative charge created and maintained? Such layers, under normal circumstances will theoretically attract each other and cancel each other out to form a collection of neutral particles with no particular structure, not even a membrane. There must therefore exist some other forces at play to keep the positive and negative apart and by which the bi-layer structure is maintained. The vortex structure is again implicated.

Ion currents and gradients

Everywhere in texts on cellular biology we read about the movement or accumulation of charge either in the form of ion currents or gradients. In the first case we have the organised movement of charged particles along a specific path and in the second we have the movement of charged particles apparently against a field gradient created by the particles themselves. How does this happen?

The only way to move a charged particle from one place to another is via electromagnetic forces; the force of gravity is only ever attractive and cannot contribute meaningfully to biological organisation. A positively charged particle will move along an electric field gradient from positive to negative or, via the relative movement of magnetic fields. We are therefore looking for an electric or magnetic field which is somehow created and maintained independently of the particles themselves.

A vortex fulfils this requirement. Just as a wind vortex will have a pressure differential from periphery to radius, so will an electromagnetic vortex demonstrate a difference of electric potential from periphery to centre. Such a field gradient will exist over the cell as a whole but also within the smaller vortices that make up the whole fractal cascade.

The specific case of a ring vortex can also maintain an electric potential difference within itself and can transport such a potential from one place to another; we have a mobile battery.

Morphogenesis

The problem of morphogenesis seems intractable given current models of biology. We need to say what the basic building blocks of biological matter consist of and how these are organised into a pre-determined structure. We need to say how this arrangement is encoded as information and how such information is translated into a stable three dimensional topology.

The word topology is used deliberately here. We can’t even say ‘shape’ as cells differ in their individual shapes according to local forces and are also continually changing form over time. A minor injury will result in repair to the point of a very similar, but not quite exact, simulation of the former morphology; the basic shape is there but the individual cells are different. The overall shape seems independent of the cells from which it is comprised thereby indicating the presence of some overall template and an independent construction process.

The vortex as a basis for morphogenesis

Consistent with the main theme of this paper, it can be considered that not only is the vortex the main driver of energy within living organisms but also the basis for the physical morphology of such systems as well. The vortex is a fundamental of nature; it can arise seemingly out of nothing, achieve a stable conformation and continue to accumulate energy with which to create further vortices via fractalisation.

The vortex as the basis for morphogenesis instantly solves many of the problems outlined above:

  • The vortex is already a three dimensional shape. We are off to a good start.
  • Stability to perturbation: A vortex maintains its integrity even as it is buffeted this way and that in a kinetically ‘noisy’ environment.
  • Adaptability: Stability is maintained even though the vortex may be coerced by local forces to adopt different shapes or proportions on a permanent basis.
  • Dynamic stability: In reality, many cells are changing shape continually and must still retain the capacity to perform the same tasks as if they were stationary.
  • The overall functionality is therefore independent of precise shape and depends only upon the vortex topology.
  • It is the vortex field itself that maintains physical form by the organisation of matter; the molecules do not order themselves. The precise local ordering of the molecules is therefore an outcome of the organisation, not the progenitor.
  • Repair is effected by the ‘materialisation’ of an existing vortex structure. Minor damage removes matter but leaves the general bio-field intact. Such field expands out from an undamaged vortex ‘reservoir’, creating new tissue as it does so.

To convince ourselves of the possibility of morphogenesis from fractal vortices, we can look at some examples.

The morphogenesis of apples

The physical shape of an apple is clearly that of a spherical vortex. If we are to look for a morphogenic field template then we can surely do no better than a similarly structured spherical field vortex. The basic shape is stable and formed by the fundamental laws of physics, needing only minor modifications to become an apple or a pear, say.

By looking at the structure of the apple and making educated guesses as to the conductivity of the various parts, we can make inferences as to the nature of the energy flow around the fruit.

The apple receives both energy and information from the main tree. The stalk is an ideal conductor for energetic ring vortices, being moist and hence electrically conductive on the inside and dry and hence electrically insulating on the outside. An electrical current flows in the interior whilst magnetic ring vortices move through the ‘skin’. Information and energy from the whole of the tree enter the vortex system, circumnavigate the periphery and complete the circuit through the core. Energy concentrates and fractalises at the centre for the manufacture of seeds whilst morphogenic information from the tree as a whole is stored in a form suitable for inheritance.

The morphogenesis of strawberries

The strawberry is, again, an obvious vortex structure but this time with the seeds on the outside. A clear conical structure at the centre of the strawberry resembles the form of ‘corona’ discharge from a power line and from this structure radiates multiple filaments each ending in a little seed.

Energy then flows from leaf to plant and up the stalk to the fruit itself where the conical structure distributes energy and information along the filaments to the seeds.

Raspberries

We have a slightly different arrangement again. This time a central cone distributes energy to individual drupelets, each of which is formed by, and then maintains, its own spherical field vortex. Each such vortex has a ‘radius’ at the centre which concentrates energy inwards towards the seed.

The morphogenesis of the erythrocyte

The red blood cells are a clear torus structure and are said to be in the proportion of the Golden Ratio [19]. This is a proportion said to be propitious for the formation of electromagnetic vortices [1].

An electric current (green) circles living blood cells, giving rise to a magnetic dipole (pink).

Illustration of a chemical equilibrium process involving carbon dioxide and water, represented by a red ellipsoid with green and blue arrows indicating reaction pathways and various chemical species labeled.

A reasonable hypothesis then is that the electric field preceded the formation of the physical blood cell. The vortex system acted as an accumulator, drawing both energy and matter inwards for assembly into the required structure, where it is maintained by the same electromagnetic forces which created it in the first place.

Vascular morphogenesis

In the illustration below, the process of vascular development is easily interpreted as the progression of vortex templates from single vortices to vascular tube. [45]

Diagram illustrating the stages of cell division, showing a series of transformations in cell structure.


Reading the diagram from left to right:

  1. Elongated vortices (endothelial cells) develop a North-South dipole and self-organise according to magnetic forces, with North poles attracting South to form a chain.
  2. Energy continues to accumulate within the organelles causing fractalisation and sub-vortices which lead to the formation of cytoplasmic vesicles.
  3. These new vesicles orient along the magnetic field and continue to accumulate energy. They grow in size and elongate in accordance with the ambient field.
  4. The vortex principle (centripetal flow) moves the new vesicles towards the centre of the whole chain where they merge together to form a cylinder at the inner radius of the tube.
  5. Energy continues to accumulate at this radius and is available for maintenance, repair and possible contributions to blood flow.

The morphogenesis of the capillaries

Quite surprisingly, the morphogenesis of the capillaries is via a completely different method.

The first illustration from [46] represents a thin layer between the ectoderm (blue) and endoderm (yellow). This layer is the outer layer of the yolk sac and is therefore an inner ring of some enclosing vortex. Energy flow is therefore from left to right (or right to left) at the outer periphery of the vortex and approximately laminar (linear).

Illustration depicting the development of hematopoietic cells and endothelial cells within the embryonic structure, including undifferentiated mesoderm, hemangioblasts, hemangioblastic aggregates, blood islands, and capillaries, with clear labels for each stage.

Blood islands – Science Direct

Interpreting the diagram, left to right:

  1. The undifferentiated mesoderm acts as an energy accumulator. Turbulence arises in the energy flow, leading to the emergence of small vortices.
  2. These materialise (somehow) as haemangioblasts and continue to accrue energy and to stabilise as physical structures.
  3. Magnetic dipole and equatorial forces again lead to the orientation and adhesion of the haemangioblasts to form an aggregate which is now a de facto vortex of itself. This collective vortex continues to accumulate ambient energy and to redistribute it to the interior.
  4. The periphery of this vortex is now an inner radius of the general flow and the energy concentration and field flow is such that further vortices are formed to become endothelial cells surrounding the blood island.
  5. The endothelial cells expand and connect together via electromagnetic forces to form a continuous tube; the capillary.

The blood continues to attract energy but this is now modulated by the capillary walls and takes on a different form. This acts as a signal to the blood cells which will now differentiate, separate and start to flow, driven by the ambient electromagnetic field thereby created.

Mitosis

Mitosis is a complex affair comprising a multitude of many seemingly unconnected processes. [47] However, by considering the principle of energy conservation and asking “What are the forces that determine such processes?”, we can easily discern the characteristic signs of vortex activity.

A cell needs energy to reproduce and this energy must come from outside of the cell. Once within the cell, such energy must be directed toward the centrosomes somehow and some process must be initiated which creates the microtubules. There is a requirement, therefore, for energy to be both accumulated and organised in a manner appropriate to the complex task in hand.

A vortex system as so far described, satisfies these demands perfectly. Energy flows from the surrounding tissue according to the vortex principle and spirals further inwards towards any vortex system within the cell such as the nucleus or centriole. These act as accumulators and when a critical level of energy is acquired, further processes are triggered.

The creation of microtubules

Microtubules are created in a dynamic fashion, with energy travelling along the tubule in the form of a ring vortex. The vortex is brought to a halt at the end of the tubule, where it continues to accumulate sufficient energy to manufacture the next section of tubule. This process is identical to that used for the manufacture of the nervous system as can be seen in the video of a zebra fish embryo, with the terminal ring vortices showing up as glowing lights. [48]

The genesis of field gradients and polarity

The cell as a whole takes the form of an electromagnetic vortex field and we can expect, as natural consequences, field gradients, centripetal movement and a well-defined polarity. Many texts will describe these fields as the result of biological processes somehow arranging charged particles to create the appropriate field structures, but here the opposite is claimed; it is the electric fields that are the cause and it is the disposition of the particles that is the result. These fields create the arrangements of physical matter and not the other way around; it is natural that a vortex structure should arise from a field but not from a random collection of particles.

Biological laws consist of the interaction between fields and matter. The movement of matter is the observable effect but the vortex field is the invisible progenitor.

Guiding the microtubules

The complex field gradients and polarities thereby created are sufficient to explain the movements of organelles and the pathways taken by the emerging microtubules.

A ring vortex is a dynamic electromagnetic construct travelling through an asymmetric field. This asymmetry allows for a relative difference in ambient field strength between one side of the ring and the other. It isn’t too far fetched to think that the result is a curved trajectory. We would expect that whenever a microtubule is directed tangentially to a vortex such as the cell nucleus, its path should curve towards it; this is what is illustrated. [47]

Diagram illustrating the role of microtubules and kinetochores in chromosome movement during cell division, featuring various types of microtubules and their connection to chromosomes.
Diagram illustrating two phases of the cell cycle: Interphase on the left and Mitosis on the right. Interphase shows a cell with a centriole and centrosome, with a network of chromatin. Mitosis displays a cell with sister chromatid pairs, kinetochore and non-kinetochore microtubules, and astral microtubules.

An identical mechanism has been proposed by Konstantin Meyl as being responsible for the gravitational lensing of light around massive cosmic objects [1]. A photon is formulated as a pair of ring vortices whose trajectory is influenced by the gravitational field of a star or black hole to bend slightly towards the object, as with the microtubules.

Mitotic cell rounding

Mitotic cell rounding is a shape change that occurs in most animal cells that undergo mitosis. Cells abandon the spread or elongated shape characteristic of interphase and contract into a spherical morphology during mitosis.” [49]

An obvious mechanism is that a simple increase of energy to the cellular vortex promotes a strengthening of the vortex and a rounding of the cell. The cell is usually pushed away from a perfect sphere by ‘pressure’ from the surrounding cells, but a stronger vortex structure pushes against the weaker neighbours and transitions the cell towards a natural spherical form.

Cellular repair via a vortex template

A short video from Michael Levin shows a single celled ‘anthrobot’ repairing a mechanically induced wound.

One very obvious interpretation of this now is that although the physical matter has been misshapen, an electromagnetic vortex persists in a necessarily circular shape and acts as a template for regeneration. Field movement of the vortex simply drags the organic matter back into a circular or spherical shape.

Implications

Enzyme reactions

For two bio-molecules to bind together, we require in general, that:

  • They be brought into close proximity
  • They be oriented propitiously
  • Some energy be available to effect the binding

The presence of a vortex field gives plausible explanations for these three requirements.

The overall vortex structure of the cell is not a homogenous structure, but is full of complex vortex structures providing field gradients, centripetal movement and energy concentrations. The overall vortex movement will tend to accumulate matter at certain places, just as debris tends to accumulate in whirlpools in a stream.

Hexagonal ring vortices will inevitably act as field accumulators to develop strong ring vortices around the hexagon [50]. A circling electric field will give rise to a magnetic dipole and it seems likely that this will assist in the molecules adopting the required relative orientations.

Energy may be required to complete the reaction, but the molecules are already near the centre of an energy vortex and the ring vortices themselves are de facto accumulators.

Catalysts

The presence of a catalyst is necessary for certain reactions but the molecule itself may play no apparent part in the reaction. It is now easy to suggest a mechanism for this effect.

A catalytic molecule is positioned within a constantly flowing stream of ‘field energy’ and has itself a certain charge structure. The charge modifies the field flow in a similar manner to a boulder in a stream and the reactants are the recipients of the downstream effects, i.e. the catalytic effects.

The general rate of energy input to the system determines the reaction rate. Heat input is converted to vortex energy and speeds up the reaction. Stirring is the direct creation of vortex energy and speeds up the reaction.

The active site on an enzyme is some feature of the overall charge structure of the molecule within the ambient vortex field. This field is necessary to supply energy to the molecule and to give it structure. We can therefore expect different behaviour from the enzyme ex vivo.

Transmutation

Louis Kervran’s book, Biological Transmutations, contains convincing evidence that biological systems are capable of transmuting one elemental substance to another; sodium to potassium, for example. A conventional explanation seems unlikely given the vast amount of energy that is assumed to be needed, but again, an explanation from vortex physics is plausible.

The reformulation of the atom by Meyl as a cluster of electromagnetic vortices, obviates the need for strong and weak nuclear forces thereby diminishing the actual energy needed to rearrange the constituent elements. Moreover, if such a transmutation takes place near the centre of a vortex, we already have:

  • An intensification of energy
  • The possibility of effectively limitless accumulation of further energy over time


Kervran’s statement that the presence of an enzyme is needed for transmutation to take place, reinforces the idea that the function of some enzymes is to ‘channel’ the ambient electrodynamic field into areas of localised high energy and specific functional characteristics.

The origins of life

The problem of describing the initial formation of life on Earth seems intractable given the current state of knowledge of physics, biology and chemistry. However, a scientific world view which incorporates the idea of energy vortices makes for a very plausible scenario for the origins of cellular structures and complex bio-chemistry.

Rather than assuming a short sharp electric shock as the genesis for complex bio-chemistry, we can instead consider a steady stream of electrical energy coming from the ionosphere and maybe originating in the sun itself. [29] [30].

The electromagnetic field at the surface of the sun is observed to have self-organised into a cellular arrangement of both electric and magnetic vortices [31] so it is not unreasonable to suppose that at some point in the past, a similar arrangement was in place at the surface of the Earth. If this was the case, then a steady stream of energy was available at certain points and such energy took the form of electromagnetic vortices. Such vortices are able to affect surface water and induce a physical flow which reflects the electromagnetic field structure.

We therefore already have many of the requirements for the organisation of the first life forms:

  • Global cellular structure
  • Permanent energy supply
  • Centripetal accumulation of energy
  • Regulation of energy according to the vortex principle
  • Electromagnetic field gradients
  • Pressure gradients
  • Induced centripetal accumulation of matter


Note that whereas the assumption of many is that the first cell evolved from bio-chemical reactions, we have here the interesting possibility that it is the electromagnetic cellular field structure which actually preceded the arrangement of matter.

The vortex field came first, self-organised into a cellular arrangement according to the basic laws of physics and thereby formed the environment necessary for the bio-chemical processes themselves.

The bio-chemistry utilises the energy supply and accumulated material from the vortex and a physical cell is constructed using the cellular field structure as a template. Molecules and organelles are then manufactured according to the varying local energy structures and gradients within the cell in a similar manner to the processes of morphogenesis that will later on lead to the construction of a full human being.

The circulation of the blood

Decades, if not centuries, of research into the mechanisms behind the circulation of blood have concluded that there is simply not enough energy imparted by the heart to drive the blood all the way around the circulatory system and that there must, as a consequence, be some additional energetic input into the bloodstream. [4]

A consensus is that, although the precise nature of the energy is not known, it nevertheless originates from the capillary beds and moves along the capillaries towards the heart.

This is entirely consistent with an overall pattern of toroidal energy flow as described in this hypothesis. Electromagnetic ‘field energy’ moves from the periphery inwards towards the capillaries where it forms vortex structures around them. This energy now spirals into the vessels and along them, somehow dragging the blood along with it.

A separate general centripetal energy flow accumulates at the heart, where it is employed to drive the pumping action and to impart more electromagnetic ‘Chi’ energy into the blood. Each individual blood cell absorbs electromagnetic field energy and stores it as a toroidal vortex current [19], whilst the physical action of the heart organises the blood flow into an overall spiral structure. This vortex structure leads to highly efficient, low viscosity, flow and a meaningful and controlled transduction of electrical to kinetic energy, thereby enabling self-propulsion of the blood down through the arteries.

The blood now moves to the periphery, driven by internal energy where it picks up additional vortex energy from the capillary beds, to form a perpetual loop powered by the centripetal concentration of the distributed energy of the whole body. Compare with Pollack’s water engine above.

This idea accounts for the missing energy and also many of the seeming anomalies in blood pressure. Blood is seen to exit the heart and enter the aorta whereupon it immediately accelerates for no apparent reason and from low to high pressure. This acceleration against the pressure gradient makes no sense from the point of view of a simple pressure pump but suggests that the blood is moving under its own impulse, thereby creating the pressure gradient by its own movement rather than being driven by it.

The water engine described by Gerald Pollack [21] provides a simplified model of the overall flow, confirming the capability of such vortex flows to self-organise and to utilise infrared radiation as an energy source. Such radiation appears to be easily incorporated into an organised energy flow in the overall form of a torus. Simply increasing infrared input speeds up the flow and decreasing it slows down the flow, this having been demonstrated in both a simple water bath and in the circulatory system of a living chick embryo. [71]

Cause and effect are inverted

A general truth of biological mysteries begins to emerge which is that actual cause and effect are frequently inverted from what seems intuitively reasonable and this leads to downstream assumptions that are ultimately at odds with observable reality.

In the case of the circulation of the blood, this has resulted in the propagation of the false idea of the heart as a pressure pump. This contradicts dozens of research papers saying the opposite but still survives as the main theory owing to its intuitively ‘obvious’ nature.

The faulty intuition arises from further basic errors and cognitive biases:

  • The idea that biology is dissipative and entropic
  • The idea that energy necessarily ‘radiates’ rather than accumulates
  • Excessive importance attributed to visible and material entities and processes
  • The view of biology as somehow ‘mechanical’
  • The view of electric fields as inert, static and lacking in innate vitality

Cognition

Cognition as an electromagnetic field

Formulations of cognition as consisting of electric currents (moving electrons) are just not credible. Electrons have no organisational capability of their own and no capacity, by themselves to store information. If the cognitive processes involve the movement of electrons then there must be some organisational forces moving those electrons around.

The only way to move a charged particle around in a controlled manner is via an electric field, but static electric fields are not capable of creating a dynamic process all by themselves and hence themselves need to be organised and modulated.

The basic substrate for cognition is therefore likely to be a dynamic electromagnetic field and this implies a vortex field.

The brain has a clear physical vortex structure and we expect the electromagnetic field structure to be a reflection of this; a field which initially serves as a morphological template is maintained by its own creation and repurposed once creation is complete. Vortex fields have been found within the brain [55] and have been correlated with cognitive processes. Konstantin Meyl has stated simply: “The brain is a scalar wave computer”. [1]

The mind-body problem

The problem centres on understanding how immaterial thoughts and feelings can interact with the material world, or whether they are ultimately physical phenomena.” – Wikipedia

In the context of the hypothesis described here, ‘thoughts’ are electromagnetic vortex structures, the bio-field itself is an electromagnetic vortex structure and even matter can be conceived of as electromagnetic vortex structures [1]. There is no separation between matter, energy, force, thought, structure and information as in existing theory; all phenomena are merely manifestations of dynamic electromagnetic activity.

A ‘thought’ (a physical vortex structure in the brain) acts to modulate the structure of the bio-field (a distributed vortex structure), which in turn manipulates matter via the charge structure (local vortex structure) of such matter. All is a pleasing unity.

The binding problem

In its most general form, ‘The Binding Problem’ concerns how items that are encoded by distinct brain circuits can be combined for perception, decision, and action. In Science, something is called ‘a problem’ when there is no plausible model for its substrate.” [68]

The ‘plausible model’ for the substrate is now a fractal electromagnetic field with an overall toroidal structure. All information is of this form and all computation is via the physical properties of such an entity.

One possibility for the combination of such ‘impressions’ is that the relevant toroidal structures are simply merged together into a single new torus by the basic laws of physics and that this process creates an overall integrated impression or ‘quale’, whilst at the same time preserving the individuality of the separate inputs somewhere in the fractal structure.

There is no distinction here between perception, decision and action. All are manifestations of a single physical process; that of an electromagnetic vortex.

Inheritance


The requirement for biological inheritance is that a vast amount of information be passed from parent to child in a compact and usable form. We need at least:

  • Morphogenic information
  • Developmental information
  • Regulatory procedures
  • ‘Innate’ behaviour and memories
  • Acquired characteristics [69][70]

The volume and nature of information required is not obviously encoded in a few gigabytes of digital data and even if such a thing could be accomplished, we would still need complicated translation and transcription procedures for all encoded data. This is cumbersome to say the least. Many geneticists are now claiming epigenetics as playing a major role in biological inheritance, but the precise mechanisms are still not clear [71].

In light of the hypothesis presented here, the preferred medium for inheritance is an electromagnetic field complex which accumulates all the necessary information and passes it on to the next generation. We have clear advantages over the digital system:

  • No obvious upper limit on data storage owing to the fractal nature of the storage system
  • Easy to add more information to the system as required
  • No need for a separate storage and transport formats
  • No need for translation or transcription
  • Robustness to perturbation owing to the stability of the vortex structure
  • No need for checksums and error correction

The point is that memories, goal oriented procedures, regulatory information and morphogenic information are already in the form of electromagnetic field structures which are at the same time, informational, functional and energetic. There is therefore no need for an encoding system for either storage or transport, they just need compacting into an appropriate ‘carrier vessel’ to eventually merge with the opposite gamete.

To pass on acquired characteristics, information is gathered from the system as a whole and packed into small volumes much the same way as Darwin supposed with his ‘gemmules’. However, whereas Darwin assumed material particles, we are here thinking about a persistent electromagnetic field structure.

Summary


A hypothesis has been described for an electromagnetic bio-field having a fractal toroidal topology and centripetal energy flow. Supporting arguments are given in the form of:

  • An argument from theoretical topology (Hairy Ball Theorem) as to the inevitable toroidal form of continuous energy flow
  • The laws of theoretical electrodynamics
  • Observations of, and analogies with, toroidal structures at all scales in the cosmos
  • The presence of physical toroidal structures within biology
  • Considerations of energy conservation
  • The biological necessity of centripetal movement and energy flow
  • The necessity of the maintenance of charge gradients
  • Plausible arguments for vortex structures as the basis of both form and function with multiple examples given
  • Considerations of the conductive properties of tissues and their physical disposition relative to the energy structure as a whole

A further hypothesis is that the field is a carrier of biological information and that, as a consequence, we now have a theoretical unity to the whole of biology, with the bio-field being the energetic and informational basis for organisation, regulation, morphogenesis, cognition and inheritance.

References

  1. Konstantin Meyl (2004), Scalar Waves: A first Tesla physics text book for engineers
  2. Konstantin Meyl (1990), Potential Vortex (volumes 1-5) ISBN 978-3-940 703-51-4 https://meyl.eu/go/indexf5ea.html
  3. C Louis Kervran (1890), Biological Transmutations, ISBN 0-916508-47-1
  4. Branko Furst (2020), The Heart and Circulation (An integrative model) anhttps://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-25062-1
  5. Coulter I, Snider P, Neil A. Vitalism-A Worldview Revisited: A Critique Of Vitalism And Its Implications For Integrative Medicine. Integr Med (Encinitas). 2019 Jun;18(3):60-73. PMID: 32549817; PMCID: PMC7217401.
  6. Rothfischer F, Vogt M, Kopperger E, Gerland U, Simmel FC. From Brownian to Deterministic Motor Movement in a DNA-Based Molecular Rotor. Nano Lett. 2024 May 1;24(17):5224-5230. doi:
    10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00675. Epub 2024 Apr 19. PMID: 38640250; PMCID: PMC11066961.
  7. Tuck AF. Gibbs Free Energy and Reaction Rate Acceleration in and on Microdroplets. Entropy (Basel). 2019 Oct 26;21(11):1044. doi: 10.3390/e21111044. PMCID: PMC7514348.
  8. Cosmological constant problem -Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant_problem
  9. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition. New York: Garland Science; 2002. The Evolution of Electron-Transport Chains. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26849/
  10. Muller AW, Schulze-Makuch D. Thermal energy and the origin of life. Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2006 Apr;36(2):177-89. doi: 10.1007/s11084-005-9003-4. Epub 2006 Apr 27. PMID: 16642267.
  11. Henke, Frederick G. “A Note on the Psychology of Vitalism.” The American Journal of Psychology, vol. 30, no. 4, 1919, pp. 406–14. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1413678. Accessed 8 Nov. 2025.
  12. Pross, A. (2022). Dynamic Kinetic Stability. In: Gargaud, M., et al. Encyclopedia of Astrobiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_5612-1
  13. Chad R. McCammon, The hyper-torus universe model: a new paradigm for understanding reality
    https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.0674/v3
  14. The Hairy Ball Theorem, Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairy_ball_theorem
  15. Gas Torus, Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_torus
  16. Plasma torus in a laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainstokamaks
  17. Beraia M, Beraia G (2018) Electromagnetic properties of the arterial blood flow. Biol Eng Med 2: doi: 10.15761/BEM.1000141
  18. Nwilddev, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
  19. Purnell, Marcy & Ramsey, Risa. (2019). The Influence of the Golden Ratio on the Erythrocyte. 10.5772/intechopen.83682.
  20. Die-Covid-Falle – Konstantin Meyl
    https://mainz.world/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Die-Covid-Falle.pdf
  21. Li Z, Pollack GH. Surface-induced flow: A natural microscopic engine using infrared energy as fuel. Sci Adv. 2020 May 8;6(19):eaba0941. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0941. PMID: 32494720; PMCID: PMC7210001.
  22. Low Reynolds number – Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number
  23. Drag (physics) – Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_(physics)
  24. The Magnetic Field on the Equator of a Magnet https://www.astro.uvic.ca/~tatum/elmag/em17.pdf
  25. Energy cascade (Kolmogorov) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_cascade
  26. Hermetic tablet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_above,_so_below
  27. Chi (Wikipedia) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi
  28. Seidl AH. Regulation of conduction time along axons. Neuroscience. 2014 Sep 12;276:126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.047. Epub 2013 Jun 29. PMID: 23820043; PMCID: PMC3849146. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3849146/
  29. Magnetic Portals Connect Sun and Earth – Tony Phillips https://web.archive.org/web/20090731010649/http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30oct_ftes.htm?list179029
  30. Flux transfer event – Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_transfer_event
  31. The energy cascade – scales from production-dissipation energy balance
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/energy-cascade
  32. Vortex Motions in the Solar Atmosphere – K. Tziotziou et al. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11214-022-00946-8
  33. Cifra M, Fields JZ, Farhadi A. Electromagnetic cellular interactions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 May;105(3):223-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Jul 30. PMID: 20674588.
  34. M. Stefanov, M. Potroz, J. Kim, J. Lim, R. Cha, M.-H. Nam The Primo Vascular System as a New Anatomical System J Acupunct Meridian Stud, 6 (6) (2013), p. 331e338
  35. K. Soh Bonghan circulatory system as an extention of acupuncture meridians J. Acupunct Meridian Stud, 2 (2009), pp. 93-106
  36. M. Stefanov, J. Kim Primo vascular system as a new morpho-functional integrated system J Acupunc Meridian Stud, 5 (5) (2012), pp. 193-200
  37. Fung PC. Probing the mystery of Chinese medicine meridian channels with special emphasis on the connective tissue interstitial fluid system, mechanotransduction, cells durotaxis and mast cell degranulation. Chin Med. 2009 May 29;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-4-10. PMID: 19480699; PMCID: PMC2694206.
  38. Scientific visualisation of the electrostatic field lines of the TRAP (trp RNA-binding attenuation protein https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DelPhi
  39. Chaplin M. Do we underestimate the importance of water in cell biology? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Nov;7(11):861-6. doi: 10.1038/nrm2021. Epub 2006 Sep 6. PMID: 16955076.
  40. Maninová M, Iwanicki MP, Vomastek T. Emerging role for nuclear rotation and orientation in cell migration. Cell Adh Migr. 2014;8(1):42-8. doi: 10.4161/cam.27761. Epub 2013 Jan 1. PMID: 24589621; PMCID: PMC3974792.
  41. Bard, F., Bourgeois, C.A.: Rotation of the cell nucleus in living cells: a quantitative analysis. Biol. Cell 54(2), 135–142 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1768-322X.1985.tb00388.x
  42. Double Layers – Plasma Universe.com https://www.plasma-universe.com/double-layer/
  43. Williams, A. C. et al “Accretion onto neutron stars with the presence of a double layer” (1986) Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 305, June 15, 1986, p. 759-766.
  44. Bio-plasma physics: Measuring Ion Transport Across Cell membranes with Plasmas – Gimmel et al. 2002APS..OSF.1P017G https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002APS..OSF.1P017G/abstract
  45. Vascular Morphogenesis and the Formation of Vascular Networks – Simon https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00106-6
  46. Blood islands – Science Direct https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/blood-islands
  47. Ryniawec, John & Rogers, Gregory. (2021). Centrosome instability: when good centrosomes go bad. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 78. 1-21. 10.1007/s00018-021-03928-1.
  48. Zebra fish growing its nervous system – NowScienceNews https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2orYA_hQrU
  49. Mitotic cell rounding – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitotic_cell_rounding
  50. Energy development from elemental transmutations in biological systems – S. Goldfein https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA056906.pdf
  51. Heejung Kim, Dugin Kaown, Jeayeon Kim, In-Woo Park, Won-Tak Joun, Kang-Kun Lee, Impact of earthquake on the communities of bacteria and archaea in groundwater ecosystems, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 583, 2020, 124563, ISSN 0022-1694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124563.
  52. Schnytzer, Adi; Schnytzer, Yisrael (2011) : Animal modeling of earthquakes and prediction markets, Working Paper, No. 2011-20, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics, Ramat-Gan
  53. John R. Leeman, Ernst D. Schmitter, Electric signals generated by tornados, Atmospheric Research, Volume 92, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 277-279, ISSN 0169-8095, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.10.029.
  54. Thornhill, Wal. “Toward a Real Cosmology in the 21st Century.” The Open Astronomy Journal 4 (2011): 191-210.
  55. Deco, G., Sanz Perl, Y., Feng, J., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2026). The turbulent brain: Modelling vortex interactions for understanding human cognition. Network Neuroscience,1–25. https://doi.org/10.1162/NETN.a.554.
  56. Grassly NC, Fraser C. Seasonal infectious disease epidemiology. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Oct 7;273(1600):2541-50. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3604. PMID: 16959647; PMCID: PMC1634916.
  57. Fares A. Factors influencing the seasonal patterns of infectious diseases. Int J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;4(2):128-32. PMID: 23543865; PMCID: PMC3604842.
  58. Martinez ME (2018) The calendar of epidemics: Seasonal cycles of infectious diseases. PLoS Pathog 14(11): e1007327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007327
  59. The Earth’s magnetic field: An overview – British Geological Survey https://geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/earthmag.html
  60. Temporal Variations of the Earth’s Magnetic Field: Overview – University of Nevada, Las Vegas: Department of Geoscience https://pburnley.faculty.unlv.edu/GEOL452
    _652/magnetism/notes/MagNotes17temporal.html
  61. Martel J, Chang SH, Chevalier G, Ojcius DM, Young JD. Influence of electromagnetic fields on the circadian rhythm: Implications for human health and disease. Biomed J. 2023 Feb;46(1):48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 19. PMID: 36681118; PMCID: PMC10105029.
  62. Gajanan Pradhan, Alessandro Magni, Federica Celegato, Marco Coisson, Gabriele Barrera, Lenka Mikuličková, Jon Ander Arregi, Ladislav Čelko, Vojtěch Uhlíř, Paola Rizzi, Paola Tiberto, Control of magnetic vortex states in FeGa microdisks: Experiments and micromagnetics, Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, Volume 8, Issue 3, 2023, 100608, ISSN 2468-2179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2023.100608.
  63. Weather fronts, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/how-weather-works/weather-fronts
  64. John R. Leeman, Ernst D. Schmitter, Electric signals generated by tornados, Atmospheric Research, Volume 92, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 277-279, ISSN 0169-8095, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.10.029.
  65. Bai, X., & Füllekrug, M. (2022). Coherency of lightning sferics. Radio Science, 57, e2021RS007347. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RS007347
  66. Geesink, Hans, and Dirk Meijer. Electromagnetic Frequency Patterns That Are Crucial for Health and Disease Reveal a Generalized Biophysical Principle: the GM Scale. https://www.academia.edu/35199978/Electromagnetic_Frequency_Patterns_that_are_Crucial_for_Health_and_Disease_reveal_a_Generalized_Biophysical_Principle_the_GM_scale
  67. Serman E, Thrastarson HT, Franklin M, Teixeira J. Spatial Variation in Humidity and the Onset of Seasonal Influenza Across the Contiguous United States. Geohealth. 2022 Feb 1;6(2):e2021GH000469. doi: 10.1029/2021GH000469. PMID: 35136850; PMCID: PMC8808265.
  68. Feldman J. The neural binding problem(s). Cogn Neurodyn. 2013 Feb;7(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11571-012-9219-8. Epub 2012 Sep 1. PMID: 24427186; PMCID: PMC3538094.
  69. Acquired Traits Can Be Inherited via Small RNAs, Columbia University Medical Center https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/acquired-traits-can-be-inherited-small-rnas
  70. Nicholas Collins, Tania L. Roth, Chapter 7 – Intergenerational transmission of stress-related epigenetic regulation, Editor(s): Livio Provenzi, Rosario Montirosso, In Translational Epigenetics, Developmental Human Behavioral Epigenetics, Academic Press, Volume 23, 2021, Pages 119-141, ISSN 25425358, ISBN 9780128192627, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819262-7.00007-6.
  71. Li Z, Pollack GH. On the driver of blood circulation beyond the heart. PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0289652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289652. PMID: 37856567; PMCID: PMC10586597.
  72. Life at Low Reynolds Number – David Tong https://davidtong.org/pdfs/teaching/fluid-mechanics/lowreynolds.pdf
  73. Physics of Life: Life at Low Reynolds Number – Scott Turner https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZk2bMaqs1E
  74. Boffelli D, Martin DI. Epigenetic inheritance: a contributor to species differentiation? DNA Cell Biol. 2012 Oct;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-6. doi: 10.1089/dna.2012.1643. Epub 2012 Sep 11. PMID: 22966965; PMCID: PMC3460613.
  75. Wan, C., Cao, Q., Chen, J. et al. Toroidal vortices of light. Nat. Photon. 16, 519–522 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01013-y
  76. Anthrobots: age reversal, ancient genes, and what new beings are telling us about genetics and evolution – Michael Levin
    https://thoughtforms.life/anthrobots-age-reversal-ancient-genes-and-what-new-beings-are-telling-us-about-genetics-and-evolution/
  77. Yu, A., Carlson, P. & Pollack, G.H. Unexpected axial flow through hydrophilic tubes: Implications for energetics of water. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 223, 947–958 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2013-01837-8oo

© 2026 Peter W. Wharmby

DNA: an unfeasible coding system

The idea that the sequence of base pairs in DNA represents any sort of blueprint for life is nonsensical from an informational theoretical point of view. The sequences are meaningless by themselves and require systems of translation and transcription which themselves require the existence and maintenance of unfeasibly large amounts of information.

This refutation applies to all systems where ‘information’ is regarded as an abstract entity and divorced from any physical function.


The idea of DNA as ‘information

Mainstream science tells us that the ordering of the base pairs in a strand of DNA represents some sort of blue-print for living systems. Depending upon who you read it can represent an entire organism or just the structure of proteins in the body. Either way, the idea is unfeasible.

The base pairs of DNA constitute data, not information, and without interpretation they are really meaningless strings of digits. There is no obvious code for a protein written into a DNA strand and no reference to any laws of physics or biology; all we have so far is a stream of ‘bits’.

The storage of data as a stream of DNA base pairs may be appropriate for stable storage and integrity during reproduction but it will not, of itself, lead to the development of a new organism.

To convert this stream of bits to anything resembling organic life, we therefore need to translate the bits from this coding scheme to one that is more representative of the laws of bio-chemistry and then somehow implement these physical instructions to construct a real entity. Scientists know this and refer to these steps as translation and transcription respectively.

Translation

DNA has about 3 gigabytes of stored data but we need to be able to interpret this data and translate it to a series of protein coding schemes or something similar. The question arises then as to how much data is needed for the translation scheme itself.

An analogy is that I want to send a Shakespeare sonnet to someone in China but they don’t speak English so an English-Chinese dictionary needs to be involved. A sonnet contains a mere 24 lines of text but the dictionary needs to contain every single word in the English language, just in case it is present in the sonnet.

The dictionary in this case then must contain vastly more data than the information to be translated.

What size of dictionary is required to translate all the potential data in a genome? ‘Unfeasibly large’ appears to be the answer.

Maintaining integrity of the data

The volume of data isn’t the only problem; we have to ensure that it is stored somewhere, free from corruption and somehow inherited. We need to specify some medium in which this data is embodied.

If we say that the integrity is maintained by error correction then we now need extra data and extra functions to implement the error correction and these themselves must be error free.

The mechanisms for error correction, translation and transcription need to be precisely inherited themselves and again require the presence of extra information.

The embodiment of biological data as a digital system has not solved any problem at all but instead added extra problems to solve with now exponentially larger quantities of data. The whole scheme actually necessitates an infinite regression of encoding and error correction.

Transcription

In addition to a dictionary for translation, we need some mechanism for transcription. The translated information coming from the DNA needs to be input into some physical process which will go on to construct proteins or whatever. So what does this process consist of, how was it constructed, where is the information for this and how was such information inherited? The information cannot be contained in the DNA itself because it was needed to construct the machinery that extracts information from the DNA in the first place.

We have managed to describe another infinite chain of regression, this time for the transcription process.

A generalisation of the problem

The problems above are described with reference to DNA but clearly apply to any digital encoding scheme within biological systems.

The central problem is that digital data is just a string of bits and at some time this will need to be converted to a real entity via the laws of physics. There are no laws of physics in a stream of bits, no feedback systems and no energy to drive the process along. All these must come from somewhere else.

The whole narrative draws attention away from the practical problem of manufacturing a cell and just points to the ordering of base pairs as somehow a great discovery.

The same problem will arise whenever a data stream is regarded as source of ‘information’ and whenever the idea of ‘information’ is regarded as an abstract mathematical entity with no concrete relationship to the laws of physics or bio-chemistry.

The solution in abstract

The solution then is to stop regarding ‘information’ and physical structure as separate entities and acknowledge that within biological systems at least, biological information must consist of ‘functionality’, i.e. it must consist of some concrete physical entity that is capable of getting things done.

Information must be in some sense ‘absolute’ and related to the laws of physics in order to remove the need for both translation and transcription. Biological information cannot therefore be digital or ‘abstract’ in nature.

A concrete solution

Konstantin Meyl, in his book “Scalar waves..”, has stated simply that: “(biological) Information is the structure of a scalar wave.”

A scalar wave in this case is an electromagnetic structure as described by Tesla which is likely found throughout biological systems. See: The nature of the bio-field

This proposal fits all of the requirements for biological information.

  • Such structures are inherently self-stabilising
  • They have their own motivational force
  • Will propagate along appropriate biological conduits
  • Have their own intrinsic energy
  • Additional energy may be absorbed from the environment
  • Energy transduction enables ‘persistence’
  • Energy transduction enables ‘function’.
  • Specific characteristics enable specific function
  • Electromagnetic nature enables direct interaction with the bio-field
  • Obviates the need for translation and transcription

These are the requirements that we need in abstract. There may be other physical constructs which implement these features, but scalar waves seem a very good fit.


The no-virus debate: Clare Craig

This is a response to Clare Craig’s essay in the Daily Sceptic titled: The Unsolved Mystery of How Viruses Spread – and Why Germ Theory Isn’t the Whole Answer which asks why the epidemiology of influenza does not support the idea of viral transmission.

Clare is highly unusual amongst virus believers in taking an interest in the epidemiology of influenza and in attempting to explain it. However, this is the correct way to proceed. Evidence must be explained; this is an immutable rule of scientific endeavour. It is no good having a nice sounding theory of small particles, genetic sequences and immunity theory, if your predictions simply do not accord with reality.

If the predictions of virology are insufficient to explain the epidemiology, then there must be some additional or alternative cause of disease which leads to the patterns we see. Clare gives some plausible mechanisms for these.

Compare with the views of the emerging ‘no-virus’ movement who have worked out that no virus has ever been isolated but take no interest whatsoever in the epidemiology of disease. Andrew Kaufman has stated in his interview with Steve Kirsch that “Epidemiology is not science” and Tom Cowan is claiming that there is “no such thing as disease” but that all symptoms are really just signs of the body healing itself and are therefore beneficial.

This is no way to make progress. The epidemiology of influenza is key to its cause, as we have nothing else to work with.


The Unsolved Mystery of How Viruses Spread – and Why Germ Theory Isn’t the Whole Answer – Clare Craig [link]

The essay makes some key claims and presents arguments for each:

  • Viruses exist and are the cause of disease (this post disagrees)
  • The epidemiology of influenza does not support the orthodox view of viral spread (correct)
  • Some other seasonal influence is at work (this post agrees and identifies such influence as some sort of disturbance of the Earth’s magnetic field)

Evidence for viral contagion

Viral genetic material turns up in clusters of sick people. The sequences match. They change over time with new mutations in consistent ways without reverting. Even though testing is not perfect, people with positive tests are far more likely to be sick than not. – Clare Craig

This is not evidence for viral contagion.

The existence of viruses has not been proven and so it is premature to talk of ‘viral genetic material’. Moreover, ‘genetic material’ is said to be present in tissue cultures and not within living organisms; this is the whole aim of so-called viral isolation.

No virus has adequately isolated and so we can never say with any certainty whether or not a particular genetic sequence originated in a virus or somewhere else.

As a consequence of this we can never say with any certainty that changes in measured sequences are the result of ‘mutation’. All that we know is that the results of certain laboratory procedures and software routines produce somewhat reproducible results which vary over time and seem to correlate with disease. Everything else is mere interpretation.

One alternative interpretation is that the body is responding to seasonal variations of the Earth’s electromagnetic field in a stereotypical way. Sick people are in a ‘state’ where metabolism, regulatory processes and gene expression are significantly altered and something of this new state persists in the tissue culture. It is this regulatory persistence which then gives rise to the patterns we see with PCR tests and sequencing results.

Such patterns in the results are then misinterpreted as mutations. The lack of reversion may be caused by the ever changing magnetic field or by the body’s tendency to adapt to almost any stimulus and to produce a noticeably different response when it next encounters a similar stimulus.

The lack of reversion is thereby explained along with the apparent rapid global spread of novel variations in sequences which is now not caused by transmission at all but by the propagation of electromagnetic effects across the globe.

Another interpretation is that a tissue culture forms a biological system of itself which is capable of receiving and interpreting seasonal cues from the environment. In this case, the resulting sequencing results are less related to the state of the original host and more related to the laboratory procedures.

Disease correlates with season and so PCR tests correspond with both season and disease.

PCR and sequencing equipment work by measuring small changes in electrical voltage and so we cannot rule out that seasonal phenomena in the Earth’s magnetic field may have some effect upon the outcome of these procedures by directly influencing the mechanics of the equipment itself. Magnetic variations can be very strong; see the Carrington Event.


Viruses have been well described. Even if isolation methods are not flawless, electron microscopy and crystallography have shown fine-grained details including the shape of structures like the surface of the spike protein.

Viruses have not been adequately isolated and we therefore cannot say that any image seen through an electron microscope is a virus, no matter how well described the morphology. There is little point in looking at a ‘spike protein’ if you can’t demonstrate its function and can’t demonstrate transmission.

Spike proteins may be present in sick individuals but the protein arises from the regulatory status and not the other way around. The spike is a result of sickness, not the cause of it and does not itself constitute a virus.

Morphology, no matter how distinctive, is not proof of function, not proof of virus and not proof of causation of disease.

It has been shown that most so-called viral morphologies can be produced in a clean culture without the presence of a virus. ttps://substack.com/@controlstudies/note/c-192514695

The possibility exists that the images seen in an electron microscope are not even present in the sample but instead are merely artefacts of the microscopy process: https://library-of-atlantis.com/2025/09/07/harold-hillmans-artefacts/


At high doses, transmission works. Human challenge trials demonstrate that viral exposure can cause illness when the dose is high enough.

The referenced link shows no human to human transmission, no transmission via breath and no transmission via droplet. It did not isolate a virus properly and therefore did not demonstrate viral exposure via any means at all.

All these arguments presuppose that the existence a virus has already been established and that such a virus has been successfully isolated. Neither of these has happened and so no transmission study is worth anything in this respect.


Genetic tracing of viruses during outbreaks shows that distinct lineages spread from person to person in predictable clusters, confirming person-to-person transmission.

No lineage has been seen to ‘spread from person to person’. Influenza occurs in geographic clusters and such a clustering is merely assumed to have been produced by transmission.

Genetic sequences are assumed to come from a virus but this is not yet proven. The tracing of a sequence is, of itself, not proof of the existence of a sub-microscopic particle containing genetic material and is not proof of any causal link between such sequences and any actual disease.

If individuals are responding in predictable ways to disturbances in the Earth’s magnetic field for example, then this will give the impression of transmission. Whole communities will get sunburn at the beach but this does not confirm person to person transmission.


This evidence explains the mechanism of viral infection. But it does not explain the timing of the waves of infection that are characteristic of many viruses like influenza and COVID-19.

No, the evidence does not explain the mechanism of viral infection.

  • Genetic tracing looked at group clustering, not individual mechanisms
  • Genetic coincidences in clusters says nothing about a mechanism
  • Purported morphology of viruses has no relevance to mechanism
  • High dose nasal inoculation is not a natural transmission mechanism

Big Fail.


Where the traditional model fails

Normal-dose challenge trials often fail. The evidence here is strong: under experimental conditions, exposure frequently does not result in illness. A recent study confirmed this again.

“Often fail”? – “Invariably fail” is closer to the truth.

Influenza comes in seasonal waves at specific locations and that is that. If you arrange a trial outside of flu season you will get no new patients. If you attempt a trial during flu season then either nobody gets ill (wrong location) or a reliable 10% of patients will get ill.

Proving actual transmission will be another Big Fail though as control groups will get as ill as the rest of them. See studies in Antarctica, submarines, cruise liners and space stations.


Hospital-acquired infections peak at the same time as cases in the community. If spread were primarily driven by close contact, we would expect a lag, as community infections peak then admissions then within hospital infections. But the expected lag does not occur. In fact, hospital-acquired infections peak before the admissions to the hospital.  

Influenza is caused by exposure to antipathetic EMF whether it be from natural or man-made sources. These are invariably localised, can entrain to a single individual and can penetrate the roof of a building. There is no escape from them: Influenza is a regulatory disorder caused by changes in the weather

The conditions in hospitals with a high degree of ambient EMF, 5G monitoring equipment, patients in close proximity and lack of fresh oxygen (What causes pneumonia?) further weakens patients and expedites outbreaks in hospitals.

I asked a local covid nurse if she was worried about catching the disease. She replied: “No, nurses have very good hand hygiene” She was not worried about transmission by breath.

Doctors, nurses, dentists, care workers, shop till assistants have theoretically far greater exposure than the rest of us and should therefore be sick almost all of the time. This never happens.

Waves occur with seasonal regularity. Epidemic peaks in the UK often occur with peak deaths at predictable times of year before falling away for a time

This is the first big clue to the cause of influenza. If millions of people get sick at certain times of the year, then the time of the year has something to do with getting sick: Influenza is a regulatory disorder caused by changes in the weather


The illusion of viral timing

It is often claimed that respiratory virus waves are driven by viral evolution or viral interference. In this view, waves happen when new variants arise that can evade existing immunity, which increases transmissibility and allows the virus to reinfect previously exposed populations.

The reality is .. much harder to explain by mutation or interference alone.

The timing is too consistent

In the UK and many other temperate countries, waves have arrived roughly every 13 weeks, across multiple years and virus types. This rhythm has held steady through variant shifts, travel restrictions and mass behavioural changes. Random events like mutation and competition do not produce this kind of precision.

Influenza arrives with a seasonal rhythm, strongest at winter solstice, but with smaller waves in summer, spring and autumn. The timing is slightly different for different regions and there are latitudinal patterns. Influenza and weather


Submariners are not protected from infections

Quite. Seasonal changes have an effect even when under water or in space. This suggests the presence of electromagnetic scalar waves (Tesla waves) which can penetrate all forms of matter.


 Faster mutation does not speed things up

In the 24 months before December 2021, pre-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 accumulated around 20 mutations per year. From January 2022 to mid-2025, Omicron accumulated approximately 25 per year. Despite this 25% increase in mutation speed, the waves kept arriving on the same seasonal schedule. 

This is because mutation is an illusion. Sequences are downstream of disease states and disease states vary strictly with the seasons. See above.


Hospitals are full of virus aerosols year-round but infections still peak and fall

An AI engine could not find an experiment that claims this and so this is likely to be an incorrect inference drawn from an unproven theory.

Viruses have not been shown to exist in hospitals or anywhere else.


Spread skips regions

Each variant of SARS-CoV-2 spread country to country following the same seasonal susceptibility patterns as influenza. Large regions were skipped entirely in early waves e.g. Eastern Europe in spring 2020 and UK, Portugal, Ireland (i.e., the west of Western Europe) in spring 2021. 

This is further support for the idea that the cause of influenza comes directly from the atmosphere. We need a cause which can, at the same time coordinate a disease over a large area but which may also have definite boundaries. An outbreak may cover an area the size of a cruise liner or a whole continent.

Weather systems are a good candidate for this, being organised along the lines of cyclonic vortex structures. Such structures may cover a continent or may be focused down to something a few yards across.


The susceptibility model

The model that makes sense of these observations is one where infectious agents are necessary but not sufficient. The timing of illness must be due to something else.

Infectious agents have not been shown to exist and so cannot be considered necessary.

There must be a third factor that:

  1. Peaks once each season (always in autumn and winter and not always in spring and summer)
  2. Affects only a fraction of the population each season
  3. Can spare certain regions entirely in any given wave
  4. Is capable of synchronising illness peaks across hospitals and communities

Yes, at last we have some agreement.

The necessary factor is some sort of disturbance in the Earth’s magnetic field. Supporting evidence is that influenza outbreaks are sometimes synchronous along lines of latitude and exhibit a general movement from tropics to poles in winter. Exposure to man made EM disturbances such as 5G causes influenza in trials and the initial outbreaks of covid correlated strongly with the rollout of 5G in Wuhan, Italy and New York.

The evidence excludes certain possibilities:

Other environmental factors like electromagnetic or space weather effects have cyclical differences but these track annually, not quarterly.

No. Big mistake here to exclude space weather effects. We have:

  • Seasonal effects of the magnetic field including those in summer, spring and fall
  • Correlations between season and disease
  • Correlations between season and bio-markers
  • Correlations between solar activity and pandemics Sunspots and ‘pandemics’
  • Correlations between magnetic field strength and covid cases
  • Correlations between covid bio-markers and phases of the moon
  • Correlations between specific weather events and influenza Influenza and weather
  • Weather itself as highly seasonal
  • Papers claiming sferics as a cause of regulatory disturbance
  • 7-day harmonics on covid cases
  • Distinctly different behaviour of magnetic flux ropes in winter and summer Magnetic flux ropes
  • Eclipses and comets implicated in disease outbreaks Neutrinos, eclipses and plagues
  • More..
Orlyuk, Romenets

The chart shows a clear correlation between the Kp index of the Earth’s magnetic field and covid cases. Covid cases in red with Earth’s magnetic field in blue (trendline in black)


Nasirpour et al.

This chart from Nasirpour et al. shows a clear association between pandemics and solar activity.


The immune clock

Our immune systems change with the seasons. Gene expression studies show clear and consistent shifts in immune pathways across the year – with January and July as polar opposites and transitional patterns in April and October. These changes are not subtle – nearly a quarter of genes are affected. The pattern is the opposite in Europe to Australia. In some cases, the winter and summer immune profiles are as different as those seen in entirely distinct disease states. 

If there are no viruses then there is no immune system as there is nothing to be immune to!

So what are they measuring?

What is being measured is some parameters of the regulatory system and these are seen to vary across the seasons. The system gets its cues from external sources such as light, temperature and electromagnetic events. Biomarkers have been seen to vary according to the phase of the moon but nobody believes that this is because of gravity or even moonlight and so the only remaining candidate is an electromagnetic signal. See: Magnetic flux ropes The Shnoll Effect Birth date, lifespan and disease Frank Brown Giorgio Piccardi

Now, as gene expression is involved, then anything involving gene expression is involved and that means almost anything.

The ‘immune system’ is regulatory in nature and phenomena such as the coordination of symptoms and sustained high temperature in influenza are surely managed by such a system as opposed to a small viral particle.

Disease is therefore a problem of regulation and regulation is receptive to cosmic rhythms: Frank Brown


Susceptibility and dose

Whatever the factors are that lead to susceptibility they must overcome the mucus barrier of the respiratory tract which is normally impenetrable to viruses.

No, because no virus is involved. Disease is the direct result of atmospheric disturbances on the regulatory system. No material substance is involved.

There are three main explanations for the seasonal cycling seen in human immune gene expression:

  1. The viral mutation model. Immune cycling is downstream of viral exposure. Seasonal waves of infection, with everyone exposed to airborne viruses, drive immune activation, while gene expression shifts reflect that exposure.

Alternatively, gene expression, ‘mutation’ and ‘immune evolution’ are all downstream effects of atmospheric disturbances which are slightly different each year. Affected individuals adapt to specific disturbances and produce different sequencing results thereby creating the illusion of mutation. The illusion of immunity is similarly created as, having adapted to a stimulus, they will likely not succumb to a similar stimulus the following year.

Immunity studies can, to some extent, be ‘repurposed’.

  1. Innate biological rhythm. Each person’s immune system runs on a built‑in annual clock, independent of environment or exposure.
  2. Environmental entrainment. Immune function responds gradually to sustained environmental inputs – atmospheric, electro-magnetic or otherwise – which vary by season and location.

This one is tempting I will admit but I think that it is again incorrect; there are no built-in clocks in the human body and even the idea of ‘entrainment’ is highly doubtful.

Influenza outbreaks conform to a characteristic pattern with narrow peaks which occur close to the winter solstice but which vary in their timing from year. Such variation is not characteristic of entrainment where we would expect very precise timings with any variation taking several annual cycles to develop.

There is disease following tornadoes and earthquakes, both associated with electromagnetic output. There are associations between sferics and headaches and there are almost instantaneous outbreaks associated with humidity changes or the rollout of cell-phone technologies. These rapid responses to randomly timed exposure show that population entrainment is certainly not necessary for the production of disease.

What seems to happen is that our bodies know approximately what sort of rhythm is required and will pick one from the available sources as a timekeeper. Speeding up the metabolism of laboratory animals will not speed up the timekeeping and so the time keeping does not arise from any metabolic process.

Our bodies seem to be able to select and receive any desired rhythm from the environment but unable to produce it internally. See: Frank Brown

The fact that people in Australia have the opposite cycle of immune gene expression indicates that the rhythm is not innate.

Told you so!

Experiments on students in deep underground caves show that they can sustain circadian rhythms with no exposure to light and this has led scientists to think that the rhythm is innate. However, the experiences of astronauts and submarine crew suggest that some influence is still reaching them somehow.

The electromagnetic scalar waves as described by Tesla are said to be capable of penetrating water or rock and so these must be considered as a prime candidate for transmission of environmental or maybe ‘cosmic’ information.

Note that sferics are said to be measurable thousands of kilometres away from the source with little to no attenuation. This is a defining characteristic of a Tesla wave.

This lack of attenuation can only be achieved if the energy of the pulse is strictly contained in a finite footprint. This will clearly result in exposure to only a certain percentage of the population and will confine such exposure to limited geographical regions at any one time.

However, it could well be something we simply have not measured e.g. a seasonal atmospheric phenomenon that is invisible to our current tools.

Yes. This is the way to go.

Contemporary physics is unable to describe biological systems despite the best efforts of both physicists and biologists. Moreover, there are so many anomalies and unexplained phenomena in the world that we must conclude that physics cannot even explain physics!

This incompleteness is important. We must expect to find things that we cannot explain in conventional terms and must not panic too much. The temptation to ignore anomalies must be resisted as must the temptation to use terms such as ‘pseudo-science’ for almost anything outside of orthodoxy. Arguments such as “This cannot be true because there is no physical explanation” are now invalid.

This raises the salience of experimental observations and emphasises the importance of epidemiology. The study of pure correlation is science without a mechanism, it enables us to uncover some aspect of truth even when we have little to no idea of how things work.


References

The Unsolved Mystery of How Viruses Spread – and Why Germ Theory Isn’t the Whole Answer – Clare Craig
https://dailysceptic.org/2026/01/27/the-unsolved-mystery-of-how-viruses-spread-and-why-germ-theory-isnt-the-whole-answer

The spread of the Sars CoV-2 virus depends on the Earth’s magnetic field – M.I. Orlyuk, A.O. Romenets, 2022

Scalar Waves – Konstantin Meyl
https://www.meyl.eu/go/index92d2.html

Revealing the relationship between solar activity and COVID-19 and forecasting of possible future viruses using multi-step autoregression (MSAR) – Nasirpour et al.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33725302/

Natural very-low-frequency sferics and headache – Vaitl et al.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11594631/

The decline in disease

The chart below is from the Dissolving Illusions website and shows the decline of most so called ‘infectious’ diseases from 1840 to 1976. All diseases shown were almost extinct before the mass production of penicillin in 1944 and certainly before the first vaccines in 1957.

The vaccines cannot therefore be responsible for the abolition of these diseases, which begs the question: What is responsible?

Toxicity?

The answer according to many people now is that these diseases were caused by some sort of poisoning and that improvements in hygiene, sanitation and workplace conditions are what led to the dramatic decline shown.

This cannot be the whole story though.

The mortality rates for scarlet fever in particular show, not a steady decline, but instead huge variations which suddenly settle down circa 1900.

These variations have two outstanding features:

  • Magnitude: They are of a greater amplitude than the overall average decline
  • Periodicity: They show clear and regular cycles

These variations are of an order of magnitude that is actually greater over a 3 year period than is achieved in a hundred year average decline. When the variations exceed the actual trend you have a problem!

What is the explanation then for these short term variations? Improvements in hygiene now seem very unlikely; how to explain a coordinated nationwide predisposition for hand-washing that comes and goes every few years? How to explain any influence that has such a cyclic nature?

Sunspot cycles and pandemics

The chart below from Nasirpour et al shows a striking correlation between many assumed infectious diseases and either high or low sunspot activity.

Sunspot activity typically peaks every 11 years.

The authors conclude:

Regarding the results of this study, we found that sunspots are the main cause of virus generation in the world.
This research reveals that the biological and astrophysical mechanisms are related to the generation of world pandemics such as COVID-19.


So although they still think that these diseases are caused by viral infection, the observed pattern itself is not caused by infectious spread but by the sunspot activity somehow.


Could sunspots cause disease?

First note that many of the disease outbreaks started before the sunspot maximum which tends to suggest that it is not the sunspots per se that are the cause of the outbreaks.

Mainstream wisdom is that sunspots originate from deep within the sun according to some internal process. In this case we may somehow be seeing the effects of this process at the Earth’s surface before they are visibly manifest on the Sun’s surface.

Other cosmologists see the solar cycles driven by external forces in the form of ‘galactic wave sheets’ or some such. Electromagnetic filaments between the Sun and the Earth are responsible for coupling events on Earth with those on the sun. Such filaments harness energy from the wider cosmos and propagate waves along the filament to the Sun at one end and the Earth at the other.

Sometimes effects are seen first at the Sun as solar flares and sometimes they appear as disease on Earth before the solar cycles peak.

These electric currents between the Sun and Earth will have an impact upon our weather and electrical discharge from the ionosphere will disturb the regulatory systems of our bodies thus leading to diseases of an inflammatory nature. See: Influenza and weather


Disease and magnetism

There are quite a few papers describing connections between ‘infectious’ diseases and changes in the Earth’s magnetic field. The assumption of a viral intermediary confuses the issue a bit but the correlations are always there and various mechanisms have been postulated.

This paper from Zaporozhan and Ponomarenko  points the finger at altered gene expression and attempts to:

  • Bring attention to periodicity as a common feature of numerous biological processes and to discuss the nature of corresponding regulatory influences
  • Show theoretical possibility of bio-regulatory effects of magnetic fields
  • Outline some signalling pathways capable of implementing bio-regulatory (including genome-regulatory) functions of electromagnetic fields
  • Summarize our knowledge about Geomagnetic field, its principle parameters and sources of variation
  • Review possible evidences of regulatory influence of Solar cycles and corresponding Geomagnetic field perturbations on flu epidemic process
  • Describe probable mechanisms of Solar cycles and Geomagnetic field regulatory influences on virus-host interactions and other biological processes

Earth sun connection

The Sun as an Extremely Sensitively Interconnected and Regulated System – Attila Grandpierre
https://old.konkoly.hu/staff/grandpierre/Sun_Sensitive.pdf

Connections between the sun and Earth are quite surprising, with statistical correlations between the Earth’s rotation rate and solar activity deep within the sun.

Not only the minimums of the Earth’s rotation show connections with the solar activity period, but also, as Currie (1973) showed, the rotation rate of the Earth actually correlates with the solar activity!” – Attila Grandpierre

Grandpierre notes that sometimes the change in solar activity comes first and at others it is the Earth’s variations that seem to initiate activity in the sun!

A better explanation surely is that energy accumulates in the solar filaments and propagates along the filament to cause correlated events in both Sun and Earth.

Whatever the origin of these phenomena, it seems to have the power to both cause sunspots and affect the rotational speed of the Earth; this is not a ‘subtle’ energy! From this perspective then, the idea that it could somehow be responsible for causing disease on Earth now seems a little less surprising.


The decline in disease

The chart again:

The peaks in the mortality rates for scarlet fever look to be about 5 and a half years apart, i.e. half a sunspot cycle. Now given the strong association between other diseases and sunspots, why should it not be that these cycles are also the result of electromagnetic disturbances?

Moreover, if such an explanation should be found sufficient for the larger variations in mortality then why is there any need of a separate explanation for the general decrease of mortality rates over the century? Something about the cosmos has settled down over the last century or so and the health of humanity has improved as a consequence.

The idea that the observed decline is largely to do with ‘space weather’ will seem like nonsense to many, but if it is supported by the data then it must at least be considered plausible.

See also: Influenza and weather


References:

Dissolving illusions: https://dissolvingillusions.com/graphs-images/

Revealing the relationship between solar activity and COVID-19 and forecasting of possible future viruses using multi-step autoregression (MSAR) – Nasirpour et al
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7961325/

Solar filaments and you: https://youtu.be/6JA38XKOVpA

The Sun as an Extremely Sensitively Interconnected and Regulated System – Attila Grandpierre
https://old.konkoly.hu/staff/grandpierre/Sun_Sensitive.pdf

Mechanisms of Geomagnetic Field Influence on Gene Expression Using Influenza as a Model System: Basics of Physical Epidemiology – Valeriy Zaporozhan, Andriy Ponomarenko
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/3/938


The cosmic origins of Life

The necessary conditions for the development of complex organisms from the basic ‘stuff’ of the universe are provided for by a complex electromagnetic field structure that has its origins far from the Earth and whose behaviour is rooted firmly in the laws of physics.

  • The cosmic ‘field’ flows around the Universe much the same as water flows in a river
  • Field energy spirals inwards to form galactic whirlpools
  • Energy concentrates to form stars which emit all manner of emergent energies
  • Solar output is given fine grained structure via impact with the Earth’s ionosphere
  • Electric discharge from the ionosphere is instrumental in the formation of complex molecules
  • Rhythmic patterns in the magnetosphere provide a regulatory basis for life which precedes complex biology
  • Geographical variation allows for a diversity of primordial soups

The nature of the Cosmos

Mainstream cosmology will have us believe that the Universe consists essentially of a large amount of fairly uninteresting ‘space’, within which exists discrete blobs of uninteresting ‘matter’. The blobs of matter emit strictly radial forces in the form of gravity which influence other objects and it is this collection of connected atoms and forces that will somehow organise itself into galaxies, planets and eventually, organic life forms.

New theories of physics and recent observations by astronomers create a very different impression. Slight modifications of Maxwell’s equations predict a ‘living sea’ of electromagnetic activity that forms a self-sustaining energy field which is full of complex activity and these predictions are confirmed in the spiral patterns of galaxies.

Start to imagine it as a river flowing downstream where eddies and vortices form and interact with each other. So does the cosmic field form spiral patterns which compress the field structures towards the centre of the vortex leading to a great concentration of energy. Compressed field structures morph into a variety of shapes, some of which will adopt the familiar stable configurations that we call ‘matter’

The result is the creation of entire galaxies and the stars within them. A nice example at the top of a page is a barred galaxy showing a textbook formation of a vortex structure. (Vortex physics- Konstantin Meyl)

Formation of the sun

Energy flows towards the centre of a vortex and a star is formed. As the field disturbances are compressed, they are forced into a multitude of different configurations, including matter, light, heat, neutrinos and other components of the solar wind.

Radiative energy streams out of the sun in the above forms whilst at the same time our star is replenished by the inward spiralling cosmic energy.

Electric filament currents form and connect with the ionosphere of the Earth round about the equator. These form a persistent one-to-one connection, feeding the Earth with both energy and information.

The Earthly connection

The broad shape of a solar filament will survive past the ionosphere and will penetrate the Earth’s surface, creating ‘telluric’ currents, large circular or spiral movements of electricity that are easily measurable in the topsoil. These field vortices are highly influential in causing the large scale weather patterns that we see.

The interaction of these currents with the Earth’s magnetosphere creates additional fine-grained structures within this field and it is these magnetic field vortices that are associated with local weather patterns and have a strong influence on the biological regulation of all life on Earth.

Disease and the weather

Strong and undeniable relationships exist between outbreaks of disease and distinctive weather patterns, with specific diseases being triggered at specific times of the year and at specific places on the planet. The disease is caused by the associated disturbance in the Earth’s magnetic field which disrupts the (largely electromagnetic) regulatory processes within the body. See: Influenza and weather

The pacemakers of Life

The work of Frank Brown (External factors in the mechanisms of biological clocks) shows very clearly that terrestrial magnetic activity is heavily rhythmic and is instrumental in the regulation of Life on Earth. Cycles are apparent coinciding with day length, year length and lunar month at least.

Brown concluded that there are no internal clocks in the body and that therefore existing bio-rhythms must be set from the outside, they are fixed by the magnetic activity on Earth and it is the job of biological organisms to attune themselves to these cosmic patterns; to use them as pacemakers.

The rhythms and energies needed to organise and regulate Life therefore precede the genesis of life.

Discharge from the ionosphere

Life evolved between the twin capacitor plates of the ionosphere and the surface of the Earth. This provides a voltage difference to be used by living organisms and also a source of discharge current.

Mainstream science really assumes that this discharge is of no particular interest, consisting of a steady and small current obeying Ohm’s law. Slight adjustments of Maxwell’s equations though, allow for spiral discharge through the atmosphere, making available a continuous flow of vortex energy which in turn will be modified by seasonal and geographical variation.

Primordial ‘soup’

We have arrived at some sort of a description of the environment within which life began.

A continually moving stream of electro-magnetic field energy pervades the atmosphere, representing discharge from the ionosphere to the Earth’s surface. This is modulated by the rotation of the Earth, the orbit of the moon and the passing of the seasons to create a pulsing, rhythmic field, helping to coordinate and regulate the emerging organisms.

The field is right-handed according to the laws of electromagnetism and this no doubt explains the chiral bias in many bio-molecules.

Vortices within the water are said to be capable of energy absorption (from solar neutrinos), frequency conversion (Meyl) and energy transduction. Transmutation of elements is possible under such conditions with calcium being a common product of such activity (Louis Kervran).

We therefore have a regulatory framework, a mechanism for energy transduction and a machine for mineral production already set up in anticipation of Life processes and it is within this electro-magnetic ‘cradle’ that the first biomolecules emerged.

Top-down causation vs Big Bangs

So far we have energy from the cosmos moving spirally inwards to form stars which transmute the energy into vortex filaments whence they are transported to our planet and refined by local conditions into formative forces. These energies will ultimately be absorbed into cellular structures that interpret them in a cognitive fashion and incorporate them into an organised biological system.

There is a plausible transmutation of energy, a refinement of structure at each stage of the process and a continual downscaling of energy from cosmos to cell, all in tune with the laws of physics. We have ‘top-down’ causation.

Compare with the mainstream version:

  • Universe begins in a big explosion
  • Stars are ‘matter’ crashing together
  • The sun works like an atomic bomb
  • Life started with a big lightning bolt
  • Molecules bond by bumping into each other
  • Randomness creates DNA

In other words, the laws of physics are fine until you can’t explain something and then you just invent some kind of explosion where those laws are temporarily suspended and some ‘chance’ process takes over and: “Behold .. Life!”

An explanation is attempted largely in terms of dissipative processes (explosions) and bottom up causation (molecular interactions). This is in tune with ideas such as entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics but is clearly at odds with the requirement to create an organised self-sustaining life form that exists ‘far from thermodynamic equilibrium’.

Any appeal to some sort of molecular Darwinism will not rescue this. You can only select for a sensible molecular arrangement if a sensible molecular arrangement has been created in the first place. This is hardly provided for by a hypothesis based upon randomness and explosions!

Explosions are going the wrong way and randomness is not formative.

The idea of top-down causation presents a pattern altogether more consistent with the observed outcomes: Instead of dissipative explosions and randomness we have a concentration of energy and increase in complexity.


The production of the first bio-molecules

The conditions within which the first complex molecules are to be formed is a mineral-steeped aqueous environment host to a variety of vibratory energies and already subject to diurnal, lunar and annual rhythms.

The Miller-Urey experiment demonstrated the spontaneous formation of amino acids. These then are to be regarded as biological ‘fundamentals’, molecular organisations that arise spontaneously according to the laws of physics. No additional input of information is needed for them to form.

Amino acids fall into various classes according to their characteristic resonant frequency and it is this property that enables assembly of the acids into a protein chain. All amino acids contributing to a functional protein will have the same resonant frequency (Cosic 1990) and a water complex vibrating at this frequency will tend to collect together all the necessary parts of the intended protein chain via ‘cymatic’ resonance.

Somehow the chain is assembled and it is time to ‘fold’. Again the vibratory environment is essential for this. The protein chain is pushed around by predominantly electromagnetic forces from one ‘attractor well’ to the next until it reaches the desired conformation. A series of maximal likelihood outcomes add up to a stable least energy solution.

This seems to be how proteins are assembled within the controlled environment of a cell but it is not inconceivable that something like this should occur in a pre-biotic environment as all it needs is the laws of physics.

The mainstream view from evolutionary theorists is that all this simply happens through random kinetic encounters of molecules coupled with the idea of ‘millions of years to get it right’; another typical brute force solution.


Self-replicating molecules

Many evolutionary theorists have stated plainly that a prerequisite for biological evolution is the (happenstance) creation of a self-replicating molecule.

No! Just .. no!

Molecules cannot replicate themselves, they generate no energy, can create no new matter, cannot assemble existing matter and have no self-knowledge, no internal map of themselves to use as a design template for the new molecule.

Bio-molecules are the product of the vibratory water-environment within which they exist. It is this environment that organises the necessary energy, matter and electro-kinetic infrastructure needed to create a new molecule.

A pre-requisite then for the continuance of biological structures is the persistence, not of the molecule itself, but of the environment that was instrumental in creating that molecule in the first place. Here lies the energy, the structure and the information necessary to reproduce molecules sympathetic to the construction of future life forms. Causality in this respect is again not from the molecule itself, not from the bottom up, but rather top-down, with energy, matter and information coming from the cosmos to the local environment and thence to the molecule itself.

Bio-molecules are not the initial cause of Life itself but a visibly manifest end product.


Pre-biotic evolution

The requirement for evolution then is for a persistent electromagnetic field environment within which to construct bio-molecules; a self-replicating protein factory to put it briefly.

This seems a tall order but a large part of the power source and regulatory structure is ever present in the form of the cosmic cycles that originate in the Sun coupled with the resonant properties of water. These are never going away.

This will all be managed by a stable, self-sustaining electromagnetic bio-field taking the form of a closed loop feedback system. See: The origins of life


Mainstream ‘theory’ of evolution

Evolutionary theorists say that the initial construction of self-replicating molecules is by random chance and that this works because there are several million years available.

Note that the invocation of randomness obviates the need to provide an actual mechanism for this process. The construction of these molecules clearly must be in accordance with the laws of Nature but this formulation is actually independent of the specific laws involved, merely needing millions of years to come about.

The suggestion of randomness as a causal means is highly misleading as ‘randomness’ is a statistical outcome pattern, not a generative mechanism.

The use of the term ‘self-replicating’ is likewise deceptive, effectively wallpapering over the inadequacies of the theory by presenting as a de facto solution something which is actually meaningless. The term is easily accepted by a lazy cognitive system and repetition of the phrase by ‘experts’ cements it in place as an unchallenged ‘fact’.
Instead of a convenient (though inaccurate) metaphor, it has become a foundational axiom.

References:

Vortex physics – Konstantin Meyl
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274120453_About_Vortex_Physics_and_Vortex_Losses

The Folding of Life Proteins: On the role of long-and short range electromagnetic pilot mechanisms – Dirk Meijer, Hans Geesink
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315706536_The_Folding_of_a_Life_Proteins_On_the_role_of_long-and_short_range_electromagnetic_pilot_mechanisms

Miller-Urey experiment – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment

Do we underestimate the importance of water in cell biology? – Martin Chaplin
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16955076/

Cosic, Irena. (1995). Macromolecular bioactivity: Is it resonant interaction between macromolecules? – Theory and applications. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering. 41. 1101-14. 10.1109/10.335859.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15347139_Macromolecular_bioactivity_Is_it_resonant_interaction_between_macromolecules_-_Theory_and_applications

Study provides evidence for externally powered Sun – Jamal Shrair
https://watchers.news/2017/08/01/study-provides-evidence-for-externally-powered-sun/

Michael Clarage: Solar filaments and you! | Thunderbolts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JA38XKOVpA

Cosmic influences on humans – J T Burns

External factors in the mechanisms on biological clocks – Frank A Brown

Sheldrake’s TED talk

Rupert Sheldrake’s TED talk , “The Science Delusion”, listed ten points of contention concerning ‘accepted’ tenets of modern science. The presentation caused quite a stir and was “taken out of circulation by TED, relegated to a corner of their website and stamped with a warning label.” – Sheldrake

The general theme of the talk is that contemporary physics, as usually described, is mechanical, materialistic, insufficient to describe biology, inheritance or consciousness and is in any case incomplete of itself. Modern science is therefore deluding itself if it thinks it has the answers to everything or even that it could supply the answers to everything, as it is hampered by its own self-imposed constraints.

This is only partly true. There is a strong streak of ‘materialistic’ thinking in all sciences certainly but field physics and in particular the Theory of Objectivity of Konstantin Meyl do not deal with ‘matter’ or even ‘forces’ as fundamentals of nature and therefore paint a very different picture from the one to which we are accustomed.

The desire to reject ‘materialism’ is fuelled in part by an incomplete description of what actually constitutes ‘materialism’.


The ten points:

  1. Nature is mechanical or machine-like
  2. Matter is unconscious
  3. The laws and constants of Nature are fixed
  4. The quantity of matter and energy is constant and was fixed by the big bang
  5. Nature is purposeless and evolution is without direction
  6. Inheritance is via the continuity of the structure of some physical substance (genes)
  7. Memories are retained in the brain as material traces
  8. ‘Mind’ is inside the head and consciousness is just brain activity
  9. Apparent paranormal abilities such as telepathy are the illusions of Bad Science
  10. Mechanistic medicine is the only one that matters

3. The laws and constants of Nature are fixed
Yes! Of course they are! If not then how does the universe run? How does it maintain pattern, order and stability? If the laws that maintain order are changing all the time then there must be some meta-laws that determine how these changes occur.

The alternative is that things just happen and anyone who thinks that can just give up on pretending to be a scientist.

The problem we have is not whether or not the laws are fixed but whether or not the laws and constants that scientists use to describe reality are in fact the fundamental laws and constants of reality. Countless observational oddities and internal inconsistencies suggest that they are, at best, incomplete.

The laws of physics as described by Konstantin Meyl are described by a single field equation and from this can be derived the laws of gravity, the Schrödinger equation and the laws of general relativity. So Meyl’s equation can reasonably be described as ‘fundamental’ but the other laws cannot. They are just mathematical representations of isolated laboratory observations.


The speed of light. In his talk Rupert mentions that the speed of light slowed down by about 20 km/s between 1928 and 1945 before resuming its approved value. The response of the standards authorities was to simply re-define the length of the metre in terms of the speed of light so as to correct for the difference
So the speed of light is now a constant by decree (but not by observation) and length is no longer fundamental. But what about ‘time’? Is that not fundamental?

We have no direct way of measuring time and the best we can do is to count the number of oscillations of an atomic clock and declare the result to be representative of elapsed time. A big problem with this is the following chart which shows that two atomic clocks in the same room but oriented differently will keep very good time with each other – except during an eclipse!

So we are stuck with a science that somehow regards length as a variable quantity and has no reliable way of measuring elapsed time and we can therefore ask: “What then is meant by speed?” or “How on can we measure distance travelled per second when we have no stable definition of either a metre or a second?”

We have too many variables and no clear idea as to which are to be regarded as ‘fundamental’.


The solution.

Konstantin Meyl cuts through the confusion with a single field equation (below). This equation only is ‘fundamental’ and nothing else.

This is the entire equation and there are no three types of mass, no separate force of inertia, electrostatic attraction, gravity etc. and as a consequence, no need for multiple ‘constants’ to mediate between such entities.

Both time and distance and the speed of light are dependent upon field strength, with high field strength leading to a shrinking of distance and a slowing of time. Light speed can vary in absolute terms but measurements of it will remain constant to the observer because as lengths shrink, so will time slow down, giving the impression to the observer of a fixed light-speed.

The observer is now part of the experiment and will shrink or speed up along with the experimental equipment and the observed phenomena.

It is the variations of the rate of atomic clocks owing to changes in the solar neutrino stream that is likely leading to variations of the measured speed of light.


4. The quantity of matter and energy is constant and was fixed by the big bang. Classical physics is clearly struggling on this one. There can be no explanation of such an initial event in terms of known physics simply because the bang itself, having created the laws of physics must therefore precede them and hence cannot be derived from them.

According to Meyl, ‘matter’ is a stable balance of positive and negative field elements which together cancel each other out. Matter can be materialised from non-matter and can be destroyed again to leave nothing behind. The total amount of ‘energy’ in a particle is always zero and so the total amount of ‘energy’ in the universe is in fact constant and equal to zero.

Einstein’s famous E=mc² is incorrect and Tesla agreed with this, having claimed to have destroyed billions of atoms with no ill effects.

Note that Meyl’s assertions concerning mass and energy derive straight from his single field equation which therefore remains the single fundamental assertion with all other physical entities being emergent properties of those equations.

Contrast this with mainstream physics where the well studied entities matter and energy are held to be fundamentals and obeying the laws of nature but at the same time all coming from the big bang and so cannot really be fundamental. They even derive from something that is not itself part of the laws of nature, is not describable by them and is fundamentally unmeasurable, untestable and un-falsifiable.

The whole framework is topsy-turvy and badly structured. We need a single testable hypothesis but what we have a patchwork quilt thrown together from ideas which are good enough of themselves but bear not much relation to each other.


6. Inheritance is via the continuity of the structure of some physical substance (genes) This is just not true. The phenomenon of Telegony is proof of this, the page on The DNA delusion confirms that inheritance has nothing to do with DNA and the page Evolution and Inheritance puts a good case that inheritance is via some sort of informational field.

It is this field that is responsible for morphogenesis and inherited or ‘innate’ behaviour – does anybody really believe that the nest building abilities of a bird for example could be encoded in a few gigabytes of DNA?

Mainstream biology now only ascribes the function of protein construction to DNA and even then there are only 20,000 genes to encode for 100,000 proteins.

What is inherited is, in most general terms, a dynamic pattern of biological activity, or a set of rules for a molecular or neural network. Stable, dynamic patterns are best represented in terms of ‘attractors’ or closed loop control systems and the suggested physical mechanism for these is the magnetic scalar waves as described by Konstantin Meyl. They are stable, dynamic, can co-exist with matter and are not measurable by modern instruments which s why they gave been missed by scientists so far.

These scalar waves are by far the best candidate for Sheldrake’s morphic field.


A bio-field to create the shape of a snowflake? The image, taken from a Michael Clarage lecture shows distinctive looking patterns in the formation of snowflakes. At the same time it is asserted that all snowflakes are different so how do they achieve self-consistency and variety at the same time?

Physics doesn’t provide a good explanation as to how groups of billions of molecules can apparently ‘know’ what each other are doing so some new physics is needed.

The snowflakes are arranged according to some template which is going to be electro-magnetic and cymatic in nature. It looks like some force-field is creating a pattern in the way the molecules are bonding together. However Martin Chaplin claims that even this is not true, with there being no fixed pattern of bonds and instead a constantly shifting landscape of molecular connections which somehow seem to maintain a precise overall shape.

In the case of ice the hydrogen bonds also only last for the briefest instant but a piece of ice sculpture can ‘remember’ its carving over extended periods.”

“.. the behaviour of a large population of water molecules may be retained even if that of individual molecules is constantly changing.” – Martin Chaplin: The Memory of Water

So what is it that is constant? What is it that determines the overall shape?


7. Memories are retained in the brain as material traces Ideas that the brain works by arrangements of neurons or movement of chemical currents have been ditched I think for ideas that it works by electric fields or currents but this still isn’t correct. The brain most likely works as a scalar wave processor (What is the brain?)

Scalar waves are stable of themselves and have all the characteristics required of a medium for the hosting of cognitive computation:

  • Parallel processing
  • Associative memory
  • Speed of light response
  • Energy renewed by solar neutrinos (?)
  • De-coupled from the physical brain

The last is particularly important. The physical brain has its own supply of energy and nutrients. Brain cells will de and be renewed. To have conscious thought somehow coupled to the physical maintenance of the brain or to even use the same processes as are used by that maintenance would surely result in chaos and confusion?

We require that cognition is kept separate from maintenance somehow. We do not want every physical change in the brain leading to, or being perceptible as, a ‘thought’ and nor can we have ‘thoughts’ requiring physical changes in the brain – this is just too slow.

The first computers used mechanical levers to implement logic circuits but they were very slow, the maintenance cost was proportional to the amount of thinking and the complexity of thought was limited by the complexity of the physical structure of the machine.

Modern computers are a big improvement, are much faster and the complexity has been factored out into the software which runs as electric currents. ‘Portable’ software means that the computations are now independent of the hardware that they are running on.

Computers do not maintain themselves however so that electric currents are available for computation whereas in the human brain, electric currents have physical consequences not necessarily related to the intent of conscious thought. Using scalar waves is therefore a much better solution for thought processes that are to be largely independent of the physical state of neurons.


One free miracle: “As Terence McKenna observed, ‘Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest.’ The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.” – Sheldrake

So modern science is really asking for a whole set of interrelated miracles which seem finely tuned to permit the existence of life:

The universe looks more and more like a great thought rather than a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter… we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter.” – James Hopwood Jeans (Physicist, mathematician, idealist)

The characterization of the universe as finely tuned intends to explain why the known constants of nature, such as the electron charge, the gravitational constant, etc., have the values that we measure rather than some other (arbitrary) values. According to the “fine-tuned universe” hypothesis, if these constants’ values were too different from what they are, “life as we know it” could not exist. – Wikipedia

The fine-tuned universe is the proposition that the conditions that allow life in the universe can occur only when certain universal dimensionless physical constants lie within a very narrow range of values, so that if any of several fundamental constants were only slightly different, the universe would be unlikely to be conducive to the establishment and development of matter, astronomical structures, elemental diversity, or life as it is understood. Various possible explanations of ostensible fine-tuning are discussed among philosophers, scientists, theologians, and proponents and detractors of creationism.” – Fine tuned universe

So a little confusion maybe with the scientists unable to explain in terms of science how the fundamental constants arise and the creationists seizing the opportunity to preach intelligent design. However, both are basing their views on what is apparent and not what is real; both are assuming that the description they have of reality is the best available.

Konstantin Meyl provides the most consistent description of physical reality so far with his Theory of Objectivity. This is based upon a single field equation (see above) and all the ‘fundamental’ constants are derived from this so there is nothing fundamental about them at all.

Meyl has calculated, just from his single equation and with no additional input, the masses of the elementary particles and the radii of the elements [more]

So we really are in a situation now where we only need a single ‘miracle’, which is the prior existence of some medium, the behaviour of which is consistent with the field equation.

Sooner or later even the last natural scientist will realize, that nature does not provide ‘constants’ at all. If ‘constants of nature’ did exist, as listed in textbooks and encyclopaedias, then they aren’t consistent with causality, since we don’t know the cause, why the factor should have exactly this size and no other. Behind every so-called constant of nature unnoticed is hiding a physical closed loop conclusion. (solution)” – Scalar waves p. 599

So ‘causality’ here remains within the realm of the physical world or more accurately, within the (theoretical) confines of the Theory of Objectivity.


9. Apparent paranormal abilities such as telepathy are the illusions of Bad Science The root cause of this attitude I think is not that there is lots of bad science around (there certainly is) but that paranormal phenomena have, by definition, no plausible mechanism within the accepted scientific frameworks.

This leads to a view that “If there is no mechanism then it isn’t science and so it isn’t really happening.” This isn’t quite true of physicists though. Reading books and papers on biology and consciousness written by physicists it seems that almost all of them believe in some sort of telepathy and even life after death.

The reason is that they are used to working with ‘insubstantial’ entities such as force fields, ‘information’, quantum entanglement and action at a distance. The brain is assumed to work by electric fields and these are the ideal candidate for transmission of thoughts.

Konstantin Meyl describes instead magnetic scalar waves and wave resonance as being the medium of choice for thought transference. These turn out to have precisely the properties required to describe many experiments on ESP.

  • Are hypothesised to be the medium for cognition
  • Can form persistent connections between two individuals
  • Can penetrate walls
  • Resonant connections do not diminish with distance
  • Connections may be stronger between related individuals (The ‘Hill effect’)

The existence of a putative mechanism now means that there is something to investigate, something to try and measure or in other words some chance of doing some proper science.


Dean Radin (pictured) is arguably at the forefront of ESP research and is mentioned by Sheldrake. He and others have tried to make a science out of PSI research by introducing rigorous controls and by attempting to remove bias by the introduction of random number generators.

The problem with random number generators however is that there is no guarantee that they are in fact ‘random’. Many are based upon some assumed random process from nature such as radio-active decay but The Shnoll Effect shows that these figures depend upon planetary alignments such as eclipses and the page Neutrinos, eclipses and plagues gives the mechanism as variations in the solar neutrino stream.

One experiment from Radin showed an apparent ability of subjects to introduce a bias into the double slit experiment by thought alone. The choice of slit for a particle to go through had a slight bias that was different from a control experiment.

Dean commissioned some statisticians to repeat the experiment and to comment on the results, [here]. Wallacczek, and Stillfried were unable to produce the results . In addition to this they tried the experiment again but this time with no test subjects at all. They found that they still got a positive result, a difference in bias between the two setups, even with no ESP attempted!

The authors offer various explanations for why this might be, including: “For example, the detection method may manifest a sensitivity to (as-yet) unknown physical factors which are beyond the ability of the particular method to reveal, track, and identify

So variations in the neutrino stream could conceivably be influential in the irreproducibility and could even be the cause of the effects manifest in the first place.

Despite their best efforts then, ESP researchers may be discovering, not paranormal abilities, but subtle physical influences unknown to most scientists.


2. Matter is unconscious Whether or not this is true depends upon precisely what is meant by ‘unconscious’ but the page The origins of life presents an argument that there is effectively a world parallel to the physical that might be called etheric and consists of an informational field which organises and animates all physical matter.

Assumptions that there is ‘something else’ need to re-examined now, as it is entirely possible that with the recent discoveries by Meyl, we have everything we need in order to explain all of the observations and measurements that we can make of the world.

No sensible discussion on consciousness can take place until we have a reasonable definition or characterisation of: consciousnes


5. Nature is purposeless and evolution is without direction The standard view of evolution is one of small random variations of DNA leading to small random variations of phenotype which are then selected for, with propitious variant surviving to reproduce.

Keith Baverstock

Now quite apart from the fact that DNA has very little to do with inheritance (The DNA delusion), the way that neo-Darwinism is phrased somewhat skips the fact that all development must be according to the laws of physics and must involve rather stable patterns of molecular arrangement or we are finished before we have even started.

The interpolation of DNA and some imaginary transcriptional mechanism has conceptually de-coupled the evolutionary process from any physical law or principle and reduced it to theoretical randomness whilst at the same time giving the impression that almost any end product is possible. In reality though, the construction of a human being must obey some quite restrictive conditions and must be stable to perturbations at all stages of development and evolution.

The ‘direction’ of evolution therefore is towards ever more efficient ways of transducing solar energy into functional shapes and units: Evolution and entropy.
Organisms use the laws of thermodynamics to their evolutionary advantage instead of fighting against them, as explained by Baverstock and Rönkkö:

In summary, we propose that the life process is based not on genetic variation, but on the second law of thermodynamics .. and the principle of least action, as proposed for thermodynamically open systems by De Maupertuis (Ville et al. 2008), which at the most fundamental level say the same thing. Together they constitute a supreme law of physics..” – Baverstock and Rönkkö

All results of the evolution in the biosphere that have arisen between the ‘capacitor plates’ of the earth itself and its ionosphere can be regarded as structured capacitor losses, which also apply to humans” – Konstantin Meyl


9. ‘Mind’ is inside the head Yes. Various people have postulated various levels of exotica including a whole extra dimension to house all our memories, but a magnetic scalar-wave network seems sufficient to describe consciousness.

The impression that our thoughts and visions are ‘out there’ is a clever and necessary illusion created by the structure of our cognitive system. (see video above).

The brain maintains spatial awareness by constructing a (literal) internal space with the ‘self’ at the centre. The outside world is big but the brain is small so the internal space is wrapped around in a nested torus system so as to fit it all in.


“The Regularities of Nature are essentially habitual” – Rupert Sheldrake
The field equations of the Theory of Objectivity are fixed but will organise into stable and adaptive control systems at a very early stage and hence manifest as higher ‘laws’ which may well have become ‘habitual’ over a million years of evolution.

Habituation, then , is not at the roots of the laws of physics but an emergent feature of them.

R.S. gives an example of the growth of certain crystal structures which once seemed impossible but now are routine. It seems to be assumed that crystals are formed by the random banging together of molecules which fall into some natural alignment because of their regular shape but if we hypothesise for one moment that there exists a hidden field that induces organisational forces on the molecules then the situation becomes clearer.

Existing crystals lead to an attendant magnetic field which is the entity that acts as the nucleating structure, not the molecules themselves, promoting further growth. Changes in geophysical factors such as the Earth’s magnetic field or variations in neutrino stream operate on this field directly and thence on the the physical molecules indirectly, to produce the changes in the patterns observed.

The experiments of Giorgio Piccardi clearly show time variations of measurable parameters in both biological and chemical processes.

Things which seem both variable and fundamental at the same time are certainly not fundamental but ’emergent’. This is the main reason behind the Science Delusion itself:, that downstream effects have been mistaken for root causes and and variables taken for constants:

The Science Delusion is the belief that science already understands the fundamental nature of reality in principle, leaving only the details to be filled in” – Rupert Sheldrake



References:

Rupert Sheldrake’s ‘Banned’ Talk – The Science Delusion at TEDx Whitechapel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hO4p3xeTtUA

Scalar waves – Konstantin Meyl
https://avalonlibrary.net/Nikola_Tesla/Books/Meyl%20-%20Scalar%20Waves%20(First%20Tesla%20Physics%20Textbook).pdf

Atomic clocks
https://www.timeanddate.com/time/how-do-atomic-clocks-work.html

TED “Bans” the Science Delusion
https://www.sheldrake.org/reactions/tedx-whitechapel-the-banned-talk

Interview with Konstantin Meyl – YouTube
https://youtu.be/tKTkpC-DHZ8

Big Bang is a Big Bluff says Meyl – YouTube
https://youtu.be/xwIJ-URG_P8

The website of Konstantin Meyl – http://meyl.eu

False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol
Authors: Jan Walleczek, and Nikolaus von Stillfried
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6714546/pdf/fpsyg-10-01891.pdf

The evolutionary origin of form and function – Keith Baverstock, Mauno Rönkkö
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24882811/

The Memory of Water: an overview – Martin Chaplin
https://www.academia.edu/47898216/The_Memory_of_Water_an_overview


The HART group

The HART group gives some interesting arguments as to why they are rejecting the idea that viruses do not exist. One is a flawed statistical argument and others are observations of genome sequences. None of this explains the epidemiology. This page shows why they are wrong and suggests an alternative model for influenza outbreaks.

The statistical argument is listed at number 1 and is tackled first.
The screenshot below is from their website



  • Note that it is number 1 on their list.
  • Not everybody got sick as part of an outbreak and that number of people is considered “significant
  • People who shared the same environment got sick at the same time – consider then an environmental cause or trigger
  • The majority of sufferers were part of an “outbreak” i.e. an event where many people got sick.

If an outbreak is defined as a large number of people getting sick at the same time then it isn’t surprising, given the population distribution in a city, that the majority of sick people got sick as part of an outbreak.


Shown here is a city grid of equal sized squares where some squares are densely populated and others not so. This sort of situation is ideal for studying epidemiology if only decent data were available. We can look at how many people in each cell got ill and try to correlate it with population density.

First imagine that some non-infectious pathogen is introduced into some of the cells on a completely random basis. Think of toxic gas being released, 5G death rays maybe or some sort of bio-energy beamed down from space.

We would see then that the chance of a cell showing disease in any of its residents is unrelated to the population of the cell so that a sparsely populated cell is as likely to show disease as one containing many occupants.

In this case then, disease would be correlated to location and since the release of a toxin into a densely populated cell would result in many people being sick we would see in the overall population that the majority of sick people would necessarily come from cells where there were many other sick people.

This is really just saying that the majority of people in a city come from population-dense areas.

This much is obvious. It is also precisely what is described in point 1 of the HART group’s statement above. They even attribute the illness to “having shared the same environment” as opposed to “having been with other sick people“.

Now let us fantasise about infection. If this were possible then we would expect that infection would spread more effectively in densely populated areas. We would also expect an increased likelihood of seeing disease in these areas as there are many more people to introduce the pathogen into the grid square from elsewhere.

Statistical analysis should then show a correlation between cell population and the occurrence of disease in that cell. Recall that in the first case, cells get affected at random and there was no correlation with population density; a 5G death tower does not know how many people there are living nearby.

There is the possibility then that an infection model can be proved or disproved merely by looking at some statistics.

If only somebody had thought to collect some data..


Fred Hoyle (1915-2001) was an astronomer and statistician who looked at the epidemiology of flu by studying incidence of the disease in English public (boarding) schools. Some pupils will board at the school and be in contact with each other 24-7 whilst others will go home at weekends or evenings. [paper]

All these schools have children of the same age groups, eat similar food, are subjected to the same harsh exercise regimen and engage in stereotypical social contact. Schools themselves are organised into ‘houses’ and dormitories, giving a controlled structure to the possible transmission routes.

These are ideal conditions to study incidence of influenza. Hoyle looked at epidemiological patterns as described above and found that, for example, a dormitory full of boys was as likely to demonstrate influenza as a solitary boy sleeping at home with his parents.

Hoyle believed in viruses but still concluded:

  • Person to person transmission is ruled out as a significant cause of the disease.
  • The overwhelming cause of the disease comes from ‘elsewhere’.
  • Low level outbreaks occur completely at random and unconnected to each other.
  • Larger outbreaks occur in geographical clusters which vary in size from a whole school and its environs to a single dormitory or part thereof.
  • A virus is ruled out as the actual cause.
  • Viruses are manufactured within the body in response to an external trigger.
  • The external trigger is some kind of ‘virion’ that comes from outer space.
  • [The results do not indicate food poisoning or collective detox.]

The chart below shows that population influenza is best modelled by a simple gaussian distribution with a mean around winter solstice and a 90% interval of only a few weeks.


Observations must be explained and the ‘viral model’ does not explain the epidemiology.

The members of the HART group know this and know that transmission studies have failed, but are still sticking to their model because: “The virus model explains all of the above in a way that no other proposed model can (yet).

Other individuals have complained of a lack of a better alternative and that viruses are ‘still the best explanation‘ for what they are seeing.

Again, from the HART group: “Scientists form a model that best explains the majority of the evidence. ” So we need to explain the epidemiology.


A statistical model:

  • Seasonal incidence: Outside of the tropics, populations will succumb to influenza in the two weeks either side of winter solstice
  • Latitudinal patterns: Finer grained structure is seen along lines of similar latitude (Hoyle and others)
  • Local outbreaks are delineated by location and are distributed at random

No mechanism is suggested here but we have achieved:

  • Prediction of timing: over 95% of cases will be in midwinter although how many seems to vary a bit.
  • Characterisation of outbreaks as being somehow related to location (we can’t even say environment).
  • Better interpretation of epidemiology: The assumption that clustering implies contagion is incorrect and has been dangerously misleading.
  • Scope for further research: What is there that is special about certain latitudes and locations?
  • A model that actually fits the observed data: Other models based upon the flawed assumption of transmission have failed spectacularly.

This seems like a good basis for a model as being grounded in observed reality. We can refine it later and look for biological mechanisms to explain these patterns but the foundation should be as described above.

The HART group, by contrast seem to want to plunge straight in with assumed bio-molecular causes and to worry about the facts of disease later on. This is the wrong way round to do science: the ‘majority of the evidence‘ needs explaining.

The group is asking the virus sceptics to explain various molecular and genomic phenomena. These all sound very interesting but they do not of themselves constitute disease and have not been shown to cause any disease.


Towards a mechanism

The model described above is purely statistical in nature and may well make useful predictions but it gives us no ‘understanding’ and describes no biological mechanism whereby disease might be caused by seasonal change.

  • Seasonal incidence: This is so precise that the only possible way that this can be achieved by resonant entrainment to some seasonal influence, either daylight hours or maybe the Earth’s magnetic field.
  • Latitudinal coincidence: This again suggests the Earth’s magnetic field is involved.
  • Local outbreaks: Tricky. Hoyle suggests virions from outer space, I will suggest cosmic ray showers or eddies (vortices) in the Earth’s magnetic field, but I am certainly open to alternatives.

What else is it that we need to explain?

The HART group is asking to explain things like a unique RNA sequence found in people who appeared to have similar symptoms, Now nobody goes to their doctor complaining about a unique RNA sequence. We don’t need to explain this, we need to explain the symptoms.

The symptoms, even by mainstream accounts, are caused by an altered bio-regulatory state. This state (erroneously referred to as the ‘immune response’) consists of an an orchestrated sequence of events leading to symptoms that include sweating, muscle aches, elevated temperature and lasts usually five days before returning to normal.

I don’t say ‘returning to homeostasis’ because this state is managed by the body itself and is perfectly stable although not sustainable.

It is this state that causes distress and constitutes what we call ‘disease’.

For this process to fit within our model then, we are looking for some way that it is produced as a direct result of the seasonal rhythms and without the intermediary of a viral particle.

This is the research to be done. It sits firmly within the purview of bio-regulatory medicine and not so much virology or genetics.


Top-down causality is common in biology and is implemented via means of attractor systems which interpret external stimuli to effect change at the cellular and even molecular level. Attractors can be highly sensitive to rhythmic input. It is quite conceivable that people in similar physiological states can produce RNA with similar sequences.

Now since most disease is just assumed to be viral in nature it follows that most disease research is performed by virologists who are really geneticists and think almost exclusively in terms of bottom-up causality, that is to say, that a small piece of RNA has the ability to destabilise a system that demonstrates organisation and robustness to perturbation at all levels.

The idea of an attractor is not something that would readily spring to mind to one trained in biology but it is essential for the understanding of living systems. Attractors are the key to top-down causality, providing an interpretive interface between the organism and its environment.

Influenza is just a sudden phase change in an attractor state triggered by some external input. Genetic events are the end point of attractor activity, not the primal cause.

Why do symptoms differ between individuals?

This is behaviour typical of chaotic attractors. Paths will converge to the attractor but diverge on the attractor so no two people will demonstrate identical disease progression. Attractor phase states are general patterns which are not precisely definable or predictable. Attempts to refine diagnosis by increasing accuracy or number of measurements will just cause confusion as there is no meaning in these details.

Since each individual is on their own specific attractor path and in their own ‘state’ at midwinter, it is now expected that not everybody will get ill at solstice. This is natural behaviour for attractors. We would expect that there is a component of disease risk that is actually independent of other health factors; an element of ‘randomness’.

Attractor states are highly stable, making routine treatment somewhere between difficult and impossible. Phase changes can be sudden and apparently non-causal, resulting in what are usually described as ‘miracle’ cures. So miracles do happen and we now have a scientific explanation for them.

From Mae-Wan Ho

Attractors present a problem from the point of view of determinism . Their behaviour is stable and predictable insofar as they will reliably produce meaningful biological patterns that result in a robustly functioning organism. However, this behaviour is not predictable from examination of their parts and not predictable from any finite history of that behaviour. This is a hammer blow for traditional reductionist science; there will always be something incalculable and unknowable where biological systems are concerned.


Summary:

  • The data comes first, the explanation comes later
  • The mechanism of genetics is interesting but does not cause flu
  • Influenza is a disturbance of organisation – not cellular damage
  • Top down causation is provided for by attractor patterns
  • The presence of attractors implies a ‘cloud of unknowing’
  • Observations (seasonality) require explanations

References:

Why HART uses the virus modelArguments against “the virus doesn’t exist”
https://www.hartgroup.org/virus-model/

Viruses from space – Fred Hoyle
https://www.hoyle.org.uk/resources/virusesfromspaceCompressed.pdf

Surveillance of influenza and other seasonal respiratory viruses – UKHSA
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/annual-flu-reports/surveillance-of-influenza-and-other-seasonal-respiratory-viruses-in-winter-2021-to-2022

The gene: An appraisal – Keith Baverstock
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33979646/

Epigenetic Regulation of the Mammalian Cell – Keith Baverstock, Mauno Rönkkö
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002290&type=printable

A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation – Denis Noble
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262309/

“Meaning of Life & the Universe: Transforming” – Mae-Wan Ho
 ISBN-10. 981310886X ; ISBN-13. 978-9813108868

Evolution and entropy

One of the mysteries of life is the question of how organic forms seem to absorb energy and information from the environment and sequester it permanently in an orderly fashion. This is seemingly in contravention of the Second Law of Thermodynamics which is often interpreted as predicting a general decrease of order in the Universe.

Scientists studying biology from this perspective almost unanimously claim that the body somehow maintains itself ‘far from thermodynamic equilibrium’, meaning that there is something special about living systems that allows them to maintain large reserves of energy and information which is not dissipated but is stored in an organised fashion in either chemical or physical processes and made available for use, as and when needed.


Keith Baverstock interprets thermodynamics and entropy in terms of their original formulation, not as an increase in disorder but rather as a movement towards a ‘least energy’ solution. This represents a de facto tendency towards an equilibrium state which Baverstock claims is now a selectable property in a Darwinian-style evolutionary process.

As an example, first consider a glass of water. The water retains its shape despite lots of Brownian motion of the molecules, owing to the fact that it is constrained within the glass. Now up-end the glass on a flat surface and lift to allow the water to flow freely. The water will fall and spread. This will be initially via gravity but will continue as Brownian motion causes the pool to spread as a statistical average of the sum of the motions of the molecules.

Now since the vibrations of the molecules are assumed to be random, there is a small theoretical chance that they all just happen to collect back together into a small pool and even draw themselves up into a glass shape. In practice though, this doesn’t happen and the water will adopt a configuration that is statistically most likely and energetically most economical; a puddle.

Now place a dry bath sponge in the middle of the puddle. The water will be drawn up against gravity and will be held suspended by capillary action. Furthermore, the shape of the water is not disordered or even tending to disorder. Instead the opposite is true; order is maintained and even increases.

No extra energy has been put into the system and energy is actually dissipated by sound waves as the water bubbles up inside the sponge. So ‘order’ here is accompanied by an energy loss as opposed to an increase, an output rather than an input. A ‘least energy’ state is achieved and maintained as an equilibrium state.

This state is not just a ‘least energy’ state but also a ‘most likely’ state from a statistical point of view.

What has this to do with evolution? Evolution is observed to proceed via a pattern of punctuated equilibrium whereby a relatively stable phenotype will occasionally be subject to a dramatic change to produce a new species before settling down again for a few hundred thousand years.

The outward form and function of animals are controlled by an internal attractor pattern and it a sudden phase change in the attractor that gives rise to new species. Once a new species has been established, minor changes in the attractor can give rise to good or bad traits for natural selection to fine tune the species to its environment.

So now let us imagine that our sponges are in a hot environment which will tend to dry them out, thus killing them and preventing reproduction and the continuation of their lineage. Sponges who manage to adopt a shape that enables the absorption and retention of the most water will have an added Darwinian advantage.

So what exactly is being selected for?

  • Fitness– the ability to not dry out. Enabled by..
  • Function – The ability to retain water. Created by ..
  • Form – an outward shape propitious for the retention of water. Created via ..
  • A physical ‘least energy’ solution for the relationship between sponge and water.

It is this last property which is the most basic, necessary and fundamental but also the one that is never mentioned by evolutionary theorists.

Organisms are not just fine-tuned to their environment but will also need to refine their own internal developmental patterns in order to achieve optimum performance.

It is no good looking at the fossil record and simply assuming that the environmental conditions were what ‘created’ a particular feature. It must be physically possible and even likely that that feature could come into being. You cannot select for something that has not yet evolved or that is unfeasibly improbable.

Therefore form must precede function and its development is thereby de-coupled from the selection of that form. The outward shape of an organism is not created by the future function or even fitness within the environment, but by the laws of physics that allowed it to happen and the laws of statistics that made it likely that it would happen.

The current theory of random mutations of DNA causing ‘traits’ in an unspecified way gives the impression that almost anything is possible and that certain features will inevitably arise if the need is great enough. Some texts will even present selection itself as a ‘driver’ of evolution, putting the cart before the horse and invoking a ‘final cause’ without regard for the mechanics of how this is achieved.

The idea that development is so incremental that it is practically parallel with selection is just nonsensical sophistry, akin to a conjuror telling you that you are seeing one thing happening when something completely different is going on right before your very eyes.

“The laws of physics must be obeyed” – Konstantin Meyl.

New species then, arise from sudden phase changes in the evolutionary attractor (see: Evolution and Inheritance) and once a species has been established, small perturbations to the attractor will tend towards a low energy solution via natural selection. The species is being ‘optimised’ to its environment. Least energy solutions are the most stable and energy efficient ways of maintaining an organism and both stability and efficiency are certainly necessary and propitious qualities as far as survival of the species is concerned.

Least energy states are probably so stable as to be irreversible. Evolutionary change has stopped and the only way to progress is for another significant phase change from the attractor.


In summary, we propose that the life process is based not on genetic variation, but on the second law of thermodynamics .. and the principle of least action, as proposed for thermodynamically open systems by De Maupertuis (Ville et al. 2008), which at the most fundamental level say the same thing. Together they constitute a supreme law of physics..” – Baverstock and Rönkkö




References:

Keith Baverstock’s homepage https://www.kbaverstock.org/

The evolutionary origin of form and function – Keith Baverstock, Mauno Rönkkö
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24882811/

Evolution in two parts: as seen in a new framework for biology – Keith Baverstock
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36325932/

Natural selection for least action. Proc Roy Soc A 464, 3055–3070. (2008).
– Ville R, Kaila I & Annila A
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2008.0178
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243685794_Natural_selection_for_least_action/link/648c9f4e8de7ed28ba3083fc/download

The ‘Hill effect’

Miroslav Hill (1929-2018) performed an experiment whereby cellular cultures were subjected to toxins and were seen to develop resistance to these toxins over several generations. To his surprise he found that sibling cells in a separate culture also developed some resistance to the toxin even though they had never been exposed to it.

The results were interpreted by Hill as a result of some sort quantum entanglement between sibling cell cultures enabling a distant correlation of information between the two.

The experiment is cited by Rupert Sheldrake as evidence of a more generalised morphogenetic field connecting all biological life over separation in both time and space.


A cell line was established (see above) with the white circles representing untreated healthy cultures and the grey circles representing the children of healthy cells that were separated off on a regular basis and poisoned with thioguanine. To start with the cultures either died or a cytopathic effect was observed.

After a few generations however the cultures demonstrated extended lifespans indicating that some beneficial adaptation had taken place. Note from the diagram though, that these cultures are not descended from already poisoned cultures but from healthy cultures that have never seen the poison and were kept separated from the other cultures by means of sealed containers and a distance of several metres.

The experiment was repeated with similar results using different toxins and again using high temperatures as a stressor.

The inference drawn was that the stressed cultures are adapting to the toxins and somehow influencing the main healthy cell-line as shown.

In the diagram, the time sequence is preserved to show that the grey cells are children of the white circles and are communicating with their co-existent sibling cultures (again in white).

How is this influence taking place? Hill suggests that the two sets of cells are displaying quantum entanglement so that when something happens to one culture, a response is seen in the sibling culture. He doesn’t like the idea of a physical signal travelling between the two: “If one tried to explain the adaptive response in terms of signals, the signals would have to travel from the exposed to the unexposed cultures. The results are instead discussed in terms of adaptive states and the non-separability of cellular states due to quantum entanglement of cells“.

Quantum entanglement is preferred over information transfer as an explanation because nothing really ‘travels’ from one point to another and so it doesn’t matter how far apart the two samples are or what physical obstacles are in between them; these things are irrelevant. We have, in addition, the fact that only sibling cells seem to be affected suggesting an existing ‘connection’ of some sort between the two cultures.


Rupert Sheldrake gives a slightly different interpretation (shown) which is that the poisoned cultures are communicating with each other through time and space so that each new test culture is also receiving information from a previously poisoned culture (see above) . The culture has been discarded but the memory of the adaptation persists in some universal field and is passed on via morphic resonance.


A similar experiment is described on the somewhat eccentric Chronodon website as shown in the diagram below where four related cell lines were created with A1 and A2 being sibling cultures and B1 and B2 also being siblings but only distantly related to A1 and A2.

The B2 culture was given a weekly dose of non-lethal levels of tetracycline in an attempt to build up resistance.

Each week samples were taken from all four cultures and given a lethal dose of the drug (shown in red). The results (in orange) show lethality in the control cultures A1 and A2 but marked resistance in the B2 culture and also in its sibling culture, B1.


Genetic mutations were observed to increase with exposure to toxins.
The chart below shows the mutations found in response to poisoning (red), a similar but less marked response in the sibling culture (blue) and almost no mutations in the control sample.

The two responses are clearly related .. but how?

Mutation rates should be unaltered in the B1 cells but they seem to be influenced by their siblings even though the experimenters again took care to eliminate chemical or electromagnetic signals by the use of sealed jars separated by a distance of some distance.

The inescapable conclusion seems to be that a signal was passed from the stressed populations specifically to their sibling population, which contained closer kin than the control population. Thus, the signal appears kin specific. The signal is also mysterious as it can cross solid barriers over a distance of at least one metre for perhaps up to twelve hours or more after the populations have been separated – twelve hours corresponding to the period of sub-lethal stress.

No definite conclusion is reached but quantum entanglement is again discussed.


Bio-photon emission is thought by some to be responsible for many distant cellular interactions including the mirror cytopathic effect but both teams in the experiments above were careful to rule out the role of this type of radiation in the effects seen, so we have a completely new candidate for transmission of biological information.


Moreover, the effects seen here are not of a destructive nature, they do not lead to a deterioration of cellular structure but rather an increased adaptability. We are not seeing a mere interference with cellular communication or a disruption of cellular order but instead the reliable transmission of genuine biological information that:

  • Produces a predictable and beneficial effect
  • Modifies both behaviour and genetic structure
  • Increases survivability
  • Is quantifiable via the number of genetic mutations
  • Is inheritable
  • Is therefore significant from an evolutionary viewpoint

In other words we have evolution not by random mutation and selection but by mutation that is directly caused by the environment and adaptive to that environment. Information (a toxin) has been introduced into the cell, has been interpreted and a meaningful response has been formulated, implemented and communicated to relatives.


Time for a genuine bio-field? Both authors are suggesting a quantum connection to explain not only the communication at a distance but the apparently targeted nature of the information. It seems that not all cultures are the recipients of the information but only those that are close relatives.

This is difficult to explain in terms of current knowledge so clearly some ‘out of the box’ thinking is needed.

Quantum entanglement however is on a particle by particle basis so it would seem that this mechanism assumes a bottom up approach to cellular functioning whereas there is a lot of evidence suggesting that top-down causality is more likely. In other words, the individual particles are guided by some global organisational principal rather than that organisation being composed of the separate activities of independent particles. Baverstock

Quantum entanglement seemingly implies that the necessary information can be transferred on a molecule-by-molecule basis and that the activity of each molecule performs the same function in the sibling culture as it did in the original. So again we have the idea that biology is merely the sum of its own atoms.

What really needs to be communicated or shared between siblings is a package of dynamic network information, a modification or update to the cellular operating system. How this is going to happen is highly unclear but it is this sort of thing that will eventually be recognised as the mechanism necessary for evolutionary inheritance and the continuity of species.


References:

Adaptive state of mammalian cells and its non-separability suggestive of a quantum system – Miroslav Hill
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286636421_Adaptive_state_of_mammalian_cells_and_its_nonseparability_suggestive_of_a_quantum_system

The Hill Effect as a Test for Morphic Resonance – Rupert Sheldrake
https://www.sheldrake.org/essays/the-hill-effect-as-a-test-for-morphic-resonance

Directed mutation in bacteria – Chronodon
https://cronodon.com/BioTech/Bacteria_bias_mutations.html

The Mechanisms of Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect – Najafi et al
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289523

The gene: An appraisal – Keith Baverstock
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33979646/

The DNA delusion

The DNA delusion is the idea that a string of nucleic acids is responsible for almost all inherited features of an organism and moreover, that this is an established scientific theory supported by experimental evidence. Nothing like this is remotely true and the confusion arises from the conflation of two related but nevertheless different hypotheses.

The historical roots of the problem lie in the fact that there are two separate ‘theories’ of inherited characteristics which both use words such as ‘gene’ ‘, ‘genome’, ‘genotype’ and ‘phenotype’. Sometimes the words mean the same thing and at other times they have different meanings, thus allowing conflation of two separate conceptual frameworks and enabling discussions of the two as if they form a single coherent and proven theory.

William Johannsen (1957-1927) coined the terms phenotype and genotype in 1909 and referred to a gene as that ‘something’ which was responsible for inherited characteristics. No biological mechanism was identified, a gene was simply some repository of information that would find its ‘expression’ in the formation of a new organism looking fairly similar to its parents.

No hypothesis about the nature of this ‘something’ should be postulated or supported by it .. The word ‘gene’ is completely free of any hypothesis ; it expresses only the established fact that in any case many traits of the organism are determined by specific, separable, and thus independent conditions.” – Wikipedia

Johann Friedrich Miescher (1844-1895) had discovered DNA in 1869 but after Crick and Watson characterised it as a double helix in 1953, scientists began to speculate that this could be something to do with inheritance and evolution.
DNA became, without any evidence, to be described as the ‘Book of Life’ or a ‘Blueprint for life’.

In their excitement, scientists began to describe segments of DNA now as ‘genes’ and to explain that the way that proteins were created from DNA as ‘expression’.

Gene expression is the process by which information from a gene is used in the synthesis of a functional gene product that enables it to produce end products, proteins or non-coding RNA, and ultimately affect a phenotype.” – Wikipedia

The problem here is that DNA sequences are described at best as ‘data’ as they don’t become ‘information’ until they are interpreted as having ‘meaning’. The interpretation process happens outside of the DNA strand itself, seems to be at liberty as to which portions of the DNA it chooses or discards and is even free to interpret the same piece of DNA in different ways depending upon many factors which are again outside of the DNA molecule itself.

The concept of information is somewhat abstract. You cannot see information and so the characterisation of DNA base pairs as ‘information’ is very much a matter of interpretation itself and rather prejudices the reader in favour of the thesis that is being put forward.

Since genes are ‘expressed’ differently according to context, one valid interpretation of this is that the DNA code of a gene is just ‘nonsense (just a sequence of CGAT bases) until it is interpreted functionally‘ – Denis Noble


Denis Noble (1936-)Many of the problems with the Modern Synthesis in accommodating the new experimental findings have their origin in neo-Darwinist forms of representation rather than in experimental biology itself
“The concepts therefore form a biased interpretive veneer that can hide those discoveries in a web of interpretation.

In his paper “Evolution beyond neo-Darwinism: a new conceptual framework” Noble regards the problems neo-Darwinism as essentially un-fixable as the whole theory has become experimentally unfalsifiable and “All parts of the neo-Darwinist forms of representation encourage the use and acceptance of the other parts.” So any part of the theory really depends on the other parts and no single part has been or could be proved independently of the others.

Neo-Darwinism is a gene-centred theory of evolution. Yet, its central notion, the ‘gene’, is an unstable concept. Surprising as it may seem, there is no single agreed definition of ‘gene’. Even more seriously, the different definitions have incompatible consequences for the theory..” – Noble

Of course, no-one now thinks that there is a simple 1:1 relation (between genes and traits) , but the language of direct causation has been retained” – Noble

In fact, it can be shown that, in the case of some of the central concepts of ‘selfish genes’ or ‘genetic program’, no biological experiment could possibly distinguish even between completely opposite conceptual interpretations of the same experimental findings” – Noble


Calico cats. It is claimed by some sources that every cell of the body contains the same DNA and that this DNA is responsible for determination of the entire phenotype. In the case of calico cats however this cannot be the case as we can see three different colours of fur ‘determined’ by the same genes.

The explanation given is that the DNA somehow contains sufficient information to create all three colours but that other developmental and ‘epigenetic’ factors are responsible for the geographic distribution of the colours. To put it more clearly, DNA is not the determinant of the coat pattern.

Similar considerations apply to eye colour: Heterochromia


XX/XY chromosomes. There is a strong statistical correlation between say XY karyotype and a male phenotype but correlation is not causality. In the paper by DelaChapelle a patient with XX chromosomes had a male phenotype, could function sexually and could produce sperm. The sperm were not viable and he had some feminisation of body shape.

In this case then something has ‘gone wrong’ with development and this is reflected in the karyotype. What we can say however is that most the information required to create a male human being is not dependent upon a Y chromosome. So where is this information held or how is it generated?

Human ‘XX males’ are sterile males whose chromosomes seem to be those of a normal female.” – Page et al. (If the end result is a male then what is it about the chromosome that is particularly ‘female’?)


Control of sex development
Most of the knowledge on the factors involved in sexual development came from animal models and from studies of cases in whom the genetic or the gonadal sex does not match the phenotypical sex.” – Anna Biason-Lauber

Sexual development is in two stages:

  1. Sexual determination – gonad development at 3 weeks
  2. Sexual differentiation – phenotypical development influenced by hormones from the gonads

Generally speaking, factors influencing sex determination are transcriptional regulators, whereas factors important for sex differentiation are secreted hormones and their receptors.”

Interesting that there is actually no mention of genes, chromosomes or DNA in this sentence. It is observed that women who take testosterone do in fact develop masculinised features but nobody believes that testosterone contains sufficient information to create a male phenotype so it must be the case that both phenotypes are possible regardless of karyotype. Chromosomes are therefore responsible for neither sex determination nor differentiation.

From the paper we find also that a female phenotype can arise from XY chromosomes: “Patients present with normal female external genitalia, streak gonads, and XY karyotype


DNA damage can result from both normal metabolic activities and environmental factors resulting in tens of thousands of individual lesions per cell per day. Many of these lesions cause structural damage to the DNA molecule and can give rise to mutation and altered gene expression. Wikpedia

To rephrase: “Human DNA is continually changing“.

In fact identical twins have different DNA by the time they are born and they will continue to diverge throughout life. Each of us has potentially different DNA in each cell of our body. (Stefan Lanka)

The characterisation of altered DNA as ‘damage’ suggests that there is a semi-stable ‘known’ sequence of DNA that has been altered and that can therefore be ‘repaired’. But if DNA is the definitive repository of genetic information then how can this be so? Where is the backup data kept?

Organisms are very good at buffering themselves against genomic change.” – Noble.
In other words, we maintain our structural integrity somewhat independently of the content of our DNA.

So how do DNA forensics work?
We can infer from watching CSI that some part of the changing genome is stable enough to represent a single individual after being extracted from dried up blood. This sequence is sufficiently different from other people for identification but similar enough to family members to recognise them as such. Amazing.

“The forensic laboratory has no control over the amount of evidence left at a crime scene or the insults to which the biologic material may have been subjected. The analysis performed therefore must be validated carefully and documented extensively before use. Also, the interpretation will often be scrutinized more stringently than routine clinical testing.” – Weedn


A Human chimera is someone with a distinct subset of cells that have a different genotype from the rest of the body. (Wikipedia) .So a female for example can incorporate cells from a male twin and live quite happily without realising it – until they get a DNA test that is..

  • The Dutch sprinter Foekje Dillema was expelled from the 1950 national team after she refused a mandatory sex test in July 1950; later investigations revealed a Y-chromosome in her body cells, and the analysis showed that she was probably a 46,XX/46,XY mosaic female.
  • In 1953, a human chimera was reported in the British Medical Journal. A woman was found to have blood containing two different blood types. Apparently this resulted from her twin brother’s cells living in her body. A 1996 study found that such blood group chimerism is not rare.
  • In 2002, Lydia Fairchild was denied public assistance in Washington state when DNA evidence appeared to show that she was not the mother of her own children. A lawyer for the prosecution heard of a human chimera in New England, Karen Keegan, and suggested the possibility to the defence, who were able to show that Fairchild, too, was a chimera with two sets of DNA, and that one of those sets could have been the mother of the children.
  • In 2002, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine described a woman in whom tetragametic chimerism was unexpectedly identified after she underwent preparations for kidney transplant. The transplant required the patient and her immediate family to undergo histocompatibility testing, the result of which suggested that she was not the biological mother of two of her three children.
  • The DNA content of semen from an assault case in 2004 matched that of a man who had been in prison at the time of the assault, but who had been a bone marrow donor for his brother, who was later determined to have committed the crime.
  • In 2008, a man was killed in a traffic accident that occurred in Seoul, South Korea. In order to identify him, his DNA was analyzed. Results revealed that the DNA of his blood, along with some of his organs, appeared to show that he was female. It was later determined that he had received a bone marrow transplant from his daughter.
  • Another instance of treatment-related human chimerism was published in 1998, where a male human had some partially developed female organs due to chimerism. He had been conceived by in-vitro fertilization. (Note the assumption here that the female development was caused by the XX chromosomes in contrast to the sprinter who had plenty of XY chromosomes but still retained a female body type.)

Evolution is said to be via random mutations of DNA and ruthless natural selection of the resulting (inherited) traits.

However, the thing that is selected for is essentially phenotype and this does not now appear to be very closely coupled to genotype, with transcription, translation and other epigenetic factors being equally or even more important. For Darwinian selection to work then, what is now needed is for these factors to be inherited somehow. We need transcriptional mechanisms to be somehow encoded in a stable form and to be passed down the generations – but DNA is assumed to be the genetic material.

Or as Denis Noble has put it: If we don’t have a model connecting genotype to phenotype then we don’t actually have a theory of evolution.

Mae-Wan Ho and her husband Peter Saunders have written extensively about genetics and evolution, reaching similar conclusions to Denis Noble:
Much of the problem is that neo-Darwinism appears completely invincible to falsification by observations and experiments, so much so that many doubt if it is a scientific theory at all” – Ho, Saunders

The page on the The fluid genome has the following highlights:

  • Macroevolution of form and function is ‘decoupled’ from the microevolution of gene sequences; there is no simple mapping from gene to phenotype
  • Useful genetic mutations are not produced at random. Instead the same non-random gene sequences are repeatedly produced by external stimuli.
  • The intrinsic dynamic structure of the epigenetic system is the source of non-random variations
  • Information flows from top down and from the cytoplasm to the genes – the opposite way to that of the Central Dogma
  • Natural selection plays little or no role in evolution especially in the evolution of major novelties
  • Epigenetic novelties are common to all individuals in a population – evolution happens to everybody at once and not to a few select individuals
  • Fluidity of the genome means that environment and organism are inseparable. Hence no variant is random with respect to the environment
  • Physical and chemical forces that generate biological patterns are independent of natural selection and require their own explanation
  • Morphogenesis is probably due to electrodynamic forces not ‘hox’ genes


Telegony is a process by which traits from a previous mate can be passed on to children of later mates. In one experiment, female flies who had mated with oversized males were able to pass on that characteristic to offspring of subsequent partners. So inheritance here is decoupled from the physical presence of DNA. See: Telegony


Summary

The almost magical properties that have been attributed to DNA actually preceded the description of the molecule and many have not been verified experimentally.

The picture painted by school text books, TV dramas and celebrity scientists is a long way from reality and is not supported by researchers or academics.

It seems to be typical of many papers on genetics that you can simply cross out all the references to genes and no real information is lost. Scientists stick to the idea that DNA contains genetic information and that all that needs to happen is that the instructions are followed correctly to get a complete human. However, on reading their own papers the impression is created that DNA hardly matters at all.

DNA is not the determinant of phenotype.

Therefore, nucleic acid cannot possibly contain our inheritance! Ideas such as epigenetics (the theory of flexible heredity) are only desperate attempts to somehow justify and keep alive the old model of a material heredity in the form of genes.” – Stefan Lanka

But if DNA is not the material substance of inheritance then we are left with two burning questions:

  1. What is the mechanism of inheritance?
  2. What is DNA for?

We don’t know how life began and we don’t know how humans evolved, how development takes place or even how order is maintained once we reach adulthood. We don’t know how traits are inherited, how they are encoded or in what substance they persist.



References:

Evolution beyond neo-Darwinism: a new conceptual framework – Denis Noble
https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/218/1/7/13568/Evolution-beyond-neo-Darwinism-a-new-conceptual

What is life? – Erwin Schrödinger 1944

“Meaning of Life & the Universe: Transforming” – Mae-Wan Ho
 ISBN-10. 981310886X ; ISBN-13. 978-9813108868

Ten Years of the Human Genome – Mae-Wan Ho
https://www.i-sis.org.uk/tenYearsOfTheHumanGenome.php

Beyond neo-Darwinism – an epigenetic approach to evolution
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/22628078_Beyond_neo-Darwinism-an_epigenetic_approach_to_evolution

A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation – Denis Noble
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3262309/

Molecular Biology of the Cell (5th ed.). New York: WH Freeman. p. 963.
Lodish H, Berk A, Matsudaira P, Kaiser CA, Krieger M, Scott MP, Zipursky SL, Darnell J (2004). 

Differences between germline genomes of monozygotic twins – Hako Johnson et al
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-020-00755-1.epdf

DNA Testing in the Forensic Laboratory – Weedn, Rogers, Henry
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296390391_DNA_Testing_in_the_Forensic_Laboratory

Control of sex development – Anna Biason-Lauber
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/34770/31/Best_practice_190110-1.pdf

XX Sex Chromosomes in a Human Male. First case. Acta Med. Scand. 1964, 175 (Suppl. 412), 25–28.
Authors: DelaChapelle, A.; Hortling, H.; Niemi, M.; Wennstroem, J.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1964.tb04630.x

Chromosome Y-specific DNA in Related Human XX Males
Authors: Page, D.C.; de la Chapelle, A.; Weissenbach, J.
https://www.nature.com/articles/315224a0

Disorders of Sex Development: Classification, Review, and Impact on Fertility
Authors: Pedro Acién, Maribel Acién
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/11/3555#

Telegony

Telegony is a scientific theory of heredity holding that offspring can inherit the characteristics of a previous mate of the female parent; thus the child of a woman might partake of traits of a previous sexual partner. ” – Wikipedia

This is a long rumoured phenomenon, with Lord Morton’s mare being a famous example. The mare was mated with a zebra and when later mated with a black stallion, gave birth to foals that showed some striped characteristics in their coats.

According to the Talk Page in Wikipedia, animal breeders will not breed from a pigeon or dog that has mated with a wild specimen because of the assumed effect on subsequent generations.

We need control studies and a scientific explanation:

In Revisiting Telegony, Crean et. al. mated immature female flies with male files who were larger in size because of a highly nutritious diet. When these females later mated with normal size males, the offspring were larger on average than a control population.

Newly discovered non-genetic mechanisms break the link between genes and inheritance, thereby also raising the possibility that previous mating partners could influence traits in offspring sired by subsequent males that mate with the same female (‘telegony’). In the fly Telostylinus angusticollis, males transmit their environmentally acquired condition via paternal effects on offspring body size. We manipulated male condition, and mated females to two males in high or low condition in a fully crossed design. Although the second male sired a large majority of offspring, offspring body size was influenced by the condition of the first male.” – Crean et al

So we have the characteristic of size, an acquired characteristic (not inherited) which is then passed on to a subsequent generation apparently without being coded into DNA first.

Charles Darwin 1809-1882 of course did not believe in neo-Darwinism or inheritance via DNA as the ideas had not been formulated in his lifetime.
However: “It is certain that ovaria are sometimes affected by a previous impregnation, so that the ovules subsequently fertilized by a distinct male are plainly influenced in character” – Darwin and Murray, 1868.

Darwin certainly believed in the inheritance of acquired characteristics and espoused the idea of Pangenesis which is that information is collected from every part of the body and bundled up into small particles (gemmules) which circulate around the body and end up in either the spermatozoa or ova, thereby enabling the transfer of information to the next generation.

This sort of idea is needed for the inheritance of acquired characteristics. A modern interpretation would need to suppose a two way exchange of information between DNA and the rest of the body so that somatic changes could be encoded back into the germ line for subsequent inheritance.

Prior to the ascendancy of the scientific establishment, it was thought that the inheritance of desirable features had something to do with maintenance of a pure ‘bloodline’. Don’t laugh..

Pyotr Sopikov (1903–1977) performed repeated blood transfusion from black Australorp hens to white Leghorns with the result that the chicks of the white birds started to develop black feathers. The effect increased over the generations and eventually a new stable cross-breed was created.


Many other researchers reproduce similar results and found that not only physical characteristics but also behavioural traits and immune responses could be induced in chicks by blood transfusion into the parents prior to egg laying. – Liu

  • Inherited plumage changes
  • Increased weight gain in offspring
  • Increased reproductive success
  • Increased productivity
  • Results reproduced by Russian, Swiss, French and other scientists
  • Similar results with rabbits
  • The offspring of stressed chickens had reduced learning abilities – Liu
  • Induced and specific immune responses were inherited
  • Repeated grafting of aubergine plants resulted in a new variety

Xenia. In the picture, each sweetcorn kernel has been fertilised by a different pollen grain from a multitude of different plants and each seed will go on to form a new plant with possibly hybrid characteristics.. So here we have an immediate transfer of genetic information and an inheritable effect before inheritance has even taken place! – Wikipedia

Various mechanisms have been proposed:

  • Nucleic acids – functioning as Darwin’s gemmules
  • Proteins functioning as genes – inherited prions again acting as gemmules
  • Contactless information transfer from the semen to the immature ova of the fly
  • Foetal genes in the mother’s blood from a previous pregnancy affect the current embryo
  • Altered uterosome – Genetic information from the sperm somehow infiltrates the walls of the uterus and changes the genetic structure, passing on the information in subsequent pregnancies – Nejabati et al
  • Wave genetics – genes are field-like structures and transfer information via resonance to the physical structure of the female, leaving a permanent imprint on the genetic apparatus of the female – Gariaev et al

Peter Gariaev 1942-2020 specifically identifies genetic information as wave-like in nature as opposed to classical theory which envisages a particular ordering of DNA base pairs, or as above, a specific conformation of a prion protein. This is natural for a physicist and solves the problem of having to say how the information is stored.

The point is that molecular biologist are fixated upon a physical storage medium such as nucleic acid or proteins for information storage but less specific on how it is moved around the organism. A prion for example is a malformed protein whose shape can propagate to other proteins, thereby initiating some king of information transfer. The mechanism by which this happens though is never specified. If information is moving from one molecule to another than there must be some time in between when it still exists but is not hosted by any physical substance. The answer will be some kind of field structure whether electromagnetic, electro-acoustic or ‘other’.

The Wave genetics considers telegony as a real life example of DNA phantom effect, and views it as a striking confirmation of Wave genetics principles. In this case the first male leaves his wave signature i.e. he “imprints” his DNA phantom in the genetic apparatus of the female. It appears that this phantom is more powerful than DNA phantoms of other males.” – Gariaev et al


Observations

The need for genetic information to be distributed to all parts of the body, for it to be mutable and for changes in any part to be registered in the sperm or ova ready for the next generation suggests a distributed field structure whose nature is unknown as are the media in which it propagates and the mechanisms by which it interacts with the physical substance of the organism.

A morphogenetic field of some sort is suspected with possibly holographic properties, meaning that all parts of the field contain information about all other parts of the field.

There is much discussion over the mechanisms by which information is inherited but less over what it is that the information represents and how it is encoded. The inheritance of ‘blue eyes’ for example is not just a bit of blue dye passing from mother to child but an entire goal oriented production process that is somehow encoded, preserved and communicated?


References:

Revisiting telegony: Offspring inherit an acquired characteristic of their mother’s previous mate – Crean, Kopps, Bonduriansky.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266322954_Revisiting_telegony_Offspring_inherit_an_acquired_characteristic_of_their_mother’s_previous_mate

Fetal genes in mother’s blood: A novel mechanism for telegony? – Yongsheng Liu
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378111913003302

Uterosomes: The lost ring of telegony? – Nejabati, Roshangar, Noun.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079610722000682?via%3Dihub

A new perspective on Darwin’s Pangenesis – Yongsheng Liu
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-new-perspective-on-Darwin%E2%80%99s-Pangenesis-Liu/a1ad0ac4800952f8374c4dbb75fa5a00f0bff0d1

Telegony, the sire effect and non-mendelian inheritance mediated by spermatozoa: a historical overview and modern mechanistic speculations
Author: – Y.S Liu
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20626678/#:~:text=Telegony%20is%20the%20belief%20that,later%20offspring%20by%20another%20male.

Like father like son. A fresh review of the inheritance of acquired characteristics– Yongsheng Liu
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1973965/

Principles of linguistic wave-genetics – Peter Gariaev et. al.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228926241_Principles_of_Linguistic-Wave_Genetics

Lord Morton’s Mare – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Morton%27s_mare#:~:text=Lord%20Morton’s%20mare%20was%20an,the%20history%20of%20evolutionary%20theory.

Pangenesis – Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangenesis

Xenia– Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenia_(plants)