Stefan Lanka rejects the ideas that matter is made from a collection of atoms and that biological tissue is made from cells, preferring to regard living systems as composed of a ‘primordial substance’ sometimes referred to as ‘ether’ and at other times as ‘Pi water’, from which all other materials are derived.
This post looks at some of his comments from the perspective of vortex physics and assumes a distributed electromagnetic bio-field that organises all biological systems. See: The nature of the bio-field
Quotations are auto translated from Telegram posts assumed to originate from either the Next Level Telegram channel: https://t.me/NEXTLEVEL_OnlineForum or the Lanka Vision channel here: https://t.me/LankaVision
Rejection of the Atomic Theory
Nothing has caused as much damage to humanity, both spiritually and physically, as the atomic theory. Einstein advocated the application of knowledge about the ether, the primary substance of life .
Stefan has a point. The Bohr model of the atom that we are all familiar with is one of solid marble-like particles that orbit a nucleus and possess various ‘properties’ such as mass and charge. Atoms are claimed to be practically unbreakable outside of a nuclear reactor or the centre of a star and are thought to be the fundamental building blocks of all material objects.
This encourages a view of living cells that sees them as constructed of atoms, the same way that a house is constructed of bricks, that is to say piecemeal, one brick (atom or molecule) at a time and according to a design or template (blueprint).
A ‘digital’ view of biology is developed which is at odds with reality but readily accepted because the prevailing theory from physics has been thoroughly absorbed (being easy to understand) at the roots of our intuition and leads to a deep rooted bias in all scientific thought.
Never proven
In another post, Lanka claims that the Atomic Theory has never been proven.
If this seems outrageous, simply reflect that almost all contemporary physicists now advocate for a quantum model of the atom whereby all matter is a manifestation of a ‘quantum field’, a continuum of probabilities. The reason they have adopted this model is because of various phenomena that are simply not explainable via the Bohr model, for example the famous Double Slit Experiment.
The two models are at odds with each other and cannot both be true at the same time.
Stefan is therefore accurate in this respect.
The ‘ether’
Stefan uses the term ‘ether’ to denote the fundamental substance of the Universe. This is an unfortunate choice of words as it refers to an earlier formulation of physics whereby the whole of the material universe sat inside the etheric substance which provided an external framework, a reference point to define time and distance.
The existence of an ether as separate from material reality has itself never been proven and adds an unnecessary dualism to reality a division between two types of ‘substrate’. Far better to envisage the whole universe as consisting of a single ‘substance’ conforming to a single set of laws which is what I think Stefan is trying to say.
Pi water and elemental transmutation
Stefan has also referred to something called Pi water as the fundamental substance of Life and claimed (after Dr. Peter Augustin) that all substances emerge from this substrate.
Again, a seemingly outrageous claim if we accept the Bohr model of the atom where matter is conserved, never destroyed and never created outside of a Big Bang.
However, the experiments of Louis Kervran and others give very strong empirical evidence that elements can be transmuted from one to another within biological systems and even that matter can be created and destroyed in synchrony with lunar cycles. See: Transmutation
Somehow, electromagnetic vortices in intracellular water accumulate enough energy to change an atom from one element to another. Konstantin Meyl has theorised that additional absorption of solar neutrinos can accumulate sufficient energy to actually create electrons within living cells.
The fundamental substance of the Universe though is not ether or Pi water but an electromagnetic field from which water itself is an emergent substance. Transmutation is achieved, not from the water, but via energy accumulated and transduced by the bio-field itself.
Spirit identified as the bio-field
This substance integrates spirit because it is the building, energy and information substance of life. In academic biology and medicine, the assumption of spirit is excluded.
An electromagnetic bio-field permeates all living systems and what appears to be ‘matter’ is really an illusion created by highly stable vortex structures within the field. It does not need to be integrated as there is nothing to integrate into; all is a unity and all that exists is the field.
This field fulfils all the criteria of what Lanka terms ‘spirit’ and is indeed largely dismissed as a source of either information or energy by academic biology, being relegated to the status of a mere power source or waste disposal unit.
In fact the bio-field (spirit) is the progenitor in all biological activity from metabolic regulation to consciousness, it is the primal source of all energy and organisation.
See: The nature of the bio-field
Cellular organisation
Our organs are organized in interconnected tissues (w+ 1/2/3-2019) and not in cells. The cell theory has never been proven, always refuted and derived from the atomic theory.
The diagram below shows the vortex structure at the surface of the sun. A living being is much smaller but the laws of electrodynamics are the same and so we may suppose that a similar arrangement is present in the bio-field of the body.
An overall toroidal electromagnetic field fragments into smaller vortices which self-organise into an energetic cellular structure. Matter accumulates at ‘hot’ points and tissue is formed in a regular pattern resembling cells.
Many researchers (e.g. Robert Becker) describe electric fields in living systems and others (Nick Lane) describe circular electric ‘currents’ resembling vortex structures. Many others describe a sharp electric gradient at cell boundaries.
So whether or not a ‘cell’ exists as described, the bio-field itself necessarily has a cellular structure arising from its vortex nature. This structure is reflected in the material substance of the tissue and leads to the impression of separate physical cells.
Lanka has stated that the nucleus of a cell is ‘free to move’ within the tissue. However, the nuclei will tend to adopt a certain spatial ordering whilst rotating slowly. This is entirely consistent with the existence of an energetic vortex structure with the nucleus at the centre and which maintains separation and rotation of such nuclei.
Living tissue has an electrically cellular structure.
Tissue repair
There is a claim (possibly from Stefan) that if a finger is cut or an apple is broken then immediately some sort of bi-layer is created and that this has been interpreted as a cell membrane.
This is very credible given the existence of a morphogenic vortex field.
Any discontinuity in tissue entails a potential discontinuity in the supervening vortex structure. However the vortex is tied to the laws of physics and will persist in some form or another; the rotational energy must complete its circuit somehow.
A cut or break then introduces an altered energy structure at the new surface and an altered energy structure means modified biological activity. New tissue is assembled almost instantly according to the laws of electromagnetism acting directly upon existing tissue. A new membrane has formed and a healing process has begun.
Exosomes
Within the cell theory (refuted), the disintegration of isolated tissue lumps, which are interpreted as cells, but Human/animal excretions containing connective tissue are also interpreted as “exosomes”.
What is meant by ‘disintegration’ in biological systems?
To answer this we need to understand what it is that holds together the tissues in the first place.
Each cell is a vortex structure with a negative electrical field moving around the periphery then there necessarily exists a magnetic dipole with North-South polarity along the axis of electrical rotation. It is this arrangement that holds the cells together, with the magnetic forces pulling the tissue together and the electrical forces maintaining separation.
All energy fields are to some extent ‘lossy’ and so eventually the electromagnetic forces will tend to weaken and the tissue will literally fall apart.
The laws of physics still hold, however, and so new configurations of matter are adopted and still according to some vortex law. We should expect, therefore to see new ‘cellular’ shapes begin to appear with even tiny vortex satellites surrounding them.
There are claims that these exosomes are somehow helping the organism survive by transporting energy and other resources from one place to another. Possibly, but whatever the function, they are created from a deteriorating bio-field and will behave according to such the laws of such an environment.
Lack of energy has caused tissue to disintegrate and the debris has adopted a new ‘least-energy’ state according to its new environment. Circular membranes are therefore in abundance, with what look like new cells appearing solely from the properties of membranous tissue imbued with electromagnetic vortex energy.
These artefacts are separated from their bio-field and are merely adopting new forms as dictated by the laws of physics. There is not necessarily any biological ‘meaning’ in any of these shapes.
Intracellular water
Gilbert N. Ling – the fluid in the “cells” is not water
In the interior of a cell we have a substance that is denser, more viscose than water with a gel-like consistency and somehow organised, energetic and ‘alive’.
Many researchers have tried to describe this substance as: ‘in an excited kinetic state’, ‘quantum coherent’, ‘fourth phase water’ or ‘full of de-localised electrons’ to choose just a few examples.
The properties of such a gel seem at odds with a classical description of water and nobody has been able to explain them in terms of molecular structure.
It would seem that Ling is somewhat justified in claiming it to be other than water and Lanka correct to reject conventional atomic theory as foundation for describing intracellular gel.
The physics of Konstantin Meyl, however, gives a richer model for molecular structures that seems more in tune with the needs of biology as a whole. Electrons in this model are stable electromagnetic field vortices which have spin in the electric domain and therefore form a magnetic dipole. See: The atom
The properties of intracellular water are likely explained by the forces arising from these fields. Magnetic forces pull the molecules together and lead to some sort of organisation and alignment whilst electric forces maintain separation between molecules.
The cell is kept in a state of high energy by the body and this leads to close packing of molecules which in turn creates higher density. Viscosity arises from ‘field drag’ and stronger fields will lead to higher viscosity to the point where the consistency turns to a gel.
No elemental transmutation is needed here, just a higher level of ‘free energy’ organised as a nested vortex structure.
Vortex alignment
The cover of the book: The Rainbow and the Worm by Mae-Wan Ho, shows various living organisms photographed with polarised light. Macro sized areas are transmitting a single wavelength of light which means that the constituent molecules are forming some sort of filter.
Ho interprets this as meaning that all the atoms are aligned in the same direction and for her this means some sort of quantum ‘coherence’.
An alternative explanation might be simply that the magnetic forces arising from the vortex structure in living bio-fields has brought all the intracellular water molecules into magnetic alignment.
No relationship between microscopy images and in vivo structures
A motionless electron microscopy image never reveals a living biological process. What is observed under electron microscopy has absolutely nothing to do with what happens in the human biological organism. Any result from the laboratory can provide absolutely no insight into the processes within a living organism.
Activities and morphologies in both living systems and microscopy environments both obey the same laws of physics but are subject to different bio-field organisation.
When transferred from a living system to a microscope slide, molecular collectives (‘organelles’) will break down and reassemble almost instantaneously in accordance with powerful magnetic forces and the general ‘cellular’ appearance of the ensuing shapes will give the impression of some sort of meaningful biological structures. This is an illusion.