An argument is presented that the absence of a heartbeat does not necessarily imply an absence of circulation and that given appropriate energetic input, the heart may be persuaded to start beating again and a body may come back to life. Accounts of cosmic events support the hypothesis.
There is a great deal of scepticism surrounding the idea that a man, once pronounced dead, could come back to life at some time later. This is largely owing to the idea that the stopping of a heart is synonymous with cessation of circulation and that this leads inevitably to a rapid and irreversible state of death.
However, the heart is not the main driver of circulation, it is not a pressure pump (The Heart is not a Pump) and the main impetus for the blood flow comes from the capillary beds according to many researchers. See: The Heart and Circulation.
Circulation continues after cardiac arrest
“S A Thompson showed that in asphyxiated dogs, residual circulation continued for up to two hours after cardiac arrest, Other research has shown 20% to 40% increases in cardiac output after occlusion of thoracic aorta” – Branko Furst
“The blood in chick embryos is seen to be circulating before the heart has been formed and vortices are observed in the blood in between pulses.” – Furst
“When the heart (of a chick embryo) was stopped, blood continued to flow for approximately 50 minutes, albeit at a lower velocity. When IR was introduced, the post-mortem flow increased..” – Li, Pollack
Galvanic energy
Somewhere way back on my Twitter feed is a photocopy of a page in a book written by some Victorian scientist who took recently deceased bodies from a morgue and drained the blood from them. The blood was re-vitalised by the introduction of galvanic energy and then replaced into the body. The blood started to flow by itself, the heart would restart and the bodies would exhibit muscle movement.
Given what I now know about the blood and circulation, I am now prepared to believe that such a thing is possible. However, it isn’t the galvanic energy that causes the blood to flow but the infusion of blood which creates the vortices necessary for propulsion. The flow of blood is causes the heart to start beating again.
Vortex flow hypothesis
Many researchers have come to the eventual conclusion that it is not the heart that is pumping the blood at all but that the ‘blood moves under its own momentum‘ (The Heart and Circulation) or some such phrase. This seems outlandish, but then so are the circumstances.
The phenomenon of vortices is repeatedly mentioned in connection with the flow of blood but the importance of this does not seem to have been appreciated.
The hypothesis here then is that the blood is moved by the generation of powerful energetic vortex structures which propel the fluid around the circulatory system and that the resulting flow is actually instrumental in causing the heart itself to beat.
The vortex structures have an electrical component and are able to absorb energy from the environment as a power source. This energy may include: electric field energy, heat, Gibbs energy and the energy from the solar neutrino stream.
The vortices are generated in the capillary beds but are starting to deteriorate by the time they get to the heart. It is here that they are re-organised by the spiral flow of the heart into the geometric structures conducive to efficient, almost friction-free flow.
Spontaneous vortex flow
From chaos to order in active fluids – Alexander Morozov
https://people.brandeis.edu/~kuntawu/Publications/Science_355_eaal1979_2017/Science_355_1262_2017.pdf
In this paper some ATP and other biological substances were added to water and the solution placed into square channels of various dimensions.
The water was seen to self-organise first into a collection of vortices as shown and second into a self-sustaining directional flow along the tube.
This begs the question: “Where does the energy come from to sustain such a flow?”
One idea is that the ambient heat is translated to a vortex structure and in this way contributes to such a flow.
Another idea comes from Konstantin Meyl in his book “Scalar Waves: a first Tesla physics handbook”. Meyl suggests that the vortex structures are capable of absorbing the occasional passing neutrino and transducing them to vortex energy within the water.
See: Blood flow and scalar waves
How did the blood flow restart after crucifixion?
The hypothesis then is that during crucifixion the heart stopped and life signs diminished considerably, but irreversible death had not yet occurred and there was still some circulation of blood driven by the vortices from the capillary beds.
Possibly movement of the body and the change from vertical to horizontal posture caused blood movement which created more vortices which increased blood flow through the heart, causing a gentle pulsating maybe.
A sudden addition to the energetic input from an increase in intensity of the solar neutrino stream further promotes blood flow and the heart begins to beat in earnest again. Life signs improve and normal functioning is resumed.
Eclipses and the solar neutrino stream
How could this come about? Konstantin Meyl is claiming that during an eclipse, the Earth acts as a lens and neutrino density on parts of the planet increase by a factor of 20,000! We should therefore be looking for evidence of a solar eclipse.
It turns out that there are plenty of references in the Bible itself that support this idea:
In Luke 23:44-45 of the New American Bible Revised Edition — the Bible translation heard at U.S. Catholic Masses — the verses explicitly refer to a solar eclipse preceding Jesus’ death: “It was now about noon and darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon because of an eclipse of the sun.”
Both the New Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition and the New Jerusalem Bible — EWTN founder Mother Angelica’s favorite teaching Bible — simply state “the sun’s light failed.”
The Contemporary English Version — a New Testament translation approved by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops — declares, “The sun stopped shining.”
The Douay-Rheims version of the New Testament — published in 1582 and used for centuries by English-speaking Catholics — asserts “the sun was darkened.”
Source: https://thegoodnewsroom.org/was-there-a-total-solar-eclipse-when-jesus-died/
