James Tour is doing a good job of highlighting some of the inadequacies of mainstream science in explaining the origins of life, cellular construction and maintenance, evolution, inheritance and the function of DNA. Several important principles of physics are rarely mentioned in these discussions so I started the ball rolling by making a list and sending him an email.
Hi James,
Thank you for starting a debate on the Origins of Life, this will hopefully highlight other areas of uncertainty in biology, all of which are suffering from similar inadequacies.
I have no training in biology or chemistry but have been reading about biology now for three years under the assumption that the basic laws of physics must hold under all circumstances and that there can be no exceptions. This holds even for biological systems at their origins, evolution, development or daily maintenance.
I will first state an overview of what I think is necessary and then briefly outline some major ideas from physics and mathematics that I consider relevant. There is enough verifiable research to support all my claims but a complete description of the Origins of Life may be beyond our grasp for reasons which will be explained.
Biology, as you have stated, is not just a bunch of chemical reactions but a precisely orchestrated dynamic organisation of energy and information which is stable, adaptive, self-organising and self-perpetuating.
Such a system is surely not possible without:
- Some repository of information additional to the physical ordering of existing molecules.
- A distributed energy system over and above what is normally described.
- A holistic ‘bauplan’ or blueprint of global organisation
- Some mechanism to implement such a plan as a physical structure
- Survival of the blueprint in the event of damage to the material
- Some qualities of the physical universe that are ‘propitious’ to the creation of life
The following constructs from contemporary physics therefore sound encouraging:
- The existence of magnetic field vortices (scalar waves) as holders of information
- The idea of Attractor States as stabilising and organisational units
- Closed loop control systems with feedback as molecular learning systems
- The concept of ‘least energy solutions’ as global organisational principles
- Solar neutrinos as additional energy for electron materialisation within ATP and as a sustaining power supply for the information storage
- The existence of mono-chiral field discharge from ionosphere to ground
- Field vortices as long term (multi-generational) storage and transmission of biological information
- The field vortices form an electro-magnetic bio-field which exists along with the physical molecules and is instrumental in their organisation
- Cymatic resonance as a means of parallel i.e. non-sequential construction of complex molecules
- Information is stored as some sort of structure on a scalar wave – no digital information in biological systems
- The possibility of transmutation of elements within field vortices and powered by solar neutrinos.
In the following diagram, life starts at the sun with crude ‘energy’ which is modulated by the ionosphere into several elements including mono-chiral field vortices. These will power a local bio-field which in turn is responsible for informing the organisation of actual physical matter. Direct absorption of neutrinos into water vortices aids the physical process and enables the transmutation of elements.
So the overall physical structure for living entities is maintained by an electro-magnetic bio-field that is powered by a solar neutrino stream. The field acts as an informational source for the physical arrangement of molecules which is implemented via ‘cymatic’ vibrations and the actual creation of elements when necessary.
The fundamental unit of Life, then, is not a bio-molecule but rather the means to create the said bio-molecule. The information to do this is held within a field vortex system with closed loop feedback. This forms a robust, stable system with some sort of molecular Darwinism being responsible for the trimming of maladaptive developments: Stable systems persist, non-stable systems perish.
The bio-field arranges the molecules but retains its own identity so that mishaps in physical construction do not necessarily affect the original (developing) blueprint. The blueprint has the character of a stable attractor and develops according to the rules of the attractor whereas the physical matter obeys the laws of physics and falls into place according to a ‘least-energy’ or ‘maximal likelihood’ principle.
There is no true randomness here and no need to ‘do over’ half finished molecules. The attractor development is, in principle, irreversible and only pseudo-random, whereas the physical arrangement of molecules is via a statistically most likely solution where the environment and bio-field introduce a bias towards the ‘desired’ result.
Things which seem complex from one point of view (sequential construction of molecules) are really simple from another point of view (attractor emergence) with this view of biology actually using the laws of thermodynamics to its advantage.
The ordering of base pairs of any molecule can in any case never be described as ‘information’. It is at best ‘data’ until some meaning is ascribed to it.
The Resonant Recognition Model of Irena Cosic claims that all amino acids that go to make a functional protein have the same resonant frequency, so in a vibratory environment this means that all such molecules will experience forces of mutual attraction. The construction of a protein under such circumstances is now sounding considerably more likely than in some ‘dice rolling’ scenario.
Chirality. Life evolved, and is still evolving between the opposing capacitor plates of the ionosphere and the Earth’s surface and there is evidence that suggests that the potential difference was many times greater in the past. Field discharge from one plate to the other can occur in the form of spiral movement of ‘charge’ and this movement will always be right handed by analogy with Maxwell’s equations
If molecules are in fact assembled piecewise then it will need some force for this to happen and that force will be electromagnetic in nature (what else is there?). All this is happening within a dynamic mono-chiral electromagnetic torsion field.
Chiral induced spin selectivity. The vortex physics of Meyl make this seem entirely natural. All particles are really composites of field vortices and all have a magnetic moment deriving from an electric spin. There is no distinction between field and particle or matter and energy. They are all geometric arrangements of the same thing: charge movement. Laboratory experiments should take place within an appropriate electromagnetic vortex field for the effect to be studied correctly.
Current physics and hence also chemistry, are ‘incomplete’ in this sense; they are missing key ideas. This sounds like a big claim but the many anomalies and unexplained phenomena really do lend support to this. Clever people have been trying for a hundred years to explain these things and made unsatisfactory progress so some out-of-the-box thinking is clearly required.
Thermodynamics and Entropy. Many scientists will claim that biological systems are ‘far from thermodynamic equilibrium‘ and while true, the word ‘equilibrium’ is a little misleading I think. There is no stasis here, despite the term ‘homeostasis’. These systems are highly ‘dissipative’ and are running downhill thermodynamically with increasing entropy just like the rest of the universe.
Constant energy input comes from the sun in the form of neutrinos and this energy is used in an increasingly efficient manner to create complex molecules as guided by the bio-field. We are in a constant state of carefully managed decline.
Why do cells not overheat? One way is via transmutation of, for example, sodium into potassium (Kervran) . Energy is instantly sequestered as molecular bonds and expelled in due course as sweat.
Evolution, from this point of view, consists of a cybernetic learning system discovering increasingly more likely ways to dissipate the input energy, much as the shape of a river evolves throughout its lifetime to more easily transport the water from a high energy state to a low energy state.
The attractor evolves according to the rules of the attractor and in accordance with its own response to environmental input. Physical molecules obey the laws of physics guided by the attractor and the whole thing is subjected to some form of natural selection. ‘Life’ emerges as a result.
This is a very different picture from that of a sequential placing of molecules as with a builder constructing a house. The builder builds to a design and it is the design that evolves, according to the availability of new materials and the success of previous designs. The design for a house is separate from the house itself and so it is with living systems. The design is held in scalar waves which as yet cannot be accurately measured and so have remained invisible to science.
Attractors form an impenetrable barrier from an analytical point of view, with the future behaviour of such a system dependent upon the entire history of the system, including a billion years of adaptation in response to environmental input. This means that it will likely be impossible to recreate ‘life’ as we know it in a laboratory.
Life is not defined by any sort of arbitrary complexity metric with an equally arbitrary threshold but by a specific symbiosis between physical matter and energetic information. One attempt to define the Origins of Life is to say that it is the first time a piece of Primordial Soup is able to move around of its own accord whilst taking with it its own piece of bio-field, its own maintenance system. Until this happens, it doesn’t matter how complicated the molecular arrangement might be – it is still just complicated soup!
The transfer of spermatozoa is the passing on of a piece of bio-field to the next generation. (Telegony)
“All results of the evolution in the biosphere that have arisen between the ‘capacitor plates’ of the earth itself and its ionosphere and can be regarded as structured capacitor losses, which also apply to humans” – Prof. Konstantin Meyl
“The Laws of Physics must be obeyed” – Prof. Konstantin Meyl
References:
Scalar Waves and Vortex Physics– Prof. Konstantin Meyl
https://www.meyl.eu/go/indexbe14.html?dir=47_Papers&page=1&sublevel=0
The gene: an appraisal – Keith Baverstock
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33979646/
Episode 0/13: Reasons // A Course on Abiogenesis by Dr. James Tour
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71dqAFUb-v0
The new particle physics (Why we should trust Meyl) – Atomic structure: Meyl
Assembly via cymatics – Resonant recognition model and The cell as a cymatic resonator and The Origins of Life
Evolution as Entropy – Evolution and entropy
Evolution as an attractor progression– Evolution and Inheritance
Introduction to attractors – Strange attractors
Chemistry actually depends upon the phases of the moon – Giorgio Piccardi
Physics depends upon the phases of the moon– The Shnoll Effect
Scalar waves are the foundation of biological communication – Distant cellular interaction and The ‘Hill effect’
Structure emerges from randomness – Random events
Inheritance is not via DNA – Telegony
Biological transmutation – Transmutation