Gravity is not a simple radial force field as described by Newton and nor is it curved space as claimed by Einstein. Instead, it is an energetic electromagnetic field which pervades the entire universe and effectively forms a substrate for all physical and energetic activity within the cosmos. It is analogous to, but not identical to, the old concept of the luminiferous aether.
The field is not static and has its own intrinsic movement at every point. Field effects propagate at the speed of light which itself is a function of field strength. The field does not emanate from any gravitational mass and nor does it need to anchored to any ‘charge’. The field exists of itself and is the primal substance of the entire universe.
Matter, mass, charge, force and energy are emergent features of field activity. The insistence of mainstream physics that each of these substances is somehow ‘fundamental’ is sufficient by itself to discredit all such theories. The only activity in the universe is field activity, with all other phenomena deriving from this. Even time, space, geometry and distance cannot be said to be ‘fundamental’ but instead are mere artefacts created by the interaction of local field conditions with the machines of men.
The gravitational field is continuous with the atoms and molecules which comprise our planet and its vortex movement is continuous with the rotation of the Earth. The Earth is therefore not ‘spinning’ in space but is simply part of a larger vortex system which turns according to the laws of field physics as opposed to those of Newtonian forces and inertia.
Since the gravitational field forms the substrate for the propagation of light and since it now spins with the Earth, the Michelson-Morley experiment needs no further explanation.
Gravity is a ‘field of inertia’ which accelerates towards the Earth and rotates with it, forming a frame of reference for the kinetic behaviour of all solid objects and for the propagation of light.
A non-technical description of gravity as a cosmic field construct existing of itself and operating in accordance with its own laws independently of any ‘mass’ in the vicinity.
The formulation of gravity as a ‘force’ which acts upon the gravitational mass of an object is not supported by experimental observation and leads to theoretical absurdities. The ideas of force, mass, acceleration and even ‘movement’ are ill-defined, vague and not experimentally verifiable.
A quick and easy to understand argument showing that gravity must necessarily have at least some aspect of it which is vortex-like in nature.
The sun is the centre of a giant cosmic energy vortex. Field energy spirals inwards and condenses at the centre to produce the hydrogen ball described by astronomers. All energy is supplied from the outside and output energy equals input energy.
The rate of the Earth’s rotation varies over time and sometimes on a very short time frame. There seems to be some correspondence with both solar and lunar activity.
The gravitational constant varies over both time and space. The Cavendish experiment makes a lot of assumptions.
The claim that we weigh less at the equator because of centrifugal force is not supported by empirical data. Natural variations of the gravitational field owing to variations in planet density are sufficient to account for the differences in weight. The equatorial bulge is sufficient to account for differences in weight across latitude.
This post suggests an overall toroidal topology for the universe and tries to introduce a most important idea which is that the physical measure of distance is dependent upon (gravitational) field strength (Boscovich, Meyl) and is therefore a function of whereabouts the measurement is made in the universe.
One thought on “What is gravity?”
Comments are closed.